Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 43: 1464-1465, 1997;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panteghini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuccia, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panteghini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuccia, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 1997;43:1464-1465.)
© 1997 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters to the Editor

Rapid, Highly Sensitive Immunoassay for Determination of Cardiac Troponin I in Patients with Myocardial Cell Damage

Mauro Panteghini1,a, Roberto Bonora1, Franca Pagani1, Francesca Buffoli2 and Claudio Cuccia2

1 1st Lab. Clin. Chem., Clin. Chem. and Enzymol. Section,
2 Div. of Cardiol., Spedali Civili, 25125 Brescia, Italy
a Author for correspondence.


To the Editor:

The aim of this study was to validate a new automated cardiac troponin I (cTnI) assay developed by Sanofi Diagnostic Pasteur (Marnes la Coquette, France) on the Access immunoassay system from the same manufacturer, and to evaluate its diagnostic sensitivity for early detection of myocardial damage. The assay is a two-site sandwich, immuno-chemiluminometric ELISA using two monoclonal antibodies that recognize different epitopes unique to the human cTnI isoform (1). Pipetting, incubations, measurements, and data-reduction steps are performed on the Access analyzer, which produces the first test result in 20 min.

The minimum detectable cTnI concentration, assessed by 10 replicate measurements in a single run of the zero calibrator serum supplied with the kit and defined as the cTnI value corresponding to the signal 3 SD greater than the mean found for this calibrator, was estimated as 0.01 µg/L. The assay measured cTnI in serum and EDTA-anticoagulated plasma in the same way: Fresh specimens collected at the same time from subjects (n = 24) with an increased concentration of cTnI gave similar results for serum and EDTA-plasma (0.49 ± 0.78 vs 0.46 ± 0.74 µg/L, respectively; P = 0.48). Assay reproducibility was tested by assaying three control materials (from Sanofi) containing human cTnI at 0.28, 6.6, and 25.4 µg/L plus two samples of pooled fresh serum (0.07 and 0.30 µg/L, respectively). Within-run CVs (n = 30) were between 3.8% and 12.5%, and between-run CVs (n = 10) ranged between 4.3% and 15.7%. Correlation studies were conducted with two alternative techniques for cTnI: Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur ELISA manual assay and Opus immunometric assay (Behring Diagnostics, Westwood, MA), performed according to the manufacturers' current protocols (2)(3). Linear regression equations were as follows: Access = 1.43 Pasteur - 0.08 µg/L (Sy|x = 0.19, r = 0.948, n = 44), and Access = 0.09 Opus + 0.05 µg/L (Sy|x = 0.48, r = 0.952, n = 81). In particular, the Opus assay led to ~10-fold higher values than the two Sanofi assays.

We used the Access assay to measure concentrations of cTnI in sera from subjects in five groups: (a) 105 apparently healthy people, ages 22–84 years; (b) 44 patients with a typical history of myocardial infarction (MI) of <8 h duration; (c) 8 patients with severe muscular damage [total creatine kinase (CK) values 10 240 to 29 000 U/L] but no apparent cardiac injury; (d) 20 consecutive dialysis patients with no evidence of myocardial injury; and (e) 22 patients with unstable angina (diagnosis based on typical electrocardiogram changes during episodes of chest pain together with coronary arteriography, performed within 72 h of admission). Procedures followed were in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1983.

We found that cTnI concentrations in 99% of the apparently healthy subjects were <=0.03 µg/L and in 88% were <=0.01 µg/L, the detection limit of the assay as defined above and determined with the zero calibrator. The highest value for cTnI in these samples was 0.063 µg/L. To evaluate the diagnostic sensitivity of the Access cTnI in the early phase of MI, we analyzed a single peripheral venous blood sample obtained in our MI patients immediately after admission to the hospital before any revascularization treatment, e.g., thrombolysis (median time after the onset of chest pain, 210 min; range, 30–450 min). For comparison, we also measured myoglobin and CK-MB mass. All three assays were performed on a single Access analyzer at the same time. The cutoff values were as follows: myoglobin, 60 µg/L; CK-MB, 5.0 µg/L; and cTnI, 0.03 µg/L. In this population, the Access cTnI showed the same diagnostic sensitivity (29 positive of 44 MI patients, 66%) as myoglobin (28 of 44, 64%), the classical early cardiac marker, whereas the sensitivity of CK-MB mass determination was significantly lower (19 of 44, 43%) ({chi}2 = 4.58, P = 0.032).

cTnI values were normal (<0.03 µg/L) in all but one of the patients with skeletal muscle damage or chronic renal failure. One polytraumatized individual had a cTnI concentration of 0.12 µg/L; clinical evaluation, however, revealed no evidence of myocardial injury. In patients with unstable angina, blood samples were collected at admission to the hospital and every 4 h thereafter for 2 days. These patients were separated into two subgroups, based on their cTnI values: those with cTnI <0.03 µg/L (n = 15), and those with cTnI >0.03 µg/L in at least one sample obtained after admission (n = 7) (Table 1 ). In the latter group, the first positive cTnI results were already identified at admission (range 0.04–0.19 µg/L), and the peak values (range 0.04–0.24 µg/L) were obtained no more than 24 h later (mean 7.4 h; range 0–24 h). Although the two groups did not differ with respect to clinical characteristics and quantitative degree of coronary disease at angiography, the type of lesion morphology was significantly different ({chi}2 = 6.36, P = 0.041), with ulcerated lesion or thrombus formation present in all cTnI-positive patients. Regardless of the relatively small number of patients studied, the incidence of MI (defined according to WHO diagnostic criteria) during the following hospitalization was significantly related to the presence of increased serum cTnI at admission. Of the seven patients who were positive for cTnI, two had non-Q-wave MI within 10 days after hospitalization. In contrast, none of the 15 patients who were negative for cTnI had an in-hospital MI ({chi}2 = 4.71, P = 0.03). In light of these results, we propose the implementation of cTnI determination in patients with suspected unstable angina so as to identify early the subjects at greater risk of cardiac events. A few samples, i.e., two or three, collected in the first 12–24 h after admission, are probably enough to obtain this information.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Clinical and angiographic data for 22 patients with unstable angina, according to relation to Access cTnI cutoff value.


Acknowledgments

We thank Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur for loan of Access apparatus and gifts of Access cTnI, myoglobin, and CK-MB reagents. To ensure against a potential conflict of interest, Sanofi was in no way involved in the collection of data, its analysis, or interpretation.


References

  1. Larue C, Defacque-Lacquement H, Calzolari C, Le Nguyen D, Pau B. New monoclonal antibodies as probes for human cardiac troponin I: epitopic analysis with synthetic peptides. Mol Immunol 1992;29:271-278. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Larue C, Calzolari C, Bertinchant JP, Leclercq F, Grolleau R, Pau B. Cardiac-specific immunoenzymometric assay of troponin I in the early phase of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1993;39:972-979. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Panteghini M, Bonora R, Pagani F. Automated immunoassay of cardiac troponin I in serum evaluated [Letter]. Clin Chem 1997;43:195-196. [Free Full Text]
  4. Myler RK, Shaw RE, Stertzer SH, Hecht HS, Ryan C, Rosenblum J, et al. Lesion morphology and coronary angioplasty: current experience and analysis [Review]. J Am Coll Cardiol 1992;19:1641-1652. [Abstract]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
ChestHome page
J.-P. Quenot, G. Le Teuff, C. Quantin, J.-M. Doise, M. Abrahamowicz, D. Masson, and B. Blettery
Myocardial Injury in Critically Ill Patients: Relation to Increased Cardiac Troponin I and Hospital Mortality
Chest, October 1, 2005; 128(4): 2758 - 2764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
I. Giuliani, J.-P. Bertinchant, C. Granier, M. Laprade, S. Chocron, G. Toubin, J.-P. Etievent, C. Larue, and S. Trinquier
Determination of Cardiac Troponin I Forms in the Blood of Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction and Patients Receiving Crystalloid or Cold Blood Cardioplegia
Clin. Chem., February 1, 1999; 45(2): 213 - 222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. H. B. Wu, Y.-J. Feng, R. Moore, F. S. Apple, P. H. McPherson, K. F. Buechler, G. Bodor, f. t. A. A. for, and C. C. S. o. c. Standardization
Characterization of cardiac troponin subunit release into serum after acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays for troponin T and I
Clin. Chem., June 1, 1998; 44(6): 1198 - 1208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (17)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Panteghini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuccia, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Panteghini, M.
Right arrow Articles by Cuccia, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS