|
|
||||||||
Drug Monitoring and Toxicology |
1
Newborn Screening Quality Assurance Program, National Center for Environmental Health, and
2
National Center for HIV, Sexually Transmitted Diseases, and Tuberculosis Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, F-19, 4770 Buford Hwy., NE, Atlanta, GA 30341-3724. Fax 770-488-4255; e-mail (SMTP) jvm0{at}.cdc.gov.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
We modified a commercially available RIA kit for zidovudine in serum (8)(9) to quantitatively measure zidovudine in DBSs and DBS eluates. Calibration and quality-control (QC) DBS materials were prepared from whole blood containing known concentrations of zidovudine, which allowed us to accurately measure zidovudine concentrations in known and unknown DBSs. The zidovudine concentration of our calibration materials was confirmed by mass spectrometry. We also used the assay to measure zidovudine in the eluate that remained after testing DBSs for HIV antibodies. The residual eluate represented a diluted specimen that contained a much lower concentration than the original DBS.
Zidovudine has been shown to reduce the perinatal transmission of HIV (10). In 1994, the US Public Health Service issued recommendations that zidovudine be administered to HIV-infected pregnant women throughout their pregnancy and during labor, and to newborns during the first 6 weeks of life (11). We developed this method of measuring zidovudine in DBSs that had been tested anonymously for maternally acquired HIV antibodies in the the national HIV Seroprevalence Survey Among Childbearing Women (12) as a means of evaluating the public health impact of the recommendations. These specimens were collected from infants 2448 h of age as part of routine screening for metabolic and genetic disorders. Because the half-life of zidovudine in newborns is 10 times greater than that of zidovudine in mothers (13)(14), we theorized that enough zidovudine should be available for measurement in DBSs and their eluates. To test these specimens, we developed an assay based on DBS calibrators and QC materials.
We report the outcome of adapting a serum RIA for use in analyzing DBSs and DBS eluates and discuss the potential application of this method to investigate zidovudine therapy among HIV-infected pregnant mothers and their newborns to reduce perinatal HIV transmission.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To adapt the serum assay for DBSs, we initially punched a zidovudine-negative DBS (1/4" punch) into each of six zidovudine liquid kit calibrators and allowed the DBSs to elute into the liquid calibrators overnight at room temperature. Calibration curves were prepared for both the liquid calibrators and for the liquid calibrators that contained a DBS punch; results from unknown specimens were determined against these curves.
We also prepared zidovudine-supplemented DBS calibrators to correct for the DBS matrix. We added zidovudine (Sigma) into fresh, adult whole blood containing EDTA with the hematocrit adjusted to 50%. We prepared seven blood pools with an aqueous stock solution to give a calibration range of 0.06 to 70 ng of zidovudine per 1/4" DBS punch (which was the equivalent of 11 to 13 000 µg/L serum). Each pool was spotted onto filter paper cards (Scheicher & Schuell grade 903, lot W-901) and air-dried overnight at room temperature. DBS QC materials were also prepared from zidovudine-supplemented whole-blood pools (QC pools 1, 2, and 3) and from adult donors receiving zidovudine therapy. The assay was conducted by the overnight elution (room temperature) of DBS calibrators and controls, in duplicate, in 300 µL of kit diluent. Two hundred microliters per specimen were transferred to another tube, and I-labeled zidovudine tracer and rabbit anti-zidovudine antibody were added. After a 2-h incubation, goat anti-rabbit precipitating complex was added. After a 30-min incubation, bound and unbound tracer were separated by centrifugation and decanting of the supernatant. Precipitates were counted in a gamma counter (ICN Biomedicals), and a doseresponse curve was calculated for the zidovudine DBS calibrators.
stability of zidovudine in dbss
Zidovudine-supplemented DBSs were placed in zip-closure bags
(Bitran®, Com-Pac International) at 4 °C, ambient
temperature, and 45 °C in the presence and absence of desiccant
(Minipax®, Multiform Desiccants). The desiccant-containing
bags were maintained at a humidity <40%. A duplicate set of specimens
was kept at -20 °C as a control. Specimens were removed from each
temperature at daily intervals for 1 week and at monthly intervals for
3 months. After removal, they were stored at -20 °C until analysis.
determination of limit of detection and assay cutoff
The limit of detection for the DBS zidovudine assay was determined
by using linear regression to plot the standard deviations for a range
of zidovudine concentrations vs response (15). Our
limit of detection was determined to be 3 times the
y-intercept, or 24 µg/L serum (16).
To evaluate the US Public Health Service recommendations for the use of zidovudine to reduce perinatal transmission of HIV, we tested the residual eluate remaining after HIV antibody testing of newborn DBSs. We did not have access to the original DBSs collected for newborn screening for metabolic disorders. Because the specimens to be tested consisted of previously diluted DBS eluates, an assay cutoff value for the screening of these eluates for zidovudine was calculated by analyzing 175 eluates that were negative for HIV antibodies. Eluates were retrieved from storage at -20 °C and thawed at room temperature. Volumes of eluates varied considerably, but most specimens had at least 40 µL available for assay. This volume was added to 460 µL of kit diluent, and then 200 µL of the diluted specimens were assayed, in duplicate, as described above. The response data, calculated as the ratio of bound counts per minute to the counts per minute of a zero DBS calibrator, were converted to [log(response)]. The mean [log(response)] of the HIV antibody-negative specimens was 0.022, and the 99% confidence limits were -0.005 and 0.049. The response data convert to zidovudine concentrations of nondetectable for the lower 99% confidence limit, and 24 µg/L serum for the upper limit. We chose the upper [log(response)] confidence limit of 0.049 as the assay cutoff value and used it as a corroborating indicator for the zidovudine-positive status of subsequently tested specimens along with the assay limit of detection.
matched dbs and plasma specimens
To evaluate the capacity of the RIA to detect zidovudine in
patient DBSs, we used whole blood containing EDTA that had been
collected from 38 adult patients receiving zidovudine therapy. Sex,
age, weight, height, dose, time of last dose, and time of blood
collection were noted for each patient. We dispensed 110 µL of whole
blood from each patient onto filter paper cards and let the blood dry
overnight. Plasma from each specimen was collected by centrifugation
(3000g, 20 min), followed by incubation of the plasma
specimens at 56 °C for 30 min to inactivate HIV. Aliquots (1.5 mL)
from each specimen were removed, and the remaining plasma was stored at
-20 °C for later use. Matched DBS and plasma specimens were
analyzed by making a 1:21 dilution of the plasma specimens and assaying
200 µL of the diluted specimen according to the manufacturer's
protocol, and by punching 1/4" DBS disks, in duplicate, into
test tubes and following the procedure for DBSs as previously outlined.
determination of zidovudine from hiv-positive and hiv-negative dbs
eluates
HIV antibody-positive residual DBS eluates collected from a state
participating in the HIV Seroprevalence Survey Among Childbearing Women
were retrieved from storage (-20 °C). These eluates had been tested
by EIA (Genetic Systems, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur) and confirmed HIV
antibody-positive by Western blot (Pageblot HIV-1, Genetic Systems).
Several HIV-negative DBS eluates from the same time period were
randomly selected and blindly inserted into the specimen set for
testing. In addition, DBS QC materials with high and low zidovudine
concentrations were eluted according to Genetic Systems' protocol,
placed in identical containers, and labeled in a manner similar to that
of the actual eluates, and then these eluates were blindly inserted, at
a separate laboratory site, into the specimen set to make up 10% of
the total specimens. DBS eluates were assayed by the modified
zidovudine RIA as described.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
|
The zidovudine DBS RIA working calibration range was 0.06 to 70 ng per 1/4" punch (6 µL of serum, which is equivalent to 1113 000 µg/L serum), whereas the serum kit working range was 0.25274 µg/L (3). For comparison, an EIA for serum had a detection range of 33.3 to 1038 µg/L, and a time-resolved fluoroimmunoassay for serum had a detection range of 1.34 to 1038 µg/L zidovudine (1).
Stability of zidovudine in DBSs.
Zidovudine was found to
be stable in the dried-blood matrix when DBSs were stored with
desiccant at either 4 or -20 °C over the 3-month study period. At
ambient temperature with desiccant, 90% of zidovudine could be
recovered at the end of the study period, whereas 85% was recovered in
the absence of desiccant. At 45 °C, 75% of zidovudine was recovered
at the end of the study period (data not shown). The presence of
desiccant did not increase the amount of zidovudine recovered after
storage at an increased temperature (45 °C).
Analysis of matched DBS and plasma patient pairs.
We
examined the feasibility and accuracy of measuring zidovudine from DBSs
by comparing measurements made on matched plasma and DBSs from adults
on zidovudine therapy. Zidovudine concentrations were calculated
against both a liquid calibration curve for plasma measurements and a
DBS calibration curve used for the DBSs. Fig. 1
shows a bias plot, where the zidovudine concentration of plasma
specimens was subtracted from the matched DBSs. Whenever a plasma
specimen tested positive for zidovudine, its corresponding DBS also
tested positive, and whenever a plasma specimen was negative for
zidovudine, its matched DBS was also negative. Twenty four of 38
specimens had no detectable zidovudine concentrations. When corrected
for dilution factors, DBS concentrations were lower than the
corresponding plasma concentrations, as indicated by the negative bias
compared with the plasma zidovudine concentrations.
|
Assay cutoff value and limit of detection.
Zidovudine
was measured from eluates remaining after HIV antibody testing for the
HIV Seroprevalence Survey Among Childbearing Women. Because our samples
consisted of eluates from previously diluted and tested specimens, an
assay cutoff value for screening eluates for zidovudine was determined
from 175 HIV-negative samples. The 99% upper confidence limit was used
as the screening cutoff to estimate whether zidovudine was present in
the eluates. Samples that fell above the screening cutoff value also
had zidovudine concentrations greater than or equal to the assay limit
of detection. The cutoff value provided a means of confirming the
zidovudine status of eluates based on the limit of detection. Fig. 2
shows a population distribution of [log(response)] of
HIV-positive and HIV-negative eluates and how they sorted with respect
to the screening cutoff concentration.
|
Analysis of DBS eluates.
Once we established the ability
of the zidovudine RIA to determine zidovudine in DBSs, we examined the
feasibility of using DBS eluates from the HIV Seroprevalence Survey
Among Childbearing Women to measure zidovudine. We conducted several
experiments to determine assay variables. Zidovudine-supplemented DBSs
were treated with reagents from Genetic Systems and eluted according to
the manufacturers' protocol for EIA HIV antibody screening. The
projected amount of eluate remaining should have been approximately 80
µL after initial and repeat EIA testing and Western blot analysis.
Because we were concerned that we would not be able to detect the
presence of zidovudine from such a limited sample, we initially
investigated whether we could determine total zidovudine from matched
patient DBS and plasma specimens by converting the zidovudine
glucuronide metabolite (G-zidovudine) back to zidovudine with
glucuronidase (8). We developed QC DBS materials
supplemented with both zidovudine and G-zidovudine to quantitatively
measure total zidovudine recovery after enzymatic treatment of samples.
We successfully recovered total zidovudine from our QC materials and
saw an increase in zidovudine from patient DBS samples treated with
glucuronidase; however, the procedure was time consuming and added much
complexity to the assay. We decided that measuring free zidovudine from
eluates was sufficient to screen for the drug without adding to the
complexity of the assay scheme and sacrificing limited sample material.
Nonetheless, the assay may not be sufficiently sensitive to give
zidovudine concentrations above the cutoff for those samples where the
ratio of metabolite to parent drug is high.
Because most of the residual eluates available for testing contained at least 50 µL in volume, we chose 40 µL as our routine sample volume and added 460 µL of the zidovudine kit diluent, giving a further 1:12.5 dilution of an already diluted DBS sample (total dilution of 250x for the original whole-blood sample). Although the small volume available did not allow us to test each sample more than once, diluting the samples did allow us to assay aliquots in duplicate by using 200 µL of the diluted sample per tube. The recovery of zidovudine from the zidovudine-supplemented DBS eluates matched the expected concentrations, indicating that small volumes of samples eluted for HIV antibody testing can be used in tests to screen for zidovudine. Samples containing slightly less than 40 µL of eluate were also screened and identified with a unique code for entry in the database for statistical analysis.
