|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Ludwig-Boltzmann-Institute for Cardiothoracic Surgical Research at the Institute of Laboratory Diagnostics, Kaiser-Franz-Josef-Hospital, Kundratstr. 3, A-1100 Vienna, Austria.
2
Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Clinical
Biochemistry, University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel
1820, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
a Author for correspondence. Fax +43-1-60191-3309.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
10 µmol/L MPA, lymphocytic as well as lymphoblastic IMP-DH
activities were reduced in a similar manner. The concentration of MPAG
required for 50% inhibition was for both cell types >25 µmol/L and
<50 µmol/L, respectively. MPAG (200 µmol/L) reduced lymphocytic as
well as lymphoblastic IMP-DH activity by ~80%. With 100 g/L HSA or
human plasma as diluent, the inhibitory effects of MPA and MPAG were
significantly (P <0.05) diminished, whereas HSA
concentrations
25 g/L only slightly influenced the inhibition of
IMP-DH activity by MPA and MPAG. In summary, it can be clearly
demonstrated that not only MPA but also MPAG contributes to the
inhibition of both IMP-DH isoenzymes, which might be relevant for the
immunosuppressive properties of mycophenolate mofetil in transplant
patients. | Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Up to now, it has not been clear which IMP-DH isoform is the more important therapeutic target of MPA (12) when used for immunosuppression in humans. Early reports indicated that only type II is up-regulated during proliferation of lymphatic and leukemic cells (9)(10)(13)(14), whereas recent studies with T cells demonstrated similar increases in the mRNA concentrations of both isoforms after stimulation (15).
Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) (Syntex), an ester prodrug of MPA, was recently approved for the prevention of acute allograft rejection (16)(17). The biochemical action of MPA causes dose-dependent inhibition of DNA synthesis in lymphocytes, leading to impairment of the cellular immune response.
MMF, which is nowadays administered to transplant recipients as adjunctive therapy to cyclosporin A and corticosteroids, is in vivo hydrolyzed to MPA. It is further metabolized to a single glucuronidated metabolite MPA glucuronide (MPAG), which is then excreted in urine (18). Transplant patients at our department receiving MMF exhibit ~50-fold higher plasma concentrations of MPAG than of MPA.
Papers dealing with the inhibitory effects of MPAG on IMP-DH activity are contradictory. While Lee et al. (18) did not find any effect of MPAG, Langman et al. (19) observed a weak enzyme inhibition by MPAG in intact lymphocytes.
This study was undertaken to investigate the effects of clinically relevant concentrations of MPA and MPAG on the type I and type II IMP-DH activity. For this purpose human lymphocytes (exhibiting type I isoform) and human lymphoblasts (exhibiting type II isoform) were incubated with various amounts of MPA and MPAG and IMP-DH activities were measured with a nonradioactive method.
In addition, the influence of human serum albumin (HSA) and human plasma on the MPA- and MPAG-mediated effects were investigated, because the pharmacological activity of MPA is suggested to be a function of unbound drug concentration (20).
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
procedures
Isolation of lymphocytes.
Whole blood was
separated by density-gradient centrifugation in Ficoll-Paque;
lymphocytes were isolated from peripheral blood mononuclear cells by
centrifugal elutriation in HBSS medium containing 10 mL/L FBS
(21). Cell viability, assessed by trypan blue exclusion,
varied between 95% and 98%. About 96% to 99% of cells were scored
as lymphocytes as determined by flow cytometric scattergrams. After
resuspending the cells, aliquots of cell suspensions were used for cell
counting in an automated counter (Coulter). For the experiments, cells
were diluted with deionized and distilled water to yield 2.5 x
108 ± 1 x 106 cells/L.
Cultivation of lymphoblasts.
MOLT-3 cells were
cultivated with RPMI 1640, 100 mL/L FBS, 100 kIU/L penicillin, 100 mg/L
streptomycin, and 2 µmol/L L-glutamine. Cell cultivation
was carried out in a humidified incubator set at 37 °C and 5%
CO2. For the experiments cells were washed twice with
DPBS and diluted with deionized and distilled water to a final
concentration of 2.5 x 108 ± 9 x
105 cells/L.
Determination of activity.
Methanol was used as vehicle
for preparing 5 mmol/L stock solutions of MPA and MPAG, which were
diluted to yield final concentrations of 040 µmol/L and of 0400
µmol/L, respectively, with deionized and distilled water; 5200 g/L
HSA or human plasma containing 81 g of protein/L (48 g/L of the
total protein was albumin) was also used. Cells were cracked by
freezing and thawing twice. Cell lysate (30 µL) was preincubated with
30 µL of various amounts of MPA or MPAG at 37 °C for 30 min before
the determination of enzyme activity. Cell lysates with equal amounts
of water, HSA, or human plasma served as controls.
IMP-DH activity was measured by means of HPLC by using a modified procedure described by Montero et al. (22). Assays were carried out at 37 °C in a total volume of 180 µL. The incubation buffer consisted of 80 mmol/L NaH2PO4, 200 mmol/L KCl, 500 µmol/L NAD+, and 1000 µmol/L IMP (pH 7.5). The reaction was started by addition of 60 µL of cell lysate and carried out for 2.5 h for lymphocytes and for 1.5 h for lymphoblasts. The incubation was stopped by addition of 35 µL of HClO4. After centrifugation 180 µL of supernatant was neutralized with 18 µL of KH2CO3.
IMP, XMP, GMP, and AMP were separated by injecting 100 µL of the neutralized supernatant onto a CNU-010 column (Chemcon) with a K2HPO4 gradient. Buffer A consisted of 0.015 mol/L K2HPO4 (pH 3.45), buffer B of 0.5 mol/L K2HPO4 (pH 3.45). A linear gradient rising from 0% B to 50% B in 8 min was used with a total run time of 28 min and an equilibrium delay of 5 min. The flow rate was 1.2 mL/min. The intraassay (n = 7) and interassay (n = 20) CVs for the measurement of IMP-DH activity were 10.9% and 16.4%, respectively, for 2.7 nmol/106 lymphocytes per hour and 7.6% and 9.8% for 11.9 nmol/106 lymphoblasts per hour, respectively.
Under the test conditions, only formation of XMP was detected and was therefore alone considered in the calculation of IMP-DH activity (given as µmol/106 cells per hour). The amount of formed XMP was determined by the ratio of its peak area in relation to XMP calibrators measured under the same conditions. The linear range for XMP was between 15 and 1000 µmol/L. Interassay CV for the XMP detection was <11% at 15 µmol/L XMP. Methanol in the same concentrations as it had as vehicle has no influence on activity.
statistical analysis
All experiments were performed in duplicate on at least three
separate occasions. Differences between the groups were tested for
statistical significance by using analysis of variance. All
calculations were carried out with the statistical software package
SAS/STAT (23). A P-value of <0.05 was
considered statistically significant. Values are expressed as mean
± SD.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Comparison of MPA-induced inhibition of IMP-DH activity
measured in lymphocytes and lymphoblasts in the presence of water, HSA,
or plasma.
In the presence of water, 2.5 µmol/L MPA decreased
lymphocytic IMP-DH activity by 60% (Table 2
), whereas in lymphoblasts even an 80% inhibition was
detectable (Table 3
). Concentrations of
10 µmol/L MPA inhibited the enzyme
activity by ~85% in both cell types. In the presence of HSA or
plasma the inhibitory effects of MPA were diminished in lymphocytes as
well as in lymphoblasts.
|
|
Comparison of MPAG-induced inhibition of IMP-DH activity
measured in lymphocytes and lymphoblasts in the presence of water, HSA,
or plasma.
In the presence of water MPAG showed very similar
effects on IMP-DH activity measured in lymphocytes (Table 4
) and lymphoblasts (Table 5
). The concentration of MPAG required for 50% inhibition was
for both cell types >25 µmol/L and <50 µmol/L, respectively. MPAG
(200 µmol/L) reduced lymphocytic as well as lymphoblastic IMP-DH
activity by ~80%. HSA and plasma again reduced the inhibitory effect
of MPAG in both cell types significantly.
|
|
Effects of increasing amounts of HSA on MPA-induced
inhibition of IMP-DH activity measured in lymphoblasts.
Fig. 1
shows the results of the IMP-DH activity measured in the
presence of different concentrations of MPA and HSA. The presence of
50 g/L HSA in the cell lysate/MPA mixture strongly diminished the
MPA-induced enzyme inhibition and increased the total MPA concentration
required to induce a certain degree of enzyme inhibition. HSA
concentrations
25 g/L had no influence on the inhibition of IMP-DH
activity by MPA.
|
Effects of increasing amounts of HSA on MPAG-induced
inhibition of IMP-DH activity measured in lymphoblasts.
Fig. 2
shows the results of lymphoblastic IMP-DH activity measured in
the presence of different concentrations of MPAG and HSA. When the cell
lysate/MPAG mixture contained 025 g/L HSA, 50 µmol/L MPAG was
sufficient to reduce the IMP-DH activity by >50%. In the presence of
50 g/L HSA the concentration of MPAG required for 50% inhibition of
enzyme activity was higher than the concentrations tested.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The concentrations of MPA and MPAG used for the in vitro experiments
were based upon the blood trough concentrations (MPA 4.7 ± 6.1
µmol/L, range 0.515.2 µmol/L; MPAG 233 ± 175 µmol/L,
range 46551 µmol/L; n = 73) measured in heart- or
lung-transplanted patients receiving 2 g/day MMF at our department. The
inhibition of IMP-DH activity was more pronounced in lymphoblasts than
in lymphocytes at MPA concentrations
5 µmol/L. In the presence of
10 µmol/L MPA, lymphocytic as well as lymphoblastic IMP-DH
activities were reduced in a similar manner. These results could be
explained by the fact that MPA is reported to inhibit type II isoenzyme
with a 4.8-fold lower Ki than type I
(11). In contrast, MPAG reduced lymphoblastic as well as
lymphocytic IMP-DH activity to the same extent. To our knowledge, no
detailed studies of the possible pharmacological effects of MPAG have
been published. Studies dealing with the effects of MPAG on IMP-DH
activity are contradictory: Lee et al. (18) reported that
MPAG is pharmacologically inactive but may be hydrolyzed in vivo to
form free MPA, whereas Langman et al. (19) observed 74%
enzyme inhibition in intact cells at 230 µmol/L MPAG. In our test
system the concentration of MPAG (diluted with water) required for 50%
inhibition was >25 µmol/L and <50 µmol/L for both lymphocytes and
lymphoblasts, respectively. Under the same conditions 200 µmol/L MPAG
reduced lymphocytic as well as lymphoblastic IMP-DH activity by
~80%. To exclude an unspecific hydrolysis of MPAG to MPA
(24) under our experimental conditions, MPA was measured
by means of HPLC at the end of the whole incubation procedure (data not
shown). Since not even traces of MPA were detected in specimens
containing 25200 µmol/L MPAG, it can be excluded that the
inhibiting effects observed in presence of MPAG are attributable to in
vitro hydrolysis of MPAG.
In the Langman study 6.215.6 µmol/L MPA was required for a 50% inhibition (19), whereas in our experiments already 5.0 µmol/L MPA (diluted with HSA or plasma) was enough to attain the same effects in lymphocytes. Moreover, Langman et al. reported about a 74% enzyme inhibition at 230 µmol/L MPAG, whereas in our study 200 µmol/L MPAG (also diluted with HSA or plasma) led to a 45% inhibition of lymphocytic IMP-DH. The differences in the extent of inhibition might be due to the fact that we used lysates for the incubation experiments, in contrast to Langman et al., who used whole blood and a rather unspecific assay for IMP-DH activity measurement.
Recently, Nowak and Shaw showed that MPA binds to HSA
(20). Since the pharmacological activity of MPA is
suggested to be a function of unbound drug concentration, we tested the
influence of increasing amounts of HSA on the MPA- and MPAG-induced
inhibition of IMP-DH activity. The presence of
50 g/L HSA in the cell
lysate/MPA or cell lysate/MPAG mixture strongly diminished the MPA- and
MPAG-induced enzyme inhibition and increased the total MPA and MPAG
concentration required to produce a certain degree of enzyme
inhibition. Our data emphasizes the hypothesis that unbound MPA (and
also MPAG) are responsible for the pharmacological effects.
Taking therapeutic MPA and MPAG blood concentrations into consideration, our data clearly show that MPA and its metabolite exhibit inhibitory effects on both type I and type II IMP-DH, whereby MPAG acts via a noncompetitive mechanism as was described for MPA (data not shown). Thus, both MPA and MPAG contribute to the immunosuppressive effect in vivo. Their transport into the cells is not rate-limiting, since Slingerland et al. (25) inhibited the complete flux from hypoxanthine into guanine ribonucleotides in intact cells by preincubating the cells with 10 µmol/L MPA for 15 min. Thus, the presented study could be helpful for monitoring the biochemical effects of MPA and MPAG by the measurements of IMP-DH with lysates of lymphocytes or lymphoblasts.
Recent reports indicate that MPA inhibits IMP-DH by acting as a replacement for the nicotinamide portion of the nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide cofactor and a catalytic water molecule (12). Whether the same mechanism of inhibition is also valid for MPAG needs to be further investigated. Nevertheless, plasma MPAG concentrations should be taken into consideration more during therapy of transplant patients with MMF, since it not only contributed to the therapeutic but also to the unwanted side effects.
In summary, we clearly demonstrated that MPA and MPAG contribute to the inhibition of both IMP-DH isoenzymes. This inhibition is partially neutralized by addition of HSA or plasma.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
T. M. Sievers New Antiproliferative Immunosuppressive Agents Journal of Pharmacy Practice, December 1, 2003; 16(6): 401 - 413. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vorbach, C. Armbruster, B. Robibaro, A. Griesmacher, I. El Menyawi, H. Daxecker, M. Raab, and M. M. Muller Endothelial cell compatibility of azithromycin and erythromycin J. Antimicrob. Chemother., February 1, 2002; 49(2): 407 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. Millan, F. Oppenheimer, M. Brunet, J. Vilardell, I. Rojo, J. Vives, and J. Martorell Assessment of Mycophenolic Acid-induced Immunosuppression: A New Approach Clin. Chem., September 1, 2000; 46(9): 1376 - 1383. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Armbruster, B. Robibaro, A. Griesmacher, and H. Vorbach Endothelial cell compatibility of trovafloxacin and levofloxacin for intravenous use J. Antimicrob. Chemother., April 1, 2000; 45(4): 533 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K L Hastings Assessment of immunosuppressant drug carcinogenicity: standard and alternative animal models Human and Experimental Toxicology, April 1, 2000; 19(4): 261 - 265. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Vorbach, B. Robibaro, C. Armbruster, M. Atteneder, M. Reiter, M. Hlousek, R. Schaumann, and A. Georgopoulos Endothelial cell compatibility of clindamycin, gentamicin, ceftriaxone and teicoplanin in Bier's arterial arrest J. Antimicrob. Chemother., August 1, 1999; 44(2): 275 - 277. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Korecka, D. Nikolic, R. B. van Breemen, and L. M. Shaw The Apparent Inhibition of Inosine Monophosphate Dehydrogenase by Mycophenolic Acid Glucuronide Is Attributable to the Presence of Trace Quantities of Mycophenolic Acid Clin. Chem., July 1, 1999; 45(7): 1047 - 1050. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. F. GUMMERT, T. IKONEN, and R. E. MORRIS Newer Immunosuppressive Drugs: A Review J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., June 1, 1999; 10(6): 1366 - 1380. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Schutz, M. Shipkova, V. W. Armstrong, E. Wieland, and M. Oellerich Identification of a Pharmacologically Active Metabolite of Mycophenolic Acid in Plasma of Transplant Recipients Treated with Mycophenolate Mofetil Clin. Chem., March 1, 1999; 45(3): 419 - 422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |