|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1 BioScientia, Institut für Laboruntersuchungen Ingelheim GmbH, Konrad-Adenauer-Strasse 17, D-55218 Ingelheim, Germany. Fax 49-6132-781-428; arndt{at}bioscientia.de
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Approach: The literature (19762000) was searched using MEDLINE and Knowledge Server with "alcohol and CDT" as the search items. The data were reviewed systematically, checked for redundancy, and organized in sequence based on the steps involved in CDT analysis.
Content: The review is divided into sections based on microheterogeneity of human serum transferrin (Tf), definition of CDT, structure of human serum CDT, pathomechanisms of ethanol-induced CDT increase, preanalysis, analysis, and medical interpretation (postanalysis). Test-specific cutoff values for serum CDT and causes of false positives and negatives for chronic alcohol abuse are discussed and summarized.
Summary: Asialo- and disialo-Fe2-Tf, which lack one or two complete N-glycans, and monosialo-Fe2-Tf (structure remains unclear) are collectively referred to as CDT. Diminished mRNA concentration and glycoprotein glycosyltransferase activities involved in Tf N-glycan synthesis and increased sialidase activity most likely account for alcohol-induced increases in CDT. Knowledge about in vivo and in vitro effects on serum CDT is poor. Reliable CDT and non-CDT fractionation is needed for CDT measurement. Analysis methods with different analytical specificities and recoveries decreased the comparability of values and statistical parameters of the diagnostic efficiency of CDT. CDT is the most specific marker of chronic alcohol abuse to date. Efforts should concentrate on the pathomechanisms (in vivo), preanalysis, and standardization of CDT analysis.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Microheterogeneity of Human Serum Tf |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
varying iron load
Tf is known to be the most important
Fe3+-transport protein in humans. Each Tf
molecule can bind a maximum of two metal irons, preferably
Fe3+. Depending on the Fe3+
supply of the organism, Tf molecules are iron free
(Fe0-Tf or apo-Tf) or loaded with one
(Fe1N- and Fe1C-Tf, where N
and C indicate the N- and C-terminal regions, respectively) or
two (Fe2-Tf) Fe3+ ions
(2). In healthy controls, Tf iron saturation is
30%, and
Fe0-, Fe1-, and
Fe2-Tfs are detectable in serum (Fig. 1
). In
Fe3+ deficiency, Tf iron saturation decreases and
higher amounts of Fe0- and
Fe1-Tfs occur in serum. In hemochromatosis
(Fe3+ excess), Tf iron saturation increases and
the isoforms found in serum are almost exclusively
Fe2-Tfs. The isoelectric point (pI) of
the Tf molecule decreases by
0.2 pH units with each
Fe3+ ion bound (2).
differing N-glycan chains
The two Tf N-glycan chains differ in their degree of branching,
showing bi-, tri-, and tetraantennary structures
(2)(4). Each antenna of the Tf N-glycan chains
terminates with a (negatively charged) sialic acid molecule (Fig. 1
).
Because of this, asialo-Tf, and the sialylated forms monosialo- through
octasialo-Tf can occur in serum (2)(4). The
relative amounts of these Tf isoforms as a percentage of total serum Tf
are <1.5% heptasialo-Tf, 13% hexasialo-Tf, 1218% pentasialo-Tf,
6480% tetrasialo-Tf, 4.59% trisialo-Tf, and <2.5% disialo-Tf in
healthy persons (5)(6)(7). Asialo- and monosialo-Tf and
octasialo-Tf are not detectable (5) or represent <0.5%
(asialo-Tf) and <0.9% (monosialo-Tf), respectively, of total Tf under
nonpathological conditions (7). The pI of the Tf molecule
decreases by
0.1 pH units with each sialic acid residue bound to the
N-glycan chains (2)(4).
modified polypeptide chain (genetic Tf variants)
Genetic Tf variants are attributable to substitutions of amino
acid(s) in the polypeptide chain (2)(4). At
least 38 Tf variants are known (8). However, only 4 of these
show a prevalence of >1%. For Tf-C, the most important type in
Caucasians, 16 subtypes have been reported. Of these, Tf-C1 shows the
highest prevalence (>95%) in Caucasians (Fig. 2
).
|
Tf-B ("busy") and Tf-D variants can interfere with CDT analysis. The pIs of non-CDT Tf-D isoforms are similar to the pIs of CDT Tf-C isoforms, which can lead to cofocusing (or coelution) and thus false-positive results for persons who are heterozygous Tf-CD and consume normal amounts of alcohol (9)(10). As we showed recently (11), Tf-D variants do not necessarily cause overdetermination of CDT; it depends on the pI of the Tf-D subtype and on the analytical specificity of the CDT analytical method. Tests incorporating trisialo-Fe2-Tf into CDT are more strongly affected by Tf-D variants than tests using the classical CDT definition (11). Tf-B variants show diminished pIs and thus increased electrophoretic mobility compared with Tf-C. Cofocusing (or coelution) of the CDT isoforms of the Tf-B variant with non-CDT isoforms of the Tf-C variant can produce false-negative results for persons who are heterozygous Tf-CB and chronically abuse alcohol.
parallel changes in all three substructures of
Tf
Alterations in the three Tf substructures usually appear in
parallel (2)(4). Thus, the distinct
microheterogeneity of human serum Tf becomes even more pronounced. In
addition, Tf molecules with various iron loads show differing sialic
acid contents and/or a modified polypeptide chain (2). As
pointed out above, iron load, sialic acid content, and modifications in
the polypeptide chain affect the pI of the Tf molecule. Alterations in
the pI, e.g., when one or two Fe3+ ions are bound
or lost, can be compensated by the presence or absence of sialic acid
residues or genetic Tf variants. Thus, Tf molecules with different
amounts of iron and sialic acid but equal pIs, e.g.,
disialo-Fe2-Tf (as the main CDT isoform) and
tetrasialo-Fe1-Tf (as the main non-CDT isoform),
appear in serum (Fig. 2
). A maximum of 36 (for the homozygous Tf type)
or 72 (for the heterozygous Tf type) isoforms can be detected by IEF in
human serum. Of these, only 3 (for the homozygous Tf type) or 6 (for
the heterozygous Tf type) Tf isoforms are collectively referred to as
CDT (see Definition of CDT below). At the same time, 9 (for
the homozygous Tf type) or 18 (for the heterozygous Tf type) non-CDT
isoforms with pIs similar to those of the CDT isoforms appear in
parallel (Fig. 2
). Because of this, the main problem in CDT
analysis is the reliable separation of CDT isoforms from non-CDT
isoforms (see Analysis).
| Definition of CDT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
14 days
(9)(12)(13). These Tf isoforms,
corresponding to asialo-Fe2-Tf,
monosialo-Fe2-Tf, and
disialo-Fe2-Tf, were later collectively referred
to as CDT (9)(14).
trisialo-Fe2-Tf and cdt
There has been a debate as to whether there is an alcohol-induced
increase of trisialo-Fe2-Tf and/or a diagnostic
benefit from including (parts of) of this isoform in CDT
(7)(15)(16)(17). Dibbelt (18) recently
demonstrated by HPLC that the trisialo-Fe2-Tf
concentration was statistically the same in serum samples with
nonpathological and pathological CDT concentrations. Increased
concentrations of the CDT isoforms were not associated in general with
increased trisialo-Fe2-Tf. Thus, Dibbelt stated
that "trisialo-transferrin is obviously of no diagnostic value" and
should not be included in CDT (18). This finding has been
supported by two studies showing a diminished diagnostic accuracy
(sensitivity) of so-called "trisialo-tests", e.g., the
%CDT-turbidimetric immunoassay (%CDT-TIA or %CDTri-TIA), which
include
50% of trisialo-Fe2-Tf in CDT,
compared with CDT tests that exclude this isoform from CDT, e.g.,
CDTect (19) and ChronAlcoI.D. (this work group, submitted
for publication).
| Structure of Human Serum CDT |
|---|
|
|
|---|
| Pathomechansisms of Ethanol-induced CDT Increase |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2,6-sialyltransferase mRNA concentrations (because of
destabilization by ethanol), decreased synthesis of
2,6-sialyltransferase, which is followed by lower sialyltransferase
activity, and decreased sialylation of Tf in rats chronically fed
alcohol were observed by Lakshman et al. (28). Xin et al.
(29) measured increased sialidase activity in liver plasma
membranes and reduced sialyl, galactosyl, and
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferases in Golgi homogenates from
alcohol-treated rats. This loss in transferase activity was also
observed when acetaldehyde was added to Golgi homogenates from normally
fed control rats (29). In this connection, a finding by Fast
et al. (30) is interesting. In assessing the role of the
carbohydrate chains of sialyltransferase (EC 2.4.99.1) for enzyme
activity, they observed diminished enzyme activity after partial
removal of the N-glycans by N-glycanase. The presence of
methanol or ethanol was necessary for complete deglycosylation. There
was a correlation between the loss of catalytic activity of the enzyme
and increased deglycosylation. One might speculate whether the
diminished activities of sialyltransferase (galactosyltransferase and
N-acetylglucosaminyltransferase) reported by Xin et al.
(29) are attributable to incomplete carbohydrate structures
of these enzymes and whether ethanol (or its metabolites) primarily
affects the glycosylation of the carbohydrate transferases that are
involved in Tf N-glycan synthesis. The results obtained by Lakshman et
al. (28) point to primary effects of ethanol on
sialyltransferase mRNA production.
In contrast to other glycoproteins, the lack of endstanding sialic acid
residues in CDT isoforms does not cause accelerated hepatic clearance
via the asialoglycoprotein receptor. Thus, the plasma half-life of CDT
is
14 days (9)(31)(32)(33), and that of Tf only
7 days (34). Patients with liver cirrhoses, regardless of
whether they were alcohol induced, showed normal arteriovenous CDT
gradients (33). Because of this, ethanol-induced alterations
of hepatic and/or renal CDT clearance seem to be unlikely as causes of
increased CDT after chronic alcohol abuse. One reason for high
CDT concentrations despite normal alcohol consumption is the
carbohydrate-deficient glycoprotein (CDG) syndrome, a hereditary
disorder of glycoprotein synthesis (35). Structural
similarities between serum glycoproteins (Tf,
1-antitrypsin, and haptoglobin ß chains)
from patients with chronic alcohol abuse and patients suffering from
the CDG syndrome were reported by Henry et al. (25). These
findings suggest that alcohol-induced increases in CDT might also be
attributable to an inhibition of the initial mannose-dependent steps of
Tf N-glycan synthesis (25). Because some types of the CDG
syndrome are attributable to deficiencies of phosphomannomutase (EC
5.4.2.8) or phosphomannose isomerase (EC 5.3.1.8), it might be
interesting to measure the corresponding enzyme activities in patients
with chronic alcohol abuse.
Our investigations revealed fluctuations between nonpathological and pathological CDT concentrations in serum from patients with combined kidney and pancreas transplantation and normal alcohol consumption. Patients with kidney transplantation alone always had CDT concentrations within reference values (36). It is known that pancreas transplantation causes hyperinsulinemia (by connecting the endocrine pancreas to the blood system and thus avoiding the first-pass effect of the liver) and bicarbonate deficiency/metabolic acidemia (by draining the exocrine pancreas into the bladder). Because metabolic acidemia is common after alcohol abuse and persistent after chronic alcohol abuse, it might also be interesting to assess the acid-base balance and serum CDT from alcoholics in parallel.
correlation between serum cdt and alcohol intake
Data concerning the correlation between the amount of ethanol
consumed and serum CDT are inconsistent. This might be the result of
ethical limitations on controlled drinking studies. According to Allen
et al. (31), almost all studies on this subject are invalid
except for those by Stibler and co-workers
(13)(14) and Storey et al.
(37). It is interesting that the critical alcohol
intake [at least 5080 g ethanol/day on 7 consecutive days
(9)] for an increase in CDT is almost the same as for
alcohol-induced liver cirrhosis (38).
| Preanalysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
22%
(14). Strong hemolysis can also lead to false-positive
results (our unpublished data).
Preanalytical conditions that do not affect the serum CDT concentration
include circadian serum CDT fluctuations [
8% (39);
intraassay CV = 10%
(11)(40)(41)]; collection of blood
into containers with kaolin (coagulation accelerator) and/or
polyacrylamide-gel separator (42); serum storage for
30 h
at room temperature (39), 7 days at 4 °C (39),
and several months at -22 °C
(14)(36)(39); repeated freezing and
thawing (36)(39); diet (33); common
drugs taken by patients of general practitioners
(14)(43); and disulfiram (27).
Conditions that need to be studied include positioning of the patient during blood collection, duration of congestion, in vivo and in vitro drug effects, use of EDTA- or heparin-plasma, and stability of whole-blood samples.
| Analysis |
|---|
|
|
|---|
CDT-specific reactions or CDT antibodies, and thus a homogeneous CDT
assay, are not available at present. Thus, routine laboratory analysis
of serum CDT requires separation of CDT from serum matrix constituents
and from non-CDT isoforms. This can be achieved by chromatographic
(e.g., anion-exchange) or electrophoretic (e.g., IEF) methods, using
the different charges and pIs of CDT and non-CDT isoforms. As pointed
out above, there are coexisting CDT and non-CDT isoforms with almost
equal pIs, e.g., disialo-Fe2-Tf (as the main CDT
isoform), tetrasialo-Fe1N-Tf,
pentasialo-Fe1C-Tf, and
heptasialo-Fe0-Tf (Fig. 2
). To reduce the number
of Tf isoforms occurring in the native serum sample and to preclude
coexistence of CDT and non-CDT isoforms with equal pIs, CDT analysis
usually starts with in vitro Tf Fe3+ saturation;
this treatment establishes a uniform Tf iron load.
Fe1- and Fe0-Tfs are
transformed to Fe2-Tfs, and only
Fe2-Tfs appear in the serum sample. The in vitro
Tf iron saturation step is followed by fractionation of the CDT and
non-CDT Tfs by electrophoresis or chromatography. Subsequently, the CDT
isoforms are detected by immunological procedures. [CDT and non-CDT
isoform separation can also be done after in vitro removal of
Fe3+ from Tf by complexation with EDTA, which
leaves Fe0-Tfs as the only isoforms in serum.
However, the selectivity of IEF is improved when focusing
Fe2-Tf isoforms (3)]. Regardless of
which fractionation procedure and which immunoassay is used, a complete
and stable Tf iron load is fundamental for reliable CDT analysis.
Incomplete in vitro Tf Fe3+ saturation or Tf iron
loss during fractionation of the CDT and non-CDT isoforms inevitably
leads to reformation of Fe1- and/or
Fe0-Tfs, co-elution of CDT and non-CDT isoforms
with equal pIs but different sialic acid and iron content, and
overdetermination of CDT (3). This point must be assessed
when developing (and launching) a new CDT analytical method
(11)(40).
electrophoretic methods
Because of its high selectivity, IEF is used as the reference
method for serum Tf isoform analysis. The Tf isoforms are separated in
a gel containing a pH gradient according to their characteristic pIs.
Again, the first analytical step is in vitro saturation of Tf with
Fe3+. After electrophoresis, the Tf bands are
visualized by immunofixation and staining of the CDT-anti-Tf complexes
(3). Finally, the Tf band patterns can be evaluated by
densitometry. It should be taken into account, however, that
application of a sufficient volume of serum for detection of CDT
isoforms to the gel (1 µL diluted 400-fold) produces an overload of
tetrasialo-Tf. It follows from this that the intensity of the main Tf
fraction does not correlate with the amount of Tf focused in this band
(3). This complicates quantitative evaluation of this and
the other Tf fractions. From the analytical point of view, this
drawback can be overcome by use of ratios of the different CDT
isoforms, e.g., disialo-/asialo-Fe2-Tf
(11)(40)(45)(46).
However, absolute CDT concentrations can also be obtained by IEF with a
calibration curve generated by different amounts of
asialo-Fe2-Tf (47). Many IEF methods
suggested for quantitative CDT analysis suffer from incomplete
documentation of detection limits, recovery (e.g., by Western
blotting), intra- and interassay CVs, and correlation between peak
height (densitometry) and amount of the Tf isoform.
Because of its high selectivity, IEF can detect genetic Tf variants without in vitro neuraminidase treatment (10)(11). The latter is done for complete removal of Tf isoform sialic acid residues and thus formation of only asialo-Tfs (10)(13)(47). Assuming complete Tf iron load and Tf sialic acid loss, only one band of asialo-Fe2-Tf would be detected in serum with a homozygous Tf type (e.g., Tf-C1), but two bands would be detected in serum with a heterozygous Tf type (e.g., Tf-CD or Tf-CB). IEF is suitable for visualization of Tf isoform patterns in the anion-exchange microcolumn eluates of (commercial) CDT tests. It is therefore an essential method for testing the reliability of the initial fractionation step used to separate CDT and non-CDT isoforms in current and upcoming CDT assays based on anion-exchange chromatography (11)(40). IEF is recommended for assessing unexpected CDT values (40)(48). IEF of serum Tf isoforms can also be used for diagnosis of the CDG syndrome [for a review, see Jaeken and Carchon (35)].
In addition to IEF in flat gels, capillary electrophoresis (49)(50)(51) and capillary zone electrophoresis (15)(52)(53) have been proposed for analysis of Tf isoforms. The main problem with these techniques is coating of the capillary surface to prevent protein adsorption and finding a coating-compatible, highly ultraviolet-transparent buffer (53). Only a tradeoff between these criteria is achievable at present. Thus, it is questionable that Tagliaro et al. (53) used uncoated (bare fused-silica) capillaries in their study without assessing the accuracy of the method, which was used for quantitative analysis of CDT.
Recently, Crivellente et al. (15) described improved analytical sensitivity and separation power of the capillary zone electrophoresis method described by Tagliaro et al. (53). The improved sensitivity and separation were obtained mainly by the addition of diaminobutane to the running buffer and an increase in column length (15). Nevertheless, the selectivity and sensitivity of capillary electrophoresis are still lower than IEF. When Tagliaro et al. (53) analyzed a serum sample with 61 units/L CDT (CDTect assay), indicating strong chronic alcohol abuse, asialo- (the second most common CDT isoform) and monosialo-Tf were not detected. Even with their improved method, Crivellente et al. (15) could not detect asialo-Fe2-Tf. In contrast, IEF of serum samples with only 25 units/L (CDTect assay; cutoff, 18 units/L) clearly detected bands for mono- and asialo-Fe2-Tf (36). Lectin affinity electrophoresis has been described for assessing Tf microheterogeneity in patients with alcoholic liver disease (24). Whether these methods can gain wide acceptance for routine CDT analysis is still unclear.
chromatographic methods
Compared with IEF, chromatographic CDT methods are less sensitive
(sample volumes of 100500 µL are needed) and less selective. Thus,
genetic Tf variants cannot be detected by anion-exchange chromatography
followed by immunoassay (a procedure usually used by commercial CDT
tests). Using a HPLC method described by Jeppson et al.
(54), Simonsson et al. (55) could reliably detect
genetic Tf variants in serum from healthy blood donors. Thus, HPLC can
also be used for assessing odd CDT values obtained by anion-exchange
chromatography/immunoassay. However, IEF is still superior to HPLC in
detecting and phenotyping genetic Tf variants with pI values close to
that of tetrasialo-Fe2-Tf, found in the most
common Tf-C1 phenotype. Analysis times of
20 min/sample
(54)(55)(56) and a time-consuming HPLC column regeneration
(54) further reduce the applicability of HPLC for large CDT
analysis series.
Recently, Yoshikawa et al. (57) described a lectin affinity chromatography method for determination of CDT. Using Sepharose columns coated with Allomyrina dichotoma (Allo A) or Trichosanthes japonica (TJA) lectins, the authors were able to separate CDT-Allo A (corresponding to disialo-Tf) and CDT-TJA (corresponding to asialo-Tf) fractions from serum. The diagnostic efficiency obtained with these fractions was higher than that of the %CDT-TIA (Axis) including trisialo-Fe2-Tf.
commercial cdt tests
In 1993, the first commercial CDT test (CDTect-RIA; Pharmacia &
Upjohn) was introduced, followed by %CDT (Axis) and the CDTect enzyme
immunoassay (CDT-EIA; Pharmacia & Upjohn). These methods use the common
CDT definition when analyzing asialo-, monosialo-, and
disialo-Fe2-Tf. Later, a test incorporating part
(50%) of the trisialo-Fe2-Tf in CDT was
developed by Axis and distributed by Axis and Bio-Rad (as the %CDT-TIA
and %CDTri-TIA, respectively) and Roche
(Tinaquant-%CDT/transferrin). Except for one HPLC method by Recipe,
currently available commercial CDT tests, even the relatively new
ChronAlcoI.D. assay, are based on fractionation of CDT and non-CDT
isoforms on anion-exchange microcolumns. Table 1
lists the analytical specificities of commercial and
noncommercial CDT tests and the corresponding test-specific cutoff
values for CDT indicating chronic alcohol abuse.
|
need for standardization of cdt analysis
The availability of CDT assays for routine laboratory diagnosis
increased and accelerated the acceptance of CDT as one of the most
specific markers of chronic alcohol abuse to date. At present,
200300 reports on CDT have been published in impact factor-listed
journals. However, the definition of CDT is increasingly vague (which
Tf isoforms are CDT isoforms, i.e., asialo-, monosialo-, disialo-
and/or trisialo-Fe2-Tf; Table 1
). Standardization
of CDT analysis by an international CDT standard and quality-control
material has not been attained [although it is possible to generate
CDT enzymatically
(55)(56)(58)]. Thus,
different Tf isoforms are analyzed, with various recoveries, as CDT
(Table 1
), which exacerbates the already poor comparability of CDT
values, diagnostic specificities and sensitivities, and predictive
values obtained in different clinical settings and among different
populations with different CDT analytical methods. To overcome this
problem, redefinition of CDT (59) or consistent use of the
common CDT definition introduced by Stibler (9) is needed.
As a result of an international meeting on standardization of CDT
analysis (in Berlin, May 2000), the aim is to develop a highly
sensitive HPLC for analysis of CDT as a standard method (e.g., for
calibration of CDT test-clinical analyzer applications) and to cease
producing so-called "trisialo tests".
The lack of standardization of CDT analyses should not discourage the use of CDT, or encourage the use of less specific markers, e.g., liver enzymes or uric acid. Hemoglobin A1C, which is widely used as an integrative long-term marker of blood glucose concentration, is far from being well standardized. Nevertheless, measurement of an individuals hemoglobin A1C concentration improves therapy for diabetes.
| Medical Interpretation (Postanalysis) |
|---|
|
|
|---|
gender dependence of serum cdt
Absolute serum CDT concentrations from healthy women typically are
higher than those of healthy men
(9)(31)(63)(64)(65)(66). Recently, de Feo et
al. (67) reported no gender dependence of serum CDT in
nonabusers and alcohol abusers, but a positive correlation between CDT
and Tf in nonabusers. The latter was also reported by van Pelt and
Azimi (68). Because females frequently have subclinical iron
deficiency and thus increased Tf concentrations, this might explain
their higher CDT concentrations. However, these findings are surprising
because it is commonly accepted that CDT and Tf do not correlate (see
below). The reason for higher CDT concentrations in healthy women
compared with healthy men remains unclear
(63)(64), in spite of the findings of de Feo et
al. (67) and van Pelt and Azimi (68).
Serum CDT:Tf ratios are not gender-dependent
[(44)(54)(69), and manufacturers test instructions].
No correlation has been found between CDT and the menstrual cycle,
serum estradiol, serum iron, or contraception
(65)(66). Compared with premenopausal women,
serum CDT was slightly increased (17.5 vs 19.3 units/L) in menopausal
women receiving estrogen therapy (65)(66).
Whether this slight difference is of practical importance [CVs of the
CDT tests of
10% must be considered
(11)(40)(41)] and whether an
association among menstrual function, CDT, and drinking behavior does
really exist, as assumed by Oslin et al. (70), needs further
investigation. Data pointing to a relationship between the amount and
frequency of menstrual blood loss and CDT were recently presented by
Leusink et al. (71).
Increased serum CDT concentrations during pregnancy have been reported. However, serum CDT did not exceed the gender- and CDTect test-specific borderline of 2628 units/L even in the third trimester (65)(66). Interestingly, de Jong and van Eijk (72) found a steady increase of tetrasialo-Tf and higher sialylated Tf isoforms and unaltered concentrations of sialic acid-deficient Tf isoforms in pregnant women during the second and third trimesters and also in women using contraceptives. In accordance with these observations, the CDT:Tf ratio should decrease (and not increase as usually discussed) in these women. This could be one reason for the diminished diagnostic sensitivity of serum CDT measurement in women compared with men (see below). Further efforts, in addition to those described by Mårtensson et al. (7), should be applied to identification of the Tf isoform patterns in healthy men and (pregnant) women. Another underlying cause can be gender-dependent differences in the drinking patterns and in the vulnerability of the liver to alcohol intoxication, as discussed recently (73).
correlation with total Tf
Except for two recent studies (67)(68), no
significant correlation between serum CDT and total Tf has been found
(9)(14)(74)(75). A
slightly improved diagnostic sensitivity was reported by Schellenberg
and Weill (45)(76), who used a "Tf-index",
referred to as the ratio of Tf isoform with a pI of 5.7 to the isoform
with a pI of 5.4
(disialo-Fe2-Tf/tetrasialo-Fe2-Tf).
Determining this ratio requires IEF, which is sometimes laborious and
requires experienced personnel. This might be one reason why the
Tf-index has not gained much acceptance. Automated IEF, such as
that described by Hackler et al. (3) and Arndt and
co-workers (36)(46), should be helpful in
further evaluating the Tf-index. For routine purposes, the Tf-index has
been replaced by the CDT:total Tf ratio. Whether this ratio increases
the diagnostic accuracy compared with absolute CDT concentrations (and
in each situation) is controversial
(7)(19)(31)(44)(48)(77)(78)(79)(80)(81).
Contradictory results were found in a single study using CDT:Tf ratios
(67), which demonstrated improved diagnostic specificity in
patients with iron-deficiency anemia but no decrease in false-negative
results in patients with alcohol abuse. Similar diagnostic
specificities for absolute CDT concentrations (units/L or mg/L) and
CDT:Tf ratios were described by Lieber (48) and Helander
(81). The main advantage of the CDT:Tf ratio is that it
improves the diagnostic specificity of CDT in patients with increased
Tf (although it is generally assumed that CDT and Tf do not correlate),
e.g., for patients with iron deficiency (reduced iron stores) or
iron-deficiency anemia but normal alcohol intake (67).
However, low total serum Tf concentrations (e.g., from acute or chronic
infection, hemochromatosis, nephrotic syndrome, or cancer) can produce
both false-negative [e.g., in hemochromatosis (67)] and
false-positive results. Thus, Lieber (48) found in some
liver disease patients increased CDT:Tf ratios that were attributable
to decreased serum Tf concentrations. Additionally, CDT:Tf ratios are
less precise than absolute CDT concentrations (the CV of the CDT:Tf
ratio is the sum of the CV of the CDT concentration plus the CV of the
total Tf). Assuming a CDT concentration of 100 mg/L and a total Tf
concentration of 4000 mg/L, the CDT:Tf ratio is 2.5%. Because of the
analytical imprecision, which is
10% for CDT and Tf, the CDT:Tf
ratio shows an imprecision of at most 20% and varies between 2.2% (90
mg/L CDT, 4040 mg/L Tf) and 2.8% (110 mg/L CDT, 3960 mg/L Tf). When
borderlines of 2.52.7% (CDT:Tf) and 100110 mg/L (CDT) are used,
the CDT:Tf ratio changes among normal (2.2%), borderline (2.5%), and
increased (2.8%). At the same time, the absolute CDT concentration
does not exceed the upper limit of the borderline. Knowing this is
important for interpretation of CDT values in longitudinal studies or
for control of relapse drinking. Our investigations revealed that
measuring (and interpreting) absolute and relative CDT concentrations
as well as the total serum Tf concentration improves the diagnostic
efficiency of CDT as a marker of chronic alcohol abuse (unpublished
data). It might be interesting to reevaluate the data from the many
clinical studies, taking into consideration absolute serum CDT
concentrations, CDT:Tf ratios, and total serum Tf concentration.
cdt and
-glutamyltransferase
In contrast to CDT analysis, measurement of
-glutamyltransferase (
-GT) activity is highly standardized,
automated, and inexpensive. Because of this,
-GT is the most
commonly used marker of alcohol abuse other than ethanol. It is obvious
to ask whether the determination of
-GT alone is sufficient and
whether CDT values are really needed for laboratory diagnosis of
alcohol abuse. Many studies on CDT investigated
-GT activities as
well. The correlation between
-GT and CDT, the diagnostic
sensitivities and specificities of CDT and
-GT, and the diagnostic
efficiencies of considering
-GT and CDT were studied alone or
conjointly. Reviews of the literature up to 1994 (82) and
between 1966 and November 1998 (83) have been published.
Since then, several studies on these subjects have appeared. Because of
the different clinical settings with many different populations varying
in sex, age, drinking amounts and patterns, and clinical backgrounds as
well as the multiple analytical and statistical methods used, it is
almost impossible to draw general conclusions from this vast amount of
data: There was no distinct correlation between absolute or relative
serum CDT concentrations and
-GT
(9)(75)(84)(85)(86)(87). Therefore, parallel
analysis of CDT and
-GT makes sense; this analysis revealed
additional diagnostic information for follow-up of alcoholics with
normal
-GT activities (84), for brief intervention among
heavy drinkers in primary healthcare (88), for evaluating
progress of patients in treatment for alcoholism (73), for
assessing alcohol consumption in a general medical clinic
(89), for monitoring alcohol consumption in men drinking
2060 g of ethanol/day (90), and for detecting heavy
alcohol consumption in female alcoholic outpatients and college
students (91). As a general conclusion, CDT is currently the
more specific and
-GT the more sensitive marker of chronic alcohol
abuse. The latter is true especially for women
(70)(73)(91), but it is not clear
whether it is related strictly to gender or to the higher vulnerability
of a womans liver to alcohol-induced damage (73).
Compared with CDT,
-GT produces false-positive results regarding
chronic alcohol abuse in many states of disease, e.g., obstructive
liver disease, posthepatic obstruction, hepatitis, fatty liver, liver
cirrhosis, liver cell carcinoma and liver metastases, cardiac
insufficiency, mononucleosis, renal transplant, hyperthyroidism,
myotonic dystrophy, diabetes mellitus, and pancreatitis
(92)(93). In contrast to CDT
(14)(43),
-GT is highly affected by several
medications and drugs of abuse, e.g., barbiturates, cephalosporins,
estrogens, oral contraceptives, phenytoin, primidone, thyrostatics,
anabolic steroids, phenothiazines, and antirheumatics
(92)(93).
diagnostic efficiency of cdt
Numerous clinical trials have been published regarding the
diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of serum CDT as a marker of
chronic alcohol abuse. Several reviews have been published
(9)(31)(82)(94)(95).
A systematic review of CDT comparing CDT and other markers of
alcoholism based on a MEDLINE database from 1966 to November 1998 was
provided by Salaspuro (83). Since then, many new reports
have appeared in journals listing impact factors. Most of these reports
have already been discussed here. It is not the aim of this review to
compare the diagnostic criteria (e.g., specificities, sensitivities,
predictive values, ROC plots) obtained for the different analytes
(e.g.,
-GT and CDT) in different populations (e.g., differences in
sex, ethnicity, hospitalization, and no/mild/moderate/heavy/chronic
alcohol abuse) by different CDT methods (e.g., electrophoresis,
chromatography, absolute/relative CDT concentrations, and different
definition of the CDT group). For calculating parameters of diagnostic
efficiency, reliable data regarding individual alcohol consumption are
a prerequisite. Thus, for classifying false positives and true
negatives, an objective "gold standard" is needed that
determines the individual alcohol consumption without any error.
Clinical background or personal reviews are customarily used for this
purpose. However, if both were faultless, we would not need laboratory
markers of chronic alcohol abuse. Because underestimating alcohol
consumption is common, false true positives or false false negatives
will occur and markedly affect the criteria of diagnostic efficiency of
CDT obtained in a specific clinical study. Additionally, in one study,
diagnostic sensitivities and specificities, and positive and negative
predictive values varied by 12% when serum CDT concentrations for the
same healthy controls and hospitalized patients were analyzed by
different CDT tests (96). This should be considered when
interpreting parameters of diagnostic efficiency.
diagnostic specificity of cdt
The main causes for false-positive results in CDT analysis have
been described by Stibler and co-workers
(9)(14). Conditions currently known to
potentially cause false positives and thus decrease the diagnostic
specificity of CDT are summarized in Table 2
. In interpreting these data, one should not generalize findings
made on some patients of small (and in part highly selected)
populations (see comments in Table 2
). Altogether, there are fewer
sources of false positives when CDT is used to monitor alcohol abuse
than
-GT. Some of these sources are relatively easy to differentiate
from alcohol history (Table 2
). Diagnostic specificities of CDT
obtained in several different clinical studies have been published
(9)(31)(82)(83)(94).
|
In summary, CDT is still the most specific laboratory marker of chronic alcohol abuse.
diagnostic sensitivity
There are conditions that can affect the diagnostic sensitivity of
CDT as a marker of chronic alcohol abuse (Table 3
). Differences in the drinking patterns during an appropriate
period before blood sampling (long-term drinking pattern) and within
the individual days of this period (short-term drinking patterns) must
be assessed. Because the half-life of CDT is
14 days, at least 14
days (4 weeks is better) before blood collection must be assessed. The
results of a 3-week drinking experiment showed that chronic consumption
of small amounts of alcohol affected serum CDT concentrations
[confirmed by Whitfield et al. (85)], but short-time
drinking of larger amounts do not (97). Because of
ethical considerations, long-time drinking experiments are difficult to
perform. However, it is known that ethanol blood concentrations are
affected not only by the amount of alcohol consumed, but also by the
amount per time period and by the body mass (distribution volume): the
shorter the period in which a gram of alcohol is consumed and the lower
the body mass, the higher the peak blood alcohol concentration. Thus,
one might hypothesize that chronic short-term consumption of high
amounts of alcohol by a lean person causes high peak blood alcohol
concentrations and substantial liver injury, and thus affects serum CDT
concentrations or the doseresponse curve. A relationship between CDT
insulin sensitivity and hypertension in men of a very specific patient
sample were discussed by Fagerberg et al. (98).
|
The main concern about CDT as a marker of chronic alcohol abuse is its
relatively low diagnostic sensitivity. Sensitivities of >90% and up
to 100%, as reviewed by Stibler (9), led to great hopes for
CDT. Subsequent studies, reporting distinctly lower diagnostic
sensitivities, could not meet these expectations [reviewed in Refs.
(31)(83)]. Recently, a diagnostic sensitivity
of 0% for women with or without liver diseases was reported
(99). The authors final statement that their data
"underline the insufficient specificity of CDT" and that "it is
not justified to base any medical decision on the measurement of CDT
concentrations, ... even more for forensic decisions" cannot be
drawn from their own data. Thus, diagnostic specificities of 83.6% and
94.2% for men with or without liver disease and 96.9% and 91.9% for
women are distinctly better than those found for
-GT: 36.1% and
24% for men and 36.6% and 50% for women. The shortcomings of this
study were discussed by Allen and Sillanaukee (100) and
Arndt et al. (101). Except for this study, diagnostic
sensitivities of 3050% for women and 5070% for men, depending on
factors such as population, drinking patterns, and daily alcohol
intake, seem to be a good average.
| Conclusions |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-GT, and not on a single CDT value alone. Efforts should be
directed toward the preanalysis of CDT, a uniform definition of CDT,
and standardization of CDT analysis.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
-GT,
-glutamyltransferase. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
-glutamyl transferase levels during disulfiram therapy. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996;20:1202-1205.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
2,6-sialyltransferase for enzyme activity. Biochim Biophys Acta 1993;1202:325-330.[Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-glutamyltransferase, and mean corpuscular volume in teetotalers. Clin Chem 1998;44:2120-2125.
-glutamyltransferase as markers of heavy alcohol consumption: gender differences. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1994;18:747-754.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
glutamyl transpeptidase in evaluating progress of patients in treatment for alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1999;23:115-120.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-Glutamyltranspeptidase and carbohydrate deficient transferrin: alternative measures of excessive alcohol consumption. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1995;19:1541-1546.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-glutamyltranspeptidase. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1998;22:615-618.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-glutamyltransferase and mean corpuscular volume. Alcohol Alcohol 1999;34:760-766.
-glutamyltransferase in alcohol-using perimenopausal women. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 2000;24:176-179.[Web of Science][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-Glutamyl-transferase (GGT). In: Thomas L,
ed. Labor und Diagnose. Frankfurt: TH-Books Verlagsgesellschaft,
1998:838..
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
R. Mancinelli and M. Ceccanti Biomarkers in Alcohol Misuse: Their Role in the Prevention and Detection of Thiamine Deficiency Alcohol Alcohol., March 1, 2009; 44(2): 177 - 182. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. P. Bergstrom and A. Helander Clinical Characteristics of Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin (%Disialotransferrin) Measured by HPLC: Sensitivity, Specificity, Gender Effects, and Relationship with other Alcohol Biomarkers Alcohol Alcohol., July 1, 2008; 43(4): 436 - 441. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. B. Whitfield, V. Dy, P. A.F. Madden, A. C. Heath, N. G. Martin, and G. W. Montgomery Measuring Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin by Direct Immunoassay: Factors Affecting Diagnostic Sensitivity for Excessive Alcohol Intake Clin. Chem., July 1, 2008; 54(7): 1158 - 1165. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Helander and G. Nordin Insufficient Standardization of a Direct Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Immunoassay Clin. Chem., June 1, 2008; 54(6): 1090 - 1092. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Perez-Cerda, D. Quelhas, A. I. Vega, J. Ecay, L. Vilarinho, and M. Ugarte Screening Using Serum Percentage of Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin for Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation in Children with Suspected Metabolic Disease Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 93 - 100. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Nedelkov, D. A. Phillips, K. A. Tubbs, and R. W. Nelson Investigation of Human Protein Variants and Their Frequency in the General Population Mol. Cell. Proteomics, July 1, 2007; 6(7): 1183 - 1187. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. R. Delanghe, A. Helander, J. P.M. Wielders, J. M. Pekelharing, H. J. Roth, F. Schellenberg, C. Born, E. Yagmur, W. Gentzer, and H. Althaus Development and Multicenter Evaluation of the N Latex CDT Direct Immunonephelometric Assay for Serum Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Clin. Chem., June 1, 2007; 53(6): 1115 - 1121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. BRAZA-BOILS, M. TOMAS, M. P. MARIN, L. MEGIAS, M. SANCHO-TELLO, E. FORNAS, and J. RENAU-PIQUERAS GLYCOSYLATION IS ALTERED BY ETHANOL IN RAT HIPPOCAMPAL CULTURED NEURONS Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 494 - 504. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J. HIETALA, H. KOIVISTO, P. ANTTILA, and O. NIEMELA COMPARISON OF THE COMBINED MARKER GGT-CDT AND THE CONVENTIONAL LABORATORY MARKERS OF ALCOHOL ABUSE IN HEAVY DRINKERS, MODERATE DRINKERS AND ABSTAINERS Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2006; 41(5): 528 - 533. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Bortolotti, G. De Paoli, J. P. Pascali, M. T. Trevisan, M. Floreani, and F. Tagliaro Analysis of Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin: Comparative Evaluation of Turbidimetric Immunoassay, Capillary Zone Electrophoresis, and HPLC Clin. Chem., December 1, 2005; 51(12): 2368 - 2371. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. M.R. Appenzeller and R. Wennig Altered Distribution of Transferrin Isoforms According to Serum Storage Conditions Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2159 - 2162. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Helander, J. P.M. Wielders, R. te Stroet, and J. P. Bergstrom Comparison of HPLC and Capillary Electrophoresis for Confirmatory Testing of the Alcohol Misuse Marker Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1528 - 1531. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
J.-B. Daeppen, F. Anex, B. Favrat, A. Bissery, J. Leutwyler, R. Gammeter, P. Mangin, and M. Augsburger Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Measured by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis and by Turbidimetric Immunoassay for Identification of Young Heavy Drinkers Clin. Chem., June 1, 2005; 51(6): 1046 - 1048. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. Papadea and R. J. Schlosser Rapid Method for {beta}2-Transferrin in Cerebrospinal Fluid Leakage Using an Automated Immunofixation Electrophoresis System Clin. Chem., February 1, 2005; 51(2): 464 - 470. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Azorin, M. Portoles, P. Marin, F. Lazaro-Dieguez, L. Megias, G. Egea, and J. Renau-Piqueras PRENATAL ETHANOL EXPOSURE ALTERS THE CYTOSKELETON AND INDUCES GLYCOPROTEIN MICROHETEROGENEITY IN RAT NEWBORN HEPATOCYTES Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2004; 39(3): 203 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Anttila, K. Jarvi, J. Latvala, and O. Niemela METHOD-DEPENDENT CHARACTERISTICS OF CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN MEASUREMENTS IN THE FOLLOW-UP OF ALCOHOLICS Alcohol Alcohol., January 1, 2004; 39(1): 59 - 63. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. A. Carchon, R. Chevigne, J.-B. Falmagne, and J. Jaeken Diagnosis of Congenital Disorders of Glycosylation by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis of Serum Transferrin Clin. Chem., January 1, 2004; 50(1): 101 - 111. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B. Ramdani, V. Nuyens, T. Codden, G. Perpete, J. Colicis, A. Lenaerts, J.-P. Henry, and F. J. Legros Analyte Comigrating with Trisialotransferrin during Capillary Zone Electrophoresis of Sera from Patients with Cancer Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1854 - 1864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Helander, A. Husa, and J.-O. Jeppsson Improved HPLC Method for Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin in Serum Clin. Chem., November 1, 2003; 49(11): 1881 - 1890. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
P. Anttila, K. Jarvi, J. Latvala, J. E. Blake, and O. Niemela DIAGNOSTIC CHARACTERISTICS OF DIFFERENT CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN METHODS IN THE DETECTION OF PROBLEM DRINKING: EFFECTS OF LIVER DISEASE AND ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION Alcohol Alcohol., September 1, 2003; 38(5): 415 - 420. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Arndt Asialotransferrin--An Alternative to Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin? Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 1022 - 1023. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Arndt, D. Kuhn, H. Herbst, M. Linnemann, and N. Nikolaidis Increased Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin of Unknown Etiology in a 15-Year-Old Male Patient with Autoimmune Hepatitis Type 1 Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 1025 - 1026. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
L. M. Stadheim, J. F. O'Brien, K. D. Lindor, G. J. Gores, and D. B. McGill Value of Determining Carbohydrate-Deficient Transferrin Isoforms in the Diagnosis of Alcoholic Liver Disease Mayo Clin. Proc., June 1, 2003; 78(6): 703 - 707. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. J. Schwarz, I. Domke, A. Helander, P. M. W. Janssens, J. van Pelt, B. Springer, M. Ackenheil, K. Bernhardt, G. Weigl, and M. Soyka MULTICENTRE EVALUATION OF A NEW ASSAY FOR DETERMINATION OF CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2003; 38(3): 270 - 275. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Legros, V. Nuyens, M. Baudoux, K. Zouaoui Boudjeltia, J.-L. Ruelle, J. Colicis, F. Cantraine, and J.-P. Henry Use of Capillary Zone Electrophoresis for Differentiating Excessive from Moderate Alcohol Consumption Clin. Chem., March 1, 2003; 49(3): 440 - 449. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. J. Legros, V. Nuyens, E. Minet, P. Emonts, K. Z. Boudjeltia, A. Courbe, J.-L. Ruelle, J. Colicis, F. de L'Escaille, and J.-P. Henry Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin Isoforms Measured by Capillary Zone Electrophoresis for Detection of Alcohol Abuse Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2177 - 2186. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
I. Ryden, P. Pahlsson, and S. Lindgren Diagnostic Accuracy of {alpha}1-Acid Glycoprotein Fucosylation for Liver Cirrhosis in Patients Undergoing Hepatic Biopsy Clin. Chem., December 1, 2002; 48(12): 2195 - 2201. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Arndt and J. Kropf Alcohol Abuse and Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin Analysis: Are Screening and Confirmatory Analysis Required? Clin. Chem., November 1, 2002; 48(11): 2072 - 2074. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Helander MULTICENTRE VALIDATION STUDY OF INSTRUMENT APPLICATIONS FOR %CDT, AN IMMUNOASSAY FOR QUANTIFICATION OF CARBOHYDRATE-DEFICIENT TRANSFERRIN IN SERUM Alcohol Alcohol., May 1, 2002; 37(3): 209 - 212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
F. Tagliaro, F. Bortolotti, R. M. Dorizzi, M. Marigo, J. R. Delanghe, B. Wuyts, and M. L. De Buyzere Caveats in Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin Determination Drs. Delanghe, Wuyts, and De Buyzere respond: Clin. Chem., January 1, 2002; 48(1): 208 - 209. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. H. Freeze Update and perspectives on congenital disorders of glycosylation Glycobiology, December 1, 2001; 11(12): 129R - 143R. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
U. Turpeinen, T. Methuen, H. Alfthan, K. Laitinen, M. Salaspuro, and U.-H. Stenman Comparison of HPLC and Small Column (CDTect) Methods for Disialotransferrin Clin. Chem., October 1, 2001; 47(10): 1782 - 1787. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A. Helander, G. Eriksson, H. Stibler, and J.-O. Jeppsson Interference of Transferrin Isoform Types with Carbohydrate-deficient Transferrin Quantification in the Identification of Alcohol Abuse Clin. Chem., July 1, 2001; 47(7): 1225 - 1233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |