|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1
Vision Biotechnology Consulting, 306-N W El Norte Pkwy., PMB 311, Escondido, CA 92026.
2
Pacific Biometrics, Inc., 220 West Harrison, Seattle, WA
98119.
3
Sudormed, Inc., 12341 Newport Ave., Suite D-200, Santa
Ana, CA 92705.
a Address for correspondence. Fax 760-634-3233; e-mail mjsarno{at}aol.com
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Methods: Flame atomic emission and ion-selective electrode techniques were used to measure potassium as a sweat volume marker. The Pyrilinks immunoassay for urine free pyridinolines was optimized to increase sensitivity for measurements in sweat. The precision, accuracy, and detection limit of this assay were characterized. To assess values and variability of sweat pyridinolines in human subjects, a nonocclusive skin patch was used to collect sweat samples from a reference group and from a mixed group experiencing accelerated bone resorption, postmenopausal women and men receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone for prostate cancer.
Results: The immunoassay intra- and interassay variations were
10% and <16%, respectively, with a detection limit of 309 pmol/L.
Linearity upon dilution and analytical recovery ranged from 93% to
109% and 85% to 122%, respectively. Sweat PYD values normalized to
potassium output yielded a weekly intraindividual biological
variability of 14.7%. The mean increase in the population experiencing
increased bone resorption vs the reference group was 36%
(P <0.05) for sweat PYD/K vs 2340% (P
<0.05) for urinary PYD/Cr, DPD/Cr, and NTX/Cr.
Conclusion: We conclude that this new platform sweat collection technology and PYD immunoassay show potential as an indicator of bone resorption.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
To reduce the observed diurnal and day-to-day variation, several groups have attempted to measure the PYD cross-links in other bodily fluids, including serum (22)(23) and plasma (23). However, single-point collections of these fluids are still subject to discernible diurnal and day-to-day variation. We have reported previously on detection of free PYD in sweat (24) and have recently developed a platform technology that uses a collection of sweat on a nonocclusive skin patch consisting of a transparent, hypoallergenic, gas-permeable membrane and a cellulose fiber absorbent pad. This device, known as the OsteopatchTM, is worn for 5 consecutive days, during which the nonvolatile components of sweat are deposited on the absorbent pad while the volatile components evaporate through the semipermeable membrane.
The 5-day collection period provides a time-integrated sample that attenuates the diurnal and day-to-day components of biological variation. This platform technology has been combined with a highly sensitive immunoassay we have developed for measurement of free PYD cross-links in human sweat. This assay uses a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that recognizes PYD and DPD cross-links with equal specificity. Additionally, in a manner analogous to urinary creatinine (Cr) correction, a marker of output coexcreted in sweat is required to normalize the PYD values for variations in sweat volume. This marker would ideally be one that is accurately measured with standardized methods in the clinical chemistry laboratory and is highly correlated with sweat output. Our studies suggest that sweat potassium meets these criteria. It is readily measured either by flame atomic emission spectroscopy (FAES) (25) or ion selective electrode (ISE) (26), and previous studies have demonstrated stable concentrations relatively independent of sweat rate (27)(28), thus indicating potential for high correlation to sweat output.
The present study describes the validation of potassium as a sweat volume marker and the development and characterization of the high-sensitivity assay for sweat PYDs. Additionally, to assess clinical feasibility, the assay was used in conjunction with the Osteopatch collection device to determine values of sweat PYD cross-links in populations of individuals with normal and accelerated bone turnover because of gonadotropin suppression. The reference group consisted of premenopausal women and healthy men, whereas the population with expected accelerated turnover consisted of postmenopausal women receiving no antiresorptive therapy and men on gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) therapy for prostate cancer (a therapy expected to increase bone resorption) (29). Lastly, comparisons to established urinary analytes collected under tightly controlled conditions were performed.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
procedures
Sweat collection on the Osteopatch.
Patches were applied to
the abdomen or lower back (lateral to the midline) of each subject
after cleansing of the sites with an isopropanol swab. Subjects were
allowed to perform routine daily activities, including showering and
exercise, during the specified period of wear.
Extraction of collected analyte.
After the specified period of
patch wear, which was dependent on the experimental design (typically 5
days, but less in some experiments, as indicated), each absorbent pad
was removed and shipped to the centralized testing site in a sealed
pouch. Upon receipt at the laboratory, the pad was rolled tightly and
placed in a microfuge tube. One mL of a 10 mmol/L acetic acid, 0.1 mL/L
Tween 20 (pH 4.50) buffer was added to each tube. The tube was then
agitated for 60 min at room temperature. The extracted material was
then centrifuged at 3000g for a period of 10 min to isolate
the liquid extract. Each sample was then dried by rotary evaporation on
a Labconco Centrivap instrument and reconstituted in 0.4 mL of a 100
mmol/L sodium phosphate (pH 8.0) buffer. Samples were then
recentrifuged at 1400g for 5 min to remove any pad fibers
before analysis.
Potassium measurement.
Sweat potassium concentration was
determined both by FAES as described previously and by ion-selective
electrode on the Beckman Instruments Synchron CX®3 analyzer. The ISE
chemistry uses an electrode containing a valinomycin membrane in
conjunction with a reference electrode to determine potassium activity
via indirect potentiometry. Correlation between the FAES and ISE
methods was performed by analysis of Osteopatch extracts from 18
healthy subjects.
Recovery of potassium.
Potassium (1.3 µmol) was added to 32
patches and allowed to dry. Potassium was extracted as described
previously, lyophilized, and reconstituted in 0.4 mL of 100 mmol/L
sodium phosphate (pH 8.0). Potassium was measured by FAES, and the
recovery was determined vs the added amount.
Potassium vs sweat volume.
Sixteen Osteopatches were modified
to contain 20 layers of absorbent pad material. These patches were then
covered with occlusive material [1509 double-coated medical tape (3M
Corp.) laminated to Saran® plastic film (Dow Brands)] to
prevent escape of volatile constituents. The patches were then weighed
and applied to the abdomen of two subjects (four patches each). The
patches were worn for a period of 7.5 h, and the experiment was
repeated on a second day by the same subjects. On the second day of
patch wear, one patch on subject 2 had become detached and was judged
to be compromised. After removal of the remaining 15 patches, the
patches were reweighed, and the mass was converted to sweat volume
using specific gravity. Potassium was then determined by FAES. The
results were expressed as µmol potassium/patch vs µL of sweat
collected.
Urinary resorption marker assays.
First morning void (FMV) and
24-h urine collections were performed under strict sampling conditions.
Specifically, on the first day of collection, the first morning urine
was discarded. After this, the next 24 h of urine was collected.
After this collection, the FMV from the following day was collected.
The FMV collection time was the same period during which the first
morning urine was discarded on the previous day. After collecting a
small aliquot of the FMV for urinary resorption marker analysis, the
remainder of the FMV was combined with the 24-h collection. The
PyrilinksTM and Pyrilinks-D assays for free urinary PYD and DPD (Metra
Biosystems) were performed as described previously
(30)(31). The OsteomarkTM assay (Ostex
International) for the N-telopeptides of type I collagen was also
performed as described previously (32).
High-sensitivity sweat pyridinoline immunoassay.
PYD
calibrators and controls were diluted 1:10 with 100 mmol/L sodium
phosphate buffer (pH 8.0). One hundred microliters of calibrators,
controls, and samples were then added to duplicate wells of a
PYD-coated microplate. Fifty microliters of reconstituted
anti-PYD-alkaline phosphatase conjugate was then added to each well,
and the plate was incubated overnight at 28 °C without agitation.
Each well was washed three times with wash buffer, and 150 µL of
p-nitrophenyl phosphate in diethanolamine was added
afterward. The substrate was allowed to incubate for a period of 5
h at room temperature. One hundred microliters of Stop Solution (1
mol/L NaOH) was added to each well. The absorbance of each well
was then read with a SpectraMax 340 microplate reader
(Molecular Devices, Inc.) set at 405-nm wavelength, and the recoveries
of controls and unknowns were calculated from a four-parameter fit of
the calibrators. The recoveries of unknowns were then normalized for
sweat volume via calculation of the PYD/K ratio (nmol PYD/mol K).
Clinical study design.
After Institutional Review Board
approval, 40 subjects were recruited. Informed consent was acquired
from all subjects. The reference group included 13 premenopausal women
and 5 apparently healthy men. The postmenopausal/GnRH (PM/GnRH)
population included 19 postmenopausal females who were receiving no
antiresorptive therapy and 3 males on GnRH therapy (Lupron) for
prostate cancer. The PM/GnRH mixed population was chosen because both
male and female subjects were experiencing gonadotropin suppression,
which would be expected to induce accelerated bone resorption, and
because it was relatively easy to recruit patients. Each subject wore
four Osteopatches for 5 days on three successive occasions during a
period of 4 weeks. During each 5-day period, each subject also gave a
FMV and 24-h urine sample under strict sampling conditions as described
previously. No patches were found to be detached or otherwise
compromised at the end of the wear period, and no subject reported an
adverse event during or after the study.
data analysis
Addition and recovery.
To assess recovery of exogenous
PYD added to human sweat, three pools were prepared from sweat extracts
from 10 subjects, each of whom wore eight patches. Two concentrations
of PYD were added to each extract pool. The percentage of recovery was
calculated using the formula:
![]() |
Biological variation.
The week-to-week intraindividual
biological variation of sweat and urinary resorption markers was
calculated using the following equation:
![]() |
where SI = biological variation, ST = total variation, and SA = analytical variation. The total variation was calculated by computing the CV (%) of the corrected marker values from all replicates and all runs of the samples from the three successive periods of sample collection. Therefore, biological and analytical variation are captured in this computation. The analytical variation was calculated by computing the mean CV of corrected marker values from all replicates and all analytical runs of each period of sample collection individually. In this experimental design, the biological variability as calculated for the sweat PYD/K system included the component from variability of manual pad processing because the contributions of the extraction, evaporation, and centrifugation steps were not isolated.
Statistical analysis of clinical study results.
The
distribution of the reference and PM/GnRH populations was tested using
the Wilk-Shapiro normality test. For this test, the null hypothesis was
that the populations were not normally distributed. Therefore,
P <0.05 is considered an indication of non-normality.
Discrimination between the reference and PM/GnRH populations was
assessed using the Student t-test in the case of normally
distributed populations and the MannWhitney test for nonnormally
distributed populations. Additionally, T-scores were
computed by subtracting the mean of the reference group from the mean
of the PM/GnRH group and subsequently dividing by the SD of the
reference group population. This calculation is equivalent to the
calculation of T-scores in bone mineral densitometry.
Correlations among sweat and urine markers and with subject age were
performed using Spearman's analysis because of non-gaussian
distribution of most data sets. In all cases, JMP software (SAS
Institute) was used for the statistical investigation.
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
sweat potassium as a normalizing marker
To assess variation in the extraction procedure, known amounts
(1.3 µmol) of potassium were added to patches (n = 32). After
extraction, lyophilization, and reconstitution, potassium was
determined by FAES. The recovery was found to be 95.4% ± 6.6%.
The Pearson correlation (r) between potassium excreted and
collected on the patch during a 7.5-h period and sweat volume was found
to be 0.9223, which was significant at P <0.0001 (Fig. 2
). However, although this short-term collection experimental
design was efficient for determining the correlation, it did not assess
the uniformity of potassium output over a 5-day period, which is the
intended collection period of the Osteopatch. To test this, a study was
performed on three subjects, each of whom wore patches for a period of
five days. During that period, each subject also wore five 1-day
patches (removed after 24 h). The 1-day and multiday patches were
extracted as described previously and then analyzed for potassium by
ISE. The results were determined as the sum of the 1-day electrolyte
determinations vs the cumulative 5-day collection. The percentage of
recoveries of the sum single day values ranged from 88.7% to 102.7%
of the cumulative 5-day patch values.
|
high-sensitivity sweat PYD immunoassay
The sensitivity of the Metra Pyrilinks kit was optimized for the
concentrations of PYD detected in urine. However, we have found the
concentrations in sweat to be less than one-tenth of those in urine
(24). To optimize the sensitivity of the system, factorial
experiments were performed. Optimization of the amount of PYD coupled
to the solid phase, sample volume, and conjugate dilution resulted in
an 11.4-fold increase in sensitivity as measured by the estimated dose
at 80% (ED80) of the binding in the absence of
antigen (B0). Competitive inhibition
curves for the standard Pyrilinks assay in comparison to the
high-sensitivity assay are shown in Fig. 3
. The ED80 for the Pyrilinks assay was
2840 pmol/L PYD vs 250 pmol/L for the high-sensitivity sweat assay.
|
Intra- and interassay reproducibility were tested using solutions of
PYD added at various concentrations into an artificial sweat matrix of
7 mmol/L KCl, 4 mmol/L NaCl, 0.25 mmol/L CaCl2,
1.67 mmol/L glycine, 1.5 mmol/L NaN3, and 0.1 g/L
bovine serum albumin. For the intraassay study, 20 replicates of each
solution were tested in a single assay; for the interassay
investigation, duplicates of each solution were run in 16 total assays
on a single day of testing. Table 1
shows the mean recovery (pmol/L PYD), SD, and CV. Intra- and
interassay variation ranged from 3.9% to 10.0% and 7.1% to 15.2%,
respectively.
|
To assess patient sample dilution and recovery, three solutions of PYD
added at various concentrations to the artificial sweat matrix were
serially diluted with the assay zero diluent/calibrator. The recovery
of the undiluted sample was used as the reference value from which
expected values were calculated. The percentage of recovery was
calculated as the observed value divided by the expected value. The
results (Table 2
) show percentage of recoveries ranging from 93% to 109%.
|
To assess recovery of exogenous PYD added into human sweat, three pools
were prepared from sweat extracts from 10 subjects, each of whom wore
eight patches. Two concentrations of PYD were added into each extract
pool. The PYD concentrations were measured in triplicate before and
after addition of exogenous PYD. The results (Table 3
) show recoveries ranging from 85% to 122% with a mean
analytical recovery of 102.8%.
|
The detection limit was tested by assay of the zero diluent/calibrator (0 pmol/L PYD) in replicates of 20. The minimum detectable concentration (MDC) was defined as the concentration of PYD corresponding to the response, in milliabsorbance (mA) units, that was 2 SDs less than the mean absorbance of the zero diluent/calibrator. The experiment was repeated in 16 individual analytical runs, and the MDC was set at the upper limit of the 95% confidence interval. The MDC was 309 pmol/L PYD.
The total, analytical, and weekly intraindividual biological
variabilities were 16.2%, 6.8%, and 14.7%, respectively, for sweat
PYD/K. These values were equivalent to the results for the 24-h urinary
markers, which displayed slightly lower values than FMV urinary PYD/Cr,
DPD/Cr, and NTX/Cr (Table 4
). To determine whether the menstrual cycle had an effect on
biological variation in the sweat system, the data were reanalyzed
separately for premenopausal and postmenopausal subjects. The
intraindividual biological variation in premenopausal subjects was
found to be 15.3%, which was not significantly different from the
postmenopausal subjects (Student's t-test, P
>0.05); the biological variability was 14.5%.
|
normality analysis and population discriminating ability
Comparisons of the Osteopatch results were made with the results
obtained by FMV and 24-h urinary PYD/Cr, DPD/Cr, and NTX/Cr. For the
reference group of 5 healthy males and 13 premenopausal females, the
populations were normally distributed for sweat PYD/K, FMV, and 24-h
urinary PYD/Cr, FMV DPD/Cr, and 24-h NTX/Cr (P >0.05). FMV
NTX/Cr and 24-h DPD/Cr were nonnormally distributed (P
<0.05). For the PM/GnRH group, the data were normally distributed for
FMV and 24-h PYD/Cr, and FMV and 24-h DPD/Cr (P >0.05). All
other markers were nonnormally distributed (P <0.05).
Table 5
shows the MannWhitney and Student t-test results
and the means and SDs for the reference and PM/GnRH groups for all
markers. The mean PYD/K excretion in sweat of the reference group was
119.7 ± 31.2 nmol/mol (mean ± SD). A preliminary reference
interval was determined as a nonparametric 10th90th percentile and
encompassed the range of values between 78.6 and 175.9 nmol/mol. The
mean PYD/K excretion in sweat for the PM/GnRH group was 163.3 nmol/mol,
which was significantly higher (P < 0.05) than the
reference group (Fig. 4
). The ratio of the PM/GnRH group mean to the reference group
mean was 1.36, representing a 36% increase. This discriminatory power
was not changed if the three male GnRH subjects were removed from
the analysis.
|
|
The mean FMV and 24-h PYD/Cr, DPD/Cr, and NTX/Cr values for the PM/GnRH population were similarly increased. Only the 24-h NTX/Cr data showed a higher mean increase than PYD/K of the PM/GnRH population values to the reference group values (1.40). The FMV PYD/Cr showed the lowest mean increase (1.23).
To account for the impact of variation on discrimination of the
populations, a T-score analysis was also performed (Table 5
). The T-score for sweat PYD/K is 1.40 which with one
exception, is comparable with the scores for the urinary markers. The
T-score for FMV NTX/Cr was 0.60, which is substantially
lower than the scores for sweat PYD/K and the other urinary markers.
The low T-score for FMV NTX/Cr is primarily because of the
high SD of NTX/Cr values in the reference group.
Correlations between sweat and urine markers and with subject age were
performed by Spearman's analysis. The results (Table 6
) show significant correlations (P < 0.05)
between sweat PYD/K and urinary PYD/Cr and NTX/Cr but not urinary
DPD/Cr. Correlations with subject age were significant for all markers
except FMV and 24-h NTX/Cr measurements.
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Potassium has been identified as the marker of sweat output and has been shown to be reliably measured by standard laboratory methods. This marker is consistently recovered from the patch and is highly correlated with sweat volume. Furthermore, Dill et al. (34) have shown that sweat potassium is insensitive to subject age, whereas sweat sodium and chloride concentrations were positively correlated, making them unsuitable as volume markers. To determine whether hydration might influence sweat potassium output, Costill et al. (35) dehydrated subjects to -3% of their body weight through controlled exercise. During certain days, lost fluid was replaced with water only, and on other days, it was replaced with a glucose-electrolyte solution. In this study, there was no significant difference in sweat potassium concentrations as a result of the replacement regimen. To assess whether dietary variation might compromise sweat potassium measurements, Lane et al. (36) studied the effects of diet on sweat composition. One study group consumed a National Aeronautics and Space Administration space diet containing 2.8 g/day of potassium. The other group consumed a laboratory diet containing 3.3 g/day of potassium. Again, there was no significant difference in sweat potassium concentration, whereas sweat sodium and chloride concentrations varied with dietary intake concentrations.
The immunoassay for PYD reported in this study has been optimized to increase sensitivity and has been shown to be accurate for measurement of PYDs in sweat. The assay is based on a high-affinity monoclonal antibody that has been shown to be specific for free PYD cross-links. The antibody recognizes free PYD and DPD with equal specificity, whereas the cross-reactivity of the antibody with amino acids and PYD-containing peptides of >1000 Da is <5% and 2.5%, respectively (30).
Although the sweat collection technology does not allow the analysis of diurnal variation because of the low concentrations of PYD excreted within 24 h, the weekly intraindividual biological variation of the sweat measurement has been shown to be minimal. The results demonstrate variability equivalent to resorption markers measured in 24-h urine collections and lower than urinary markers in FMV collections. Additionally, it should be noted that our calculation of biological variation for the sweat PYD/K measurements incorporated the contribution of variation in the manual pad processing procedure (extraction, evaporation, and centrifugation). Therefore, the true biological variation of sweat PYD measurements is likely to be lower than the 14.71% reported in this study. This may be further reduced once the pad processing procedure is automated.
There is no significant difference in intraindividual biological variation between pre- and postmenopausal females in our study. This is in contrast to a recent report by Gorai et al. (37), which demonstrated significant variation during the menstrual cycle.
With regard to population discrimination, statistical assessments of the distribution of the PM/GnRH population are suggestive of the ability of the sweat PYD system to identify subjects with increased bone resorption. When expressed as T-scores, the sweat system displays performance second only to 24-h urinary DPD/Cr measurements in the population of subjects with gonadotropin suppression evaluated in this study. Correlations between sweat PYD/K and the urinary markers were generally lower than the correlations between the urinary analytes themselves. This may be because of differences in excretion pathways or to renal processing of peptide-bound PYDs to free PYDs, a finding reported recently by Colwell and Eastell (38).
In conclusion, in combination with the platform collection technology, this new marker shows potential as an indicator of bone resorption. The findings in this study suggest that the sweat system is a noninvasive alternative to urine collections. Furthermore, this technology may eventually be suitable for prescription self-use, in a fashion similar to fecal occult blood testing. However, additional cross-sectional and longitudinal studies with disorders such as osteoporosis, Paget disease of bone, hyperthyroidism, and hyperparathyroidism are indicated and will be useful in further defining the clinical utility of the system.
conflict of interest
All authors are affiliated with Pacific Biometrics, Inc. as either
direct employees, consultants (Mark Sarno), or as collaborators under
contract (Donald Schoendorfer).
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
| References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
H. W. Vesper, L. M. Demers, R. Eastell, P. Garnero, M. Kleerekoper, S. P. Robins, A. K. Srivastava, G. R. Warnick, N. B. Watts, and G. L. Myers Assessment and Recommendations on Factors Contributing to Preanalytical Variability of Urinary Pyridinoline and Deoxypyridinoline Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 220 - 235. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |