Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 1718-1724, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:1718-1724.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Simple, Rapid, Quantitative, and Sensitive Detection of Telomere Repeats in Cell Lysate by a Hybridization Protection Assay

Yasuhiro Nakamura1, Minoru Hirose2, Hajime Matsuo1, Naohiro Tsuyama1, Keiichi Kamisango2 and Toshinori Ide1,a

1 Department of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Hiroshima University School of Medicine, Kasumi 1-2-3, Hiroshima City, Hiroshima 734-8551, Japan.

2 Diagnostic Science Laboratories, Chugai Diagnostic Science Company Ltd., 3-41-8 Takada, Toshima-ku, Tokyo 171-8545, Japan.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 81-82-257-5294; e-mail tide{at}pharm.hiroshima-u.ac.jp


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Detection of telomere repeats by Southern hybridization of genomic DNA is time consuming, and the reading of a mean terminal restriction fragment (TRF) length from a smear pattern of an autoradiogram can be inaccurate. We developed a hybridization protection assay (HPA) for telomere repeats.

Methods: We heated 5 µL of DNA solution or 10 µL of cell or tissue lysate at 95 °C for 5 min, mixed it with 100 µL of hybridization solution containing 3 x 106 relative light units of acridinium ester-labeled probe, and incubated the mixture for 20 min at 60 °C. We then added 300 µL of selection buffer and incubated the mixture for 10 min at 60 °C to differentially hydrolyze unhybridized probe. Chemiluminescence was measured for 2 s per tube.

Results: The amount of telomere repeats was assayed by HPA within linearity from 10 to 3000 ng of purified genomic DNA or from 1000 to 100 000 cell equivalents of lysate. To normalize the amount of DNA in lysate, the amount of Alu sequence was measured by HPA. A ratio of telomere to Alu (TA ratio) = 0.01 corresponded to ~2 kbp of mean TRF length determined by Southern blotting in cultured fibroblast and colorectal tissue samples. The TA ratio decreased from 0.06 to 0.02 with increasing division age from 30 to 90 population doubling levels of cultured human fetal fibroblasts. The assay required ~45 min from collection of cell or tissue samples.

Conclusions: The amount of telomere repeats was quantitatively measured by HPA in 10 ng of sheared genomic DNA or in the lysate of 1000 cells. This method is simple, rapid, quantitative, sensitive, and applicable to the measurement of telomere repeats in clinical samples such as needle biopsy specimen or as few as 1000 cells in body fluid or washings.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Telomeres are a specialized structure at the end of eukaryotic chromosomes. Telomeric DNA generally consists of a tandemly repeated G-rich sequence oriented 5' to 3' toward the end of the telomere repeat. Because this sequence is evolutionally conserved, with some exceptions, from unicellular organisms such as yeast and ciliates to mammals, the telomeric repeat sequence appears critical for telomere function in eukaryotes (1)(2).

Telomere DNA of human somatic cells shortens at each cell division, which determines, as a mitotic clock, a finite proliferative capacity of human somatic cells (3)(4)(5)(6). Telomerase is required for such cells to proliferate indefinitely, maintaining telomere length, as the germ line and most cancer cells. A causal relationship between telomere shortening and cellular senescence has been established by studies that showed that transfection of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase gene (hTERT) into various human mortal somatic cells leads to elongation of telomere length and extension of the in vitro replicative life span (7)(8).

To examine telomere length of human genomic DNA, a majority of reports has applied terminal restriction fragment (TRF)1 length estimation by Southern blotting of genomic DNA digested with restriction enzyme. This technique has advanced our knowledge of telomere metabolism and provided important data on the shortening of TRFs with cellular senescence of human somatic cells (3)(4)(5)(6) and the elongation of TRFs after introduction of telomerase gene into telomerase negative cells (7)(8).

TRF length estimated by Southern blotting does, however, have disadvantages: (a) TRF does not indicate pure telomere repeat length but includes various unknown lengths of subtelomic sequences; (b) to estimate TRF length, genomic DNA should be purified as intact (unsheared) as possible; (c) the mean TRF length estimated by reading smear patterns of autoradiograms may be inaccurate; and (d) Southern blotting is time consuming.

Recently we reported the application of a hybridization protection assay (HPA) with an acridinium ester (AE)-labeled probe to quantify telomerase reaction products (telomere repeat DNA) (9)(10). In the present study, we applied HPA to measure telomere repeats in genomic DNA. This method cannot measure telomere repeats in individual cells or chromosomes, but it has advantages when compared with Southern blotting: it is simple, rapid, sensitive, quantitative, and reproducible; and it measures the number of telomere repeats, rather than TRF with subtelomic sequence, in purified and sheared genomic DNA as well as in unpurified DNA in cell or tissue lysate.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
hpa
The HPA procedure for quantifying telomere repeats in this study was based on the method described previously to measure telomerase activity (9). Five microliters of DNA solution was heat denatured for 5 min at 95 °C. The volume of DNA solution could be increased up to 20 µL without affecting the result. One hundred microliters of AE-labeled probe [5'-CCC TAA CCC TAA CCC TAA CTC TGC TCG AC-3', where indicates the AE position; emission, 3 x 106 relative light units (rlu)] in hybridization buffer [0.1 mol/L lithium succinate buffer, pH 4.7, containing 200 g/L lithium lauryl sulfate, 1.2 mol/L lithium chloride, 20 mmol/L EDTA, and 20 mmol/L ethyleneglycol-bis-(ß-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid (EGTA)] was added into each reaction tube and incubated for 20 min at 60 °C. We added 300 µL of selection buffer (0.6 mol/L sodium tetraborate buffer, pH 8.5, containing 50 mL/L Triton X-100) to differentially hydrolyze unhybridized probe during incubation for 10 min at 60 °C. Chemiluminescence was measured for 2 s per tube by a luminometer (Leader 1; Gen-Probe). Alu sequence was also measured by HPA, using a probe: 5'-TGT AAT CCC AGC ACT TTG GGA GGC-3', where indicates the AE position.

synthetic oligodeoxyribonucleotides
Synthetic oligodeoxynucleotides, (5'-GGT TAG-3')4G and (5'-GGT TAG-3')20 and their opposite strands were purchased from Sawady Technology. Longer telomere repeats, ~1 and 2 kbp length, were synthesized by PCR, using a synthetic 120-mer. For the Alu sequence, 5'-GCC TCC CAA AGT GCT GGG ATT ACA-3' and its opposite strand were purchased from Sawady Technology. AE labeling was performed by us at Chugai Diagnostic Science Company, Ltd.

preparation of genomic dna and cell lysate
Genomic DNA was purified from cultured cells or resected frozen human colorectal tissue samples as described previously (11). Lysate of cultured cells was prepared for direct measurement of telomere repeats as follows. Cultured cells (~5 x 106) were scraped, collected into a 1-mL tube, and pelleted by centrifugation. The pellet was dissolved in 100 µL of hybridization buffer (0.1 mol/L lithium succinate buffer, pH 4.7, containing 200 g/L lithium lauryl sulfate, 1.2 mol/L lithium chloride, 20 mmol/L EDTA, and 20 mmol/L EGTA). Released genomic DNA was extensively sheared by pipetting (50 times). The tissue sample was powdered in liquid nitrogen, and an aliquot (2–3 mg) was dissolved in 100 µL of hybridization buffer.

southern blotting
Southern blotting to measure TRF length was performed for HinfI-digested genomic DNA by using 32P-labeled (TTAGGG)4 probe as described previously (11).

cell culture
Normal human fibroblasts, TIG-3 (12), were cultured and used at different population doubling levels (PDLs) as described (13). TIG-3 had a maximal proliferative life span of ~80 PDLs. SVts9-3 and SVts9-4 were mortal cell lines (telomerase activity negative) with maximum PDLs of ~100–110, which were derived from TIG-3 after transfection with SV40 tsT antigen (13). SVts8 was a immortal cell line derived from TIG-3 after transfection with SV40 tsT antigen (13) and was continuously cultured at 34 °C over 400 PDLs.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
quantification of telomere repeats by hpa
We first examined basic studies to quantify synthetic oligonucleotides of telomere repeats by HPA probe. Because it was confirmed, as shown later, that Escherichia coli DNA did not give any positive signal, 5 µg of E. coli DNA was added as a carrier in each assay. As shown in Fig. 1 , the detection limit for the single-stranded 25-mer, (GGT TAG)4G, and the 120-mer, (GGT TAG)20, was 1 pg, and the assay was linear up to 300 pg regardless of the size of telomere repeats. The emission, in rlu, was always higher, as confirmed by three repeated experiments, for the same amount (in picograms) of 25-mer vs 120-mer. This may be the because 25-mer DNA was theoretically hybridized with one probe molecule, whereas the 120-mer DNA was hybridized with four probe molecules, i.e., the 120-mer DNA molecule was fivefold larger (by weight) than the 25-mer, whereas it was fourfold larger in the number of bindable probe molecules than the 25-mer. As expected, the emission in rlu of the double-stranded 25-mer and 120-mer was one-half of that obtained from the same weight (picograms) of the single-stranded 25- and 120-mers (data not shown). The discrepancy between the weight of the telomere repeats and the hybridizable probe number (which corresponded to rlu) was negligible when the longer telomere repeats were assayed using longer telomere repeat DNAs. Fig. 1 shows the results for double-stranded DNA containing telomere repeats of ~1 kbp and 2 kbp, which were prepared by preparative PCR amplification using 120-mer double-stranded molecules.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Detection limit and linearity of HPA for telomere repeats of synthetic oligomer.

G-rich synthetic telomere-repeat DNA was assayed by HPA probe. Each point represents the mean of two to four measurements. •, single-stranded (5'-GGT TAG-3')4G; {circ}, single-stranded (5'-GGT TAG-3')20. E. coli genomic DNA (5 µg) was included in each assay tube as a carrier. Double-stranded 1-kbp telomere repeats ({blacksquare}) and double-stranded 2-kbp telomere repeats ({square}) were amplified by PCR using both strands of 120-mer as primer-template. E. coli genomic DNA (1 µg) was included in each assay tube as a carrier. Amount of input HPA probe was 3 x 10 6 rlu.

Genomic DNA from the cultured human cell line SVts8 was examined by AE-labeled probe (Fig. 2 ). Because the size of genomic DNA might affect the results, DNA was mechanically sheared or digested with restriction enzyme before assay (Fig. 2A ). No significant difference was observed between genomic DNAs of unsheared and sheared by extensive pipetting (Fig. 2B ). HinfI-digested DNA appeared to give a slightly higher signal (Fig. 2B ), but this was insignificant and repeated experiments gave the same results as unsheared DNA samples. Unsheared DNA also was viscous and inappropriate for quantitative handling; therefore, we used mechanically sheared DNA for further analysis. We also examined the effect of the hybridization temperature used with the AE-labeled probe. As seen in Fig. 2B , hybridization was better at 60 °C, which was the optimal temperature set for the standard procedure to measure telomerase products that were small double-stranded DNA (9). Because 95 °C was the optimal denaturation temperature for the established procedure for detecting telomerase products (9), higher denaturation temperatures might be required for large genomic DNA. However, a denaturation temperature of 100 °C was not better than 95 °C (data not shown), and we set the denaturation temperature at 95 °C. Telomeric repeats in human genomic DNA were detected at concentrations of 0.01 µg or less, and the assay was linear up to 3 µg (Fig. 3 ). The emission (in rlu) of DNA from TIG-3 at 39 PDLs was always higher than that from SVts8, which was consistent with data that the former had longer TRFs (Fig. 4 ). E. coli DNA did not give any positive signal (Fig. 3 ).



View larger version (36K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Assay of telomere repeats in genomic DNA.

Genomic DNA purified from SVts8 cells was unsheared, sheared by extensive pipetting, or digested with HinfI. (A), size of DNA was estimated by agarose gel electrophoresis (7 g/L agarose gel; 25 V for 20 h). Numbers on the left are the numbers of base pairs. (B), telomere repeats were assayed by AE-labeled probe at different hybridization temperatures in sheared and unsheared genomic DNA. Values are the means of two measurements.



View larger version (31K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Sensitivity and linearity of HPA for telomere repeats of genomic DNA.

Telomere repeats were measured by HPA for different amounts of purified genomic DNA (sheared) from normal human fibroblasts (TIG-3 at 39 PDLs; •), SV40-transformed immortal clone (SVts8 over 300 PDLs; {blacksquare}), and E. coli ({circ}). Each point represents the mean (bars, SE) of four to six measurements. Mechanically sheared and HinfI-digested DNA gave the same rlu values, which were used together to calculate the mean.



View larger version (37K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Telomere shortening of cultured human fibroblasts with division age.

Genomic DNA from normal human fibroblasts (TIG-3), an SV40-transformed mortal clone from TIG-3 (SVts9-3), and an SV40-transformed immortal clone (SVts8) at different PDLs was assayed for TRF length by Southern blotting (A) and for telomere repeats by HPA (B). For Southern blotting (A), DNA was digested with HinfI, and 2 µg was electrophoresed (7 g/L agarose gel; 25 V for 20 h). Numbers on the left represent the numbers of base pairs. For the HPA assay (B), 1 µg of sheared genomic DNA was used. •, normal TIG-3; {circ}, SV40-transformed mortal clone (SVts9-3); {square}, SV40-transformed immortal clone (SVts8). Each point represents the mean of two measurements.

quantification of telomere repeats in genomic dna samples
Telomere shortening was examined for normal human fibroblasts and their SV40 transformants. As presented in Fig. 4AUp , the TRF length decreased according to cell division age in both the normal human fibroblast cell line, TIG-3, and its SV40 transformants. The mean TRF length by Southern blotting of normal TIG-3 cells was 8.4 kbp at 36 PDLs, 6.2 kbp at 62 PDLs, 5.9 kbp at 78 PDLs, and 5.8 kbp at 83 PDLs, at which TIG-3 cells senesced. SVts9-3 was a SV40-transformed mortal cell line with an extended proliferative life span up to ~100 PDLs. The mean TRF length by Southern blotting of SVts9-3 was 6.7 kbp at 53 PDLs, 5.6 kbp at 80 PDLs, 4.4 kbp at 93 PDLs, and 4.3 kbp at 99 PDLs. An immortalized clone, SVts8, proliferated over 300 PDLs and had a TRF of ~6.6 kbp. The TRF of immortal SVts8 did not change with division number. Corresponding to the above data, a decrease in the amount of telomere repeats was clearly detected by HPA according to cell division age in both normal and SV40-transformed cells (Fig. 4BUp ).

Genomic DNA from colorectal tissue samples was also examined. Fig. 5 A presents several examples of TRF length of genomic DNA from colorectal tissues of either tumor (T) or non-tumor (NT) tissue. Colorectal DNAs showed a rough correlation (correlation coefficient = 0.62) between emission in rlu by HPA and mean TRF length by Southern blotting except for several points, which were high by HPA and low by Southern blotting (Fig. 5B ). These samples out of correlation were degraded DNA, as confirmed by gel electrophoresis, probably attributable to shearing during the purification process of genomic DNA. The open circles in Fig. 5B were results from TIG-3 and its SV40 transformants at different PDLs, which also showed a rough correlation between rlu and TRF length.



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. TRF length by Southern blotting and telomere repeat by HPA in genomic DNA from colorectal tissue samples.

(A), TRF length by Southern blotting. DNA was digested with HinfI, and 2 µg was electrophoresed (7 g/L agarose gel; 25 V for 20 h) for Southern blotting. T and N are tumor and non-tumor sample pairs, respectively, from the same patient. Numbers on left represent the number of base pairs. (B), relationship between telomere repeats measured by HPA and TRF length measured by Southern blotting in genomic DNA from colorectal tissues (•) and cultured fibroblasts ({circ}). For HPA, 1 µg of sheared DNA was used for each assay.

quantification of telomere repeats in cell and tissue lysates
For direct assay of telomere repeats by HPA, the cell pellet was lysed with dilution buffer for the AE-labeled probe, which contained a detergent, lithium lauryl sulfate, and high salt (see Materials and Methods) and could lyse cells and tissues. Released DNA was sheared by extensive pipetting. This lysate was used directly for assay of telomere repeats. The Alu sequence determined by Alu-specific AE-labeled probe could be used to normalize amount of DNA (Fig. 6 A) because the amount of Alu sequence per genomic DNA was constant in both cultured cells and colorectal tissues in all samples we examined (data not shown). In Fig. 6B , the Alu sequence and telomere repeats were assayed in serially diluted cell lysate. Telomere repeats in lysate from 101 cells could be detected. Because cell lysate contained mRNA that had Alu sequences, the emission in rlu of the Alu sequence in cell lysate might be higher than that in purified genomic DNA. If so, the ratio of the emission of the telomere repeats to the emission of the Alu repeats was lower in cell lysate than that in purified genomic DNA. However, the ratio of emission of the telomere repeats to that of the Alu sequence was ~0.03 in lysate from SVts8 cells (Fig. 7 A, {square}). This ratio was almost equal within experimental error to that obtained in purified genomic DNA from SVts8 cells (Fig. 6B ). This indicates that the presence of mRNA did not alter the rlu value of the Alu sequence. Fig. 7A shows the rlu ratio of telomere repeats to Alu repeats determined by HPA in cell lysate of TIG-3 and its transformant cell lines. The rlu ratio decreased according to cell division age. These data do not show changes in telomere repeat length at the individual chromosome level directly but gave information of telomere reduction according to cell division age, as shown in Fig. 4Up . Fig. 7B shows three samples of colorectal tissue in which the relative amount of telomere repeats determined by HPA (rlu ratio, 0.042 for sample a, 0.018 for sample b, 0.048 for sample c) was well correlated with mean the TRF length by Southern blotting (8.2 kbp for sample a, 4.1 kbp for sample b, 8.8 kbp for sample c). Data from cultured fibroblasts and from colorectal tissue samples showed that a ratio 0.01 for the emission (in rlu) of telomere repeats to that of Alu repeats corresponded to ~2 kbp of mean TRF length measured by Southern blotting under our assay conditions.



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 6. Measurement of telomere and Alu sequences by HPA.

(A), Alu sequence was measured by HPA in purified genomic DNA from TIG-3 at 36 PDLs. (B), Alu and telomere sequences were measured by HPA in serially diluted lysates corresponding to the different number of SVts8 cells. {circ}, Alu sequence; •, telomere repeats. Each point represents the mean (bars, SE) of four to six measurements.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 7. Amount of telomere repeats in extracts from cells and tissues.

(A), lysates from 1 x 104, 3 x 104, and 1 x 105 cells were used, each in triplicate, for HPA assay of telomere repeats, and lysates from 1 x 103, 3 x 103, and 1 x 104 cells were used, each in triplicate, for HPA assay of Alu repeats. Because these values were within the linear range of the assay, all values were normalized to 1 x 104 cells for calculation of the rlu ratio. (B), lysates from three colorectal tissue samples (a and b, colorectal carcinoma; c, healthy colorectal tissue) were serially diluted and assayed in triplicate for telomere repeats and for Alu sequence by HPA. The TRF lengths by Southern blotting of genomic DNA from these samples were 8.2 kbp for a, 4.1 kbp for b, and 8.8 kbp for c. Bars, SE.

The HPA assay required ~45 min from collection of cell or tissue samples. This procedure was applicable to biopsied or resected human soft tissue samples for clinical examinations.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Southern blotting has been widely used to measure mean TRF length. This method is effective for obtaining a rough idea of mean TRF length and the distribution pattern of TRF length among cell populations. However, TRF length measurement by Southern blotting has several intrinsic problems. Because TRF includes various unknown lengths of subtelomic sequences, the pure telomere repeat length is not known. In addition, the mean TRF of genomic DNA does not give information at the individual cell or individual chromosome level. TRF length measurement by Southern blotting has additional technical problems: (a) Genomic DNA must be purified as intact (unsheared) as possible from tissue and cells. (b) It is sometimes difficult to handle viscous solutions containing high-molecular weight genomic DNA. (c) It is a time-consuming procedure, involving genomic DNA purification, digestion with restriction enzymes, gel electrophoresis, blotting, hybridization, and autoradiography. (d) Measurement of the mean TRF length by quantitative densitometry of the smear pattern of an autoradiogram may not be accurate.

The HPA method, presented here to measure the amount of telomere repeats, still has the disadvantage of not giving information at the individual cell or individual chromosome level. Moreover, neither the mean TRF size nor variation of TRF in the given cell population was directly measured by this method. However, information could be obtained by HPA on telomere shortening with increasing division age of cultured fibroblasts and on variations of the amount of telomere among different tissue samples. Results obtained by HPA showed a good agreement with the results of mean TRF length measured by Southern blotting. In addition, the HPA method has great advantages compared with Southern blotting: (a) The amount of telomere repeats measured by HPA does not include subtelomic sequences. (b) Intact (unsheared) genomic DNA is not required; rather, sheared DNA is recommended. (c) The HPA method is easy to handle, simple, rapid, sensitive, and quantitative. (d) The amount of telomere repeats is measured directly in cell and tissue lysates.

Direct assay of cell lysate requires the normalization of amounts of DNA, which was achieved through calculating the rlu ratio of telomere repeats to Alu sequence. Data from cultured fibroblasts and from colorectal tissue samples showed that a rlu ratio of 0.01 corresponded to ~2 kbp of mean TRF length under our assay conditions. The HPA procedure is convenient for clinical examination of telomere repeats in a small number of cells in washings or body fluid or in a small portion of human tissue obtained by endoscopy or needle-biopsy.

Other methods have been published to measure telomere repeat size, and each method has its own advantages and disadvantages. Telomere staining by fluorescence in situ hybridization with telomere peptide nucleic acid-probe has the advantage of giving the amount of telomere repeats at each chromosome end (14) but has the disadvantage of requiring a complicated process with special equipment for quantitative measurement; it also is hard to examine a large number of cells and tissues with this method. Southern hybridization of DNA trapped on a filter by slot-blot makes it possible to estimate telomere amounts from whole cells, using standardization by the ratio of telomere to centromere DNA content (15). This method does not require purification of DNA, but it is time consuming for Southern hybridization and is less accurate for quantification of the slot-blot pattern. Flow cytometry of cells stained with fluorescent telomere probes reveals the amount of telomere repeats at the individual cell level with large number of cells, but it requires special equipment and is not suitable for solid tissues (16). It is good to have several different techniques to measure telomere repeats for various purposes, and HPA can be an additional method. Researchers in various fields can select the appropriate method according to their own experimental and clinical purposes.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported, in part, by a grant-in-aid for scientific research on priority areas (Cancer Research) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan and grants-in-aid for scientific research from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports, and Culture of Japan.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: TRF, terminal restriction fragment; HPA, hybridization protection assay; AE, acridinium ester; EGTA, ethyleneglycol-bis-(ß-aminoethylether)-N,N,N',N'-tetraacetic acid; rlu, relative light unit(s); and PDL, population doubling level.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Blackburn EH, Greider CW, eds. Telomeres. Cold Spring Harbor, NY; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1995:396pp..
  2. Zakian AV. Structure and function of telomeres. Annu Rev Genet 1989;23:579-604. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Harley CB, Futcher AB, Greider CW. Telomeres shorten during ageing of human fibroblasts. Nature 1990;345:458-460. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Allsopp RC, Vaziri H, Patterson C, Goldstein S, Younglai EV, et al. Telomere length predicts replicative capacity of human fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:10114-10118. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Hastie ND, Dempster M, Dunlop MG, Thompson AM, Green DK, Allshire RC. Telomere reduction in human colorectal carcinoma and with ageing. Nature 1993;346:866-868.
  6. Vaziri H, Schachter F, Uchida I, Wei L, Zhu X, Effros R, et al. Loss of telomeric DNA during aging of normal and trisomy 21 human lymphocytes. Am J Hum Genet 1993;52:661-667. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt SE, Chiu C-P, Morin GB, et al. Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells. Science 1998;279:349-353. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Vaziri H, Benchimol S. Reconstitution of telomerase activity in normal human cells leads to elongation of telomeres and extended replicative life span. Curr Biol 1998;8:279-282. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Hirose M, Hashimoto JA, Ogura K, Tahara H, Ide T, Yoshimura T. A rapid, useful and quantitative method to measure telomerase activity by hybridization protection assay connected with telomeric repeat amplification protocol. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1997;123:337-344. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Hirose M, Hashimoto JA, Tahara H, Ide T, Yoshimura T. New method to measure telomerase activity by transcription-mediated amplification and hybridization protection assay. Clin Chem 1998;44:2446-2452. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Tahara H, Tokutake Y, Maeda S, Kataoka H, Watanabe T, Satoh M, et al. Abnormal telomere dynamics of B-lymphoblastoid cell strains from Werner's syndrome patients transformed by Epstein-Barr virus. Oncogene 1997;15:1911-1920. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Matsuo M, Kaji K, Utakoji T, Hosoda K. Ploidy of human embryonic fibroblasts during in vitro aging. J Gerontol 1982;37:33-37. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Tsuyama N, Miura M, Kitahira M, Ishibashi S, Ide T. SV40 T-antigen is required for maintenance of immortal growth in SV40-transformed human fibroblasts. Cell Struct Funct 1991;16:55-62. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Lansdorp PM, Verwoerd NP, van de Rijke FM, Dragowska V, Little M-T, Dirks RW, et al. Heterogeneity in telomere length of human chromosomes. Hum Mol Genet 1996;5:685-691. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Norwood D, Dimitrov DS. Sensitive method for measuring telomere length by quantifying telomeric DNA content of whole cells. Biotechniques 1998;25:1040-1045. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Rufer N, Dragowska W, Thornbury G, Roosnek E, Lansdorp PM. Telomere length dynamics in human lymphocytes subpopulations measured by flow cytometry. Nat Biotechnol 1998;6:743-747.



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Nucleic Acids ResHome page
R. M. Cawthon
Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR
Nucleic Acids Res., May 15, 2002; 30(10): e47 - e47.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (18)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Ide, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS