Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 45: 682-683, 1999;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traba, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by de la Piedra, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traba, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by de la Piedra, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 1999;45:682-683.)
© 1999 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Different Behaviors of Serum and Urinary CrossLaps ELISA in the Assessment of Bone Resorption in Healthy Girls

Maria Luisa Traba, Jesús A. Calero, Cioly Méndez-Dávila, Carmen García-Moreno and Concepción de la Piedraa

a address correspondence to this author at: Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Laboratorio de Bioquímica, Sección Metabolismo Mineral y Óseo, Avda Reyes Católicos 2, 28040 Madrid, Spain

Many fragments derived from collagen I degradation come to serum during bone resorption. The characterization of these fragments and the development of assays that can measure them are the basis of most of the biochemical markers of bone resorption. One of these fragments consists of two cross-linked amino acid sequences derived from the C-terminal telopeptide region of type I collagen {alpha}1 chains. Fragments containing the sequence EKAH-DGGR (CTX), with a DG site being either nonisomerized ({alpha}-CTX) or ß-isomerized (ß-CTX) were identified. Pyridinoline, deoxypyridinoline, and other cross-links linked both telopeptides (Fig. 1 ) (1). Recent reports have suggested that the proportions of nonisomerized and ß-isomerized fragments depend on bone age (1).



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Heterogeneity of urinary degradation products of C-terminal telopeptides derived from the {alpha}1 chain of human type I collagen.

There are two available assays that can measure the ß-isomer form of the CTX epitope: urinary CrossLapsTM ELISA (2), and Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA (3), both from Osteometer (Denmark). The urinary assay is a polyclonal (rabbit) antibody assay for which the minimal requirement for detection is the presence of the amino acid sequence EKAHßDGGR. According to the manufacturer, only one strand is necessary for recognition. Thus, among the products in Fig. 1Up , this assay would be able to detect compounds 2 and 3. The serum assay is based on two highly specific monoclonal antibodies, also directed against the amino acid sequence EKAHßDGGR; however, according to the manufacturer, the minimal requirement of this assay is the presence of two chains of ß-CTX, which must be cross-linked. In this case, among the products in Fig. 1Up , the serum assay would be able to detect only compound 3.

The urinary version of this assay has provided a sensitive and specific index of bone resorption that is able to predict the outcome of antiresorptive therapy and bone loss rate in postmenopausal women (2). Recent works have demonstrated that Serum CrossLaps can also be used to predict women with the highest risk of developing osteoporosis and to monitor antiresorptive therapy (4).

Based on the different antigenicity of the two assays, the aim of the present work was to compare the usefulness of urinary ß-CTX (CrossLaps ELISA; Osteometer) and serum ß-CTX (Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA), in the detection of changes of bone resorption between females 16–19 years of age and females 21–24 years of age. Urine (second morning void) and serum samples were collected in the morning on the same day.

Variations in the serum concentrations of the bone isoenzyme of alkaline phosphatase (Tandem®-R Ostase® IRMA; Hybritech) were used as control. Thirty-one healthy control females, age 19 ± 2.3 years (range, 16–24 years) were studied. None of them were receiving any treatment known to affect calcium metabolism. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital.

The concentrations of the biochemical markers studied are shown in Table 1 . As expected, bone alkaline phosphatase (bAP) was significantly lower in the females >19 years of age than in the females <=19 years of age. Serum ß-CTX also decreased significantly with age. However, urinary ß-CTX in the older group was similar to that of the younger group. We observed a significant linear correlation between serum ß-CTX and serum bAP (P = 0.0296); however, we did not find a significant correlation between urinary ß-CTX and serum bAP (P = 0.2297), although serum ß-CTX correlated with urinary ß-CTX (P = 0.0211).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Serum bAP, serum ß-CTX, and urinary ß-CTX in control healthy females, according to their ages (16–19 and 20–24 years, respectively).

One possible explanation of the differences found between serum and urinary assays of ß-CTX could be the different antigenicity of both assays. Accordingly, the serum assay seems to be more restrictive than the urinary assay for detecting products derived from the telopeptide region of collagen type I.

The decrease in bone remodeling that occurs in older girls with respect to younger girls is a generally accepted fact. In accordance with the results found in this work in ß-CTX and bAP concentrations, it would be possible suggest that serum ß-CTX assay (Serum CrossLaps) reflects better than urinary ß-CTX assay (CrossLaps) the changes in bone remodeling that take place in young girls. It is possible that, independent of the differences attributable to renal clearance, the serum assay can be more specific for bone than the urinary assay because of the different antigenicity of the assays.

More work is necessary to investigate this point, but the observed differences between the two ß-CTX methods constitute an interesting point to consider when selecting a serum or a urinary assay to perform a particular study.


Acknowledgments

We thank the students of Ntra. Sra. de las Maravillas School and the Nursery School of the Fundación Jiménez Díaz (Madrid) for their kind collaboration.


Footnotes

Fundación Jiménez Díaz, Biochemistry Laboratory, Bone and Mineral Metabolism Section, 28040 Madrid, Spain

fax 34-91-5494764, e-mail cpiedra{at}fjd.es


References

  1. Fledelius C, Johnsen AH, Cloos PAC, Bonde M, Qvist P. Characterization of urinary degradation products derived from type I collagen. J Biol Chem 1997;272:9755-9763. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Bonde M, Qvist P, Fledelius C, Riis BJ, Christiansen C. Applications of an enzyme immunoassay for a new marker of bone resorption (CrossLaps): follow-up on hormone replacement therapy and osteoporosis risk assessment. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1995;80:864-868. [Abstract]
  3. Rosenquist C, Fledelius C, Christgau S, Pedersen BJ, Bonde M, Qvist P, Christiansen C. Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA. First application of monoclonal antibodies for measurement in serum of bone-related degradation products from C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen. Clin Chem 1998;44:2281-2289. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Christgau S, Rosenquist C, Alexandersen P, Bjarnason NH, Ravn P, Fledelius C, et al. Clinical evaluation of the Serum CrossLaps One Step ELISA, a new assay measuring the serum concentration of bone-derived degradation products of type I collagen C-telopeptides. Clin Chem 1998;44:2290-2300. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Traba, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by de la Piedra, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Traba, M. L.
Right arrow Articles by de la Piedra, C.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS