Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 123-126, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinatra, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinatra, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:123-126.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Interference of Plant Peroxidases with Guaiac-based Fecal Occult Blood Tests Is Avoidable

Marc A. Sinatra, D. James B. St. Johna and Graeme P. Young2

Department of Gastroenterology and University of Melbourne Department of Medicine, The Royal Melbourne Hospital, C/O Post Office, Victoria 3050, Australia.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 61 3 9342 7848; e-mail james.stjohn{at}nwhcn.org.au.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables are reputed to interfere with guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests. We added horseradish peroxidase to fecal samples and tested them with Hemoccult®, Hemoccult SENSA®, and hydrated Hemoccult. Positivity rates with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA decreased rapidly as the time between smearing (preparation) and development increased, whereas they remained high with hydrated Hemoccult. For samples with added blood, positivity rates did not decrease with time. When 61 volunteers were tested on a standard restriction and on a challenge diet high in plant peroxidase, no positive results occurred during standard restriction. During the challenge diet, one volunteer was positive with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA when development was delayed 24 h, and no volunteers were positive when it was delayed 48 h and 72 h. However, with hydrated Hemoccult, positives occurred in 13 of 61 volunteers at 24 h, 8 of 61 at 48 h, and 5 of 61 at 72 h. Thus, peroxidase-rich plant foods do not need to be excluded from the diet with Hemoccult and Hemoccult SENSA if development is delayed for at least 48 h after smearing. A delay of this duration will not solve the problem of plant peroxidase interference with hydrated Hemoccult.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests (FOBTs)1 are based on the detection of the peroxidase activity of heme/hemoglobin (Hb) (1). As a consequence, ingestion of substances containing peroxidase activity is a potential source of false-positive test reactions (1)(2). Patients are, therefore, advised to abstain from certain peroxidase-rich foods for 72 h before and during sample collection for the test (2). Because this requirement is likely to adversely affect participation in testing, any simplification of the dietary requirements should prove beneficial.

Animal food products high in heme content (e.g., beef, lamb, and processed foods containing these meats) and certain raw peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables (e.g., broccoli, cauliflower, radishes, turnips, and some melons) (3) are restricted during sample collection (2). Although good evidence exists to support the exclusion of animal food products with high heme content (4), no direct evidence exists for the exclusion of raw, peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables.

Plant peroxidases, like Hb, are hemoproteins that have the prosthetic group ferriprotoporphyrin IX (hemin) (5). Plant peroxidases are thought to have a much higher enzymatic activity than Hb (6) because of differences in the apoproteins of the two molecules (7). The Hb apoprotein does not survive transit through the gut (8)(9), and a similar result might be expected for plant peroxidases. However, plant peroxidases are located within an indigestible cellulose cell wall (10), which should provide them with some protection against digestion. Their chances of surviving transit are probably further enhanced by plant peroxidase-associated glycans, which have been shown to protect them from proteolytic degradation (11).

The test reaction of chemical FOBTs takes place in a mixture of feces, guaiaconic acid, and an ethanol-based, hydrogen peroxide-containing developer. In theory, the greater the ethanol concentration of this environment, the more likely it is that the protein portion of the plant peroxidase will be denatured and, hence, the less likely that any plant peroxidases that survive digestion would influence the test result. Because the ethanol concentration of the reaction mixture is dependent on the ethanol concentration of the developer and the water content of the fecal smear, plant peroxidase interference should decrease as the fecal smear dries.

This study was designed to investigate whether plant peroxidases are capable of interfering with the guaiac-based FOBTs, Hemoccult® (HO), Hemoccult SENSA® (HOS), and hydrated Hemoccult (HHO) and, if interference does occur, whether it decreases as the time between fecal smearing and development increases.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
fecal occult blood testing
HO and HOS tests (SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) were performed according to the manufacturer's instructions (12). The HHO test method was the same as the standard HO test method except that 25 µL of water was applied to each fecal smear 1 min before addition of developer. A test was considered positive if any trace of blue appeared on or emanated away from the fecal smear within 1 min after the addition of developer.

All test cards were stored at room temperature away from light in a manner allowing them to air dry between the times of fecal smearing and development.

in vitro studies
Single fecal samples were obtained from four healthy young subjects after each had completed a minimum of 3 days on a standard low heme/low plant peroxidase diet as described elsewhere (2). Before the protocol was begun, each fecal sample was tested and found to be negative for occult blood with each of the FOBTs used in the study.

Plant peroxidase was used in the form of crude horseradish peroxidase extract (HPE; ICN Biomedicals, cat. no. 195371) diluted to a working concentration of 10 g/L in distilled water. Hb was used in the form of whole blood collected in acid citrate-dextrose collection tubes.

HPE or whole blood was added to fecal samples 1 h after defecation. The concentrations of added HPE or whole blood were chosen to give low, medium, and high positivity rates for their respective analytes. The final concentrations of HPE were 0.3, 1.0, and 5.0 mg/g feces, and the final concentrations of Hb were 0.3, 0.5, and 1.0 mg/g feces. Test cards were smeared immediately after the addition of HPE or whole blood. For each FOBT, three test cards were prepared for each concentration of each fecal sample and developed at 1, 8, 24, 48, 72, and 144 h after smearing for both the plant peroxidase and Hb samples. Overall, 54 test cards (108 windows) were developed for each FOBT per fecal sample.

in vivo studies
Healthy subjects, ages 18–30, with no history of bleeding hemorrhoids or personal or family history of relevant gastrointestinal disorders were recruited for the study. This group was chosen because it was highly unlikely that any subject would have a gastrointestinal disorder that would account for a positive FOBT. A total of 64 volunteers were enrolled in the study. None was taking nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Each volunteer received written and oral information about the protocol and the purpose of the investigation and gave free and informed consent for inclusion in the study. The protocol was approved by The Royal Melbourne Hospital Board of Medical Research (Project No. 136/94).

Three volunteers failed to comply with the dietary requirements of the study and withdrew. Of the 61 volunteers who completed the study, 32 were men and 29 were women. The mean age was 26 years.

The volunteers were tested on two separate dietary regimens with each of the three FOBTs: after being placed on a low heme/low plant peroxidase diet (diet A) and after a low heme/high plant peroxidase challenge diet (diet B). The diets were equivalent except that on the plant peroxidase challenge diet, the volunteers were provided with 750 g of raw peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables, comprising 160–180 g of broccoli, 160–180 g of cauliflower, 40–50 g of red radish, 110–120 g of turnip, and 250–280 g of cantaloupe, to consume each day. They were permitted to eat any additional raw fruits and vegetables. The diets commenced 3 days before sample collection started and continued until sample collection was completed.

The volunteers prepared test cards, noting the day and time of passage, from each of three consecutive stools. For diet A, they prepared one test card (two windows) per FOBT per stool. For diet B, they prepared three test cards (six windows) per FOBT per stool. All samples were collected free from contamination by urine or toilet water, and all test cards were returned to the laboratory within 24 h after defecation.

Test cards for diet A were developed 24 h after defecation. For diet B, test cards were developed at 24, 48, and 72 h after defecation.

At the completion of diet B, the volunteers were provided with a dietary record and asked to estimate the percentage of each raw fruit and vegetable they actually consumed for each day of the diet. Reported percentages for the day on which the last sample was collected were excluded.

statistics
Comparisons between HO, HOS, and HHO for samples with added HPE and Hb were made with the Kruskal–Wallis test (13). Where significance was found, pairwise comparisons of the three groups were made via the method of Dunn (14). Differences in positivity rates were compared by calculating the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the difference for paired cases (15).


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
in vitro studies
For the samples with added HPE, positivity rates for HO and HOS were initially high but decreased substantially as the time between sample preparation and development increased (Fig. 1 ). In contrast, for HHO the initial positivity rates were very high and remained high over the 6-day time course. HHO was significantly more affected by the added HPE than HOS at all time points and more affected than HO at all except the 1-h time point (Kruskal–Wallis test; P = 0.02 at 1 h, P <0.0001 at 8 h, P <0.0001 at 24 h, P <0.0001 at 48 h, P =0.0003 at 72 h, and P = 0.001 at 144 h).



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Overall positivity rates of each FOBT for the fecal samples with added HPE in relation to time after smearing.

{blacksquare}, HO; X, HOS; , HHO; *, Kruskal–Wallis test, P <0.05, pairwise difference between HOS and HHO; {dagger}, Kruskal–Wallis test, P <0.05, pairwise difference between HO and HHO.

For the samples with added whole blood, positivity rates for HO and HOS initially increased and then plateaued, whereas the positivity rate for HHO remained constant (Fig. 2 ). HOS was the most sensitive test, with significant pairwise differences from HHO at the 24-h (Kruskal–Wallis test; P = 0.03), 48-h (P = 0.03), 72-h (P = 0.03), and 144-h (P = 0.02) time points. Despite the apparent greater sensitivity of HO over HHO, there were no significant pairwise differences between these two tests at any time point.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Overall positivity rates of each FOBT for the fecal samples with added Hb in relation to time after smearing.

{blacksquare}, HO; X, HOS; , HHO; *, Kruskal–Wallis test, P <0.05, pairwise difference between HOS and HHO.

in vivo study
Compliance.
Given the very large quantity of fruit and vegetables the subjects were asked to consume, compliance was good. All of the supplied cantaloupe was consumed on 88% of study days, all broccoli was consumed on 83% of study days, all cauliflower was consumed on 83% of study days, all red radish was consumed on 82% of study days, and all turnip on 68% of study days.

FOBT results.
No subject tested positive with any of the tests on the low heme/low plant peroxidase diet (n = 61). For the plant peroxidase challenge diet, the only positive HO and HOS test results occurred at 24 h after smearing, and only one volunteer tested positive with each of the tests (Fig. 3 ). There were no significant differences for either test when compared with their positivity rates on the low heme/low plant peroxidase diet (differences for both the HO and HOS tests, 1.6%; 95% CI of the difference, -1.5% to 4.8%). For the HHO test, 13 volunteers were positive at 24 h, significantly more than on the low heme/low plant peroxidase diet (difference, 21.3%; 95% CI, 11.0–31.6%). Although the number of volunteers who tested positive with the HHO test decreased to eight at 48 h and then to five at 72 h, significantly more subjects still tested positive at each of these time points (48-h difference, 13.1%; 95% CI, 4.6–21.6%; 72-h difference, 8.2%; 95% CI, 1.3–15.1%). In addition, significantly more subjects tested positive with the HHO test at each time point on the high plant peroxidase challenge diet than with the HO or HOS tests (24-h difference, 19.6%; 95% CI, 9.7–29.6%; 48-h difference, 13.1%; 95% CI, 4.6–21.6%; 72-h difference, 8.2%; 95% CI, 1.3–15.1% for both HO and HOS).



View larger version (20K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Positivity rates of each FOBT for the 61 subjects on the low heme/high plant peroxidase challenge diet 24, 48, and 72 h after smearing.

The error bars represent the SE. *, significant at {alpha} = 0.05 level compared with the low plant peroxidase diet.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The results demonstrate that ingested plant peroxidases are capable of surviving transit through the gut and that, in the feces, they can cause positive guaiac-based FOBT reactions. For HO and HOS, they also show that the ability of plant peroxidases to cause false-positive reactions decreases rapidly as the time between fecal smearing and development increases. In contrast, positivity rates attributable to the peroxidase activity of Hb increase before plateauing over the same time course for these two tests.

Three previous studies were unable to demonstrate any interference by the ingestion of raw fruits and vegetables with HO (4)(16)(17), results that are compatible with those seen in the present study. There was, at best, only minimal interference with HHO in the one previous study that examined it (4), a result that differs from our present findings. However, the challenge diet in that study did not include the substantial amount of peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables used in the present study.

Recently, Rozen et al. (18) postulated that the high HOS positivity rate observed in the Israeli colorectal cancer screening studies was caused by a culturally-based preference for peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables over other food groups. They found that the positivity rate fell substantially when they delayed development until 3 days after sample application. In another study, they demonstrated that the HOS positivity rate obtained in subjects on a standard restriction diet was equivalent to that obtained in subjects on an unrestricted diet whose test cards were stored for at least 3 days before development (19). Their conclusions are compatible with the results obtained in this study.

Previously, we showed that HOS is capable of detecting lower concentrations of Hb in feces than HO (20)(21). This was observed as a nonsignificant trend in our study (Fig. 2Up ). In this light, it is interesting that we found HOS to be no more affected by plant peroxidase interference than HO. This result may be explained by the fact that the HOS developer contains 5% more ethanol than the HO developer (12), consequently rendering a higher proportion of any plant peroxidases inactive because of denaturation.

Hydration of HO has been shown to decrease the detection limit of the test for blood (22)(23)(24) and to increase its clinical sensitivity for colonic neoplasia (24)(25). In this study, we found HHO to be, at best, no more sensitive for blood than HO. Because the fecal blood concentrations we looked at were lower than those examined in the previous studies, hydration may increase the sensitivity of HO only where higher concentrations of fecal blood are concerned.

HHO has been shown to have a lower specificity than HO (25). More recently, it was found to have a higher positivity rate and lower positive predictive value than HOS in a bowel cancer screening program without finding a substantially higher yield of lesions (26). The results of our study suggest that plant peroxidase interference may account, at least in part, for these observations. Overall, it appears that HOS has a distinct advantage over HHO in clinical practice because HOS is less prone to interference by plant peroxidases.

The key finding of our study was that a diet extremely high in raw peroxidase-rich fruits and vegetables does not affect HO or HOS if, after smearing, the test cards are stored at room temperature for 48 h or more before development. Therefore, raw fruits and vegetables may be eaten without restriction by subjects being tested for fecal occult blood by Hemoccult or Hemoccult SENSA, provided that test cards are stored at room temperature for at least 48 h before development. In contrast, stringent restriction of raw fruits and vegetables appears to be required for hydrated Hemoccult.


   Acknowledgments
 
This study was supported, in part, by a grant from SmithKline Diagnostics, Inc., Palo Alto, CA. We thank Josefina Baker and Ronald Schoengold for advice, Masha Alexeyeff and Joanne Tilkeridis for technical assistance, and the volunteers for their enthusiasm and cooperation.


   Footnotes
 
2 Present address: Gastroenterology Unit, Flinders Medical Centre, Bedford Park, South Australia 5042, Australia.

Presented, in part, to the Annual Meetings of the American Gastroenterological Association, Washington, DC, May 11–14, 1997, and the American Association of Clinical Chemistry, Atlanta, GA, July 20–24, 1997. Published in abstract form in Gastroenterology 1997;112:A657 and Clinical Chemistry 1997;43;A130.

1 Nonstandard abbreviations: FOBT, fecal occult blood test; Hb, hemoglobin; HO, Hemoccult; HOS, Hemoccult SENSA; HHO, hydrated Hemoccult; HPE, horseradish peroxidase extract; and CI, confidence interval.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Young GP. Screening for colorectal cancer: alternative faecal occult blood tests. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 1998;10:205-212. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. St John DJB, Sinatra MA. Update on office testing for occult blood. Pract Gastroenterol 1997;21:8-20.
  3. Caligiore P, Macrae FA, St John DJB, Rayner LJ, Legge JW. Peroxidase levels in food: relevance to colorectal cancer screening. Am J Clin Nutr 1982;35:1487-1489. [Free Full Text]
  4. Macrae FA, St John DJB, Caligiore P, Taylor L, Legge JW. Optimal dietary conditions for Hemoccult testing. Gastroenterology 1982;82:899-903. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Dunford HB, Stillman JS. On the function and mechanism of action of peroxidases. Coord Chem Rev 1976;19:187-251.
  6. Everse J, Johnson MC, Marini MA. Peroxidative activities of hemoglobin and hemoglobin derivatives. Methods Enzymol 1994;231:547-561. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Dawson JH. Probing structure-function relations in heme-containing oxygenases and peroxidases. Science 1988;240:433-439. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. McDonald CA, Burford Y, Yuen AC, Walls RS, Goulston KJ. Immunochemical detection of fecal occult blood. Aust NZ J Med 1984;14:105-110. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Young GP, St John DJB. Selecting an occult blood test for use as a screening tool for large bowel cancer. Front Gastrointest Res 1991;18:135-156.
  10. Gaspar T, Penel C, Thorpe T, Greppin H. Peroxidases 1970–1980. A survey of their biochemical and physiological roles in higher plants, Geneva, Switzerland: Universite' de Gene've-Centre de Botanique, 1982..
  11. Hu C, van Huystee RB. Role of carbohydrate moieties in peanut (Arachis hypogaea) peroxidases. Biochem J 1989;263:129-135. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. . Hemoccult® SENSA®. Product instructions 1994 SmithKline Diagnostics Palo Alto, CA. .
  13. Daniel W. Applied nonparametric statistics, 2nd ed 1990:226-234 PWS-Kent Publishing Boston, MA. .
  14. Dunn OJ. Multiple comparisons using rank sums. Technometrics 1964;6:241-252.
  15. Gardner MJ, Altman DG. Confidence intervals rather than P-values: estimation rather than hypothesis testing. Br Med J 1986;292:746-750.
  16. Broderick GT, Jr, Harris SM, Meyer GW. False-positive Hemoccult test not caused by turnips [Letter]. N Engl J Med 1982;307:191.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Meyer GW, Komadina K, Perucca P. Vegetable peroxidase is denatured by gastric acid: fresh vegetables do not cause false-positive stool Hemoccult in normal subjects [Letter]. Gastroenterology 1991;101:871.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Rozen P, Knaani J, Papo N. Evaluation and comparison of an immunochemical and a guaiac faecal occult blood screening test for colorectal neoplasia. Eur J Cancer Prev 1995;4:475-481. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Rozen P, Knaani J. Comparative specificities of a guaiac and an immunochemical fecal occult blood test and elimination of dietary restrictions [Abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1998;47:AB103..
  20. Petty MT, Deacon MC, Alexeyeff MA, St John DJB, Young GP. Readability and sensitivity of an established and a new faecal occult blood test in the hospital ward environment. Med J Aust 1992;156:420-423. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Young GP, Sinatra MA, St John DJB. Influence of delay in stool sampling on fecal occult blood test sensitivity. Clin Chem 1996;42:1107-1108. [Free Full Text]
  22. Wells HJ, Pagano JF. 'Hemoccult'TM Test–reversal of false-negative results due to storage [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1977;72:A125.
  23. Matlock GA, Earnest DL. Effect of hydration on Hemoccult II sensitivity [Abstract]. Gastroenterology 1979;76:1196.
  24. Macrae FA, St John DJB. Relationship between patterns of bleeding and Hemoccult sensitivity in patients with colorectal cancers or adenomas. Gastroenterology 1982;82:891-898. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Bradley M, Snover DC, Church TR, Williams S, et al. Sensitivity, specificity and positive predictivity of the Hemoccult test in screening for colorectal cancers: the University of Minnesota's colon cancer control study. Gastroenterology 1989;97:597-600. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Levin B, Hess K, Johnson C. Screening for colorectal cancer: a comparison of three fecal occult blood tests. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:970-976. [Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
GutHome page
R J C Steele, P L McClements, G Libby, R Black, C Morton, J Birrell, N A G Mowat, J A Wilson, M Kenicer, F A Carey, et al.
Results from the first three rounds of the Scottish demonstration pilot of FOBT screening for colorectal cancer
Gut, April 1, 2009; 58(4): 530 - 535.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
C. G Fraser
Faecal occult blood tests - eliminate, enhance or update?
Ann Clin Biochem, March 1, 2008; 45(2): 117 - 121.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (15)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sinatra, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Sinatra, M. A.
Right arrow Articles by Young, G. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS