Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 43: 2256-2261, 1997;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, B. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Pediatric Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43:2256-2261.)
© 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

GC-MS determination of organic acids with solvent extraction after cation-exchange chromatography

Ja Won Suh1, Seon Hwa Lee and Bong Chul Chunga

Doping Control Center, Korea Institute of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 131, Cheongryang, Seoul, Korea.
1 Department of Special Chemistry, Seoul Medical Science Institute, Seoul, 140–230, Korea.
a Author for correspondence. Fax +82-2-958-5059; e-mail bcc0319{at}kistmail.kist.re.kr


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 
We combined column and partition chromatography to isolate, purify, and quantify biological organic acids in urine and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF). Urine and CSF samples were introduced onto a preconditioned cation-exchange column (Dowex 50W x 8 resin) to remove the biological interferences. The effluent with water was extracted with ethyl acetate two times (pH 1 and 3) and the organic acids were quantitatively converted into their trimethylsilyl derivatives for detection by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry. The good quality-control data were obtained through precision and accuracy tests. Inter- and intraassay CVs were 0.01–10.2% and 0.02–12.2%, respectively. Analytical recoveries compared favorably with results from the commonly used solvent extraction method. This method was used for the measurement of the 14 organic acids in the urine and CSF of healthy volunteers. The values obtained were in the range of the published data.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 
Since the isovaleric acidemia case report by Tanaka et al. in the 1960s, determination of organic acids in biological samples has become an important tool for detection and diagnosis of organic acidemia [e.g., methylmalonic acidemia (MMA), medium-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, etc.] (1)1 . This is because most of the organic acids are directly or indirectly related as intermediates in biochemical synthetic pathways and organic acidemia from specific enzymes (methylmalonyl-CoA, ornithine transcarbamylase, etc.) or because cofactor (vitamin B12, 5'-deoxyadenosyl cobalamine, etc.) defects lead to the accumulation of organic acids and their corresponding metabolites (2). In addition, an organic acid profile enables one to evaluate metabolic disorders pathobiochemically on the basis of their relations to one another as precursors or products. Therefore, careful consideration of small changes in organic acid ratios is essential for more accurate diagnosis and optimal management for prognosis after treatment in addition to quantitative determination of organic acids.

Because of their clinical usefulness, many analytical methods have been developed for the analysis of organic acids in biological samples (3)(4)(5)(6). In particular, solvent extraction and anion-exchange methods before gas chromatography (GC) or gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analyses have been more widely used for detection in biological samples. The solvent extraction method is very simple and fast, but it gives inaccurate quantification because of a lack of specificity resulting from numerous endogeneous components (urea, amino acids, etc.) at acid pH. The anion-exchange method gives better specific isolation from urinary components in comparison with the solvent extraction method (7)(8). However, a disadvantage of the anion-exchange method is that large amounts of amino acids with amphiphilic ions (COOH and NH2) can mask some important organic acids on a GC chromatogram. For these reasons, Sweetmann and coworkers introduced one modified method by liquid partition chromatography on a silicic acid column and established the concentration range of organic acids in several types of biological samples (urine, plasma, amniotic fluid) (9). As expected, this method gave specific isolation, but was somewhat laborious and time consuming for routine analysis in most clinical laboratories. Therefore, a simple and specific isolation method is needed for more accurate diagnosis of inherited and acquired metabolic disorders.

In this paper, we describe a combined method for the specific quantitative analysis of biological organic acids based on the method of Husek and Liebich (10). This method includes column and partition chromatography, results in quantitative recoveries of many acids, and overcomes the critical points (lack of specificity) in the screening of organic acid-related diseases. We present preliminary evidence that this efficient procedure can be applied to the detection of MMA.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 
calibrators and reagents
Organic acid calibrators were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. [D]Homovanillic acid (HVA) used as internal calibrator was purchased from MSD Isotope Co. All solvents were of guaranteed grade and used without further purification. Dowex 50W x 8 (strongly acidic cation-exchange resin, H+) was purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Deionized water was distilled before use. Silylating reagents, N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide (MSTFA) and trimethylsilyl chloride (TMS-Cl), were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. Ethyl acetate was high-purity "HPLC solvent" grade.

samples
Urine specimens were obtained from healthy volunteers, 9 women (26–32 years of age) and 10 men (30–39 years), all with unremarkable medical history. No dietary restrictions were applied except for total abstinence from alcoholic beverages for 24 h; three of the subjects were smokers. Patient urine specimens were obtained from Y university and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) specimens (subjects 1–12 years of age) from K university. All samples were stored at -20 °C until analysis.

gc-ms
A Hewlett Packard GC-MS system used for this study consisted of a model 5890A gas chromatograph, a model 5970B mass selective detector, a HP 5970C MS chemstation, and a HP 7946 disc drive. A fused-silica capillary column coated with HP-5 cross-linked 5% phenylmethyl silicone (SE-54, 34 m x 0.2 mm i.d., 0.33 µm film thickness) was also used. The GC temperature program was as follows: initial temperature was 100 °C, held for 1 min, increased to 130 °C at a rate of 2 °C/min, then to 200 °C at a rate of 3 °C/min, and finally to 280 °C at a rate of 6 °C/min and held for 10 min. The split ratio was 1:12, injection temperature was 250 °C, transfer line temperature was 270 °C, and ion source temperature was 200 °C. The mass spectrometer was operated at 70 eV in the electron impact mode with SCAN or selected ion monitoring (SIM). The selected ion groups for the identification of 15 organic acids in SIM mode are listed in Table 1 . The dwell time for each ion was set at 50 ms.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Characteristic ions and retention times of TMS-derivatized organic acids.

sample preparation
Solvent extraction method.
To adjust the pH to <1, 200 µL of 6 mol/L HCl was added to 2 mL of urine containing 5 mg/L internal calibrator ([D]HVA), and 1.5 g of sodium chloride was also added. Organic acids in biological samples were extracted into 5 mL of ethyl acetate by mechanically shaking for 10 min, and the tube was immediately centrifuged at 800g for 5 min. The organic layer was transferred to a second tube and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dried in a vacuum desiccator over P2O5-KOH.

Strong cation exchange method.
Into a Pasteur pipet (i.d. 0.5 cm), preconditioned Dowex 50W x 8 resin was poured up to 3 cm of height. Urine (2 mL) containing 5 mg/L internal calibrator solution ([D]HVA) was applied to the column adjusted to pH <1. As soon as urine and internal calibrator were introduced, the effluent with 2 mL of water was collected without waste and 200 µL of 6 mol/L HCl was added to adjust the pH to <1. Then, 1.5 g of sodium chloride and 5 mL of ethyl acetate were also added. The mixture was shaken mechanically for 5 min and the two layers were separated after centrifugation (800g, 5 min). The organic layer was transferred to another tube and 1 mL of 0.1 mol/L glycine buffer (pH 3) was added to adjust pH to <3. The mixture was shaken mechanically for 5 min and the two layers were separated after centrifugation (800g, 5 min). The organic layer was transferred to another tube and solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The residue was dried in a vacuum desiccator over P2O5-KOH.

Derivatization
The residue was dissolved in 50 µL of TMS reagent mixture (MSTFA/TMS-Cl, 100:1 by vol) and heated at 60 °C for 15 min. After heating, 2-µL aliquots were injected onto the GC column with an autosampler.


   Results and Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 
extraction and analysis
One of the most critical points for organic acid profiles in biological samples (urine, CSF) is the specific isolation from amino acids, urea, and creatinine (11), which interfere with the quantification of some important organic acids. Therefore, on the basis of the extraction method of Husek and Liebich (10), a combined method including column and partition chromatography was established to remove the interferences derived from biological matrix. The isolation of the organic acids of interest is based on the use of a cation-exchange column and moderate pH adjustment (<pH 3) to neutralize the negative charges of the anions (pH < pKa - 2). Then, to enhance the specificity on the GC chromatogram, they were derivatized with the TMS reagent mixture (MSTFA/TMS-Cl). By using the above method, organic acids were simultaneously determined by GC-MS and in a single run successfully separated within 45 min.

gc-ms profiles
Figure 1 shows the effects of a newly modified method on the resulting GC-MS analysis. Total ion chromatogram of TMS-derivatized standard organic acids is shown in Fig. 1a , demonstrating the good GC separation of 15 organic acids in a single run. Although some organic acids were coeluted, they could be analyzed because of the specificity of SIM mode with two or three ions on the basis of characteristic ions and retention times in Table 1Up . Also, all of the subsequent quantified data were obtained by SIM mode. Fig. 1b , solvent extraction method, shows that urea and amino acids severely mask important portions (A, B) of the organic acids profile for the diagnosis of inherited and acquired metabolic diseases such as MMA, maple syrup urine disease (MSUD), and Reye syndrome. For example, in the A region are methylmalonic acid, ethylmalonic acid, and methylsuccinic acid for the diagnosis of organic aciduria such as MMA, and in the B region are HVA and azelaic acid for neuroblastoma and dicarboxylic aciduria (12). In contrast with the solvent extraction method, however, the considerably improved organic acids profile by the addition of small column is shown in Fig. 1c . Namely, the disappearance of huge amounts of urea and amino acids at 10.2, 12.3, 31.0, and 33.0 min is shown. This demonstrates that the combined method results in the effective isolation of the organic acids from several interferences (urea, amino acids, etc.).



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. GC-MS chromatograms of (a) standard organic acids (1.0 mg/L), (b) urinary organic acids from solvent extraction method, and (c) urinary organic acids from well-combined extraction method (strong cation-exchange method).

For peak identities, see Table 1Up .

precision and recovery
The intra- and interday reproducibility of the urine profiling is given in Table 2 . Precision and accuracy data from supplemented artificial urine, as judged from CV (<10%), were satisfactory. Recovery studies were performed three times at 1 mg/L concentration for each organic acid. Table 3 represents the analytical recoveries of organic acids on liquid–liquid extraction and newly improved (strong cation exchange) extraction methods. As shown in Table 3 , analytical recoveries exceeding 60% were mostly found regardless of a wide variety of nonpolar and polar organic acids. Although the extraction recoveries of lactic acid, hippuric acid, and citric acid were only 39%, 26%, and 10%, respectively, they could be sufficiently detected in biological samples.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Precision and accuracy data for determination of organic acids.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Analytical recoveries of a liquid–liquid extraction method and our ion-exchange method.

results in urine and csf
The concentration range of organic acids in control urine and CSF was simultaneously determined by GC-MS with the above extraction method and the same quantification method used for the calibrator. As shown in Table 4 , our results agree with the results that Hoffmann et al. (9) have previously reported.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Concentration range of organic acids in CSF and urine of controls.

Figure 2 displays a urinary organic acid profile of a patient with MMA. As mentioned above, it shows an effective result of the combined method applied for confident diagnosis of a metabolic disorder.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. GC-MS chromatogram of urinary organic acids from a patient with MMA.

In conclusion, with the extraction method described here, quantitative profiles of organic acids were obtained by GC-MS, and the competing endogeneous substances (amino acids, urea, creatinine, etc.) on GC-MS chromatograms were effectively excluded. Also, this method made it possible to establish a more accurate concentration range of organic acids in biological fluids (urine, CSF). From the above results, we suggest that this efficient method will be suitable for the quantitative analysis of organic acids for diagnosis and follow-up study of patients with new or ill-defined disorders in most clinical laboratories.


   Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported in part by grant 2E14130 from the Korea Ministry of Science and Technology.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: MMA, methylmalonic acidemia; GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; HVA, homovanillic acid; MSTFA, N-methyl-N-trimethylsilyltrifluoroacetamide; CSF, cerebrospinal fluid; TMS-Cl, trimethylsilyl chloride; and SIM, selected ion monitoring.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results and Discussion
References
 

  1. Tanaka K, Budd MA, Efron ML, Isselbacher KJ. Isovaleric acidemia: a new genetic defect of leucine metabolism. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1966;56:236-242. [Free Full Text]
  2. Tanaka K. Disorders of organic acid metabolism in biology of brain dysfunction 1975 Plenum Publishing Corp. New York. .
  3. Tanaka K, Hine DG, West-Dull A, Lynn TB. Gas-chromatographic method of analysis for urinary organic acids. I. Retention indices of 155 metabolically important compounds. Clin Chem 1980;26:1839-1846. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tanaka K, West-Dull A, Hine DG, Lynn TB. Gas-chromatographic method of analysis for urinary organic acids. II. Description of the procedure, and its application to diagnosis of patients with organic acidurias. Clin Chem 1980;26:1847-1853. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Shih VE. Detection of hereditary metabolic disorders involving amino acids and organic acids. Clin Biochem 1991;24:301-309. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Niwa T. Metabolic profiling with gas chromatography–mass spectrometry and its application to clinical medicine. J Chromatogr 1986;379:313-345. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Verhaeghe BJ, Lefevere MF, De Leenheer AP. Solid extraction with strong anion exchange column for selective isolation and concentration of urinary organic acids. Clin Chem 1988;34:1077-1083. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Charlmers RA, Watts RWE. The quantitative extraction and gas–liquid chromatographic determination of organic acids in urine. Analyst 1972;97:958-967. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hoffmann G, Aramaki S, Blum-Hoffmann E, Nyhan WL, Sweetmann L. Quantitative analysis for organic acids in biological samples. Clin Chem 1989;35:587-595. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Husek P, Liebich HM. Organic acid profiling by direct treatment of deprotenized plasma with ethyl chloroformate. J Chromatogr 1994;656:37-43.
  11. Yukio Y, Hisakumi S, Masahiko T. Simultaneous determination of urinary creatinine and aromatic amino acids by cation-exchange chromatography with ultraviolet detection. J Chromatogr 1991;566:19-28. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Shimizu A, Nakanishi T. Quantitative analysis of urinary organic acid. Jpn J Clin Pathol 1992;40:743-750.




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Suh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, B. C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Suh, J. W.
Right arrow Articles by Chung, B. C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Pediatric Clinical Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS