|
|
||||||||
Enzymes and Protein Markers |
1
Novadex, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
2
University of CaliforniaSan Diego Medical Center,
Division of Rheumatology, San Diego, CA 92103.
3
University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department
of Internal Medicine, Omaha, NE 68198.
4
Metra Biosystems, Inc., 265 N. Whisman Rd.,
Mountain View, CA 94043.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 650-903-9500; e-mail jvisor{at}metrabio.com.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Chondrex mRNA is expressed strongly in chondrocytes and liver; weakly in brain, kidney, and placenta; and at undetectable amounts in heart, lung, skeletal muscle, pancreas, mononuclear cells, and skin fibroblasts (4). In addition, chondrex mRNA is undetectable in normal human cartilage but is prominent in cartilage of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA)1 (4). The amino acid sequence of chondrex shows some homology to the bacterial chitinase protein family, although chitinase activity has not been demonstrated (3)(4). Some postulate that chondrex functions as a glycosidic bond hydrolase involved in the tissue-remodeling process (3)(4)(6).
Based on this information, a RIA was developed and used to measure chondrex concentrations in serum and synovial fluid of patients with various forms of joint disease and in serum of presumably healthy adults (3)(6). The RIA data showed that chondrex concentrations are ~2.5-fold greater in the serum of patients with inflammatory or degenerative joint disease than in healthy adults. Moreover, chondrex concentrations in synovial fluid were 1015-fold higher than in serum. Serum and synovial fluid chondrex concentrations were highly correlated in patients with joint disease, suggesting that in patients with joint disease, most of the chondrex found in serum may be produced in the joint. These data suggest that chondrex may be a useful new marker for joint disease.
We describe here the development of the Chondrex(TM) enzyme immunoassay for quantifying chondrex in human serum. In the present study we report the analytical performance characteristics of the assay and describe preliminary clinical results. Having established a representative reference interval for serum chondrex in healthy adults, we compare this with the chondrex serum concentrations in individuals with active and inactive RA, osteoarthritis (OA), and diabetes. In addition, serum chondrex concentrations are compared with clinical response variables in RA patients on disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Chondrex (YKL-40). Chondrex (YKL-40) was obtained from the supernatants of MG-63 cells (from the laboratory of Paul Price, University of CaliforniaSan Diego) cultured by a modified version of the procedure of Johansen et al. (3). MG-63 production flasks were seeded at 1.8 x 10 to 2.7 x 10 cells/cm in RPMI-1640 (Irvine Scientific) plus newborn calf serum, 100 mL/L (Irvine Scientific), 0.1 mol/L HEPES, and 50 mg/L vitamin C (complete medium). Flasks were incubated at 37 °C with humidity and CO2-enriched (100 mL/L) atmosphere for 68 days, replacing spent medium with fresh every 23 days. The cultures were then switched to serum-free medium (complete medium minus the newborn calf serum). The supernatants were harvested and the media replaced every 13 days for 30 days. Chondrex was purified from the supernatants by concentrating glass-fiber-filtered material 20-fold with a 30-kDa screen channel cassette with tangential flow (Filtron) and then affinity-purifying over a heparin-Sepharose CL-6B column (Pharmacia Biotech) equilibrated with a solution of 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate and 50 mmol/L sodium chloride, pH 7.5. Bound material was eluted with a sodium chloride gradient (from 50 mmol/L to 2 mol/L) in 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, and 4-mL fractions were collected and pooled according to: absorbance at 280 nm, chondrex concentration by immunoassay, and purity by sodium dodecyl sulfatepolyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Monoclonal antibody 116 was purified from hybridomas grown in HB Pro serum-free media (Irvine Scientific). Terminal culture supernatants were harvested by centrifugation when cell viability fell to <1020%. Supernatants were purified over fast-flow Protein ASepharose (Pharmacia) after 0.2-µm (pore size) filtration and addition of saturated sodium borate and sodium chloride to final concentrations of 100 g/L and 3 mol/L, respectively. Bound antibody was eluted with 0.1 mol/L glycine, pH 3.0, and fractions were neutralized by the addition of 10% (by vol) 1.2 mol/L Tris, pH 8.5. Antibody-containing fractions were pooled and dialyzed into 10 mmol/L phosphate, 150 mmol/L sodium chloride, pH 7.2.
BiotinFab conjugate.
Monoclonal antibodies were
digested into Fab fragments by incubation with immobilized papain
(Pierce Chemical Co.) in accordance with the manufacturer's
instructions. The Fab fragments were purified over fast-flow Protein
ASepharose with use of 10% saturated sodium borate and 3 mol/L
sodium chloride. Purified Fab in the unbound material was concentrated
and dialyzed into 50 mmol/L sodium carbonate, pH 8.5. Biotinylation was
performed with a 15-fold molar excess of
D-biotinyl-
-aminocaproic acid
N-hydroxysuccinimide ester (Boehringer Mannheim) in
accordance with the manufacturer's instructions.
Polyclonal antibody.
New Zealand White rabbits were
immunized every 3 weeks for 90 days with 50 µg of heparin-purified
chondrex. The primary immunization was with chondrex in complete
Freund's adjuvant, the first boost was in incomplete Freund's
adjuvant, and all subsequent boosts were in 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate,
150 mmol/L sodium chloride, pH 7.2. Rabbits were bled 10 days after
immunization. Antisera was purified by Protein ASepharose (Pierce)
chromatography. Bound antibody was eluted with 0.1 mol/L glycine, pH
3.0, and neutralized by addition of 10% (by vol) 1.2 mol/L Tris, pH
8.5. Antibody-containing fractions were pooled and dialyzed into 50
mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.5.
| Alkaline phosphatase-labeled antibody. Purified polyclonal antibody was conjugated to alkaline phosphatase by cross-linking with sulfo-succinimidyl 4-(N-maleimidomethyl)-cyclohexane-1-carboxylate (sulfo-SMCC) and N-succinimidyl-3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionate (SPDP). The antibody was incubated with a 10 mol/L excess of sulfo-SMCC diluted in 50 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, for 60 min at 24 °C with inversion. Purification was through G-25 SF resin (Pharmacia) equilibrated with 100 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 6.0. In parallel, alkaline phosphatase (Biozyme Labs) that had been dialyzed into 50 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 7.5, was incubated with a 10 mol/L excess of SPDP (Pierce) in acetonitrile for 30 min at 24 °C with inversion and then purified over a G-25 column (1.6 x 29 cm) equilibrated with 100 mmol/L sodium phosphate, pH 6.0. The SPDP-labeled alkaline phosphatase was reduced with dithiothreitol (Pierce) for 30 min and purified over G-25 once more. The derivatized antibody and alkaline phosphatase (3 mol of alkaline phosphatase per mole of antibody) were mixed together and incubated for 60 min at 24 °C with inversion. The reaction was quenched with 0.1 mol/L N-ethylmaleimide in acetonitrile to a final concentration of 2 mmol/L, and the mixture was purified through Superdex 200 (Pharmacia) size-exclusion gel (1.6 x 80 cm) equilibrated with 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate, 150 mmol/L sodium chloride, pH 7.0. Fractions were pooled on the basis of: absorbance at 280 nm, alkaline phosphatase activity, and signal-to-noise ratio. |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Calibrators.
Calibrators were prepared by dilution of
heparin-purified chondrex to 0, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 300 µg/L in
calibrator base (10 mmol/L sodium phosphate, 100 g/L bovine serum
albumin, 1 g/L sodium azide, pH 7.0).
Streptavidin plates.
Streptavidin-coated MaxiSorp(TM)
Nunc-Immuno(TM) microtiter plates (from VWR) were prepared by incubating
150 µL (per well) of 10 mg/L streptavidin (Scripps Labs) in 50 mmol/L
sodium phosphate, pH 7.2, for 1624 h at room temperature. The liquid
was then aspirated from the wells, and any remaining binding sites were
blocked by incubation for 2 h at room temperature with 20 mmol/L
Tris, 150 mmol/L sodium chloride, 15 g/L bovine serum albumin, 0.1 mL/L
Tween, 1 g/L sodium azide, pH 7.5. After washing 3 times with wash
buffer (20 mmol/L Tris, 150 mmol/L sodium chloride, 1 mL/L Tween-20, pH
7.5), plates were coated overnight (1624 h) at room temperature with
200 µL/well of 150 g/L sucrose in 10 mmol/L sodium phosphate, 150
mmol/L sodium chloride, pH 7.2. The liquid was aspirated and the plates
were dried overnight with low humidity at 25 °C. The plates were
stored in foil pouches with desiccant at 4 °C until needed.
Other reagents.
Triglyceride solution (Pentex,
Triglyceride Superstrate, no. 96052) was purchased from Bayer.
Hemoglobin was prepared from a lysate of washed erythrocytes. The
hemoglobin concentration was determined spectrophotometrically at 578
nm ([heme, mg/L] = A578
nm/0.0002278). Hydroxychloroquine was obtained from Geneva
Pharmaceuticals.
| assay method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| study subjects |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Healthy subjects. Serum samples were collected from 329 apparently healthy individuals, 226 women and 103 men, mean age 37.1 ± 8.6 years (median 36). The women were ages 2460 years (mean 37.7 ± 8.9 years, median 36) and the men 2160 years (mean 35.6 ± 7.9 years, median 35). All subjects were thought to be free from articular, bone, liver, endocrine, or other chronic disorders. None was currently taking any medication known to modify arthritic disease or influence joint metabolism (e.g., slow-acting or DMARD). |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Joint disease subjects
. Serum samples from individuals
who had been previously diagnosed with active and inactive RA as well
as OA according to American College of Rheumatology criteria were
obtained from consecutive individuals visiting a physician during the
collection interval. Serum was stored at -70 °C until use. The
active RA group consisted of 56 patients, 44 women and 12 men, ages
2095 years (mean 55 ± 18 years, median 56) at various clinical
stages of RA. The inactive RA group consisted of 9 patients, 7 women
and 2 men, ages 2976 years (mean 45 ± 17 years, median 38). The
OA group consisted of 27 patients, 22 women and 5 men, ages 2690
years (mean 65 ± 15 years, median 67).
Joint disease subjects on DMARD therapy
. Serum samples
and corresponding clinical data were obtained from 20 patients who had
received DMARD therapy (methotrexate alone, sulfasalazine and
hydroxychloroquine in combination, or all three drugs) at regular
intervals over at least a year. These patients were part of a larger
study described in O'Dell et al.
(7). Patients were classified by
response, according to a modified version of the American College of
Rheumatology criteria. Responders had
20% improvement in joint count
and
20% improvement in 3 of the 4 remaining variables tested
(patient global assessment, physician global assessment, erythrocyte
sedimentation rate or C-reactive protein, and duration of morning
stiffness). Moderate responders had
20% improvement in joint count
and
20% improvement in 1 or 2 of the remaining 4 variables.
Nonresponders had <20% improvement in joint count. Two patients could
not be classified in any of these categories because of fluctuations in
response criteria; they were excluded from further analysis.
| statistical method |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Precision.
The interassay precision was determined by
triplicate measurements of two serum samples in 27 assays over 11 test
days. For chondrex values of 208 ± 7.7 µg/L and 79 ± 2.2
µg/L (mean ± SD), the interassay CVs were 3.7% and 2.8%,
respectively. The within-run and total CVs (Table 1
) were determined by replicate measurements (n = 12) of
three serum samples over 3 days. For serum samples with mean chondrex
concentrations of 36, 86, and 177 µg/L, the average within-run and
total CVs were 3.6% and 5.4%, respectively.
|
Assay performance.
Three serum samples with various
endogenous chondrex values (A, B, and C) and one serum sample to which
purified chondrex had been added (D) were diluted with the zero
calibrator. There was good agreement between observed and expected
values (Table 2
). The mean ± SD recovery for all samples was 102%
± 5%. Addition of 34 µg/L of chondrex to each of nine serum samples
resulted in an analytical recovery of 98% ± 11%.
|
stability studies
Sample stability.
The freezing and thawing of serum as
many as 6 times did not significantly affect the measured chondrex
concentration in the 5 samples tested. Recovery after 6 freeze/thaw
cycles was 106% ± 6% (mean ± SD) of the initial unfrozen
sample values. Storage of serum samples for 9 days at 4 °C did not
significantly affect the measured chondrex concentration in the 8
samples tested, the average recovery being 107% ± 8%.
interference studies
Possible interference in the determination of chondrex by common
compounds in human serum was investigated by adding 300 mg/L bilirubin,
5 g/L hemoglobin, and 30 g/L triglyceride into low, medium, and high
chondrex serum pools and comparing the recoveries with those for
controls to which only buffer had been added. No significant
interference was seen with the high concentrations of these serum
components, the mean recovery of the 3 serum pools being 100% ± 3%,
100% ± 3%, and 96% ± 2% after addition of bilirubin, hemoglobin,
and triglyceride, respectively. Total serum protein, tested at 7
concentrations between 30 and 120 g/L, did not affect quantification of
chondrex; the mean recovery for the protein concentrations tested was
97% ± 4%.
Possible interference in the determination of chondrex by
pharmaceutical reagents commonly prescribed to arthritis patients was
investigated by adding various concentrations of 23 drugs to a serum
pool. Pharmaceutical interference was determined in an iterative
manner, starting at a maximum concentration of 10 g/L unless prohibited
by the solubility of the additive. Interference was defined as a >10%
change in chondrex recovery in comparison with a solvent-dilution
control. The highest concentration of the various drugs that did not
cause interference with chondrex recovery is listed in Table 3
. All concentrations listed are at least 3 times (range,
35000) the expected peak plasma concentration.
|
clinical performance
Chondrex values in healthy adults.
The serum from 329
healthy adults (226 women, 103 men) was tested with the Chondrex assay.
Fig. 2
illustrates the individual concentration of serum chondrex as a
function of age in both men and women. The chondrex values decreased
slightly with age in women (P <0.05), but there was no
significant trend between age and Chondrex values for the men. As shown
in Fig. 3
, the distribution of the values was skewed and nongaussian for
both women and men. The nonparametric reference intervals were 2593
µg/L for women, 24125 µg/L for men, and 2595 µg/L for all
healthy adults combined (indicated by shading in Fig. 4
). The median chondrex value for the 103 men was 45.6 µg/L
(mean, 55.4 ± 35.0) and for the 226 women was 41.15 µg/L (mean,
48.6 ± 24.2), but the differences were not statistically
significant (P = 0.207). The median chondrex
concentration for all healthy adults combined was 42.9 µg/L
(mean ± SD, 50.7 ± 28.2 µg/L) (Table 4
).
|
|
|
|
Comparisons between groups.
Sera from individuals with
active joint disease (RA and OA) and from individuals with inactive RA
or nonjoint autoimmune disease (diabetes) were tested with the Chondrex
assay. The data are summarized in Table 4
and the individual values are
plotted in Fig. 4
. The reference interval for healthy adults is
represented by shading (Fig. 4
). Chondrex values for patients with
active RA were significantly higher than in healthy adults, patients
with inactive RA, and patients with diabetes (P <0.0001).
Chondrex values for patients with OA were also significantly greater
than in healthy adults (P <0.0001), inactive RA
(P = 0.018), and diabetes patients (P =
0.019). No differences were observed between healthy adults and
subjects with inactive RA (P = 0.932) or between active
RA and OA subjects (P = 0.487).
ROC curves were constructed to compare chondrex values obtained in
active RA and OA subjects with those of healthy adults, and to compare
values in active and inactive RA subjects (Fig. 5
). The area under the ROC curve for active RA patients vs
healthy adults was 0.864 (SE 0.030) and that for OA patients vs healthy
adults was 0.754 (SE 0.068). The ROC curve for active RA vs inactive RA
patients yielded an area under the curve of 0.857 (SE 0.065). A cutoff
of 86 µg/L for active RA was chosen by determining the closest point
to the upper left corner of the ROC curve. At this cutoff, the Chondrex
assay demonstrates a clinical sensitivity of 69.6% (95% confidence
interval 57.979.6) and a specificity of 91.5% (95% confidence
interval 88.593.9) for active RA compared with healthy adults.
|
RA patients treated with DMARD therapy.
Chondrex values
were obtained on baseline and follow-up samples from 18 RA patients
participating in a clinical trial of the effects of methotrexate alone,
sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine in combination, or all three
drugs. The mean of the chondrex values at baseline, 144.5 ± 85.1
µg/L, was significantly greater than in healthy adults (P
<0.0001). As can be seen in Fig. 6
, chondrex values for patients in the responder group decreased
to within the reference interval, except for three patients whose
chondrex values at baseline exceeded 3 times the mean for healthy
adults. All of these exhibited decreased chondrex values at the first
time point, and values in 2 patients decreased steadily while on
treatment. The mean chondrex value for all responders at the first time
point was -21% from baseline, and baseline values were negatively
correlated with the degree of change (r = 0.67,
P = 0.03). The moderate responder group had a decrease
of 13% from baseline in chondrex values at the first time point.
Chondrex values in the nonresponder group increased 13% at the first
time point, and all of these patients had values exceeding the
reference interval at completion of the study.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The Chondrex assay has good within-run and between-run precision, good linearity upon dilution of samples, and good analytical recovery. Chondrex concentrations in serum samples are stable at 4 °C for as long as 9 days and as many as 6 freeze/thaw cycles. The measurement of chondrex in serum is not affected by abnormally high concentrations of common serum components such as bilirubin, hemoglobin, triglycerides, and total protein. In addition, pharmaceutical compounds commonly prescribed for the treatment of arthritis did not affect assay performance when added to serum.
We have established reference intervals for a large group of healthy women and men. Because of the lack of availability of radiographs of the study subjects and the prevalence of undiagnosed but radiographically confirmed evidence of OA in the elderly (10), the maximum age in the reference group was restricted to 60 years. Chondrex values in women and men were not statistically different, so the data were combined for analyses. This is consistent with a study by Johansen et al. (6), which found no significant difference in serum chondrex concentration between men and women. In our population of healthy women, chondrex decreased slightly with age, but there was no significant trend between age and chondrex values for the men. Johansen et al. (6) reported no difference in serum concentrations of chondrex between age groups in children and adults younger than 70 years.
Chondrex values in healthy adults were compared with those in individuals with joint disease. Mean chondrex values in patients with active RA were significantly greater than the mean concentrations seen in both healthy adults and patients with inactive RA. These results are consistent with two studies by Johansen et al. (3)(11) and suggest that chondrex may be useful in assessing disease activity in RA patients. ROC analysis indicates very good diagnostic accuracy of the assay for active RA and may facilitate the use of chondrex as an adjunct in the diagnosis of inflammatory disease.
Chondrex values were also significantly higher in OA patients than in healthy adults, and ROC analysis indicates the diagnostic accuracy is good. However, chondrex values in OA patients were not significantly different from patients with active RA. Similar findings have been reported by Johansen et al. (3)(11). This suggests that this marker is not likely to support a differential diagnosis between RA and OA.
It is not entirely unexpected that the concentration of chondrex is increased in both RA and OA patients, given the resulting manifestation of accelerated cartilage degradation and joint damage in both diseases. Hakala et al. (4) reported detecting chondrex mRNA in preparations from cartilage of RA patients but not in preparations from normal articular cartilage. Also, mRNA was detected from surgical specimens of inflamed synovia as well as cartilage specimens from OA patients. The expression of chondrex in diseased joints may be a response to an altered tissue environment. The rapid induction of chondrex production in normal human cartilage after introduction to cell culture conditions (4) supports a function for chondrex in the cartilage-remodeling process. One postulate is that chondrex functions as a glycosidic bond hydrolase involved in tissue remodeling (3)(4)(6)a postulate supported by amino acid sequence homology of chondrex to the bacterial chitinase protein family (3)(4)(6). Because chitin itself is not found in vertebrates, however, and because chitinase activity of chondrex could not be demonstrated, Johansen et al. (3) speculate that divergent evolution of an ancestral chitinase altered the specificity of the vertebrate enzyme so that it now cleaves a different glycosidic linkage in a yet-unidentified macromolecule found in articular cartilage.
It has also been postulated that chondrex is an autoantigen target of the immune response in RA, in light of the presence of sequences that bind to the DR4 peptide-binding motif and elicit mononuclear cell proliferation (12). Corollary studies in OA patients are not available but, when performed, will perhaps help to clarify immune response differences and the subsequent disease courses of OA and RA.
In patients treated with DMARD therapy, decreasing chondrex values reflected the clinical improvement observed in responders, whereas Chondrex values were maintained or increased in nonresponders. Responders with the highest baseline chondrex values failed to normalize, though all showed a large decrease at the first timepoint examined after the start of treatment. These responses are consistent with those seen in studies of the effects of corticosteroid injections in patients with knee RA (13) and in RA patients treated with methotrexate, sulfasalazine, or penicillamine (14). The largest decreases in chondrex values were observed in the responders with the highest baseline values. The assay may be useful in determining which patients are most likely to benefit from therapy. Whether it can aid in the selection of therapy needs to be addressed in larger studies.
Clinical response in the present study was defined on the basis of improvement in markers of inflammation (joint count, laboratory indicators reflecting systemic inflammation, and so forth). However, chondrex values remained increased in some of the responders in spite of this improvement. As seen here and in previous studies, chondrex values are increased in patients with both degenerative and inflammatory joint disease. These findings suggest that chondrex may reflect aspects of joint destruction in addition to inflammation. Longitudinal studies with measures of articular cartilage and periarticular bone destruction will be required to define the prognostic capabilities of this marker.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
H. F. Bigg, R. Wait, A. D. Rowan, and T. E. Cawston The Mammalian Chitinase-like Lectin, YKL-40, Binds Specifically to Type I Collagen and Modulates the Rate of Type I Collagen Fibril Formation J. Biol. Chem., July 28, 2006; 281(30): 21082 - 21095. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Sharif, R. Granell, J. Johansen, S. Clarke, C. Elson, and J. R. Kirwan Serum cartilage oligomeric matrix protein and other biomarker profiles in tibiofemoral and patellofemoral osteoarthritis of the knee Rheumatology, May 1, 2006; 45(5): 522 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. Schmidt, J. S. Johansen, P. Sjoegren, I. J. Christensen, B. S. Sorensen, K. Fode, J. Larsen, and H. von der Maase Serum YKL-40 Predicts Relapse-Free and Overall Survival in Patients With American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage I and II Melanoma J. Clin. Oncol., February 10, 2006; 24(5): 798 - 804. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Johansen, B. V. Jensen, A. Roslind, D. Nielsen, and P. A. Price Serum YKL-40, A New Prognostic Biomarker in Cancer Patients? Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., February 1, 2006; 15(2): 194 - 202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
O. J. Bergmann, J. S. Johansen, T. W. Klausen, A. K. Mylin, J. S. Kristensen, E. Kjeldsen, and H. E. Johnsen High Serum Concentration of YKL-40 Is Associated with Short Survival in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia Clin. Cancer Res., December 15, 2005; 11(24): 8644 - 8652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Bernardi, M. Podswiadek, M. Zaninotto, L. Punzi, and M. Plebani YKL-40 as a Marker of Joint Involvement in Inflammatory Bowel Disease Clin. Chem., October 1, 2003; 49(10): 1685 - 1688. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. C. Tsark, W. Wang, Y.-C. Teng, D. Arkfeld, G. R. Dodge, and S. Kovats Differential MHC Class II-Mediated Presentation of Rheumatoid Arthritis Autoantigens by Human Dendritic Cells and Macrophages J. Immunol., December 1, 2002; 169(11): 6625 - 6633. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Ostergaard, J. S. Johansen, T. Benfield, P. A. Price, and J. D. Lundgren YKL-40 Is Elevated in Cerebrospinal Fluid from Patients with Purulent Meningitis Clin. Vaccine Immunol., May 1, 2002; 9(3): 598 - 604. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. C. Register, C. S. Carlson, and M. R. Adams Serum YKL-40 Is Associated with Osteoarthritis and Atherosclerosis in Nonhuman Primates Clin. Chem., December 1, 2001; 47(12): 2159 - 2161. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S A YOUNG-MIN, T E CAWSTON, and I D GRIFFITHS Markers of joint destruction: principles, problems, and potential Ann Rheum Dis, June 1, 2001; 60(6): 545a - 548. [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
E. Gineyts, P. Garnero, and P. D. Delmas Urinary excretion of glucosyl-galactosyl pyridinoline: a specific biochemical marker of synovium degradation Rheumatology, March 1, 2001; 40(3): 315 - 323. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Sekine, K Masuko-Hongo, T Matsui, H Asahara, M Takigawa, K Nishioka, and T Kato Recognition of YKL-39, a human cartilage related protein, as a target antigen in patients with rheumatoid arthritis Ann Rheum Dis, January 1, 2001; 60(1): 49 - 54. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K. Vos, A. M. M. Miltenburg, K. E. van Meijgaarden, M. van den Heuvel, D. G. Elferink, P. J. M. van Galen, R. A. van Hogezand, E. van Vliet-Daskalopoulou, T. H. M. Ottenhoff, F. C. Breedveld, et al. Cellular immune response to human cartilage glycoprotein-39 (HC gp-39)-derived peptides in rheumatoid arthritis and other inflammatory conditions Rheumatology, December 1, 2000; 39(12): 1326 - 1331. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Conrozier, M-C Carlier, P Mathieu, F Colson, A L Debard, S Richard, H Favret, J Bienvenu, and E Vignon Serum levels of YKL-40 and C reactive protein in patients with hip osteoarthritis and healthy subjects: a cross sectional study Ann Rheum Dis, October 1, 2000; 59(10): 828 - 831. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
![]() |
K Vos, P Steenbakke |