Determination of zidovudine from HIV-positive and
HIV-negative DBS eluates.
A group of 180 HIV antibody-positive and
49 HIV antibody-negative eluate samples were screened for zidovudine.
These samples were collected from infants born between October and
December 1994, following the release of the US Public Health Service
recommendations for zidovudine therapy, and were tested anonymously for
the HIV Seroprevalence Survey Among Childbearing Women. No information
was available to confirm that the mother or infant had undergone
zidovudine therapy. Of the 180 HIV antibody-positive samples tested,
51% tested positive for zidovudine, and no HIV antibody-negative
samples tested positive for zidovudine. Included in the analysis of
these samples were blind-coded QC materials, up to 10% of the total
number of specimens in the sample set. The zidovudine DBS screening
assay correctly identified all blinded QC materials. A subsequent set
of randomly selected HIV antibody-positive and -negative specimens
collected from the same geographical area between January and March
1995 showed a similar percentage of HIV antibody-positive samples
testing positive for zidovudine. However, after decoding specimens,
there were two zidovudine-positive specimens among the HIV
antibody-negative specimens (17). In addition, a set of
200 HIV antibody-positive and 100 HIV antibody-negative specimens
collected between September 1993 and March 1994, before the US Public
Health Service recommendations were issued, were tested for zidovudine
and only 1% of the HIV antibody-positive samples tested positive
for zidovudine.
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The zidovudine RIA was successfully used to quantitatively determine zidovudine from DBSs and to screen for zidovudine in HIV antibody-positive and HIV antibody-negative DBS eluates with minimal volumes. Because we only had access to stored eluates and not the original DBSs, this application of the DBS RIA for zidovudine should be considered a screening assay. In some cases, the eluates were in storage (at -20 °C) 1 year or more before testing. However, zidovudine was shown to be stable in the DBS matrix when stored at -20 °C, and it has proven to be stable in DBS eluates that had been in long-term storage at -20 °C, as demonstrated by the stability of QC materials over the course of assay development and implementation.
Our study has shown that zidovudine could be measured in residual eluates saved from the HIV Seroprevalence Survey Among Childbearing Women or in DBSs collected from newborns and adults. This methodology is being applied to larger epidemiological studies of high-risk HIV populations (17). The zidovudine DBS assay could provide an important analytical tool for the assessment of zidovudine therapy among HIV-positive pregnant women and their newborns. In addition, this information could be useful to state and local public health professionals, who need population-based data concerning the prevalence of zidovudine therapy among HIV-positive pregnant women to target resources in a more cost-beneficial manner and to adjust HIV counseling and testing protocols. This assay is also being applied to studies investigating the association between zidovudine therapy and the reduction of viral load in women and newborns as assessed by reverse-transcriptase PCR.
In this study, we used residual specimens routinely collected from newborns that had been screened for inborn errors of metabolism and tested anonymously for HIV antibodies. DBSs are ideal collection devices (18) for the clinical monitoring of zidovudine therapy among newborns or adults with consent. The zidovudine RIA has sufficient sensitivity to assay very small blood volumes. Evaluating DBSs by RIA thus provides a means of monitoring drug therapy and dosing. DBSs can also be transported easily and inexpensively, allowing for remote collection of samples followed by zidovudine testing elsewhere. We plan to measure zidovudine in blood collected from HIV-positive pregnant women and newborns enrolled in several international clinical trials for the prevention of perinatal HIV transmission, and to assist ongoing epidemiologic studies designed to quantitatively assess zidovudine treatment protocols for diverse populations.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
J. Sia, S. Paul, R. M. Martin, and H. Cross HIV Infection and Zidovudine Use in Childbearing Women Pediatrics, December 1, 2004; 114(6): e707 - e712. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. V. Mei, J. R. Alexander, B. W. Adam, and W. H. Hannon Use of Filter Paper for the Collection and Analysis of Human Whole Blood Specimens J. Nutr., May 1, 2001; 131(5): 1631S - 1636. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |