Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 124-126, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zeillinger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zeillinger, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:124-126.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Detection of p53 Polymorphism at Codon 72 by PCR and Allele-specific Oligonucleotide Hybridization on Microtiter Plates

Dan Tong1, Elisabeth Kucera1, Margit Stimpfl1, Heinz Kölbl1, Sepp Leodolter1,2 and Robert Zeillinger1,a

1 University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecology, at the General Hospital of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
2 Ludwig-Boltzmann Institute for Gynecological Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, A-1090 Vienna, Austria;
a address correspondence to this author at: University of Vienna, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Molecular Oncology Group, Waehringer Guertel 18-20, EBO 05, A-1090 Vienna, Austria

The p53 tumor suppressor gene lies on chromosome 17p and encodes a nuclear phosphoprotein. Wild-type p53 protein can suppress cellular transformation and proliferation (1)(2). Mutations in the p53 gene are the most common genetic alteration in human cancers (3). More than one-half of all human cancers show either absence of the p53 protein function or mutations in the gene. Mutant and wild-type p53 may oligomerize, thereby disrupting the function of the tetrameric complex (4). Codon 72 of the p53 gene was found to be a site of frequent polymorphism (5). The frequencies of allelic variants at this codon not only differ among different ethnic groups (6)(7), they are also associated with cancer susceptibility (8)(9)(10).

A relationship between viral infection and cancer has been found. It has been reported that adenovirus E1b 55-kDa protein and human papillomavirus E6 protein can bind to and inactivate p53 protein (11)(12). Targeting of p53 by these viruses prevents cell death and induces the cellular proliferation that is necessary for viral replication. The development of most cervical carcinomas has been shown to be associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by HPV types 16 and 18 has been found to promote the degradation of p53 (13). Recently, it was suggested that the arginine form at codon 72 of p53 was more susceptible to E6-mediated degradation than the proline form. Individuals homozygous for the arginine form at codon 72 were approximately sevenfold more susceptible to HPV-associated tumorigenesis than heterozygotes (14).

We established a PCR and microtiter plate-based hybridization assay for the detection of the codon 72 polymorphism in p53. The system was evaluated with DNA from cell lines with known allelic information. We examined DNA from 105 cervical carcinoma patients and 133 healthy female volunteers, who were representative for the Austrian population.

EDTA-blood samples from 105 cervical carcinoma patients and 133 healthy volunteers were collected at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Vienna, from 1984 to 1998. The median age of the cervical carcinoma patients was 49 years (range, 25–92 years), whereas the median age of the control group was 54 years (range, 21–77 years). In addition, all patients were matched for ethnic background and represented the typical Austrian population. Informed consent was obtained from all patients, and all procedures were approved by the institute’s responsible committee.

Breast cancer cell lines T-47D, BT-549, BT-483, CAMA-1, DU4475, Hs 578.T, SK-BR-3, and MCF-7, and ovarian cancer cell lines OVCAR-3 and ES-2 were purchased from American Type Culture Collection. All cell lines were cultured according to the instructions from American Type Culture Collection.

DNA was isolated from blood and cell lines by commercially available kits (DNA Extraction Systems I and II; ViennaLab).

Sense primer 5'-ATGGATGATTTGATGCTGTC-3' and antisense primer 5'-AGAAGCCCAGACGGAAAC-3' were used for the amplification of a DNA fragment containing the polymorphic site at codon 72. The antisense primer was labeled with fluorescein. For PCR, 30 ng of DNA was used as template in a total volume of 30 µL. The reaction mixture included 15 pmol of both sense and antisense primers, 250 µmol/L dNTPs (ViennaLab), 3.0 µL of 10x amplification buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 9.0, 50 mmol/L KCl, 0.1 g/L gelatin, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 1.0 mL/L Triton X-100; ViennaLab) and 1.0 U of Super Taq Polymerase (HT Biotechnology). PCR was performed on a Perkin-Elmer GeneAmp PCR system 9600 with 40 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 52 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 30 s. All reactions were preceded by a primary denaturation step at 94 °C for 1 min. PCR product (5 µL) was then resolved on 3% agarose gels containing 0.1 mL/L SYBR Green I (Molecular Probes). Gels were excited with 254 nm transilumination.

Oligonucleotides were designed to specifically hybridize either with PCR products from the p53 Pro72 isoform (5'-GCTCCCCCCGTGGC-3') or the Arg72 isoform (5'-CTGCTCCCCGCGTG-3'). The probes were 5' labeled with biotin. The detection of the p53 polymorphism was carried out using the Universal Gene Mutation Detection Kit (ViennaLab). Briefly, 10 µL of PCR product was denatured in an alkaline buffer and added to 100 µL of Tris-based hybridization buffer containing 5 pmol of specific oligonucleotide in a streptavidin-coated well. Hybridization was carried out at 37 °C for 30 min. After two stringent washes in a buffer containing 0.4x standard saline citrate at 37 °C, an anti-fluorescein horseradish peroxidase complex was added to the well. Then it was incubated at room temperature for 15 min. The well was washed twice with phosphate-buffered saline, and a color developer containing 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine was added to the well. After 15 min of color development, an acidic buffer was added to stop the reaction, and the color intensity was measured at 450 nm with 630 nm as reference.

For system evaluation and to verify the results from microtiter well-based hybridization, PCR products from cell lines and from 20 randomly selected samples were sequenced directly using an ALFexpress DNA sequencer and the Thermo Sequenase fluorescently labeled primer cycle sequencing kit (Amersham Pharmacia Biotech).

Differences in the allelic frequencies of p53 at codon 72 between the cervical carcinomas and the control group as well as between the Austrian population and other Caucasian populations were examined by the {chi}2 test.

DNAs from several breast and ovarian cancer cell lines were used to evaluate our detection system. Allelic information of p53 at codon 72 in these cell lines was obtained from sequencing. As shown in Fig. 1 A, after amplification of template DNAs by PCR, a 223-bp PCR product was generated. Hybridization of these PCR products to the oligonucleotides specific for the p53 Pro72 isoform and the Arg72 isoform on microtiter plates generated either a blue-colored positive signal or a colorless negative signal in the wells. Fig. 1A shows that the cell lines T-47D, BT-549, and ES-2 are homozygous for p53 Pro72, cell lines BT-483, CAMA-1, Hs 578.T, SK-BR-3, and OVCAR-3 are homozygous for Arg72, and the cell line MCF-7 is heterozygous for Pro72 and Arg72. This result was in accordance with the results from direct sequencing, confirming that the detection of p53 polymorphism at codon 72 by PCR and allele-specific hybridization on microtiter plates is a reliable method. The blue-colored positive signal changes to yellow after addition of the acidic buffer. Positive signals usually have an absorbance reading of >0.500, and negative signals are below 0.050 at 450 nm.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Evaluation of the detection system with DNA from cell lines with known allelic information (A) and specific hybridization of various amounts of PCR products to oligonucleotides specific for the arginine and proline forms (B).

(A), PCR products on an agarose gel are shown at the top; hybridization results for the proline-specific oligonucleotide (pro oligo) and arginine-specific oligonucleotide (arg oligo) on a microtiter plate are shown at the bottom. (B), gray and white columns represent hybridization to proline- and arginine-specific oligonucleotides, respectively. AU, absorbance units.

To test the binding specificity of the allele-specific oligonucleotides to the PCR products, different amounts of PCR products from DNAs with different allelic types were applied to the hybridization system. Fig. 1BUp shows that binding of the oligonucleotides to the corresponding PCR products is specific. As the intensity of the signals increased with the increasing amounts of PCR products, the intensities of the unspecific binding were unchanged.

Analysis of the p53 polymorphism at codon 72 showed that the proportion of individuals homozygous for arginine, homozygous for proline, and heterozygous for arginine and proline were 54.3%, 7.6%, and 38.1% among the 105 cervical carcinoma patients and 62.4%, 8.3%, and 29.3% among the 133 healthy women (Table 1 ). {chi}2 analysis revealed no significant differences in these proportions between the two groups.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Distribution of p53 allelic variants at codon 72.

Sequencing of the PCR products from 20 randomly selected samples showed 100% concordance with the results obtained from PCR and allele-specific oligonucleotide hybridization on microtiter plates (data not shown).

In previous studies on the p53 polymorphism at codon 72, tumor samples were used as the source for DNA (14)(15)(16). Although loss of heterozygosity at the p53 locus is not common in cervical carcinomas, in one study, an allelic imbalance was observed in 22% of the samples (17). Another study demonstrated a loss of heterozygosity rate of 15% on chromosome 17p in cervical carcinomas; the authors suggested that this might be caused by alterations of the p53 gene (18). The use of DNA from tumor samples for polymorphism analysis may, therefore, lead to inaccurate results. In this study, we used DNA from peripheral blood lymphocytes because they are not affected by such genetic alterations frequently observed in solid tumors.

Comparing the frequencies of allelic variants found in Austrian women with those reported in other Caucasian women (Table 1Up ) (7)(16), both the control group and the carcinoma patients showed no significant differences from the other study groups, indicating that the frequencies of p53 variants at codon 72 are not different in Caucasian women in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and Austria.

Our results show that there is no difference in the allelic frequencies of the p53 gene at codon 72 between cervical carcinoma patients and the control group. Because we did not determine HPV status in our study group, we cannot directly compare our results with the data of Storey et al. (14). Storey et al. reported that individuals homozygous for the arginine form at codon 72 are approximately sevenfold more susceptible to HPV-associated cervical cancer than heterozygotes. However, our data are in accordance with the results of two other studies (15)(16), one of which included only cases that were positive for HPV types 16 and 18. Both studies reported a lack of correlation between polymorphism at codon 72 of p53 and risk of cervical cancer. It cannot be ruled out that such a correlation exists in ethnic groups different from the ones investigated in these studies and ours because a significant difference for the prevalence of arginine homozygotes among various ethnic groups has been reported (6). Therefore, more epidemiological studies that include patients with different ethnic backgrounds should be undertaken. Detection of this p53 polymorphism with PCR and allele-specific hybridization on microtiter plates is amenable to automation and thus can be very useful for this purpose.


Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Anniversary Fund of the Austrian National Bank for the Promotion of Scientific Research and Teaching (Project ÖNB 6054). We thank Andrea Wolf and Sabrina Zeillinger for isolating the DNA used in this study.


Footnotes

fax 43-1-40400-7832, e-mail robert.zeillinger{at}akh-wien.ac.at


References

  1. Baker SJ, Markowitz S, Fearon ER, Willson JK, Vogelstein B. Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53. Science 1990;249:912-915. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Finlay CA, Hinds PW, Levine AJ. The p53 proto-oncogene can act as a suppressor of transformation. Cell 1989;57:1083-1093. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Vogelstein B. Cancer. A deadly inheritance. Nature 1990;348:681-682. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Milner J, Medcalf EA. Cotranslation of activated mutant p53 with wild type drives the wild-type p53 protein into the mutant conformation. Cell 1991;65:765-774. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Matlashewski GJ, Tuck S, Pim D, Lamb P, Schneider J, Crawford LV. Primary structure polymorphism at amino acid residue 72 of human p53. Mol Cell Biol 1987;7:961-963. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Beckman G, Birgander R, Själander A, Saha N, Holmberg PA, Kivelä A, et al. Is p53 polymorphism maintained by nature selection?. Hum Hered 1994;44:266-270. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Själander A, Birgander R, Saha N, Beckman L, Beckman G. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes show distinct differences between major ethnic groups. Hum Hered 1996;46:41-48. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Birgander R, Själander A, Zhou Z, Fan C, Beckman L, Beckman G. p53 polymorphisms and haplotypes in nasopharyngeal cancer. Hum Hered 1996;46:49-54. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Buller RE, Sood A, Fullenkamp C, Sorosky J, Powills K, Anderson B. The influence of the p53 codon 72 polymorphism on ovarian carcinogenesis and prognosis. Cancer Gene Ther 1997;4:239-245. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Kawajiri K, Nakachi K, Imai K, Watanabe J, Hayashi S. Germ line polymorphisms of p53 and CYP1A1 genes involved in human lung cancer. Carcinogenesis 1993;14:1085-1089. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Sarnow P, Ho YS, Williams J, Levine AJ. Adenovirus E1b–58kd tumor antigen and SV40 large tumor antigen are physically associated with the same 54 cellular protein in transformed cells. Cell 1982;28:387-394. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Werness BA, Levine AJ, Howley PM. Association of human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 E6 proteins with p53. Science 1990;248:76-79. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Scheffner M, Werness BA, Huibregtse JM, Levine AJ, Howley PM. The E6 oncoprotein encoded by human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 promotes the degradation of p53. Cell 1990;63:1129-1136. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Storey A, Thomas M, Kalita A, Harwood C, Gardiol D, Mantovani F, et al. Role of a p53 polymorphism in the development of human papillomavirus-associated cancer. Nature 1998;393:229-234. [Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Minaguchi T, Kanamori Y, Matsushima M, Yoshikawa H, Taketani Y, Nakamura Y. No evidence of correlation between polymorphism at codon 72 of p53 and risk of cervical cancer in Japanese patients with human papillomavirus 16/18 infection. Cancer Res 1998;58:4585-4586. [Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Rosenthal AN, Ryan A, Al-Jehani RM, Storey A, Harwood CA, Jacobs IJ. p53 codon 72 polymorphism and risk of cervical cancer in UK. Lancet 1998;352:871-872. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Helland A, Holm R, Kristensen G, Kaern J, Karlsen F, Trope C, et al. Genetic alterations of the TP53 gene, p53 protein expression and HPV infection in primary cervical carcinomas. J Pathol 1993;171:105-114. [Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Mullokandov MR, Kholodilov NG, Atkin NB, Burk RD, Johnson AB, Klinger HP. Genomic alterations in cervical carcinoma: losses of chromosome heterozygosity and human papilloma virus tumor status. Cancer Res 1996;56:197-205. [Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (4)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zeillinger, R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tong, D.
Right arrow Articles by Zeillinger, R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS