Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 44: 1580a-1581a, 1998;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lotz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Prellwitz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lotz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Prellwitz, W.
(Clinical Chemistry. 1998;44:1580-1581.)
© 1998 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters

False-Positive LSD Drug Screening Induced by a Mucolytic Medication

Johannes Lotz1,a, Gerd Hafner1, Jörg Röhrich2, Siegfried Zörntlein2, Thomas Kern3, and Winfried Prellwitz1

1 Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, ,
2 Institut für Gerichtsmedizin,
3 Klinik für Anästhesiologie, Klinikum der Johannes Gutenberg Universität, 55101 Mainz, Germany
a Address correspondence to this author at: Institut für Klinische Chemie und Laboratoriumsmedizin, Langenbeckerstr. 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany; fax 0049-6131-17-6627.


To the Editor:

Since the early 1990s, the ingestion of lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD) as an inexpensive alternative to amphetamine derivatives has once again become widespread (1)(2). Consequently, screening of LSD has gained importance in clinical routine. The drug screening of a patient with a severe craniocerebral trauma showed a positive LSD screening by the homogeneous immunoassay CEDIA® DAU LSD (Boehringer Mannheim). In spite of the 3-h half-life of LSD in plasma (3), the drug screening remained positive for several days. These samples were analyzed by means of fluorescence detection (FLD 1046A, Hewlett–Packard) after solid-phase extraction with HPLC technique (HP 1050, Hewlett–Packard) (4). The positive immunoassay results could not be confirmed. In the following study, we carried out a general screening of medications in urine using the HPLC technique (Remedi HS, Bio-Rad Laboratories). Ambroxol as well as Pirenzepin were detectable.

Because of other unexpected positive LSD results of patients of the same intensive care unit, we carried out a general LSD screening of 10 patients of this ward. All of these 10 samples tested positive by the CEDIA DAU LSD assay but could not be confirmed by the HPLC technique. All those patients had an Ambroxol medication and tested positive for Ambroxol in urine by the HPLC technique. Finally, we carried out a self-test. No LSD could be detected in a fasting urine sample of a volunteer who afterward took 5 mL of Mucosolvan® juice (Dr. Karl Thomae) equivalent to 15 mg of Ambroxol-HCL. Another urine sample was analyzed as being positive 90 min after ingestion of Ambroxol. The addition of 50 µL of Mucosolvan juice to the LSD-negative fasting urine also led to a positive result. Mucosolvan juice diluted with two parts of distilled water resulted in a positive LSD test as well.

Ambroxol is a widespread and frequently used concomitant medication for infections of the upper respiratory tract. Predominantly, Ambroxol is used in an outpatient setting. In Germany, no less than ~40 pharmaceutical companies distribute Ambroxol. Ambroxol is widespread in most parts of Europe as well as in Japan, but it is not admitted, e.g., in the United States of America and the United Kingdom.

Therefore, LSD drug screening with the homogeneous immunoassay CEDIA DAU LSD yields a high incidence of false-positive results, especially in winter. In conclusion, Ambroxol administration should be excluded when a LSD screening in urine is performed by CEDIA DAU LSD. Moreover, positive results should be verified by a more specific method, such as GC/MS or HPLC techniques.


References

  1. Wright JD, Pearl L. Knowledge and experience of young people regarding drug misuse. BMJ 1995;310:20-24. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Abraham HD, Aldidge AM. Adverse consequences of lysergic acid diethylamide. Addiction 1993;88:1327-1334. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Moffat AC Jackson JV Moss MS Widdop B eds. Clark's isolation and identification of drugs 2nd ed. 1986:715-716 The Pharmaceutical Press London. .
  4. Veress T. Study of the extraction of LSD from illicit blotters for HPLC determination. J Forensic Sci 1993;38:1105-1110. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lotz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Prellwitz, W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Lotz, J.
Right arrow Articles by Prellwitz, W.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS