|
|
||||||||
Letters |
hCG Reference Service, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520
a Author for correspondence. Fax 203-785-6367; e-mail laurence.cole{at}yale.edu.
To the Editor:
Much concern has been raised by the unraveling at the hCG Reference Service of six cases of persistent phantom human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG). These are false-positive hCG results, which are likely attributable to human anti-mouse IgG or to heterophilic antibodies (1)(2)(3). The hCG Reference Service, started in January 1998 to aid with the interpretation of irregular or discordant hCG immunoassay results, requests parallel serum and urine samples. Each is tested in four separate two-step microtiter plate ELISAs (assay 1 detects intact hCG, assay 2 detects nonnicked or bioactive hCG only, assay 3 detects the hCG free ß-subunit only, and assay 4 detects the hCG ß-core fragment only) at three different concentrations (undiluted, a 1:2 dilution, and a 1:5 dilution). From the data, inferences are made about the nature (nonnicked or nicked hCG, free ß-subunit, and ß-core fragment) and likely source (trophoblast disease, pituitary hCG, cancer, or phantom hCG) of the hCG immunoreactivity.
In all six cases of phantom hCG tested by the service, increased hCG
concentrations were detected in serum samples (Table 1
), but no detectable hCG, free ß-subunit, or ß-core fragment
was found in the parallel urine samples (<3 IU/L). In all cases, the
presence of phantom hCG was confirmed by at least two of the following
three criteria: the finding of serum concentrations that were nonlinear
on dilution; the finding of hCG concentrations in a two-step assay that
were 20% or less of values in a one-step (single incubation with both
coating and tracer antibodies) sandwich assay or that differed by 80%
in two different hCG assays; and the finding of measurable ß-core
fragment immunoreactivity (not usually detectable in serum) in serum
samples.
|
The six cases had similar histories. Each started with an
incidental pregnancy test (Table 1
). The pregnancy test was
positive (69285 IU/L), and the patient was sent to an obstetrician.
In each case, ultrasound failed to reveal a fetal sac, laparoscopy did
not reveal an ectopic pregnancy, and dilation and curettage revealed no
recent history of pregnancy or trophoblast disease. In each case, the
false-positive hCG persisted for an additional 311 months (5451
IU/L) before samples were sent to the hCG Reference Service. In all six
cases, the patients were referred to an oncologist or gynecologic
oncologist with a suspected diagnosis of trophoblast disease or
postgestational choriocarcinoma.
Four of the six cases received multiple courses of methotrexate chemotherapy, and one of the six received in addition EMACO chemotherapy, with no major quantitative reduction in false-positive hCG results. After chemotherapy, two patients underwent a hysterectomy and one other patient underwent an oophorectomy, all without a major reduction in measured hCG concentrations. One patient developed type 1 diabetes as a complication of the chemotherapy and became comatose. All therapies came to a halt with the finding by the hCG Reference Service that the persistent hCG results, the sole basis for treatment, were in fact false-positive or "phantom" hCG.
We have now heard that in two of our earliest phantom hCG cases (tested in Spring 1998), the false-positive hCG results eventually, after 1014 months, subsided. The cases came from all parts of the United States (one from the West Coast, three from the Midwest, and two from the Northeast). These cases of phantom hCG found their way through word of mouth to the hCG Reference Service, a new, unadvertised facility, in a 9-month period. We wonder how many other similar cases may exist.
Four of the six false-positive cases had been detected and followed
with the Abbott Diagnostics AxSym hCGß test (Table 1
), and one of six
had been followed with the sister assay, the Abbott Diagnostics IMx
hCGß test, which uses the same antibody/chemical set. Thus, five of
the six cases were detected with this one type of assay. We do not know
if this type of assay, among the >40 quantitative hCG test sold in the
US (4), is particularly prone to false-positive results.
Laboratory directors and managers need to be aware of this potential problem, especially if they are performing the AxSym or IMx hCGß type test. They need to be available to help physicians quickly exclude or identify phantom hCG, which can be done by simply running quantitative urine hCG tests. In phantom hCG cases, no hCG immunoreactivity may be detected (<5 IU/L) in urine samples. Other simple methods to exclude phantom hCG are to test serum samples with competitive hCGß RIAs (which do not detect phantom hCG), or to demonstrate nonlinearity in dilutions of the serum samples in an hCG immunoassay (phantom hCG may give grossly nonlinear results). Alternatively, help can be sought from the hCG Reference Service.
References
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
A. A.A. Ismail A Radical Approach Is Needed to Eliminate Interference from Endogenous Antibodies in Immunoassays Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 25 - 26. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
R. Rej Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Roongsritong, I. Warraich, and C. Bradley Common Causes of Troponin Elevations in the Absence of Acute Myocardial Infarction: Incidence and Clinical Significance Chest, May 1, 2004; 125(5): 1877 - 1884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. S. Krouwer Critique of the Guide to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement Method of Estimating and Reporting Uncertainty in Diagnostic Assays Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1818 - 1821. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. M. Halldorsdottir, M. O. Carayannopoulos, M. Scrivner, and A. M. Gronowski Method Evaluation for Total {beta}-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Using Urine and the ADVIA Centaur Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1421 - 1422. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
V. Marks False-Positive Immunoassay Results: A Multicenter Survey of Erroneous Immunoassay Results from Assays of 74 Analytes in 10 Donors from 66 Laboratories in Seven Countries Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 2008 - 2016. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A.A. Ismail, P. L. Walker, J. H. Barth, K. C. Lewandowski, R. Jones, and W. A. Burr Wrong Biochemistry Results: Two Case Reports and Observational Study in 5310 Patients on Potentially Misleading Thyroid-stimulating Hormone and Gonadotropin Immunoassay Results Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 2023 - 2029. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. J. Kim, O. F. Laterza, K. G. Hock, J. F. Pierson-Perry, D. M. Kaminski, M. Mesguich, F. Braconnier, R. Zimmermann, M. Zaninotto, M. Plebani, et al. Performance of a Revised Cardiac Troponin Method That Minimizes Interferences from Heterophilic Antibodies Clin. Chem., July 1, 2002; 48(7): 1028 - 1034. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. M. Parrish and D. E. Bruns US Legal Principles and Confidentiality of the Peer Review Process JAMA, June 5, 2002; 287(21): 2839 - 2841. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. A. Ismail and J. H Barth Wrong biochemistry results BMJ, September 29, 2001; 323(7315): 705 - 706. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. A. Butler and L. A. Cole Use of Heterophilic Antibody Blocking Agent (HBT) in Reducing False-Positive hCG Results Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1332 - 1333. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. A. Cole, S. Shahabi, S. A. Butler, H. Mitchell, E. S. Newlands, H. R. Behrman, and H. L. Verrill Utility of Commonly Used Commercial Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Immunoassays in the Diagnosis and Management of Trophoblastic Diseases Clin. Chem., February 1, 2001; 47(2): 308 - 315. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. J. Kricka Interferences in Immunoassay--Still a Threat Clin. Chem., August 1, 2000; 46(8): 1037 - 1038. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |