|
|
||||||||
Letters |
Lab. of Clin. Chem. and Toxicol., AZ Middelheim, Lindendreef 1, 2020 Antwerp, Belgium
a Author for correspondence.
To the Editor:
Zoppi et al. (1) recently described a case of sulfhemoglobinemia. The exact cause of the dyshemoglobinemia in this patient was not clearly mentioned, but it was probably drug-induced. The patient was improperly treated with methylene blue, on the basis of an analysis of whole blood by CO-oximetry in which the presence of methemoglobin was reported. The authors did not specify the type of CO-oximeter used for the initial analysis. However, from the tabulated data the reader is apt to conclude that the measurement was done on an IL 482 instrument (Instrumentation Laboratory, Milan, Italy).
The IL 282 and IL 482 CO-oximeters have not been constructed for
determination of sulfhemoglobin. Nevertheless, these instruments can
give a strong indication of the presence of sulfhemoglobin in a blood
sample on the basis of a combined positive result for methemoglobin and
a negative value for carboxyhemoglobin. This bizarre phenomenon was
first observed by Zwart et al. and published in an evaluation report of
the IL 282 CO-oximeter in 1981 (2). In the IL 282 and IL
482 operator's manuals, it is mentioned that these instruments were
not constructed for the determination of sulfhemoglobin and that
sulfhemoglobin may interfere with the determination of methemoglobin.
The wording of the statement, however, may be unclear: "The spectral
absorbance of sulfhemoglobin is similar to that of methemoglobin and
the same limitations would apply. Sulfhemoglobin is not commonly found
in blood, however, making such interference rare." We would favor
wording such as: "The spectral absorbance of sulfhemoglobin is
similar to that of methemoglobin. Therefore, the presence of
sulfhemoglobin in a blood sample will cause a positive interference or
false-positive result for methemoglobin. The presence of sulfhemoglobin
in a blood sample is suspected whenever a methemoglobin result is
displayed
10%, combined with a negative carboxyhemoglobin value."
IL now markets the model 682 CO-oximeter, which will detect and
actually indicate sulfhemoglobin concentrations >1.5%, making this
clarification in the new instrument's manual unnecessary. However,
manufacturers could help users if they clearly mention all known
clinically relevant limitations in instrument manuals and update the
manuals with all essential information published in the scientific
literature.
References
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. S Gopalachar, V. L Bowie, and P. Bharadwaj Phenazopyridine-Induced Sulfhemoglobinemia Ann. Pharmacother., June 1, 2005; 39(6): 1128 - 1130. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. C. Lu, R. D. Shih, S. Marcus, B. Ruck, and T. Jennis Pseudomethemoglobinemia: A Case Report and Review of Sulfhemoglobinemia Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, August 1, 1998; 152(8): 803 - 805. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |