Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 44: 677-679, 1998;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berteau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loric, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berteau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loric, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Laboratory Management
(Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44:677-679.)
© 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Influence of Blood Storage and Sample Processing on Molecular Detection of Circulating Prostate Cells in Cancer

Pierre Berteau1, Frédéric Dumas1, Jean-Luc Gala2, Pascal Eschwège3, Bernard Lacour1, Marianne Philippe2, and Sylvain Loric1,a

1 INSERM U90 and Clin. Biochem. Lab., CHU Necker, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France;
2 Mol. Chem. Lab., Saint-Luc Clin. Univ., Clos Chapelle aux Champs 30, Bruxelles, Belgium;
3 Urol. Unit and Exp. Surg. Lab., CHU Bicêtre, 78 rue du Général Leclerc, 94270 Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France;
a address correspondence to this author, at: Lab. de Biochim. A, Hôpital Necker, 149 rue de Sèvres, 75015 Paris, France

Although not in routine use, molecular techniques appear able to detect small numbers of solid tumor cells in blood, lymph nodes, and bone marrow (for review see 1). Provided that a given mRNA is expressed exclusively in tumor tissue and not by nucleated blood cells, lymph node cells, or bone marrow cells, its presence outside the organ identifies disseminated metastatic cells. In prostate cancer (CaP), early detection of metastases by molecular staging could help in selecting which patients would benefit most from surgical therapy (2).

Several reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) protocols are able to amplify the mRNAs encoding prostate-specific antigen (PSA) or prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) in blood (1), lymph nodes (3), or bone marrow (4). Nevertheless, the results reported have varied so widely (e.g., positive PSA RT-PCR results ranging from 25% (5) to 80% (6) for metastatic CaP patients) that definitive conclusions about the clinical relevance of this new molecular tool have not yet been established. The heterogeneity of both preanalytical and analytical steps of PCR protocols may explain the discrepancies observed between studies. To our knowledge, no systematic studies of the successive steps of the RT-PCR method have yet been performed. To better standardize the assay, we have assessed the effects of the storage conditions of blood samples and delay before processing.

To compare the effect of delayed vs immediate sample processing, we collected 250-mL blood samples in 25 10-mL EDTA-treated tubes (Becton Dickinson) from 4 apparently healthy blood donors. Each sample was then supplemented with 10 metastatic lymph-node-derived prostate carcinoma LNCaP cells (7), and gently mixed. One tube of supplemented sample from each donor was processed immediately after preparation to serve as a positive control; the remaining ones were tested with various storage temperatures and delays. Five were sealed and left at room temperature (19–22 °C) for 3, 6, 9, 12, or 24 h. Eighteen, 9 refrigerated immediately at 4 °C and another 9 mixed first with 2 volumes of NH4Cl (9 g/L) before cooling to 4 °C, were left for 6 or 12 h, or 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, 12, or 15 days at the same temperature. Each blood sample was processed by the same protocol, as follows: Plasma was discarded and the remaining blood cells were diluted in 2 volumes of the NH4Cl solution and shaken overnight at 4 °C. Each sample was then centrifuged at 1000g for 20 min and the supernatant removed. Total RNA was extracted from these cells by the guanidium-thiocyanate/phenol/chloroform extraction technique (8). The RNA pellet obtained after ethanol/sodium acetate precipitation was dried under reduced pressure and dissolved in 50 µL of RNase-free water; the yield of RNA was quantified by spectrophotometric analysis at 260 nm. RNA quality was evaluated by examining the average ratio of UV absorbance at 260 and 280 nm and then checked for purity by agarose gel analysis.

RT-PCR for PSA or PSMA was performed as previously described (9), with normalization by amplification of ß-globin (10). Briefly, 1 µg of total RNA was used for synthesis of the first strand of cDNA with SuperScript II reverse transcriptase and 100 ng oligo(dT)l2–18 as template (Life Technologies). Then, 1 µL of cDNA was amplified by PCR by the following protocol: 94 °C for 1 min (2 min for the first cycle); 62 °C, 60 °C, and 58 °C for 1 min (for PSA, PSMA, and ß-globin, respectively); and 72 °C for 1 min (10 min for the last cycle) for 25 cycles. The PCR products (15 µL) were run on ethidium bromide-stained agarose gels (20 g/L) and visualized by transillumination. Fluorescence was captured with a CCD camera and integrated by use of NIH Image 1.7 software. Statistical analysis of the results of three independent experiments performed in duplicate was done with GraphPad Prism/Stat(TM) software.

Room temperature (19–23 °C) storage of blood dramatically affected the RNA. Within 6 h, there was an important loss of RNA as indicated by UV quantification (Fig. 1 A) and confirmed by gel analysis (not shown). On samples stored from 6 to 24 h at room temperature, amplification of PSA and PSMA cDNAs was still possible but was impaired, as indicated by a decrease in the intensity of bands for PCR products (Fig. 1 , B and C). Extracting RNA from the 9 samples cooled immediately to 4 °C gave comparable signals to those for samples stored 6 h to 6 days at that temperature. Amplification of both PSA (Fig. 1B ) and PSMA (Fig. 1C ) cDNAs also gave comparable results for the samples stored 6 h to 6 days. The decrease in PSMA cDNA signals in the samples stored for 12 or 15 days at 4 °C apparently paralleled the decrease in PSA amplification and reflected loss of RNA after storage for >6 days. The immediate addition of ammonium chloride did not enhance the apparent stability of RNA, but PSMA and PSA amplifications were slightly lower in NH4Cl conditions than in the standard 4 °C storage after 6 days or longer. This suggests a long-term inhibitory effect of NH4Cl on reverse transcriptase: (a) RNA amounts extracted were identical in the two groups of samples stored at 4 °C, regardless of NH4Cl addition, and (b) no discrepant results were observed between PSA and PSMA cDNAs.



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. (A) RNA yield from human whole-blood samples containing 104 LNCaP cells per milliliter after different storage times in different conditions: room temperature (23 °C) or 4 °C with or without 2 volumes of NH4Cl (9 g/L); (B) PSA RT-PCR of the different RNA extracts; (C) PSMA RT-PCR of the different RNA extracts.

RNA was extracted as described and yield was measured by photometric absorbance at 260 nm. Band intensity was captured and integrated after electrophoresis on ethidium bromide-labeled 2% agarose gel. Each point represents the mean ± SD of three independent experiments performed in duplicate. Significance shown above bars: 1, P <0.05; 2, P <0.01; 3, P <0.005; 4, P <0.001 (Student's unpaired t- test) when compared with RNA extraction or PSA and PSMA RT-PCR performed on samples with immediate processing.

The current study demonstrates an important loss in RNA recovery within 6 h when samples are stored at room temperature. Stable results for at least 6 days are obtained when samples are immediately stored at 4 °C after sampling. The length of the delay is of particular interest to laboratories receiving and processing blood samples stored for the day or sent at room temperature from remote institutions. Although the cultured LNCaP cells used here may not exactly mimic the behavior of prostate cancer cells, much less other types of cancer cells, our results support the following recommendations: 1) Place blood samples at 4 °C immediately after drawing. 2) Avoid shipping samples to the laboratory at room temperature. 3) If the RNA is to be extracted within 2 weeks, store blood samples immediately at 4 °C without ammonium chloride.


Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by grants from Association de Recherche contre le Cancer (ARC 1367) and Association de Recherche sur les Tumeurs de la Prostate (ARTP).


Footnotes

fax 33144495120


References

  1. Pelkey TJ, Frierson HF, Jr, Bruns DE. Molecular and immunological detection of circulating tumor cells and micrometastases from solid tumors. Clin Chem 1996;42:1369-1381. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ennis RD, Katz AE, De Vries GM, Heitjan DF, O'Toole KM, Rubin M, et al. Detection of circulating prostate carcinoma cells via an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay in patients with early stage prostate carcinoma. Cancer 1997;79:2402-2408. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Deguchi T, Doi T, Ehara H, Ito S, Yoshinori Y, Nishino Y, et al. Detection of micrometastatic prostate cancer cells in lymph nodes by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. Cancer Res 1993;53:5350-5354. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Wood DPJ, Banks ER, Humphreys S, Rangnekar VM. Sensitivity of immunochemistry and polymerase chain reaction in detecting prostate cancer cells in bone marrow. J Histochem Cytochem 1994;42:505-511. [Abstract]
  5. Israeli RS, Miller WH, Jr, Su SL, Powell CT, Fair WR, Samadi DS, et al. Sensitive nested reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction detection of circulating prostatic tumor cells: comparison of prostate specific membrane antigen and prostate specific antigen based assays. Cancer Res 1994;54:6306-6310. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Cama C, Olsson CA, Raffo AJ, Perlman H, Buttyan R, O'Toole K, et al. Molecular staging of prostate cancer II. A comparison of the application of an enhanced reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction assay for prostate specific antigen versus prostate specific membrane antigen. J Urol 1995;153:1373-1378. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Horoszewicz JS, Leong SS, Kawinski E, Karr JP, Rosenthal H, Chu TM, et al. LNCaP model of human prostatic carcinoma. Cancer Res 1983;43:1809-1818. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. Single-step method of RNA-isolation by acid guanidium thiocyanate–phenol–chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 1987;162:156-169. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Loric S, Dumas F, Eschwège P, Blanchet P, Benoit G, Jardin A, Lacour B. Enhanced detection of hematogenous circulating prostatic cells in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma using prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSM)-based nested reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assay. Clin Chem 1995;41:1698-1704. [Abstract]
  10. Matsumura M, Niwa Y, Kato N, Komatsu Y, Shiina S, Kawabe T. Detection of alpha-protein mRNA, an indicator of hematogenous spreading hepatocellular carcinoma in the circulation: a possible predictor of metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1994;20:1418-1425. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Berteau, F. Dumas, J.-L. Gala, P. Eschwege, B. Lacour, M. Philippe, and S. Loric
Molecular Detection of Circulating Prostate Cells in Cancer II: Comparison of Prostate Epithelial Cells Isolation Procedures
Clin. Chem., August 1, 1998; 44(8): 1750 - 1753.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (13)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Berteau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loric, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Berteau, P.
Right arrow Articles by Loric, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Laboratory Management


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS