Test Your Knowledge with Our Clinical Case Studies!
Clinical Chemistry 56: 729-731, 2010. First published March 26, 2010; 10.1373/clinchem.2009.139253
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2009.139253v1
56/5/729    most recent
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holick, M. F.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holick, M. F.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2010;56:729-731.)
© 2010 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Opinion

The D-lemma: To Screen or Not to Screen for 25-Hydroxyvitamin D Concentrations

Michael F. Holick1,a

1 Department of Medicine, Section of Endocrinology, Nutrition, and Diabetes, Vitamin D, Skin, and Bone Research Laboratory, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA.

aAddress correspondence to the author at: Boston University School of Medicine, 715 Albany St., Boston, MA 02215. Fax 617-638-8882; e-mail mfholick@bu.edu.

The first 300 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Until recently, there has been little interest in the medical and pediatric communities regarding the vitamin D status of their patients. It had been assumed that everyone was vitamin D sufficient and that only those patients with fat-malabsorption syndromes were at risk(1). African Americans were at risk because of their sunscreening skin pigment, but little attention was placed on their vitamin D status because African Americans were at less risk of fracture than Caucasians. The introduction of drugs to treat osteoporosis made physicians aware that vitamin D deficiency was a contributing factor for osteoporosis.

Vitamin D made in the skin or ingested from the diet is converted in the liver to 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D]1 (1)(2), the major circulating form of vitamin D used for evaluating the vitamin D status of patients. 25(OH)D is hydroxylated in the kidneys to form the biologically active metabolite 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D [1,25(OH)2D](1)(2). Because most children and adults were assumed to be vitamin D sufficient when reference intervals for 25(OH)D were determined, values ranged from 10 µg/L (ng/mL) to 55 µg/L. Studies of adults that evaluated parathyroid hormone (PTH) with 25(OH)D revealed, however, that PTH concentrations began to plateau at 30–40 µg/L(3). Healthy adults receiving vitamin D and calcium supplementation who had blood 25(OH)D concentrations between 11 µg/L and 19 µg/L demonstrated substantial decreases in their PTH concentrations, whereas adults with a 25(OH)D concentration between 20 µg/L and 25 µg/L had no significant change in PTH, suggesting that vitamin D deficiency should be defined as a 25(OH)D concentration <20 µg/L(4). Postmenopausal women whose 25(OH)D concentration increased from approximately 20 µg/L to approximately 32 µg/L had a 65% increase in intestinal calcium absorption(5). Thus, vitamin D deficiency was defined as a . . . [Full Text of this Article]