Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 43: 184-185, 1997;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galanti, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galanti, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology
(Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43:184-185.)
© 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Specificity of Salivary Thiocyanate as Marker of Cigarette Smoking Is Not Affected by Alimentary Sources

Laurence M. Galanti

Clinical Laboratory, Cliniques Universitaires de Mont-Godinne, B-5530 Yvoir, Belgium: fax 32 81 42 3204

Thiocyanate is an end product of detoxification of hydrogen cyanide present in cigarette smoke. Its excretion in urine, saliva, and sweat can thus provide a useful marker of exposure in smokers and nonsmokers (1)(2)(3)(4). Salivary tests have the advantages of easy, noninvasive sampling and of good stability, even in nondemanding storage conditions (5). However, thiocyanate and other cyanogens are also found in many foods including cabbage, broccoli, almond, and horseradish. Consequently, their ingestion can be supposed to artifactually increase thiocyanate excretion, thereby affecting the specificity of the test (6).

To evaluate the importance of this alimentary source of thiocyanate, we selected 65 subjects from the screening of 221 consecutive subjects in a smoking cessation program and from a healthy population of adult volunteers. Ages ranged from 18 to 72 years (median 48 years). All subjects were asked to fill in a questionnaire on their smoking habits and on their alimentary intakes during the 3 weeks preceding sampling. The criteria of selection were as follows: smokers (>10 cigarettes/day) who did not ingest cyanogenic food during the last 3 weeks, ex-smokers for >3 weeks, and nonsmokers. Salivary thiocyanate concentration was measured in duplicate by the method of Densen et al. (7). On the basis of the questionnaire, three groups were compared: Group A included 30 nonsmokers or ex-smokers who had ingested food known to contain cyanogens during the last 3 weeks. Among those subjects, 10 had ingested such food at more than three meals, and three subjects at more than five (up to eight) meals. Group B (n = 20) included smokers, and group C (n = 15) included nonsmokers or ex-smokers who had avoided these foods. The study was in agreement with the guidelines approved by the ethics committee at our institution.

Salivary thiocyanate concentrations were similar in groups A and C (mean ± SD 101 ± 51 vs 92 ± 90 mg/L; not significant) but were significantly higher in group B (413 ± 172 mg/L; P <0.01 vs groups A and B). Considering a cutoff value of 230 mg/L to separate smokers from non- or ex-smokers, all but two subjects (one in group B and one in group C) were correctly classified (Fig. 1 ), which corresponds to a sensitivity of 95% and a specificity of 98%. In addition, no trend toward higher salivary thiocyanate concentrations was observed in group A subjects, whose ingestion of food containing cyanogens was the most important (more than three meals: 97 ± 57 mg/L).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Saliva thiocyanate concentrations in subjects of groups A, B, and C.

{diamondsuit}, individual values. {circ} and vertical bars are mean values and standard deviations, respectively, for each group. Horizontal dotted line is the cutoff value of 230 mg/L best separating smokers from non- or ex-smokers.

Among the biological markers of the exposure to tobacco smoke, thiocyanate is widely used in epidemiological studies (8)(9)(10)(11)(12). Thiocyanate is a metabolite of cyanide and the end product of the detoxification of cyanide compounds by the catalytic action of a mitochondrial enzyme called rhodanase. Hydrogen cyanide and organic cyanides are respectively present in the gaseous and in the particulate phases of tobacco smoke and are absorbed mainly at the pulmonary level. These cyanide compounds are the main source of exogenous thiocyanate in smokers. Saliva tests are the most stable and sensitive procedure for obtaining thiocyanate measures of smoking exposure (13). The half-life of salivary thiocyanate is 10 to 14 days, allowing the evaluation of exposure to the toxic components of tobacco smoke during the preceding 3 weeks. Besides cabbage, broccoli, almond, and horseradish, cyanide compounds are also present in manioc, wood millet grass, and corn; ingestion of these foods could theoretically increase the thiocyanate concentration independently of smoking exposure. Although no study to date has determined whether or not this alimentary supply may significantly affect the specificity of salivary thiocyanate concentrations as a marker of smoking exposure, alimentary contamination is generally considered, on a theoretical basis, a possible cause of a false-positive test.

Our data show that, in non- and ex-smokers, the concentration of thiocyanate in saliva is not affected by alimentary sources and that the specificity of salivary thiocyanate concentrations to identify smokers is not affected by alimentation. This suggests that, despite the presence of cyanogens in some foods, the usual alimentary supply is too low to significantly affect the diagnostic value of the test. Consequently, the results of this test may be interpreted independently of any dietetic consideration.


References

  1. Butts WC, Kuehneman M, Widdowson GM. Automated method for determining serum thiocyanate to distinguish smokers from nonsmokers. Clin Chem 1974;20:1344-1348. [Abstract]
  2. Chen Y, Pederson L, Lefcoe N. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and serum thiocyanate level in infants. Arch Environ Health 1990;45:163-167. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Barylko-Pikelna N, Pangborn RM. Effect of cigarette smoking on urinary and salivary thiocyanates. Arch Environ Health 1968;17:739-745. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Prue DM, Martin JE, Hume AS. A critical evaluation of thiocyanate as a biochemical index of smoking exposure. Behav Ther 1980;11:368-379.
  5. Galanti LM, Delwiche JP, Dubois P, Somville MA, Pouthier F, Prignot J. Effect of storage conditions on saliva thiocyanate concentration. Clin Chem 1989;35:496-497. [Free Full Text]
  6. Foss OP, Lund-Larsen PG. Serum thiocyanate and smoking: interpretation of serum thiocyanate levels observed in a large health study. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1986;46:245-251. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Densen PM, Davidow B, Bass HE, Jones EW. A chemical test for smoking exposure. Arch Environ Health 1967;14:865-874. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Robertson AS, Burge PS, Cockrill BL. A study of serum thiocyanate concentrations in office workers as a mean of validating smoking histories and assessing passive exposure to cigarette smoke. Br J Ind Med 1987;44:351-354. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Bruckert E, Jacob N, Lamaire L, Truffert J, Percheron F, de Gennes JL. Relationship between smoking status and serum lipids in a hyperlipidemic population and analysis of possible confounding factors. Clin Chem 1992;38:1698-1705. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Ruth KJ, Neaton JD. Evaluation of two biological markers of tobacco exposure. MRFIT Research Group. Prev Med 1991;20:574-589. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Palmer RF, Dwyer JH, Semmer H. A measurement model of adolescent smoking. Addict Behav 1994;19:477-489. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Cesana GC, de-Vito G, Ferrario M, Sega R, Mocarelli P. Trends of smoking habits in northern Italy (1986–1990). The WHO MONICA Project in Area Branzo, Italy. MONICA AREA Brianza Research Group. Eur J Epidemiol 1995;11:251-258.
  13. Luepker RV, Pechacek TF, Murray DM, Johnson CA, Hund F, Jacobs DR. Saliva thiocyanate: a chemical indicator of cigarette smoking in adolescents. Am J Public Health 1981;71:1320-1324. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
O S Oluwole, A O Onabolu, I A Cotgreave, H Rosling, A Persson, and H Link
Incidence of endemic ataxic polyneuropathy and its relation to exposure to cyanide in a Nigerian community
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, October 1, 2003; 74(10): 1417 - 1422.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (10)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Galanti, L. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Galanti, L. M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Drug Monitoring and Toxicology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS