Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 1863-1865, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:1863-1865.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Analytical and Clinical Performance Characteristics of Hybritech's Tandem-R free PSA Assay during a Large Multicenter Clinical Trial to Determine the Clinical Utility of Percentage of Free Prostate-specific Antigen

Daniel W. Chan1, Cynthia A. Kelley1, Timothy L. Ratliff2, Dymphna D'Agostino2, Julie Ritchey2, Dolores J. Lamb3, Josie Beck3, Nadean Lott3, Mark H. Wener4, Phyllis Daum4, Robert E. Henkin5, Diane N. Kaske5, Debbie W. Golightly5, James McBride6, Grace Layco6, May K. Ota6, Milenko J. Tanasijevic7, Christine Grudzien7, David L. Woodrum8, Kurtis R. Bray8, Paula C. Southwick8, Gail H. Gasior8 and Kathleen G. Loveland8,a

1 Department of Clinical Chemistry, The Johns Hopkins University, 600 N. Wolfe St., Baltimore, MD 21287-7065;
2 Department of Urology Research, Washington University, 10130 Wohl Clinic, St. Louis, MO 63110;
3 Scott Department of Urology and Cell Biology, Baylor College of Medicine, 1 Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX 77030;
4 Department of Immunology, University of Washington Medical Center, Box 357110, Seattle, WA 98195;
5 Nuclear Medicine In Vitro Laboratory, Loyola Medical Center, 2160 S. First Ave., Maywood, IL 60153;
6 Department of Clinical Chemistry, UCLA Medical Center, 10833 LeConte Ave., Los Angeles, CA 90095;
7 Department of Clinical Chemistry, Brigham & Women's Hospital, 75 Francis St., Boston, MA 02115;
8 Department of Research and Development, Hybritech Incorporated, a subsidiary of Beckman Coulter, Inc., P.O. Box 269006, San Diego, CA 92196-9006;
a author for correspondence: fax 619-536-8058, e-mail KGLoveland{at}Beckman.com

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is present in serum in several forms, most importantly free PSA (FPSA) and PSA complexed to {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin (1)(2). These PSA forms are useful in assessing prostate disease (3)(4)(5). When PSA is >10 µg/L (ng/mL), the probability of prostate cancer is 50% (6); when PSA is between 4 and 10 µg/L, the probability of prostate cancer is 25%. Patients in the latter range are usually recommended for biopsy, but here the low specificity leads to many unnecessary biopsies. The percentage of FPSA (%FPSA) is used to enhance specificity. The relative proportion of FPSA in serum may range from 5% to 50% (7), but a lower %FPSA is associated with higher probability of prostate cancer (8).

Published guidelines for the clinical use of %FPSA have been contradictory because of differences in assay systems and standardization, study designs, patient populations, and the number of subjects enrolled (9). A large well-controlled multicenter clinical trial was conducted to define a medically significant %FPSA cutpoint that would indicate the need for prostate biopsy. This report summarizes the assay performance from the largest clinical trial to date evaluating %FPSA in a patient population representative of those men in whom the test would be used in clinical practice. The data formed the basis for the Food and Drug Administration's approval of Hybritech's free PSA assays. Detailed clinical performance characteristics have been presented previously (10).

The objective of this clinical trial was twofold: to evaluate the performance of Hybritech's Tandem®-R free PSA assay as it is routinely used in laboratories, and to identify a %FPSA cutpoint with a high rate of cancer detection (clinical sensitivity) while avoiding unnecessary biopsies in men without cancer (clinical specificity) when total PSA is between 4 and 10 µg/L.

Subjects were enrolled prospectively at seven university medical centers in accordance with practices and ethical standards of each site's Institutional Review Board and the Declaration of Helsinki. The subjects were men 50–75 years of age with a nonsuspicious digital rectal examination, a Tandem PSA result between 4 and 10 µg/L, and a histologically confirmed diagnosis from a six-sector ultrasound-guided needle biopsy.

Blood was drawn before prostate treatment or biopsy. Serum was separated from the clot within 3 h, stored at 4 °C, and tested within 24 h. PSA was assayed and reported in duplicate using Hybritech's Tandem-E PSA for photon ERA® instrumentation (immunoenzymetric monoclonal antibody assay) or Tandem-R PSA (immunoradiometric monoclonal antibody assay) reagent sets. Three laboratories used Tandem-E PSA and four laboratories used Tandem-R PSA. Serum was then stored at -70 °C. After meeting all enrollment criteria, the same serum was thawed and assayed at each site in duplicate using the Tandem-R free PSA (immunoradiometric monoclonal antibody) assay (11). FPSA assays included kit controls (~1.0 and 15 µg/L) and three serum pools (~0.3, 2.0, and 6.5 µg/L FPSA). In this blinded study, FPSA was not reported to the physician, and laboratory personnel did not know the diagnosis of the patient. The percentage of FPSA was calculated as (FPSA/PSA) x 100% = %FPSA.

Tandem (total) PSA and Tandem free PSA assays are manufactured in several formats at Hybritech Incorporated, a subsidiary of Beckman Coulter, Inc., San Diego, CA.

The lower limit of detection was calculated at each laboratory as the FPSA concentration corresponding to the signal 2 SD greater than the mean of 20 replicates of the zero calibrator. Results for the lower limit of detection at the seven sites were 0.03, 0.02, 0.04, 0.03, 0.02, 0.01, and 0.02 µg/L FPSA, and met the manufacturer's claim of 0.05 µg/L or less.

A proficiency panel prepared at Hybritech was used for interlaboratory method comparison. Each laboratory received identical sets of 43 test samples for analysis in duplicate using Tandem free PSA and total-PSA assays. Assessment of >720 results demonstrated that equivalent results, laboratory to laboratory, were obtained for both total and free PSA. The Levene test for homogeneity of variance showed no significant differences in dispersion among sites for FPSA (P = 0.20) or PSA (P = 0.98). A repeated measures ANOVA showed no significant differences across the sites for results of the proficiency samples (FPSA, P = 0.81; PSA, P = 0.99). Therefore, pooling of results across sites and the use of any Tandem PSA format was acceptable.

Three elements of precision and long-term reproducibility were determined:

  1. Reproducibility within and among the seven laboratories was evaluated according to NCCLS Guideline EP5-T2 for evaluation of precision performance of chemistry devices. Results from 20 analytical runs of five controls, tested in duplicate, showed total reproducibility at <6.8% CV for the lowest concentration (0.32 µg/L FPSA; Table 1 ).

    View this table:
    [in this window]
    [in a new window]
     
    Table 1. Imprecision of Tandem-R free PSA.1

  2. Two assayed kit controls and three serum pools were used to accept or reject each of 230 assays. The lot of kit controls changed in July and October 1996. The lot of pools used did not change. The seven laboratories used 41 lots of reagent to produce 773 patient results during the 17 months of the clinical trial. Fig. 1 is a graph of controls and pools and shows consistent and reproducible recovery over time.


    View larger version (31K):
    [in this window]
    [in a new window]
     
    Figure 1. Tandem-R free PSA assay reproducibility over time.

    Results of two kit controls and three serum pools plotted from seven laboratories using 41 lots of reagent in 230 assays over the 17 months of the clinical trial.

  3. The imprecision (CV) on sample duplicates for the proficiency panel was 3.1% for FPSA and 2.4% for PSA across all sites. The precision (CV) for the 773 subject serum samples (tested in duplicate) averaged 3.0% for all sites combined. This reproducibility between sample replicates supports testing routine samples in singlet.

After successful completion of method validation procedures, each laboratory reported free- and total-PSA results on subjects meeting study enrollment criteria. ROC curves were generated using data from the 773 subjects enrolled in the trial (379 prostate cancer and 394 benign prostatic disease). A cutpoint of 25% FPSA was determined to yield a sensitivity of 95%. The use of this cutpoint (performing biopsies only in patients with values less than or equal to the cutpoint) would have avoided biopsies in 20% of men with benign disease.

The probability of cancer was determined from PSA and %FPSA results on these subjects with a biopsy-based diagnosis. For men with PSA between 4 and 10 µg/L, the risk of cancer is 25% (6)(12). %FPSA is useful to further stratify the probability of cancer in this group. For subjects with %FPSA values of 0–10%, 10–15%, 15–20%, 20–25%, and >25%, cancer was found on biopsy in 56%, 28%, 20%, 16%, and 8%, respectively.

Percentage of FPSA studies may be affected by numerous factors (9). One important factor is sample stability. The handling of samples in this study followed published data. PSA and FPSA are reported to be stable when the serum is separated from the clot within 3 h, stored at 4 °C, and tested within 24 h. Freezing and thawing serum does not affect recovery (13)(14). It is important to freeze serum promptly after pipetting to preserve FPSA integrity. Samples may be stored at -70 °C for up to 2 years (15).

PSA and %FPSA results from other manufacturers may provide values different from those obtained in this study. The use of assays from multiple manufactures or applying the cutpoint derived from one set of assays to that of another manufacturer can lead to erroneous clinical conclusions (5)(16)(17). Differences may be attributable to assay calibration, antibody specificity, or non-equimolarity of the total-PSA assay.

In summary, results from this large multicenter clinical trial show that %FPSA can be applied in two ways: (a) use of a single cutpoint, or (b) determination of individual risk for cancer. With the first approach, a single cutpoint of 25% is recommended for men 50–75 years of age with PSA results between 4 and 10 µg/L with benign findings in a digital rectal examination. Men with 25% FPSA or below would be recommended for biopsy. This approach would detect 95% of cancers (clinical sensitivity) and would spare 20% of men with benign disease from biopsy (clinical specificity). The second approach provides an individual patient's risk (probability of cancer). Risk would be stratified based on the %FPSA value when total PSA is between 4 and 10 µg/L. The risk of cancer is high (56%) when %FPSA is 0–10%, and the risk decreases as %FPSA increases. The risk of cancer is low (8%) when %FPSA is >25%. This approach allows the physician and patient to discuss individualized management options.


References

  1. Christensson A, Laurell CB, Lilja H. Enzymatic activity of prostate-specific antigen and its reactions with extracellular serine proteinase inhibitors. Eur J Biochem 1990;194:755-763. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Lilja H, Christensson A, Dahlen U, Matikainen MT, Nilsson O, Pettersson K, Lovgren T. Prostate-specific antigen in serum occurs predominately in complex with {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin. Clin Chem 1991;37:1618-1625. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Stenman U-H, Leinonen J, Alfthan H, Rannikko S, Tuhkanen K, Alfthan O. A complex between prostate-specific antigen and {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin is the major form of prostate-specific antigen in serum of patients with prostatic cancer: assay of the complex improves clinical sensitivity for cancer. Cancer Res 1991;51:222-226. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Christensson A, Bjork T, Nilsson O, Dahlen U, Matikainen MT, Cockett AT, et al. Serum prostate specific antigen complexed to {alpha}1-antichymotrypsin as an indicator of prostate cancer. J Urol 1993;150:100-105. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Sokoll LJ, Chan DW. Total, free and complexed PSA: analysis and clinical utility. J Clin Ligand Assay 1998;21:171-179.
  6. Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, Flanigan RC, et al. Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men. J Urol 1994;151:1283-1290. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Catalona WJ, Smith DS, Wolfert RL, Wang TJ, Rittenhouse HG, Ratliff TL, et al. Evaluation of percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate cancer screening. JAMA 1995;274:1214-1220. [Abstract]
  8. Partin AW, Catalona WJ, Southwick PC, Subong ENP, Gasior GH, Chan DW. Analysis of percent free prostate-specific antigen (PSA) for prostate cancer detection: influence of total PSA, prostate volume, and age. Urology 1996;48:55-61. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Woodrum DL, Brawer MK, Partin AW, Catalona WJ, Southwick PC. Interpretation of free prostate specific antigen clinical research studies for the detection of prostate cancer. J Urol 1998;159:5-12. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Catalona WJ, Partin AW, Slawin KM, Brawer MK, Flanigan RC, Patel A, et al. Use of the percentage of free prostate-specific antigen to enhance differentiation of prostate cancer from benign prostatic disease: a prospective multicenter clinical trial. JAMA 1998;279:1542-1547. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Woodrum DL, French CM, Hill TM, Roman SJ, Slatore HL, Shaffer JL, et al. Analytical performance of the Tandem-R free PSA immunoassay measuring free prostate-specific antigen. Clin Chem 1997;43:1203-1208. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Keetch DW, Catalona WJ, Smith DS. Serial prostatic biopsies in men with persistently elevated serum prostate specific antigen values. J Urol 1994;151:1571-1574. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Woodrum DL, French C, Shamel LB. Stability of free prostate-specific antigen in serum samples under a variety of sample collection and sample storage conditions. Urology 1996;48:33-39. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Arcangeli CG, Smith DS, Ratliff TL, Catalona WJ. Stability of serum total and free prostate specific antigen under varying storage intervals and temperatures. J Urol 1997;158:2182-2187. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Woodrum D, York L. Two year stability of free and total PSA in frozen serum samples. Urology 1998;52:247-251. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Semjonow A, Oberpenning F, Brandt B, Zechel C, Brandau W, Hertle L. Impact of free prostate-specific antigen on discordant measurement results of assays for total prostate-specific antigen. Urology 1996;48:10-15. [ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Nixon RG, Meyer GE, Blase AB, Gold MH, Brawer MK. Comparison of 3 investigational assays for the free form of prostate specific antigen. J Urol 1998;60:420-425.




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chan, D. W.
Right arrow Articles by Loveland, K. G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS