|
|
||||||||
Enzymes and Protein Markers |
1
Departments of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102.
2
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine,
Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415.
3
Biosite Diagnostics Inc., San Diego, CA 92121.
4
Denver Health Medical Center, Denver, CO 80204.
5
The AACC cTnI Subcommittee on cTnI Standardization.
Subcommittee members: Dr. Bodor, Chairman; Dr. Apple and Robert
Christenson, University of Maryland, Baltimore; Francesco Dati, Dade
Behring Marburg GmBH, Marburg, Germany; Yehai Gawad, Cardiogenics Inc.,
Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Catherine LaRue, Sanofi Diagnostics Pasteur,
Marnes la Coquette, France; James Potter, University of Miami, Miami,
FL; Hemant Vaidya, Behring Dade, Newark, DE; Dr. Wu and Jean Rhame,
American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Washington, DC.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 860-545-5206; e-mail awu{at}harthosp.org.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The release of the troponin complex after myocardial injury has not been fully characterized. Using Western blot analysis, Lavigne et al. (13) suggested that cTnI occurs predominately as free subunits, with no evidence of a troponin I-T complex. In contrast, Katrukha et al. (11) used specific monoclonal antibodies and suggested that troponin I exists in blood predominately as the I-C complex, with <10% found in the free form. Morjana et al. (14) also concluded that serum of AMI patients contains cTnI complexes, along with partially degraded cTnI. There is also little data on the release of troponin T subunits into blood after AMI.
An understanding of the release pattern for troponin subunits after AMI is important when comparing results of different commercial assays for these proteins. The number of cTnI assays that are approved by the Food and Drug Administration increases each quarter. Unfortunately, there is no consensus of cTnI results because values from one assay to another can differ by a factor of 10 or more (15). These discrepancies are largely due to differences in the reference materials used in the assay calibration. The lack of mass standardization also existed for CK-MB mass assays before the development of a CK-MB standard (16). Unlike CK-MB, where nearly all commercial mass assays make use of the "Conan" antibody (17), cTnI assays use different antibodies. Therefore differences in the antibody recognition of various troponin I forms are expected. In the current study, we used gel filtration chromatography to examine the troponin T and I forms released after myocardial injury. We also characterized the immunoreactive response of different commercial cTnI assays to purified troponin forms.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The protocol for use of human subjects was reviewed and approved by the Hartford Hospital Institution Review Board. Because leftover blood from routine collections was used for all samples and no patient identifiers were used, informed consent was deemed unnecessary. Three serum samples from patients with Q-wave AMI were separately added to the gel filtration column. A diagnosis of AMI was made by attending physicians, using standard World Health Organization criteria (18), including the results of total CK and CK-MB. To ensure a high concentration of troponin subunits, the selected samples were collected 2472 h after onset and were at or near the peak troponin values. The cTnI concentration for serum samples 13 were 200, 240, and 450 µg/L, respectively (Opus Plus, Dade Behring). Samples were loaded within 24 h after collection. One milliliter of serum was added to the column for fractionation. One-milliliter fractions were collected on an automated collector (Pharmacia), capped, and stored at 4 °C until analysis. In addition, 1.0 mL of sample 2 (serum) was added to a 3-mL heparin blood collection tube (final concentration, 15 units), and 1.0 mL of sample 3 was added to an EDTA blood collection tube [final concentration, 25 mg/L (2.5 mg/dL) of K3EDTA]. These samples were incubated overnight and applied separately to the column. Collected fractions were assayed for cTnT, using the second generation assay on the ES300® (Roche Boehringer Mannheim), and assayed for cTnI, using the Opus Plus® and a prototype cTnI assay on the Immuno 1® (Bayer Diagnostics).
To further compare results of serum vs heparin-treated plasma, 50 samples, each simultaneously collected into a serum (red) and heparin-containing plasma (green) blood tubes, were assayed for cTnI, using the Opus Plus and Immuno 1. A linear regression analysis was performed on these data. Twenty-four serial serum samples from AMI patients were tested for cTnI, using the Opus Plus before and after the addition of cTnC to a final concentration of 100 µg/L. Some of these were also tested for cTnI on the Opus Plus after addition of 10 µg/L of cTnC. Negative-troponin serum and heparin-treated plasma pools were prepared for use as matrices for the preparation of the troponin-supplemented samples. These pools consisted of blood from healthy individuals and were assayed for cTnT and cTnI to verify the low concentration before use. Three different high troponin serum pools were prepared from AMI samples. The pools were aliquoted and stored frozen at -70 °C before testing on selected cTnI analyzers capable of using serum as a specimen.
preparation of troponin standards and samples
All containers and pipettes that contacted cTnI and cTnT complexes
were polypropylene. Three milligrams of lyophilized human cTnI
(Bio-Tech International) at pH 3.0 was reconstituted in 1.5 mL of 1.0
mmol/L HCl. The reconstituted cTnI solution was centrifuged at
16 000g for 10 min to remove any particulate matter. The
cTnI concentration in the supernatant was determined from the
absorbance at 280 nm, using the equation: concentration (g/L) =
A280/0.44 (19). A minor 3%
correction for scattering was made to the value of
A280 by extrapolation of the absorbance readings
at wavelengths >350 nm. The cTnI concentration was 1.66 g/L. The
absorptivity value was checked by calculation from the amino acid
sequence of human cTnI as described by Pace et al. (20). The
calculated value of 0.41 was in good agreement with the experimentally
determined value of 0.44 used in this work. The cTnI was diluted to a
final concentration of 11.0 mg/L in a 3 mmol/L dithiothreitol (DTT,
Pierce Chemical Co.), 50 mmol/L 3-(N-morpholino) propane
sulfonic acid (MOPS; Fisher Biotech), 630 mmol/L NaCl, 40 g/L bovine
serum albumin (Bayer Pentex) buffer, pH 7.10. DTT was used to reduce
the intramolecular disulfide bond between the cysteine residues of the
cTnI and to reduce any mixed disulfides formed between the cysteine
residues and external reductant used during the purification of the
protein. Four hours after the reduction reaction was started, the
reduced sample was split into two aliquots: One (reduced troponin I)
was diluted with deionized water to a final concentration of 10.3 mg/L;
the other was oxidized by the addition of peroxide to a concentration
of 20 mmol/L. Thirty minutes after the addition of peroxide, catalase
(Calbiochem) was added to the oxidized sample to a final concentration
of 1.4 mg/L to convert the hydrogen peroxide to oxygen and water. The
final oxidized cTnI concentration was 10.3 mg/L. Three hours after the
catalase was added to the oxidized sample, both the reduced and
oxidized cTnI sample solutions were frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at -70 °C.
Ternary troponin complex.
Human cardiac ternary
troponin complex (Bio-Tech) was obtained frozen in a buffer solution
consisting of 60 mmol/L MOPS, 1.0 mol/L KCl, and 2 mmol/L
CaCl2, pH 7.2. The stated concentration of troponin complex
was used to calculate the final molar concentrations of troponin I. The
concentration was confirmed by measuring the absorbance at 280 nm (with
a minor 9% correction for scattering made to the value of
A280 by extrapolation of the absorbance readings
at wavelengths >350 nm). The concentration was determined using the
equation: concentration (g/L) = A280/0.37. The
found value was within 3% of the stated value. The absorptivity 0.37
was obtained by averaging the absorptivities of troponins I, C, and T.
This coefficient was verified by the amino acid sequence of human
cardiac troponin complex (21). The calculated value of 0.41
is in good agreement with the experimentally determined value of 0.37
used in this work. The ternary troponin complex was diluted to a final
troponin I concentration of 10.7 mg/L in a buffer consisting of 40
mmol/L MOPS, 2 mmol/L CaCl2, 40 g/L bovine serum albumin,
and 600 mmol/L NaCl, pH 7.1. Aliquots of the troponin complex were
frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -70 °C.
cTnT.
Lyophilized human cTnT (0.10 mg; Scripps Laboratories)
was reconstituted with 0.40 mL of 10 mmol/L HCl. The cTnT was diluted
to a final concentration of 15.0 mg/L in a 50 mmol/L MOPS, 630 mmol/L
NaCl, 2 mmol/L CaCl2, 40 g/L bovine serum albumin (Bayer
Pentex) buffer, pH 7.10. Aliquots of cTnT were frozen in liquid
nitrogen and stored at -70 °C. cTnT does not contain any cysteine
residues, and therefore does not undergo oxidation/reduction.
Binary complexes.
Frozen aliquots of oxidized or reduced cTnI
at 10.3 mg/L and cTnT at 15.0 mg/L were thawed at room temperature. For
the I-C complex, lyophilized human cTnC and CaCl2 were
added directly to the oxidized or reduced cTnI solutions to obtain
final concentrations of 10.3 mg/L cTnI, 10.4 g/L cTnC, and 1 mmol/L
CaCl2. For the I-T complex, the cTnI solutions were mixed
in equal volumes with cTnT to obtain final concentrations of 5.15 mg/L
cTnI and 7.5 mg/L cTnT. For the T-C complex, lyophilized cTnC was added
directly to cTnT to obtain final concentrations of 15.0 mg/L cTnT and
15.2 g/L cTnC. All solutions were incubated 2 h after the
components were mixed, and then were frozen in liquid nitrogen and
stored at -70 °C. From these stock preparations, dilutions were
aliquoted into troponin-free serum and plasma pools to produce working
samples at three different troponin concentrations. Table 1
lists the composition and concentrations of the working
troponin samples used in the comparative study. To minimize air
oxidation, samples were individually prepared and frozen to -70 °C
within 10 min after preparation.
|
interassay comparisons for cTnI
Nine cTnI assays were tested using the working troponin samples
described above. The identities of the specific assays were not
revealed. The commercial assays included the Opus Plus,
Access® (Beckman), Stratus II®
(Dade Behring), AxSYM® (Abbott Laboratories), Immuno
1 (Bayer Diagnostics), Triage® Cardiac System (Biosite
Diagnostics), and Alpha Dx® (First Medical). The
prototype cTnI assays were the Immulite® (Diagnostic
Products) and the ACS:180® (Chiron Diagnostics). Serum was
used in all assays except for the Triage device, for which
heparin-treated plasma was used. Serum was also tested for cTnT, using
the ES300. To minimize air oxidation of cTnI, each of the 27 samples
listed in Table 1
was assayed within 1 h after it was thawed at
room temperature.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
Fig. 2
illustrates the gel filtration results for AMI serum sample 1.
For cTnT, there were three peaks that have molecular weights that
corresponded to a troponin ternary complex of T-I-C, free troponin T,
and immunoreactive fragments (Fig. 2A
). When these fractions were
tested for cTnI (Opus Plus), only two peaks were evident, corresponding
to the ternary complex and the binary complex of I-C (Fig. 2B
). No free
cTnI was observed. When the serum sample was incubated with EDTA, the
results showed a disappearance of the ternary complex for both cTnT
(Fig. 2C
) and cTnI (Fig. 2D
). The absolute concentrations for each band
was also markedly decreased. Similar results were also observed for AMI
sample 3 (results not shown). We also tested fractions collected from
sample 1 for cTnI, using a prototype Immuno 1 assay, which produced
similar results to those shown in Fig. 2
, A-D (data not shown).
|
Figure 3
illustrates results for AMI sample 2. In contrast to the other
two AMI samples, this sample did not contain any major peaks
corresponding to the ternary troponin T-I-C complex, but did contain
the cTnI-C complex (Fig. 3
, A and B). Instead, very low molecular
weight cTnI fragments were observed that were not seen in either of the
other two samples (Fig. 3B
). Sample 2 was also tested after incubation
with heparin (Fig. 3
, C and D). There was no substantial difference in
the release pattern of troponin subunits, and the recovered troponin
subunit concentrations were within experimental limits. The effect
of heparin on the ternary complex could not be determined
because this particular sample did not have any of this complex. The
results for cTnI, using the Immuno 1 assay showed identical results
(data not shown).
|
The results comparing serum and heparin-treated plasma samples
simultaneously collected on AMI and non-AMI patients are shown in Fig. 4
, A (Opus Plus) and B (Immuno 1). The linear regression showed
no marked difference between serum and heparin-treated plasma,
confirming the results from the gel filtration experiments.
|
Free cTnC at 100 µg/L and 1 mg/L was added to serum tubes from AMI patients before testing for cTnI, in an attempt to recover any free cTnI that might have been lost to plastic or glass surfaces during the measurement procedure. The mean (± standard deviation) for the 24 samples was 29.3 (± 37.0) µg/L without addition of cTnC, and was not different from the result of 29.7 (± 36.7) with addition of 100 µg/L. On a subset of seven samples, the mean (± SD) for cTnI without and with 1 mg/L of cTnC was also not different at 27.6 (± 23.6) and 27.7 (± 22.9) µg/L, respectively.
interassay comparison of cTnI results
The results of the interassay comparison of cTnI assays are
illustrated in Fig. 5
A. All results are plotted on a relative scale, according to the
expected values shown in Table 1
. None of the cTnI assays responded to
free cTnT or the binary complex of cTnT-C, and thus these results are
not shown. All of the assays tested were sensitive to each of the
prepared samples containing cTnI subunits. There were differences in
the absolute and relative responses to each other. Assays 2, 5, and 7
had roughly equimolar responses for each of the seven cTnI forms and
produced results that were about 70110% of the expected
concentrations listed in Table 1
. Assays 4, 8, and 9 also produced
reasonably equimolar responses, but at a concentration that was
~2.5-fold, 4-fold, and 4.5-fold those listed in Table 1
,
respectively. The response for assay 3 was similar to assays 2, 5, and
7 for free cTnI (oxidized and reduced) and binary cTnI-T complexes;
however, for the ternary and binary cTnI-C complexes, results were
about threefold those of the free cTnI. Assays 1 and 6, in general,
also showed higher responses for the ternary complex and binary cTnI-C
complexes. In addition, each of these latter assays had nonequal
responses with respect to oxidized and reduced cTnI, particularly when
these cTnI subunits were part of complexes.
|
The comparison of serum and heparin-treated plasma samples for
cTnI, using assay 4, is illustrated in Fig. 5B
. Minor differences were
observed for the binary I-C complexes, whereas major differences were
observed for the ternary complex, the binary I-T complex, and free
troponin I forms. The comparative cTnT results of purified samples for
free cTnT, ternary cTnT-I-C complex, and the cTnT-C binary complex are
shown in Fig. 5C
. The cTnT assay did not produce positive results for
free cTnI or either of the I-C binary complexes (thus results are not
shown). The assay has a rather equimolar response to the ternary and
binary complexes, which was about threefold higher than the response
for the free cTnT form.
The results of the serum pool, using the different cTnI assays, are
shown in Fig. 6
. Results are plotted against assay 3. There was a high degree
of analytical correlation for these three samples as shown. Assay 2
produced the lowest result, whereas assay 6 produced the highest
result. The difference between the two extreme assays is roughly
20-fold.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Our findings are consistent with results of the College of American Pathologists proficiency surveys for cTnI (23). In the 1997 survey, laboratories (n >600) assayed samples, using the Access, Opus Plus, or Stratus II. The mean cTnI concentration varied substantially, depending on which cTnI assays was used. The Access assay produced the lowest concentrations, some 20-fold lower than results from the Opus Plus. Results between these extremes were reported for the Dade Stratus II, at about one-third of the Opus Plus assay.
The gel filtration study was very limited, in that only three serum
samples were tested and that they all contained very high cTnI
concentrations. We were not able to examine how troponin subunits are
differentially released as a function of time after onset of injury.
The gel filtration technique is very insensitive because of the
dilution of fractions by the elution buffer; therefore, early and very
late AMI samples with low troponin concentrations could not be tested
without concentrating the eluates. It is likely that the pattern of
release varies over time, possibly with intact ternary complexes
predominating early, followed by binary complexes, free forms, and
immunoreactive fragments. Katrukha et al. (11) showed that
free cTnI was not a major component of total cTnI when blood was tested
up to 100 h after AMI. We were also not able to verify the
identity of the individual peaks as they eluted from the column.
Variations in the column retention times of complexed and free subunits
can affect interpretations. Some of the low molecular weight components
shown in Fig. 3
, B and D, may in fact be cTnI components that were
retained by the column because of the adhesiveness of cTnI.
The disposition of free cTnI after release from damaged myocytes is unknown. The free subunit does have a high affinity for troponin C (k = 1.27 x 10) (22), and there may be binding with residual serum troponin C (10). Because skeletal muscle troponin C is homologous to the cardiac subunit, there is probably some troponin C available in serum to bind cTnI (10). Whether there is enough troponin C present to bind all the available free cTnI that is released into blood is unknown. There are no commercial assays for TnC, and a serum reference range has not been established. A prototype assay for fast skeletal muscle troponin I has been developed, and the reference limit was 0.2 µg/L (24). The skeletal muscle troponin C concentration may be in this same range. CTnI can bind to other proteins present in blood, such as calmodulin, a structural analog to troponin C (25), which may obscure antibody recognition sites. It may also be possible that free cTnI is lost to the surfaces of blood collection tubes, pipette tips, sample cuvettes, and so forth. It is also possible some free cTnI is released into blood but is not detectable by our gel filtration system because of its insensitivity to low concentrations or because of the manner in which the gel filtration experiments were conducted.
The absolute and relative differences between cTnI assays remain a
concern for laboratories that switch from one assay to another as new
instrumentation becomes available, or when a clinician attempts to
compare results from one laboratory with another. The American
Association for Clinical Chemistry cTnI Standardization Committee will
be specifying a reference material based on a complex (binary or
ternary) to be used as a primary standard. When the standard becomes
available, manufacturers of cTnI assays can calibrate their assays to
it, thereby greatly reducing the interassay variability of results.
However, the data presented in Fig. 5A
shows that interassay biases
will not be entirely removed because each assay has different relative
reactivities to the various cTnI forms. True interchangeability of
results between cTnI assays will only occur if all manufacturers also
standardize the antibodies used.
Differences in the reactivities between oxidized and reduced forms may
also present stability problems for some assays. cTnI released from
damaged tissue in the reduced form may oxidize with exposure to air
within 5 h (10). The oxidation can be accelerated with
the addition of peroxide or inhibited with thiol-reducing agents such
as 2-mercaptoethanol or DTT (10). Unless stabilizing
reagents are added, cTnI assays that exhibit a differential response to
reduced vs oxidized forms (e.g., assay 6 of Fig. 5A
) may exhibit
changing results during the first few hours after blood collection, as
cTnI slowly oxidizes to form disulfide linkages. In addition, the
oxidation of cTnI in circulating blood will yield a differential
response among assays that do not recognize the oxidized and reduced
forms equally. We were not able to verify which cTnI assays
demonstrated different results when samples are assayed immediately and
after several hours of room temperature storage.
The analysis and standardization for cTnT is more straightforward than for cTnI. Because of patent rights, all commercial assays for cTnT are marketed by one manufacturer. Available laboratory-based and point-of-care testing devices are calibrated to the same reference material. The Elecsys® analyzer was not available to us; however, the same antibodies are used in all cTnT assays, and no difference in the results was expected. Free cTnT is recoverable in substantial concentrations in blood after injury. The analysis of free cTnT may offer additional clinical information over that of total cTnT. The low (or absent) concentration of free cTnI in the limited samples examined by this study may explain differences observed in the kinetics of cTnT vs cTnI release after AMI.
In conclusion, all cardiac troponin assays do a good job at detecting myocardial injury, irrespective to the absolute value obtained. Because of the specificity of troponin, an abnormal blood concentration has clinical significance for cardiac disease.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
D. C Gaze and P. O Collinson Multiple molecular forms of circulating cardiac troponin: analytical and clinical significance Ann Clin Biochem, July 1, 2008; 45(4): 349 - 355. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P Wong, S Murray, A Ramsewak, A Robinson, C van Heyningen, and E Rodrigues Raised cardiac troponin T levels in patients without acute coronary syndrome Postgrad. Med. J., March 1, 2007; 83(977): 200 - 205. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Abramov, M. Abu-Tailakh, M. Frieger, A. Ganiel, D. Tuvbin, and A. Wolak Plasma Troponin Levels After Cardiac Surgery vs After Myocardial Infarction Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann, December 1, 2006; 14(6): 530 - 535. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Fahie-Wilson, E. M. Hall, and E. J. Lamb The authors of the article cited above respond: Clin. Chem., December 1, 2006; 52(12): 2307 - 2309. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. H. Madsen, G. Christensen, T. Lund, V. L. Serebruany, C. B. Granger, I. Hoen, Z. Grieg, J. H. Alexander, A. S. Jaffe, J. E. Van Eyk, et al. Time Course of Degradation of Cardiac Troponin I in Patients With Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The ASSENT-2 Troponin Substudy Circ. Res., November 10, 2006; 99(10): 1141 - 1147. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Rouine-Rapp, K. P. Rouillard, W. Miller-Hance, N. H. Silverman, K. K. Collins, M. K. Cahalan, A. Bostrom, and I. A. Russell Segmental Wall-Motion Abnormalities After an Arterial Switch Operation Indicate Ischemia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2006; 103(5): 1139 - 1146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. H. Christenson, S. H. Duh, F. S. Apple, G. S. Bodor, D. M. Bunk, M. Panteghini, M. J. Welch, A. H.B. Wu, S. E. Kahn, and for the American Association for Clinical Chemistr Toward Standardization of Cardiac Troponin I Measurements Part II: Assessing Commutability of Candidate Reference Materials and Harmonization of Cardiac Troponin I Assays Clin. Chem., September 1, 2006; 52(9): 1685 - 1692. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. N. Fahie-Wilson, D. J. Carmichael, M. P. Delaney, P. E. Stevens, E. M. Hall, and E. J. Lamb Cardiac Troponin T Circulates in the Free, Intact Form in Patients with Kidney Failure Clin. Chem., March 1, 2006; 52(3): 414 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. S. Apple Clinical Biomarkers of Cardiac Injury: Cardiac Troponins and Natriuretic Peptides Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2006; 34(1): 91 - 93. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. Babuin and A. S. Jaffe Troponin: the biomarker of choice for the detection of cardiac injury Can. Med. Assoc. J., November 8, 2005; 173(10): 1191 - 1202. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Rajappa and A. Sharma Biomarkers of Cardiac Injury: An Update Angiology, November 1, 2005; 56(6): 677 - 691. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T Nageh, R A Sherwood, B M Harris, and M R Thomas Prognostic role of cardiac troponin I after percutaneous coronary intervention in stable coronary disease Heart, September 1, 2005; 91(9): 1181 - 1185. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eriksson, T. Ilva, C. Becker, J. Lund, P. Porela, K. Pulkki, L.-M. Voipio-Pulkki, and K. Pettersson Comparison of Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassays Variably Affected by Circulating Autoantibodies Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 848 - 855. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rej Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Sodi, S. Darn, and A. Stott Time for Troponin T? Implications from Newly Elucidated Structure Clin. Chem., April 1, 2004; 50(4): 786 - 787. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. A. Simpson, J. Van Eyk, and S. Iscoe Respiratory muscle injury, fatigue and serum skeletal troponin I in rat J. Physiol., February 1, 2004; 554(3): 891 - 903. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. B. Wallace, E. Hausner, E. Herman, G. D. Holt, J. T. Macgregor, A. L. Metz, E. Murphy, I.Y. Rosenblum, F. D. Sistare, and M. J. York Serum Troponins as Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Cardiac Toxicity Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1): 106 - 121. [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ritter, P. A. Lee, J. F. Taylor, L. Hsu, J. D. Cohen, H. D. Chung, and K. S. Virgo Troponin I in Patients without Chest Pain Clin. Chem., January 1, 2004; 50(1): 112 - 119. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Kucher and S. Z. Goldhaber Cardiac Biomarkers for Risk Stratification of Patients With Acute Pulmonary Embolism Circulation, November 4, 2003; 108(18): 2191 - 2194. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Eriksson, M. Junikka, P. Laitinen, K. Majamaa-Voltti, H. Alfthan, and K. Pettersson Negative Interference in Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassays from a Frequently Occurring Serum and Plasma Component Clin. Chem., July 1, 2003; 49(7): 1095 - 1104. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Ziebig, A. Lun, B. Hocher, F. Priem, C. Altermann, G. Asmus, H. Kern, R. Krause, B. Lorenz, R. Mobes, et al. Renal Elimination of Troponin T and Troponin I Clin. Chem., July 1, 2003; 49(7): 1191 - 1193. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. E. Lipshultz, M. J. G. Somers, S. R. Lipsitz, |