|
|
||||||||
Articles |
Department of Clinical Biochemistry, Aarhus University Hospital at Skejby, DK-8000 Aarhus N, Denmark.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 45-8949-6018.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: The within-person variation of P-Hcy and the effects of posture and tourniquet application during venipuncture were studied in 24 healthy subjects. The analytical imprecision of our stable-isotope dilution assay was 3.1%.
Results: The within-person variation (CV) was 8.1%. Daily supplementation with 0.4 mg of folic acid for 2 weeks produced a small but significant decrease in P-Hcy, but there were no significant changes in within-person variation before and after supplementation. After 30 min in the horizontal posture, P-Hcy declined by 6.3%. A 3-min tourniquet application caused a 2.8% increase of P-Hcy.
Conclusions: Our value for within-person variation is consistent with results from studies reported recently in the literature. A 3-min tourniquet application does not add appreciable variation to the measurement of P-Hcy, but the posture of the subject during venipuncture contributes considerably to the within-person variation. We recommend that blood collection when the patient is in a supine position be avoided.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
In addition to knowledge of analytical and between-person variation, e.g., reference intervals, a prerequisite for the interpretation of a single P-Hcy test is knowledge of the magnitude of within-person variation and the possible effects of preanalytical variables. The importance of this was illustrated by the early and influential report by Wu et al. (2), who found a significant mean difference of <2 µmol/L between proband cases of early coronary artery disease and controls.
In a previous study, we reported data on analytical variation and age- and gender-specific reference intervals (3). However, data on the within-person variation of P-Hcy are still sparse and inconsistent (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Because protein-bound Hcy accounts for 70% or more of the total measured Hcy in plasma from healthy subjects (9)(10), the amount of venous stasis and the position of the subject during venipuncture may affect the measured value. To our knowledge, data for a possible effect of tourniquet application on P-Hcy are not available, and we are aware of only one study (n = 7) on the effects of posture on P-Hcy (11).
The present study was designed to obtain additional data on within-person variation in non-folate-deficient subjects. Because our previous study suggested that one-fourth of the apparently healthy volunteers recruited among the employees of our hospital were not consuming enough folate to keep P-Hcy low (3), we included a folic acid supplementation trial to assess folate status in our reference population. We also examined the magnitude of possible changes introduced by tourniquet application or different postures.
The purpose of this study was to provide further background information needed to interpret P-Hcy in general and to provide a better basis for accurate assessment of risk factor associations with vascular disease.
| Subjects and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
study design
Blood was obtained from the volunteers on regular working days
before the coffee break, ~2 h after a typical continental breakfast.
At each blood collection, four test tubes were filled.
The subject was comfortably seated for 5 min before a routine tourniquet was applied for ~15 s by a technologist experienced in the venipuncture procedure. A small (0.8 x 19 mm) 21-gauge scalp vein needle was then inserted into an antecubital vein, and blood was collected into four evacuated blood tubes. The tourniquet was released as soon as blood began to flow into the first tube, which after exactly 30 s was replaced by the next tube and then two other tubes to be filled (sample A1). The subject was then placed in a horizontal posture. After the subject had been supine for 30 min, blood was collected again (sample A2), using the same blood collection procedure.
A week later, samples B1 and B2 were collected under circumstances similar to those under which samples A1 and A2 were obtained. Subjects then received 0.2 mg of folic acid, twice a day, until the last blood collection (samples D).
Two weeks later, sample C1 was collected under circumstances similar to those under which sample A1 was obtained. Simultaneously, after a tourniquet had been applied for 3 min, sample C2 was taken from the opposite arm.
Finally, 1 week later, samples D1 and D2 were collected under circumstances similar to those under which samples C1 and C2 were obtained.
specimens
Tube 1 was thrown away. Tube 2 contained heparin as an
anticoagulant for measurements of albumin and protein. To exclude
kidney insufficiency, we measured the creatinine concentration in the
first sampling (A1). Tube 3 contained EDTA as an anticoagulant and was
used for measurement of the volume fraction of erythrocytes
(hematocrit). Tube 4 contained heparin as an anticoagulant with sodium
fluoride added to a final concentration of 4 g/L blood, according to
the procedure described previously (12), to prevent blood
cell production and release of Hcy into the plasma, which would cause
an artificial increase in measured concentrations. Plasma was separated
by centrifugation within 2 h and stored at -20 °C until
determination of Hcy.
assays
P-Hcy was measured by a modification of the assay developed by
Stabler et al. (13) and Allen et al. (14).
The method is based on the stable-isotope dilution principle with
solid-phase extraction of the sample (12). The method was
linear over the concentration range examined (0.5300 µmol/L)
(15). Only samples collected on the same day were analyzed
in the same assay. Precision was assessed by internal quality-control
samples at two concentrations (13.9 and 28.6 µmol/L; n = 60)
measured throughout the study. The CVs for both were 5%.
Creatinine and albumin in plasma were measured with a Vitros 950® analyzer (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics), and protein was measured by the biuret method on a Cobas Mira® analyzer (Roche). The ratio between P-Hcy and albumin was calculated as µmol Hcy/L divided by µmol albumin/L, assuming a relative molecular weight of 66 500 for albumin. The volume fraction of erythrocytes (hematocrit) was measured with an H3RTX® (Bayer Technicon).
statistical analysis
Results are given as mean ± SD, CV, and range. Differences
between variances were tested with the F-test. The variance
components, as calculated by analysis of variance with nested design
(balanced repeated subsampling), were between-person, within-person,
and analytical variation. The relationship between variables was
assessed using the Pearson correlation coefficient and regression
analysis. The reference change, i.e., the minimum detectable (95%)
change on two consecutive measurements, was calculated as
2.77(within-person variance + analytical
variance)1/2 (16). Unless otherwise
stated, a significance value of 0.05 was assumed.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
analytical variation
Analytical variation as determined by duplicate measurement of all
samples in the study was 3.1% (Table 1
).
|
within-person variation before folic acid
The mean P-Hcy concentration in the two first-morning samples,
collected after 5 min rest in a sitting position (A1 and B1), was 8.5
µmol/L. Five women and four men had concentrations above the
appropriate reference limits for their age and gender (3) on
one or both occasions. The P-Hcy concentration range was 4.014.4
µmol/L. The variations in P-Hcy are presented in Table 1
.
within-person variation after folic acid
The mean P-Hcy concentration in the two first-morning samples
obtained during supplementation with folic acid (samples C1 and D1),
which were collected after 5 min of rest in a sitting position, was 8.0
µmol/L (range, 3.812.8 µmol/L). Thus, supplementation with folic
acid produced a significant mean change in P-Hcy of -0.49 ± 0.93
µmol/L (range, -1.95 to 1.45 µmol/L; P <0.02). The
variations in P-Hcy of these morning samples are presented in Table 1
.
The between- and within-person variations were not significantly
different for men and women, and supplementation with folic acid caused
no significant changes of these variations. Before supplementation with
folic acid, the P-Hcy values for samples B1 varied from 83% to 121%
of the values for samples A1 (decreases in concentration of up to 1.8
µmol/L and increases of up to 2.3 µmol/L). During the
supplementation, the concentrations ranged from 78% to 123% between
samples C1 and D1 (decreases up to 2.0 µmol/L and increases up to 1.9
µmol/L). The reference change between two consecutive measurements
detectable over the background of random biological and analytical
variations was calculated as 2.0 µmol/L, using the mean within-person
SD of 0.68 µmol/L and the analytical SD of 0.26 µmol/L.
effect of posture
The results obtained from the samples taken after 30 min at supine
rest (A2 and B2) are presented in Table 2
. The decreases in P-Hcy, albumin, protein, and hematocrit were
all significant, and the decreases in albumin, protein, and in
hematocrit were correlated significantly with the decrease in P-Hcy.
However, the P-Hcy/albumin ratio of 0.0198 ± 0.0055 did not
change with posture (see Fig. 1
). Assuming an analytical CV for P-Hcy of 3% and for albumin of
1%, the analytical CV for the ratio will be ~3%. Twenty-three of
the 24 participants had changes no larger than 6% of their individual
ratios.
|
|
effect of tourniquet application
An increase in P-Hcy after a 3-min application of tourniquet (C2
and D2) was observed (Table 3
). The increases in P-Hcy, albumin, protein, and hematocrit were
all significant, and the increases in albumin and in protein correlated
significantly with the increase in P-Hcy. However, the P-Hcy/albumin
ratio of 0.0123 ± 0.0032 did not change with the application of
tourniquet. All participants had changes no larger than 6% of their
individual ratios (Fig. 1
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The between-person CV of P-Hcy was 28%, and the concentration range was 4.014.4 µmol/L before and 3.812.8 µmol/L after supplementation with folic acid. This finding suggests that our study population initially had only subtle or no folate deficiency. The intervals are in the same range reported in an earlier study (3) in which we generated a 0.95 reference interval of 4.511.9 µmol/L based on results for the 182 out of 235 unsupplemented individuals who had low P-Hcy values and also were weak responders to reduction of P-Hcy through folic acid supplementation. Furthermore, the CV of 28% agrees with values reported recently in the literature, namely 33.5% reported by Garg et al. (5), 23.9% reported by Cobbaert et al. (7), 24.0% reported by Clarke et al. (4), and 26.3% reported by Rossi et al. (6).
The within-person variation was 8.1%. This value is consistent with results from the above-mentioned four studies: 7.0% (20 individuals, ages 2165 years, from whom samples were drawn weekly for 4 weeks), 9.4% (44 individuals, ages 2146 years, from whom samples were drawn biweekly at each of four visits per individual), 8.9% (96 individuals, ages 6574 years, from whom samples were drawn at 2-month intervals over a 1-year period), and 8.3% (20 individuals, ages 3155 years, from whom samples were drawn at weekly intervals on four occasions), respectively. These concordant results do not confirm previous observations by Santhosh-Kumar et al. (8) who studied 79 individuals, ages 1865 years, from whom samples were drawn on days 5 and 8 of supplementation with 1 mg of folic acid daily. The authors found a variation of P-Hcy threefold higher for any given individual than that found in our study, reporting that concentrations of Hcy in the second serum sample ranged as low as 36% to as high as 165% of the values on the first serum sample (decreases up to 5 µmol/L and increases up to 7 µmol/L). The discrepant results are puzzling, and the reason is not clear. The imprecision of the method used was remarkably high (8%), but the large variation in Hcy concentrations can only partly be related to analytical imprecision. Other factors could also contribute to the variation, e.g., the sampling procedure using serum instead of plasma (vide infra) or the presence of folate deficiency in the study population.
It has become increasingly apparent that the blood-sampling procedure may contribute considerably more variation to the measurement of P-Hcy than the total variation in the analytical procedures for the assay. After sampling, the blood cells still produce and release Hcy into the plasma (18)(19), causing an artificial increase of P-Hcy of ~10%/h until centrifugation. Cooling the blood on ice immediately after collection and separating the blood cells from the plasma within 1 h inhibits the release of Hcy by the cells (18)(19). However, this procedure is inconvenient and a source of error, and it will be impossible to implement in many clinical settings. Adding fluoride (12) or acidic citrate (20) to the blood samples controls the problem. For obvious reasons, measurement of Hcy in serum samples is obsolete. We collected blood in tubes with fluoride because standard tubes with sodium fluoride and heparin as an anticoagulant are readily available, and this practical procedure is the daily routine in our laboratory.
Because the analytical variation in this study only was 3.1%, the 6.3% decrease of P-Hcy after 30 min in the horizontal posture indicates that the position of the subject during venipuncture may have a much greater effect on the outcome of the laboratory result than the variation of the assay procedures. Omitting standardization of the blood-sampling procedure with respect to posture by collecting the blood from subjects sitting and lying down at random may increase the intraindividual variation from 8.1% up to ~12%. The observed range of changes (-15.3% to 0.4%) in our 24 subjects is smaller and not consistent with the results reported by Thirup and Ekelund (11), who found that in seven healthy adults, P-Hcy concentrations changed from -29.9% to -10.3% after 30 min at supine rest. The reason for the discrepant results is not clear. Because almost all blood collections for the determination of P-Hcy, in our experience, are done on ambulatory subjects or walking inpatients, we recommend that blood collection during supine rest be avoided.
The effect of a 3-min tourniquet application was evaluated, a duration of tourniquet time that is often required when blood is drawn from a patient whose veins are difficult to see or palpate or when several blood specimens are taken at one venipuncture (21). The observed 2.8% increase after the 3-min tourniquet application was relatively small compared with the 8.1% within-person variation and does not add an appreciable variation to the measurement of P-Hcy.
The increases of P-Hcy we found after venous stasis and the decreases of P-Hcy after 30 min in the horizontal posture are consistent with the fact that at least 70% of Hcy in circulation is bound to plasma proteins and only non-protein-bound Hcy can cross into the extravascular space.
In conclusion, our study emphasizes the need for controlled blood collection, particularly when investigating the role of slightly increased P-Hcy as a risk factor for vascular diseases. The factors of tourniquet application and especially posture will contribute significantly to the within-person variation of P-Hcy if not controlled.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
H. R. N. Pour, D. E Grobbee, M. Muller, M. Emmelot-Vonk, and Y. T van der Schouw Serum sex hormone and plasma homocysteine levels in middle-aged and elderly men Eur. J. Endocrinol., December 1, 2006; 155(6): 887 - 893. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. R. Solomon Cobalamin-responsive disorders in the ambulatory care setting: unreliability of cobalamin, methylmalonic acid, and homocysteine testing Blood, February 1, 2005; 105(3): 978 - 985. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A Martinez-Berriotxoa, G Ruiz-Irastorza, M-V Egurbide, M Rueda, and C Aguirre Homocysteine, antiphospholipid antibodies and risk of thrombosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus, December 1, 2004; 13(12): 927 - 933. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. J. Huijgen, F. P.W. Tegelaers, C. H.H. Schoenmakers, C. J. Pronk-Admiraal, and S. Ekema Multicenter Analytical Evaluation of an Enzymatic Method for the Measurement of Plasma Homocysteine and Comparison with HPLC and Immunochemistry Clin. Chem., May 1, 2004; 50(5): 937 - 940. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
E. Nurk, G. S. Tell, S. E. Vollset, O. Nygard, H. Refsum, and P. M. Ueland Plasma Total Homocysteine and Hospitalizations for Cardiovascular Disease: The Hordaland Homocysteine Study Arch Intern Med, June 24, 2002; 162(12): 1374 - 1381. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Voortman, A. Melse-Boonstra, J. M. Schulz, J. Burema, M. B. Katan, and P. Verhoef Optimal Time Interval between Repeated Blood Sampling for Measurements of Total Homocysteine in Healthy Individuals Clin. Chem., October 1, 2001; 47(10): 1839 - 1841. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. C. McKinley, J.J. Strain, J. McPartlin, J. M. Scott, and H. McNulty Plasma Homocysteine Is Not Subject to Seasonal Variation Clin. Chem., August 1, 2001; 47(8): 1430 - 1436. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |