Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 44: 876-878, 1998;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bains, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bains, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44:876-878.)
© 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Simple DNA Probe Assays Based on Particle Agglutination

William Bainsa

a e-mail william{at}wbains.u-net.com

I describe the use of latex agglutination as a simple readout for DNA hybridization assays. Latex agglutination is a well-known readout for antibody-based diagnostics (1)(2) and uses "sandwich" assay chemistry for which analogous DNA assays are well known (3)(4). Latex agglutination is extremely simple and chemically robust, and latex particles have been used as a label in DNA hybridization (5). Here I show that simple agglutination of particles is an efficient measure of DNA hybridization, one that is insensitive to the presence of proteases, detergents, and solvents.

Cloned m13 DNAs from the cytochrome f gene of Phormidium laminosum were kindly provided by Chris Howe (Department of Biochemistry, Cambridge, UK) (6). m13 DNA was prepared essentially as described by Maniatis et al. (7). Polystyrene microparticles (5.6-µm polyvinylstyrene particles, density 1.060 kg/L; 4.5-µm polystyrene/divinylbenzene particles, density 1.100 kg/L) were obtained from Bangs Laboratories. Nitrocellulose filters were obtained from Schleicher & Schuell. All other reagents were obtained from Sigma Chemicals.

DNA was cross-linked onto polystyrene, using 1-ethyl-3,3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-carbodiimide (EDAC), according to the methods of Nikiforov et al. (8) and Vary (9). Two milligrams of DNA was incubated overnight with 2 mg of EDAC and 25 mg of beads in a total volume of 330 µL of water at 18 °C. Another 10 µL of 0.1 g/mL EDAC was added, and the incubation was continued for 1 h. Coupled beads were washed three times in 0.1x standard saline citrate (SSC; 1x SSC = 8.765 g of NaCl, 4.1 g of disodium citrate per liter of water), stored at 4 °C. Particles with a reduced surface density of DNA were prepared by reacting 2 mg of DNA with 2 mg of EDAC and 25 mg of beads in a total volume of 330 µL of water at 18 °C for 1 h; then the particles were washed. DNA was immobilized onto polystyrene plate surfaces using exactly the same protocol.

All hybridizations were carried out in 5x SSC, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 60 °C in an orbital shaker. A unified agglutination index (AI) was calculated from photomicrographs as follows:

These constants were selected to reflect the growth kinetics of particle aggregates (10).

The density of particle aggregates was measured by centrifugation through a sucrose density gradient (1–12% sucrose in 5x SSC, 0.01% SDS) in 5-ml polypropylene tubes at 20 °C in a Sorvall (DuPont) OTD65B centrifuge equipped with a Sorvall AH627 swing-out rotor. Centrifugation times and speeds were not critical, providing that {omega}t > 6.4 x 10 revolutions/s (e.g., 8000 rpm for 10 min).

The results of counting agglutinated particles with a microscope are given in Fig. 1 . This measure is simple and allows sensitive, quantitative measurement of the degree of agglutination achieved. Many of these experiments also showed "clumping" of the particles, which was visible to the unaided eye. Particles that were shaken with DNA that hybridizes to both particles showed clear clumping into large aggregates. Particles shaken with DNA that does not hybridize to both particles or shaken without DNA showed only slight agglutination. Agglutination was dependent on the amount of DNA loaded onto the surface of the particles, as well as the amount in solution.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Plot of AI vs DNA concentration.

(A) Several hybridization conditions are shown:Standard, as described in text; Control, with control (noncomplementary) DNA at 0.1 g/L; Low density, as for Standard but with lower density of probe DNA on beads; Low temperature, carried out at 45 °C. (B) and (C) Photomicrographs of agglutinated beads. (B) Beads agglutinated with 0.1 g/L of target DNA. (C) Beads shaken with 0.1 g/L nontarget DNA.

Fig. 1Up also illustrates that performing hybridization at lower temperatures results in a slightly lower AI. The rate of agglutination of particles is limited by particle collision kinetics (10), which are not markedly affected by temperature (for these large particles); therefore, the decrease in agglutination with temperature is not as extreme as would be expected from considerations of DNA hybridization kinetics (11). Decreasing temperature also increases nonspecific binding slightly. Most nonspecific binding is caused by static charging of the particles, as illustrated by the nonzero agglutination at zero DNA concentration in Fig. 1Up . Increasing reaction time increases the cumulative particle collision probability but also mechanically disrupts large aggregates; therefore, it only increases assay sensitivity when the target DNA concentration is low. At high concentrations, the agglutination is essentially complete in 25 min.

I also measured agglutination by detecting the binding of DNA-coated particles to the base of a DNA-coated microtiter plate in the presence of complementary target DNA, an assay similar to that described by Vener et al. (5), and by measuring the density of aggregates that result when DNA-coated particles of two different densities hybridize to a target. The sucrose gradient separated the two original particles (high and low densities) from clusters of particles (intermediate density). The extent of hybridization is measured by the fraction of beads that have moved from the top and bottom bands into the central region of the tube.

The above experiments are summarized in Table 1 . Both methods show agglutination caused by target DNA at 1 x 10-8 g/L in a 30-µL reaction volume, corresponding to ~1.5 x 10 genomes of target. This result is sensitive to the presence of DNase but not protease (Table 1 ); it is resistant to the presence of SDS (which was included in all hybridizations to reduce nonspecific particle agglutination), nonionic detergents, and 5% ethanol (data not shown).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of hybridization results.

This report shows that particle agglutination can be used as a readout technology for DNA hybridization. This is a distinct application of DNA immobilization from other applications reported previously, such as the immobilization of DNA to beads for kinetic studies (12), for posthybridization labeling (5) or chromatographic separations (13)(14), or to 96-well microtiter plates (15) to aid PCR. In this study, as in latex-based immunoassays, the microparticles are both the solid support on which hybridization is carried out and the readout technology by which we determine that hybridization has occurred. The model reactions shown here provide clear indications of the presence of target DNA at concentrations of 100 pg (0.5 pmol) in times comparable with typical PCRs (16). Test sensitivity is dependent on hybridization time, temperature, and probe density on the particles. Surprisingly, this simple readout technology can give greater sensitivity than a comparable sandwich hybridization using radiolabeled m13 probes (4).

Particle agglutination tests are simple to make and to operate. DNA probe-based tests using particle agglutination are thus attractive to smaller laboratories and less highly automated environments. Surveys of existing applications of DNA probe-based tests show that the sensitivity achieved in these model experiments is sufficient for a substantial proportion of medical diagnostic applications of DNA probe-based tests (17).


Acknowledgments

My thanks to Mary Meza (Bangs Labs) and Dan Brown (MRC Cambridge) for help with coupling chemistry, to Chris Howe for providing m13 clones, and to Nick Ashley and Lyn Scott for encouragement and comments .


Footnotes

Merlin Ventures, 101 Beechwood Ave., Melbourn, Royston, Herts SG8 6BW, UK


References

  1. Bangs L. Latex immunoassays. J Clin Immunoassay 1990;13:127-131.
  2. Carney J. Rapid diagnostic tests employing latex particles. Anal Proc 1990;27:99-100.
  3. Dunn AR, Hassell JA. A novel method to map transcripts: evidence for homology between an adenovirus mRNA and discrete multiple regions of the viral genome. Cell 1977;12:23-36. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Ranki M, Palva A, Virtanen M, Laaksonen M, Soderlund H. Sandwich hybridization as a convenient method for the detection of nucleic acids in crude samples. Gene 1983;21:77-85. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Vener TI, Turchinsky MF, Knorre VD, Lukin Yu V, Shcherbo SN, Zubov VP, Sverlov ED. A novel approach to nonradioactive hybridization assay of nucleic acids using stained latex particles. Anal Biochem 1991;198:308-311. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Wagner MJ, Packer JCL, Howe CJ, Bendall DS. Sequence, charge properties of cytochrome f in the cyanobacterium Phormidium laminosum. Biochim Biophys Acta 1996;1276:246-252. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Maniatis T, Fritsch EF, Sambrook J. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual 1982 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Plainview. .
  8. Nikiforov TT, Rendle RB, Goelet P, Rogers YH, Kotewicz ML, Anderson S, et al. Genetic bit analysis: a solid phase method for typing single nucleotide polymorphisms. Nucleic Acids Res 1994;22:4167-4175. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Vary CPH. Triple helical capture assay for quantification of polymerase chain reaction products. Clin Chem 1992;38:687-694. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Bains W, Noble P. Sensitivity limits of latex agglutination tests. Am Clin Lab 1993;March:14-17.
  11. Wetmur JG. DNA probes. Applications of the principles of nucleic acid hybridization. Crit Rev Biochem Mol Biol 1991;26:227-259. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Wolk SF, Haines L, Fisch J, Kremsky JN, Dougherty JP, Jacobs K. Rapid hybridization kinetics of DNA attached to submicron latex particles. Nucleic Acids Res 1987;15:2911-2926. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Wada T, Watanabe H, Kawaguchi H, Handa H. DNA affinity chromatography. Methods Enzymol 1995;254:595-604. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Huang SC, Swerdlow H, Caldwell KD. Binding of biotinylated DNA to streptavidin coated polystyrene latex. Anal Biochem 1994;222:441-449. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Galiudo L, Rangel-Aldao R, Ramirez JL. A combined polymerase chain reaction-colour development hybridization assay in a microtitre format for the detection of Clostridium species. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 1993;39:553-557. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Taylor GR. Polymerase chain reaction: basic principles and automation. McPherson MJ Quirke P Taylor GR eds. PCR: a practical approach 1991:1-14 IRL Press New York. .
  17. Bains W. Simplified format for DNA probe-based tests. Clin Chem 1991;37:248-253. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bains, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bains, W.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS