Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 43: 154-157, 1997;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Labbe, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Labbe, R. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Nutrition
(Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43:154-157.)
© 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Ascorbic acid determination with an automated enzymatic procedure

Winnie Lee, Susan M. Roberts and Robert F. Labbea

Department of Laboratory Medicine, Box 359743, Harborview Medical Center and University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104-2499.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 206-731-3930; e-mail labbe{at}mail.labmed washington.edu.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Given the widespread interest in antioxidant nutrients, we have developed a new procedure that will permit the automated determination of plasma ascorbic acid (AA) concentration with a Roche Fara centrifugal analyzer. After the deproteinization of plasma with metaphosphoric acid, AA is oxidized to dehydroascorbic acid by AA oxidase. The product is coupled to o-phenylenediamine to produce a chromophore for which the absorbance is measured at 340 nm. The procedure allows much faster throughput than conventional HPLC methods while yielding results that correlate well and provide improved precision. Linearity extends beyond the reference range of 26.1–84.6 µmol/L, and severe hemolysis is the only interference identified.


Key Words: indexing terms: antioxidants • centrifugal analyzer • dehydroascorbic acid


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
A wide variety of methods involving different chromophores, detection systems, and enzymes has been developed for the determination of ascorbic acid (AA) and dehydroascorbic acid (DHAA) in biological samples.1 The different principles involved have been reviewed and critiqued by Washko et al. (1). In recent years HPLC has become the preferred method of determination, but this method has the disadvantages of being relatively labor intensive and costly for a clinical laboratory. In fact, very few currently available AA assays are ideally suited to the clinical laboratory. One such procedure, which is based upon measurement of an enzymatic reaction rate and involves a Beckman Synchron CX5 analyzer, has been previously described by Tulley (2).

Given the increasing interest in nutrition testing, and especially in nutrients that serve as antioxidants such as AA, an automated procedure designed for the clinical laboratory is desirable. To meet this need, we have developed an easily adaptable procedure that has significant advantages over chromatographic and spectrophotometric methods. This enzymatic end point procedure was developed by using the Cobas Fara centrifugal analyzer. In principle, AA is selectively and completely oxidized to DHAA by AA oxidase. The product is then coupled with o-phenylenediamine (OPDA) to yield a chromophore, the absorbance of which is measured at 340 nm.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Reagents.
AA, AA oxidase, dithiothreitol (DTT), and OPDA were all purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO). Sodium phosphate monobasic and sodium phosphate dibasic were obtained from Mallinckrodt Baker (Phillipsburg, NJ). Metaphosphoric acid (MPA) was purchased from Aldrich Chemical Co. (Milwaukee, WI).

A protein precipitating agent (MPA/DTT) consisted of a 6.13 mol/L (40%) MPA solution containing 53.5 mmol/L DTT. An MPA/DTT diluent solution was then prepared by diluting this precipitating agent 1:10 in deionized water.

A stock calibrator solution of AA was prepared by dissolving 2.83 mmol/L in MPA/DTT diluent. This stock solution was stable for 1 year when stored at -20 °C. For working calibrator solutions, dilutions of the stock calibrator were made in the MPA/DTT diluent to concentrations of 283, 170, 113, 56.6, and 28.3 µmol/L. These diluted calibrator solutions were stable for 1 week when stored at 4 °C.

A 0.10 mol/L phosphate buffer was prepared by dissolving 11.547 g of NaH2PO4 and 3.885 g of Na2HPO4·7H2O in 800 mL of deionized water, adjusting to pH 6.5, then diluting to 1.0 L. A stock solution of AA oxidase was prepared by diluting with this buffer the assayed activity of the enzyme indicated on the vial from the supplier to obtain an activity of 200 U/mg per mL. A 100-µL aliquot of this stock enzyme solution was further diluted with 2.4 mL of the phosphate buffer to obtain an enzyme activity of 8 kU/L or 40 mg of protein/L to be used as a working reagent.

OPDA was dissolved to a concentration of 4.6 mmol/L in 0.1 mol/L phosphate buffer, pH 6.5. DTT was then added to a concentration of 0.6 mmol/L. This solution was stable for 2 weeks when stored at 4 °C in a brown bottle.

Sample preparation.
AA is very labile and subject to oxidation to DHAA, which in itself is also labile (3). For this reason, specimens are preferably collected in EDTA to minimize metal-catalyzed oxidation. The anticoagulated whole-blood specimens were collected and handled to ensure minimal exposure to air until deproteinized and stabilized. With plasma, only fasting specimens should be used for assessing AA status. After centrifugation of the specimen, plasma (500 µL) was removed and quickly treated with 50 µL of MPA/DTT as a stabilizer. The treated sample was vortex-mixed for 30 s, then centrifuged for 10 min at 1500g in a refrigerated centrifuge at 4 °C. The supernatant was stored at -20 °C until assayed. This filtrate can be stored at -20 °C for 1 month. Longer storage may be acceptable, but has not been clearly established. Perchloric acid, sometimes used as a protein precipitant and stabilizer in AA determination (4), gave results that were comparable with those obtained with MPA/DTT (unpublished observation).

Instrumentation.
This procedure was developed with a Roche Diagnostic Systems (Montclair, NJ) Cobas Fara centrifugal analyzer. For each control and unknown, 200 µL of the deproteinized plasma supernatant was loaded into the Cobas cups and placed into a Fara sample rack. AA concentrations of 28.4, 56.8, and 170 µmol/L were loaded into Cobas cups and placed into positions 8, 9, and 10 of the Fara calibrator rack. An amount of OPDA/DTT reagent sufficient for the number of samples was placed in a 15-mL reagent cup. The working AA oxidase solution was placed in a 4-mL reagent cup. Both reagents were placed in the programmed position on a reagent 5 rack, the AA oxidase going into the left or 1 position. The program parameters for the Cobas Fara were set as outlined in Table 1 . An enzymatic end point was measured with a direct printout in concentration being obtained after 300 s of incubation, i.e., 30 readings at 10-s intervals. The blank was automatically subtracted and the calculation was performed internally according Beer's Law. All results were multiplied internally by a factor of 1.1 to correct for dilution of the specimen by MPA/DTT.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Cobas Fara parameters for AA determination.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Linearity.
Linearity was determined with aqueous calibrators prepared in MPA/DTT. Response was linear from 5.68 to 283 µmol/L, which is into a deficiency range and well above the upper physiological range. Absorbance response to concentration is expressed by the equation A340 = 1.00025[AA] - 0.00041, and r2 = 0.9998.

Precision.
Commercial lyophilized control material was supplemented with AA calibrators at concentrations of 93.4 and 37.9 µmol/L. The within-run CVs were 0.51% and 2.7%, respectively (n = 22). The between-run CVs were 4.2% and 8.4%, where n = 19 and 20, respectively.

Recovery.
Recovery was determined by using five different concentrations of AA, ranging from 55.5 to 160 µmol/L added to plasma. Recovery ranged from 93.8% to 119%, with a mean of 104%.

Interferences.
The addition of bilirubin at a concentration of 1860 µmol/L to both a control and a serum pool produced no effect on assay results. Similarly, Intralipid® added to a concentration of 18 g/L to create a severe lipemia showed no effect on results. A hemoglobin concentration of 1.3 g/L had no effect, but at 2.5 g/L (equivalent to extensive hemolysis) the resulting AA concentration was falsely low by a significant 17%.

Correlation.
For comparison with HPLC as a reference method, 62 specimens were assayed by the two procedures. The range of AA concentrations was 1.1 to 183 µmol/L. The correlation between the methods was defined by AAEnz = 0.953AAHPLC + 0.0047 and r2 = 0.957.

Reference range.
The reference range for plasma AA concentration in healthy adults, including both men and women, was 26.1–84.6 µmol/L, based upon fasting specimens (n = 20).


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This enzymatic procedure for the determination of AA has two distinct advantages. First, the precision is improved over our previous experience with HPLC. Second, the throughput is greatly increased; a batch of 30 samples can be assayed in ~15 min of instrument run time. Moreover, the procedure can be utilized potentially in many clinical and research laboratories. If a laboratory has a different centrifugal analyzer available, the procedural details can probably be adapted. We have used the procedure successfully on the Roche Cobas Bio analyzer (unpublished results). The procedure has more recently been adapted for use also on a Cobas Mira analyzer (5).

The described automated procedure was chosen and developed to keep specimen processing as simple as possible so that the test would be most convenient and practical for the clinical laboratory, yet give results that were comparable with or superior to a reference HPLC procedure (4). The automated procedure has been utilized for patient care as well as research in our institution for ~2 years. In daily practice, experience has shown that running the test in duplicate is not necessary to obtain clinically reliable results.

Results obtained through participation in a proficiency program conducted by NIST indicate that this enzymatic procedure has a routine negative bias averaging ~4% (6). Data are not available for a more detailed analysis of this feature of the procedure. However, nearly all participants in the NIST program use HPLC as a method of determination, and we found the same bias with our laboratory's HPLC results as noted above in the correlation evaluation. Any negative bias may be explained in part by the initial blanking before starting the enzymatic reaction, a procedural step that removes endogenous DHAA. A negative bias might result also from a greater specificity introduced by the enzymatic reaction, although this seems less likely. A possible role of DTT, added as a preservative, in preventing complete enzymatic oxidation of AA seems unlikely since the coupling of DHAA with OPDA should pull the reaction to completion. Since the bias has not invalidated the results and appears to have no clinical significance, we have not pursued further an interpretation or a correction.

In considering either the assessment or the monitoring of AA status of patients, it may be noteworthy that both AA and DHAA are biologically available, but normally only a trace (much less than 5%) of total AA equivalents circulate in plasma as DHAA (3)(7). Since this analytical procedure blanks out any DHAA before initiating the enzymatic reaction, only the AA form is detected. For nutritional status determinations in clinical practice, this is of no significance. However, the failure to detect DHAA due to blanking may be noteworthy for some research applications.

The assessment of AA status is commonly believed to be most accurate when measured in leukocytes as an indication of body tissue stores. While leukocyte concentrations may be appropriate for healthy individuals, the same conclusion cannot be arbitrarily extended to hospitalized patients (3)(7). In addition to the effects of trauma, many commonly used drugs as well as states of hyperglycemia and stress can dramatically alter the flux of AA across cell membranes (3). For this reason, we believe that a fasting plasma specimen is preferred, at least for hospitalized patients. Of further importance for the clinical laboratory, plasma preparation is far more practical than is leukocyte preparation, even if the isolation of leukocytes is limited to the buffy coat. In either case, fasting specimens are preferred for the most dependable determination of AA status.

Although the roles of AA in metabolism remain to be fully elucidated, the requirements of AA for optimal wound healing and immune function are of prime importance to hospitalized patients. Thus, assessment of AA status on hospital admission and monitoring of AA therapy would seem to be prudent until outcome studies demonstrate the true value of maintaining AA repletion. The features of this method will permit a more frequent and cost-effective test for this important, commonly deficient nutrient (6) to be offered on a routine basis for patient care.


   Acknowledgments
 
This investigation was supported in part by National Institutes of Health grant #DK35816.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: AA, ascorbic acid; DHAA, dehydroascorbic acid; DTT, dithiothreitol; OPDA, o-phenylenediamine; and MPA, metaphosphoric acid .


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Washko PW, Welch RW, Dhariwal KR, Wang Y, Levine M. Ascorbic acid and dehydroascorbic acid analyses in biological samples. Anal Biochem 1992;204:1-14. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Tulley R. New enzymatic method for the analysis of vitamin C in plasma and automation on the Beckman CX5 [Abstract]. Clin Chem 1992;38:1070.
  3. Lee W, Davis KA, Rettmer RL, Labbe RF. Ascorbic acid status: biochemical and clinical considerations. Am J Clin Nutr 1988;48:286-290. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Lee W, Hamernyik P, Hutchinson M, Raisys VA, Labbe RF. Ascorbic acid in lymphocytes: cell preparation and liquid-chromatography assay. Clin Chem 1982;28:2165-2169. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Chu C, Lee W, Prunty J. Plasma ascorbic acid: stability and enzymatic spectrophotometric detection with a Roche Cobas Mira Plus centrifugal analyzer [Abstract]. Clin Chem 1996;42:S301.
  6. Margolis SA, Duewer DL. Measurement of ascorbic acid in human plasma and serum: stability, intralaboratory repeatability, and interlaboratory reproducibility. Clin Chem 1996;42:1257-1262. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Schorah CH, Downing C, Piripitsi A, Gallivan L, Al-Hazaa AH, Sanderson MJ, Bodenham A. Total vitamin C, ascorbic acid, and dehydroascorbic acid concentrations in plasma of critically ill patients. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:760-765. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
G. Devereux, S. W. Turner, L. C. A. Craig, G. McNeill, S. Martindale, P. J. Harbour, P. J. Helms, and A. Seaton
Low Maternal Vitamin E Intake during Pregnancy Is Associated with Asthma in 5-Year-Old Children
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., September 1, 2006; 174(5): 499 - 507.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med.Home page
S. Martindale, G. McNeill, G. Devereux, D. Campbell, G. Russell, and A. Seaton
Antioxidant Intake in Pregnancy in Relation to Wheeze and Eczema in the First Two Years of Life
Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2005; 171(2): 121 - 128.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
R. E. Rudolph, T. L. Vaughan, A. R. Kristal, P. L. Blount, D. S. Levine, P. C. Galipeau, L. J. Prevo, C. A. Sanchez, P. S. Rabinovitch, and B. J. Reid
Serum Selenium Levels in Relation to Markers of Neoplastic Progression Among Persons With Barrett's Esophagus
J Natl Cancer Inst, May 21, 2003; 95(10): 750 - 757.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
J. Satia-Abouta, R. E. Patterson, I. B. King, K. L. Stratton, A. L. Shattuck, A. R. Kristal, J. D. Potter, M. D. Thornquist, and E. White
Reliability and Validity of Self-Report of Vitamin and Mineral Supplement Use in the Vitamins and Lifestyle Study
Am. J. Epidemiol., May 15, 2003; 157(10): 944 - 954.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Colome, R. Artuch, M.-A. Vilaseca, C. Sierra, N. Brandi, N. Lambruschini, F. J Cambra, and J. Campistol
Lipophilic antioxidants in patients with phenylketonuria
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2003; 77(1): 185 - 188.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. J O'Byrne, S. Devaraj, S. M Grundy, and I. Jialal
Comparison of the antioxidant effects of Concord grape juice flavonoids {alpha}-tocopherol on markers of oxidative stress in healthy adults
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1367 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. L. Nunes, K. Robinson, A. Kalynych, S. B. King III, D. S. Sgoutas, and B. C. Berk
Vitamins C and E Inhibit O2- Production in the Pig Coronary Artery
Circulation, November 18, 1997; 96(10): 3593 - 3601.
[Abstract] [Full Text]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (29)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Labbe, R. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lee, W.
Right arrow Articles by Labbe, R. F.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Nutrition


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS