Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 46: 1464-1470, 2000;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lishanski, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lishanski, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Oak Ridge Conference
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2000;46:1464-1470.)
© 2000 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Screening for Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms Using Branch Migration Inhibition in PCR-amplified DNA

Alla Lishanski1

1 Advanced Diagnostics Group, Dade Behring Inc., San Jose, CA 95135.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: New methods are required for the exploration of the human genome by discovering sequence variations. This study evaluated the performance of a new method for screening a large number of samples for several DNA polymorphisms.

Methods: We used a homogeneous method based on inhibition of spontaneous branch migration by any sequence difference between two molecules of PCR-amplified DNA. A set of four PCR primers is required: a forward primer, either biotinylated or labeled with digoxigenin, and two reverse primers that share a priming domain but have different "tail" sequences at their 5' ends. After PCR amplification, denaturation and reannealing of the single DNA strands produce doubly labeled cruciform structures, which dissociate by strand exchange. The presence of two different alleles in a sample causes complete inhibition of dissociation, and the association of biotin and digoxigenin is homogeneously detected using luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay.

Results: The 90 samples of the Human Variation Panel (Coriell Cell Repositories) were screened for nine known single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and one 5-bp deletion. The average signal-to-background ratio varied from ~10 to 20. The frequency of the predominant allele for different SNPs varied from 51% to 88% overall. For some SNPs, it varied among the nine ethnic groups, e.g., 25–85% (average, 51%) for one SNP. The average heterozygosity varied from 0.17 to 0.54 and as much as 0.2–0.9 (average, 0.54) for one of the SNPs.

Conclusion: The method allows simple and rapid screening of a large number of samples for the presence of multiple alleles.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Detection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)1 is central to the emerging discipline of pharmacogenomics, both for research applications such as genomics and for clinical applications such as patient stratification. These applications require the ability to screen very large numbers of samples quickly and inexpensively. We recently described branch migration inhibition (BMI), a homogeneous mutation detection method based on spontaneous BMI in PCR-amplified DNA (1). This method makes use of the fact that spontaneous strand exchange is inhibited by any sequence difference between two DNA molecules (2)(3)(4). It offers a simple approach to detecting all possible polymorphisms in an amplicon in a single reaction. This study describes the application of BMI to screening the Human Variation Panel for several known polymorphisms.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
dna and primers
Genomic DNA samples were purchased from Coriell Cell Repositories. Two panels were used: M08PDR (eight individual DNA samples from the Human Polymorphism Discovery Resource Panel), and the Human Variation Panel. The latter consisted of nine subpanels: HD01, HD02, HD03, HD04, HD09, HD06, HD07, HD08, and HD27 (5).

The SNP information can be found in the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) SNP database (6). Nine SNPs located in chromosome 21 were chosen (NCBI assay identification nos. 3989, 4141, 4212, 4213, 4214, 4215, 4216, 4030, and 4031, respectively). They were submitted to the database by Drs. M. Olivier and D. R. Cox (Stanford Human Genome Center, Stanford, CA). The primer sequences for these SNPs were the same as indicated in the NCBI SNP database above.

The primer sequences for amplifying the region that contains a 5-bp deletion were 5'-TCA.AAT.TGT.TGG.CTA.ACA.CCA-3' (forward) and 5'-TAC.TGG.TGT.ACC.GTC.CAT.GT-3' (reverse).

All forward primers were 5' end-labeled with biotin and digoxigenin, respectively. The same tail sequences, t1 and t2, were added to the 5' ends of all reverse primers: t1, 5'-ACC.ATG.CTC.GAG.ATT.ACG.AG-3'; t2, 5'-GAT.CCT.AGG.CCT.CAC.GTA.TT-3'.

The universal labeled primer sequence was 5'-TGC.CAC.CTG.ACG.TCT.AAG.AA-3'. This sequence constituted the 5' domains of all of the adapter primers, whose 3' domains were the sequences of the primers listed in the NCBI SNP database (6).

The oligonucleotides were purchased from Operon Technologies or from Oligos Etc.

pcr and branch migration
PCR amplifications were carried out using T3 thermocyclers (Biometra). Thirty-five PCR cycles were performed with 30 s of denaturation at 94 °C, 1 min of reannealing at 62 °C, and 1 min of extension at 72 °C. The thermocycling was preceded by a 10-min incubation at 95 °C to activate the AmpliTaq GoldTM DNA polymerase and was followed by 2 min of denaturation at 95 °C and a 30-min incubation at 65 °C (reannealing and branch migration). The reaction mixtures (10 µL) contained 10 ng of genomic DNA, 0.25 U of AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase (PE Bioscience), 200 µmol/L each dNTP, 62.5–250 nmol/L each primer, and 0.5 µg/mL ethidium bromide in the commercial Taq buffer (10 mmol/L Tris-HCl, pH 8.3, 50 mmol/L KCl, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 0.1 g/L gelatin).

The ratio of universal-to-adapter forward primer was 19:1 (total concentration, 125 nmol/L), and 40 PCR cycles were performed as described above.

The presence of amplified product was verified by the increased fluorescence of ethidium bromide in the presence of double-stranded DNA by placing PCR tubes on an ultraviolet transilluminator.

signal detection
For luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay (LOCITM) detection, 2-µL aliquots of amplified material subjected to the BMI conditions were mixed with 50-µL suspensions containing 1.25 µg of streptavidin-coated donor beads and 0.625 µg of anti-digoxigenin monoclonal antibody-coated acceptor beads (7). The mixtures were incubated for 30 min at 37 °C and irradiated at 680 nm; the chemiluminescent emission was measured using a custom-made reader that accommodated eight-tube strips (the automated AlphaQuestTM microplate reader is now commercially available from Packard BioScience).

The above protocol detects only heterozygotes. To detect homozygotes for the minor allele, 1 µL of each sample was mixed with 5 µL of the PCR buffer containing 1 µL of an amplicon that corresponds to DNA homozygous for the predominant allele. The mixture was denatured and subjected to branch migration (2 min at 95 °C, followed by 30 min at 65 °C). LOCI beads were added to the reaction mixture, and the signal was read as above.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
experimental procedure
A brief outline of the experimental protocol is illustrated in Fig. 1 [for a more detailed description of BMI, see Lishanski et al. (1)]. Genomic DNA is amplified using a set of four specifically designed primers. The two forward primers have the same sequence, but one is 5' end-labeled with biotin, and the other is labeled with digoxigenin. The two reverse primers have the same priming sequence but two different tail sequences, t1 and t2, each 20 nucleotides in length, that are not complementary to the genomic target and become incorporated into duplex PCR products upon amplification. PCR is followed by heat denaturation and reannealing of the single strands to eventually form, among other structures, a doubly labeled four-stranded cruciform DNA structure. When the two arms of this structure are identical (no mutation or SNP is present), strand exchange via spontaneous branch migration leads to its complete dissociation into two duplex molecules, and no signal is observed. When there is a mutation or a SNP present, branch migration in the presence of Mg2+ is inhibited, and the cruciform structure remains unresolved. The stable association of biotin and digoxigenin in this structure can be detected by standard ELISA or homogeneously detected by LOCI (7) as shown schematically in Fig. 2 .



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. The principle of polymorphism detection by BMI.

Only one of the two detectable cruciform structures is shown. All intermediate steps that lead to its formation are omitted and are described in detail in Ref. (1). B, biotin; D, digoxigenin; T1 and T2, sequences complementary to t1 and t2, respectively. The block that a single base-pair difference presents for spontaneous branch migration is symbolized by two open squares.



View larger version (12K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Detection of cruciform DNA structures by LOCI.

Sensitizer, streptavidin-coated latex bead loaded with a photosensitizer; Acceptor, anti-digoxigenin monoclonal antibody-coated (Anti-Dig Mab) latex bead loaded with a chemiluminescent olefin (5). The doubly labeled cruciform structure links the two beads together. Irradiation at 680 nm (h{nu} 680 nm) produces singlet oxygen (1O2), which reacts with the olefin to produce a chemiluminescent emission (h{nu} 550 nm) from the acceptor particle. B, biotin; D, digoxigenin.

detection of several known dna polymorphisms by bmi
The smallest subset of the National Human Genome Research Institute’s DNA Polymorphism Discovery Resource (8) was screened for nine known SNPs in chromosome 21 using BMI. The panel consists of eight individual genomic DNA samples from different groups representative of the genetic diversity found in the US population. All information about the SNPs can be found in the NCBI SNP database (6). The primer sequences and the PCR conditions were exactly the same as indicated in the NCBI SNP database, except that the tail sequences t1 and t2, which are necessary for performing BMI were added to the 5' ends of the reverse primers. These tail sequences were the same for all the amplicons studied. The forward primers were 5' end-labeled with biotin or digoxigenin, respectively. A 5-bp deletion in the Down syndrome region of chromosome 21 (9) was also included in the panel. The lengths of the 10 studied amplicons varied from 122 to 245 bp.

The results of BMI screening for 10 known DNA polymorphisms are shown in Fig. 3 . Heterozygous samples were immediately revealed as positives by virtue of two different alleles present in the same PCR reaction. Homozygotes for both alternative alleles appeared as negatives and were indistinguishable at this stage. To reveal homozygotes for the minor allele (Fig. 3 , filled symbols), all amplified samples were mixed with an equal amount of a sample homozygous for the predominant allele, the mixtures were denatured, and branch migration was repeated. All previously negative samples that became positive after this procedure were identified as homozygotes for respective minor alleles. The average heterozygote-to-average homozygote signal ratio in the first screen (no reference added) varied from 9 (SNP 4212) to 22 (5-bp deletion). Only minimal optimization that consisted of increasing the primer concentration was required to achieve this degree of discrimination. The correctness of genotype identification by BMI was confirmed by sequencing of selected samples.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Detection of 11 known polymorphisms by BMI.

The signal is normalized for each polymorphism separately, with average signal for heterozygotes taken as 1. The horizontal lines are at 3 SD above the mean negative. Open symbols correspond to BMI performed without a reference. Homozygotes for minor alleles (filled symbols) are shown twice: the lower symbols correspond to BMI performed without a reference, and the upper symbols correspond to BMI performed with a reference. Indicated at the bottom of Fig. 3Up are (top to bottom) NCBI assay identification numbers, alternative alleles for each SNP, and amplicon lengths (including the tails).

screening of the human variation panel for known dna polymorphisms
After ascertaining the adequacy of BMI analysis for the chosen polymorphisms, we screened a larger panel, the Coriell Cell Repositories Human Variation Panel (5) for all of them as described above. Fig. 4 shows an example of screening of this panel for one of the SNPs above (SNP 4213). To avoid false negatives attributable to amplification failure, the presence of amplified DNA was confirmed by increased fluorescence of the ethidium bromide that was included in the PCR reaction mixture (10). In many cases, the samples that failed to amplify could be pinpointed easily because they generated abnormally low (3- to 10-fold lower than true negatives) LOCI signals.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Screening of the Human Variation Panel for SNP 4213.

The signal was normalized as described in the legend for Fig. 3Up . Each vertical section corresponds to one of the nine ethnic groups. Control samples (right) are positive or negative by sequencing.

Allele frequencies and heterozygosities were calculated for each polymorphism. The results are summarized in Tables 1and 2, respectively. For some SNPs (e.g., 3989 and 4031), the two alternative alleles were present in approximately equal amounts overall, but in certain groups one of the alleles predominated. For other SNPs (e.g., 4216 and 4030), one of the alleles was clearly predominant in all of the groups (Table 1 ). However, the relatively small number of samples in each group did not allow us to reach any statistically significant conclusions about allele distribution. The overall percentage of heterozygotes varied from 17% to 54% for different SNPs, and as much as from 20% to 90% (average, 54%; SNP 3989) among the nine groups (Table 2 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Predominant allele frequency for various polymorphisms.1


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Heterozygosity for various polymorphisms.1

using a generic labeled primer for bmi
To avoid making expensive labeled primers for each amplicon to be analyzed, we developed a different protocol (Fig. 5 ). The forward primer was a 9:1–20:1 mixture of a universal labeled primer and a sequence-specific adapter primer. The universal primer sequence was derived from a bacterial cloning vector. The 3' proximal domain of the adapter primer was complementary to the target genomic DNA, and its 5' proximal domain was identical to the universal primer. In the first few rounds of PCR, the adapter primer generated enough amplicon to serve as a target for the universal primer. The final PCR product was suitably labeled for subsequent LOCI detection. The use of a universal primer for similar purposes has been reported by others (11).



View larger version (7K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 5. Use of a universal labeled primer in BMI.

Forward primer is ~20:1 mixture of a universal primer [50% biotinylated (B) and 50% labeled with digoxigenin (D)] and an adapter primer. The 5' domain of the adapter is identical to the universal primer. A single PCR reaction produces tagged amplicons, which serve as substrates for BMI.

The results for four different SNPs using the universal primer approach are shown in Table 3 . The discrimination was comparable to that achieved using the respective sequence-specific labeled forward primers (Fig. 3Up ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Normalized LOCI signal for BMI using universal forward primer.1


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of BMI in a relatively high-throughput application in terms of its robustness and accuracy. The additional goal was to simplify the method and make it more user-friendly. Ideally, one should be able to use the existing PCR primers without the necessity to redesign or chemically modify them other than to add the tail sequences and the tags. To find whether this degree of simplicity is possible for BMI, 10 arbitrarily chosen DNA sequences that are known to contain polymorphic sites were screened. The published primers that have been designed without considering BMI requirements were used, and PCR conditions were exactly as recommended by the SNP submitter. None of the 10 amplicons presented serious problems in terms of high background that may be caused by nonspecific priming. Most of them required no optimization at all, and for those that initially produced rather low signal-to-background ratios (~3–5), a simple doubling or quadrupling of the primer concentration improved this ratio to ~10–20. The priming specificity afforded by the AmpliTaq Gold DNA polymerase with its built-in hot-start feature was sufficient to perform BMI in the cases examined in this study without recourse to the other hot-start methods described previously for Pfu polymerase (1). Implementation of a hot-start is essential because conventional AmpliTaq polymerase generates unacceptably high background. Surprisingly, the hot-start provided by the Platinum Pfx enzyme (Life Technologies) has not yet been sufficient in our hands.

One of the potential problems in automatable procedures such as BMI can be false-negative samples that result from PCR failures. Therefore, it is important to verify the presence of a sufficient amount of amplified product in each reaction. Because gel electrophoresis is undesirable, it is fortunate that for most of the tested amplicons failed amplification manifested itself by an abnormally low LOCI signal (severalfold lower than the true negatives). For those amplicons in which this effect was absent or less pronounced, the nonappearance of increased fluorescence of ethidium bromide in the presence of double-stranded amplified DNA was indicative of failure to amplify. The incidence of such failures was typically <2%.

One of the limitations of BMI, apart from its inability to identify polymorphisms or determine their exact location within an amplicon, is that it cannot distinguish between the homozygotes for two alternative alleles. It detects only heterozygotes, and if finding that more than one allele of a sequence exists is not deemed sufficient, an additional step is required, which consists of adding a reference amplicon that corresponds to one of the two possible homozygotes to each amplified sample and repeating denaturation and branch migration. This step allows identification of homozygotes for the second allele. The inability of BMI to differentiate between the two types of homozygotes is less of a disadvantage if BMI is used for SNP discovery.

There exists a possibility of multiplexing for BMI. Each amplicon in a multiplex mixture would have to be given a different pair of tails to prevent the amplicons from signal-generating interactions with each other. An additional technical challenge would be the necessity to use a different pair of tags corresponding to bead pairs with non-overlapping spectral characteristics for each amplicon. We have not yet explored the multiplexing potential of BMI.

The results of screening of the Human Variation Panel by BMI hint at possible differences in the allele frequency distribution between various ethnic groups for some of the biallelic SNPs. However, the relatively small number of samples included in this study did not allow us to reach any statistically significant conclusions (nor was such comparison intended). The main conclusion of this study is that BMI is suitable for rapid prescreening of large numbers of samples for the presence of DNA polymorphisms with subsequent characterization by sequencing of the positives that are revealed. The possibility of reducing the cost by using a single generic tagged primer enhances the potential of the method for SNP discovery.


   Acknowledgments
 
I wish to thank Drs. Sam Rose and Alan Dafforn for their support, many helpful discussions, and critical reading of the manuscript; Drs. Ted Ullman and Nurith Kurn for their input in the evolution of BMI; Dr. Nurith Kurn for contributing to the idea of universal primer; and Yen Ping Liu (Dade Behring Inc., San Jose, CA) for the gift of LOCI beads.


   Footnotes
 
Address for correspondence: Dade Behring Inc., PO Box 49013, San Jose, CA 95161-9013. Fax 408-239-2707; e-mail alla_lishanski{at}dadebehring.com

1 Nonstandard abbreviations: SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; BMI, branch migration inhibition; NCBI, National Center for Biotechnology Information; and LOCI, luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Lishanski A, Kurn N, Ullman EF. Branch migration inhibition in PCR-amplified DNA: homogeneous mutation detection. Nucleic Acids Res 2000;28:e42.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Panyutin IG, Hsieh P. Formation of a single base mismatch impedes spontaneous DNA branch migration. J Mol Biol 1993;230:413-424.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Hsieh P, Panyutin IG. DNA branch migration. In: Eckstein F, Lilley DMJ, eds. Nucleic acids and molecular biology. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 1993;9:42–65..
  4. Biswas I, Yamamoto A, Hsieh P. Branch migration through DNA sequence heterology. J Mol Biol 1998;279:795-806.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Coriell Cell Repositories (Human Variation Panels). http://locus.umdnj.edu/nigms/nigms_cgi/panel.cgi?id = 1 (accessed May 2000)..
  6. NCBI. A database of single nucleotide polymorphisms. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/SNP/index.html (assessed May 2000)..
  7. Ullman EF, Kirakossian H, Singh S, Wu ZP, Irvin BR, Pease JS, et al. Luminescent oxygen channeling immunoassay: measurement of particle binding kinetics by chemiluminescence. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:5426-5430.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Collins FS, Brooks LD, Chakravati A. A DNA polymorphism discovery resource for research on human genetic variation. Genome Res 1998;8:1229-1231.[Free Full Text]
  9. Lishanski A, Bell M, Scherrer S, Rine J. Development of polymorphic markers in chromosome 21 using double-strand conformation polymorphisms (DSCP) [Abstract]. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Genome Mapping and Sequencing, May 11–15, 1994, Cold Spring Harbor, NY: 148..
  10. Higuchi R, Dollinger G, Walsh PS, Griffith R. Simultaneous amplification and detection of specific DNA sequences. Biotechnology 1992;10:413-417.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Nazarenko IA, Bhatnagar SK, Hohman RJ. A closed tube format for amplification and detection of DNA based on energy transfer. Nucleic Acids Res 1997;25:2516-2521.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Genome ResHome page
Q. Yang, A. Lishanski, W. Yang, S. Hatcher, H. Seet, and J. P. Gregg
Allele-Specific Holliday Junction Formation: A New Mechanism of Allelic Discrimination for SNP Scoring
Genome Res., July 1, 2003; 13(7): 1754 - 1764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Lishanski, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Lishanski, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Oak Ridge Conference
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS