Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 2285-2287, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rees Smith, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rees Smith, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:2285-2287.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Measurement of Thyroid-stimulating Hormone Receptor Autoantibodies by ELISA

Jane Bolton1, Jane Sanders1, Yasuo Oda1, Ceri Chapman1, Reiko Konno2, Jadwiga Furmaniak1 and Bernard Rees Smith1,a

1 RSR Ltd., Avenue Park, Pentwyn, Cardiff CF23 8HE, UK;
2 Cosmic Corporation, Tomisaka Bldg., 2-7-3 Koishikawa, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 112, Japan;
a author for correspondence: fax 44-1222-732704

Hyperthyroidism in Graves disease is attributable to autoantibodies to the thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR), and measurement of these TSHR autoantibodies (TRAbs) can be useful in disease diagnosis and management (1)(2)(3)(4). Usually TRAbs are detected by bioassays based on cultured cells or by receptor assays based on 125I-labeled TSH (1)(2)(3)(4). The most widely used receptor assay (5) uses detergent-solubilized porcine TSHR with TRAbs to inhibit the TSHR-125I-TSH interaction, and polyethylene glycol (PEG) to separate receptor-bound and free labeled TSH by precipitation. Recently, we developed a monoclonal antibody (MAb) to the porcine TSHR COOH terminus that can be used to attach the TSHR to a solid phase, and we describe the use of this antibody to develop an ELISA for TRAbs. In the assay, TRAbs compete for binding to the TSHR with biotinylated bovine TSH [bovine TSH being readily available and having a much higher biological activity than human TSH (6)]. TSH-biotin binding is then monitored using a streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate.

The C-terminal end of the porcine TSHR (last 160 amino acids) (3) was expressed in Escherichia coli as a fusion protein with glutathione S-transferase and used to produce MAbs as described previously (7). One of the MAbs had a relatively high affinity (5 x 109 L/mol) for detergent-solubilized porcine TSHR, and the purified IgG was used to coat ELISA plate wells by incubation overnight at 4 °C. In these experiments, 100 µL of 0.01 g/L antibody in 100 mmol/L NaHCO3, pH 9.2, was used. After washing and coating with 10 g/L bovine serum albumin (Sigma-Aldrich), the plates were washed again with assay buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 7.4, 50 mmol/L NaCl, 1 g/L bovine serum albumin, 1 mL/L Triton X-100). Detergent-solubilized porcine TSHR (100 µL) diluted in assay buffer was then added, and the plates were incubated for 30 min with shaking at room temperature. The TSHR preparation was then removed, and the wells were washed with assay buffer. The receptor-coated wells were then used immediately or dried, sealed in foil pouches, and stored at 2–8 °C.

In the assay, 100 µL of test sera and 10 µL of mouse serum (to neutralize any anti-mouse IgG present in the test sera) were added to duplicate receptor-coated wells, followed by incubation at room temperature for 2 h. Sera were then removed (without washing at this stage), and 100 µL (5 ng) of biotinylated bovine TSH (TSH-bi; RSR Ltd.) in assay buffer added. After further incubation for 15 min at room temperature, excess TSH-bi was removed (without washing at this stage), 100 µL of streptavidin-peroxidase conjugate (Sigma-Aldrich) was added, and incubation was continued for 20 min. The wells were then washed once with assay buffer and once with distilled water. The peroxidase substrate tetramethylbenzidine (100 µL) was added to the wells, followed by, after 20 min, the addition of 2 mol/L H2SO4 and measurement of absorbance at 450 nm.

In the presence of sera from healthy blood donors, an absorbance of ~2 was observed. This was reduced in a dose-dependent manner to ~0.3 by TRAbs or by bovine TSH. For example, thyroid-stimulating antibody first international standard 90/672 (National Institute for Biologic Standards and Controls, Hertfordshire, UK) at 3, 10, and 30 units/L gave 15%, 37%, and 70% inhibition of TSH binding, respectively [inhibition of TSH binding expressed as: 100 x (1 - ratio of absorbance at 450 nm of test sample to absorbance at 450 nm of a pool of healthy blood donor sera)].

Sera from individual healthy blood donors (n = 65), double-stranded DNA antibody-positive patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (n = 10), rheumatoid factor-positive patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 10), and patients with Hashimoto thyroiditis (n = 15) showed inhibition of TSH binding of <10%.

We compared the ELISA and the conventional TRAb receptor assay based on 125I-labeled TSH and PEG precipitation (5) in 56 sera from patients suspected of having Graves disease (Fig. 1 ). Of the 56 sera studied, 38 were clearly positive by 125I assay, and the same 38 were clearly positive by ELISA (inhibition of TSH binding >15% in both assays). Two sera were borderline positive in both assays (12–13% inhibition), and one serum was borderline positive by 125I assay (11% inhibition) but negative by ELISA (3% inhibition). At this stage it was not clear which result (borderline positive or negative) would better reflect the outcome of treatment. The remaining 15 sera were negative in both the radioactive assay (inhibition of binding, -4% to 8%) and the ELISA (inhibition of binding, -6% to 9%). We used the same 56 sera to compare the ELISA and a TRAb bioassay based on stimulation of cAMP production in isolated porcine thyroid cells (8) (reagents from Yamasa Ltd.); r = 0.73. Thirty-four of the 56 sera were positive by bioassay compared with 38 of 56 by ELISA. One sample was positive by bioassay (285% stimulation; positive = greater than 180%) but only borderline positive by ELISA (12% inhibition) and by radioactive assay (12% inhibition). The 56 patients in the study were receiving or had received treatment for hyperthyroidism; consequently, in the case of the five sera with discrepant bioassay and ELISA results, it was not clear which result better reflected the underlying disease activity [see Refs. (1)(2) for a review of the relative clinical effectiveness of TRAb measurement by inhibition of TSH-binding assay and by bioassay].



View larger version (16K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Comparison of TRAbs by ELISA and radioactive assay in 56 sera from patients suspected of having Graves disease.

See text for experimental details. Pearson’s correlation coefficient r = 0.95; intercept on horizontal axis = 1.1, and on vertical axis = -2.4; slope = 1.075. Standard deviation of the residuals (Sy|x) = 1.1; SD for the slope 0.154; SD for the y-intercept 6.8.

In terms of TRAb ELISA precision, typical variations in absorbances at 450 nm (in the same assay run) were 1.67 ± 0.05, 1.1 ± 0.04, 0.76 ± 0.025, and 0.51 ± 0.028 (means ± SD; n = 28).

Intraassay imprecisions (CVs) were 9.0%, 4.5%, and 2.3% at mean inhibitions of TSH binding of 30%, 42%, and 71%, respectively (n = 28), and interassay CVs were 6.8%, 3.3%, and 2.3% at mean inhibitions of TSH binding of 24% (n = 10), 45% (n = 6), and 69% (n = 10), respectively. These values of intra- and interassay imprecision are similar to those observed for the radioactive assay (5).

Occasional sera from patients with Graves disease contain TSH antibodies (9)(10) that form complexes with labeled TSH in the PEG-based receptor assay for TRAb. These TSH-antibody complexes are precipitated with PEG in addition to TSHR-TSH complexes, giving an increase in precipitated 125I compared with healthy blood donor sera. Consequently, TRAb measurements with the PEG method are difficult to make in samples containing TSH antibodies. To investigate the effects of TSH antibodies in the ELISA, measurements were made in sera from 48 treated Graves disease patients selected for the presence of antibodies reactive with labeled bovine TSH. The effects of anti-TSH antibodies clearly evident in the PEG method (mean inhibition of TSH binding, -33.3%; range, -13% to -87%) were not observed in the ELISA (mean inhibition of TSH binding, 18.7%; range, -0.4% to 47%). This was presumably attributable to the removal of the test serum samples containing TSH antibodies after incubation in the receptor-coated wells. Consequently, TRAb concentrations were measurable in samples containing TSH antibodies with the ELISA, and in the series studied, 38 of 48 sera showed >=10% inhibition (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Inhibition of TSH binding by sera (from 48 patients with Graves disease) containing TSH antibodies.

Our results indicate that porcine TSHR immobilized on ELISA plates, using a MAb to the receptor’s COOH terminus, and TSH-biotin can be used to create a TRAb ELISA. The ELISA has similar sensitivity and precision to the current radioactive test but has some major advantages, including easy automation and absence of interference from antibodies to TSH.


References

  1. Rees Smith B, McLachlan SM, Furmaniak J.. Autoantibodies to the thyrotropin receptor. Endocr Rev 1988;9:106-121. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Davies TF, Roti E, Braverman LE, DeGroot LJ. Therapeutic controversy. Thyroid controversy-stimulating antibodies. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:3777-3785. [Free Full Text]
  3. Sanders J, Oda Y, Roberts S-A, Maruyama M, Furmaniak J, Rees Smith B. Understanding the thyrotropin receptor function-structure relationship. Baillière’s Clin Endocrinol Metab 1997;11:451-479. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Rapoport B, Chazenbalk GD, Jaume JC, McLachlan SM. The thyrotropin (TSH) receptor: interaction with TSH and autoantibodies. Endocr Rev 1999;19:673-716. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Southgate K, Creagh FM, Teece M, Kingswood C, Rees Smith B. A receptor assay for the measurement of TSH receptor antibodies in unextracted serum. Clin Endocrinol 1984;20:539-543. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Grossmann M, Weintraub BD, Szkudlinski MW. Novel insights into the molecular mechanisms of human thyrotropin action: structural, physiological, and therapeutic implications for the glycoprotein hormone family. Endocr Rev 1997;18:476-501. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Oda Y, Sanders J, Roberts S, Maruyama M, Kato R, Perez M, et al. Binding characteristics of antibodies to the TSH receptor. J Mol Endocrinol 1998;20:233-244. [Abstract]
  8. Asahi K, Takeoka K, Kadozaki H, Takano T, Fushimi R, Tada N, et al. Fundamental and clinical evaluation of determination of thyroid stimulating antibody (TSAb) by Yamasa TSAb kit. Clin Endocrinol Jpn 1996;44:401-409.
  9. Noh J, Hamada N, Saito H, Oyanagi H, Ishikawa N, Momotani N, et al. Evidence against the importance in the disease process of antibodies to bovine thyroid-stimulating hormone found in some patients with Graves’ disease. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1989;68:107-113. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Sakata S, Takuno H, Nagai K, Kimata Y, Maekawa H, Yamamoto M, et al. Anti-bovine thyrotropin autoantibodies in patients with Hashimoto’s thyroiditis, subacute thyroiditis, and systemic lupus erythematosus. J Endocrinol Investig 1991;14:123-130. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (25)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rees Smith, B.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bolton, J.
Right arrow Articles by Rees Smith, B.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS