Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 63-66, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Hematology
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:63-66.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Effect of Urgent Clinician Notification of Low Hemoglobin Values

Paul Frooma,1, Tayser Mahameed1, Rosa Havis1 and Mira Barak1

1 Central Laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, Nesher, Israel.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Hematology Laboratories, Central Laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, Nesher, Israel. Fax 972-4-8209094; paulf{at}ioh.org.il.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Urgent clinician notification of low hemoglobin values is a common practice. The effect of such notification for samples obtained during an office visit is uncertain.

Methods: We notified the attending physicians in 100 consecutive cases of outpatients with hemoglobin <80 g/L. We reviewed the medical charts of these patients with their personal physicians 1–2 months later. We considered transfusions unnecessary only when given to a clinically stable patient with probable iron deficiency anemia in the absence of chronic diseases that produce the anemia.

Results: Overall, 47 (47%) of the patients were referred to the emergency room (ER), and 31 of the 47 (66%) were transfused. Increasing age and decreasing hemoglobin were associated with increased referral of patients to the ER. Six of 31 transfusions were unnecessary. An emergency transfusion was clearly indicated in only 3 of the 31 patients; the other patients were clinically stable. A modified notification strategy excluding microcytic samples >50 g/L would have detected these three patients. Over the follow-up period, no patient not referred to the ER died from complications of anemia, nor were any patients hospitalized with acute symptoms of low hemoglobin.

Conclusion: In some settings, urgent notification of medical outpatient clinics of patients with hemoglobin <80 g/L may lead to unnecessary ER visits.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Red blood cell transfusions generally are recommended in hospitalized patients if the hemoglobin is <60 g/L (1)(2). Delay in appropriate use of red cell transfusion might put the patient at risk for hypoxic complications. Although the risk of acute events attributable to anemia probably occurs only with a hemoglobin concentration <50 g/L (2)(3), patients with ischemic heart disease might be at risk with higher values. Because the clinical signs of anemia are unreliable (4)(5), contacting the physician immediately when the blood count is unexpectedly low could be prudent. Immediate physician notification of a low hemoglobin obtained during an office visit, however, might lead to adverse consequences. Inappropriate notification squanders human resources and penalizes the physician with an untimely information overload (6)(7). A telephone call, in itself, might suggest the need for immediate attention, leading to unwarranted referrals to the emergency room (ER), inconvenience and anxiety for patient and family, and even unnecessary blood transfusions (2)(8). We are unaware of any outcome studies that demonstrate either the benefits or risks of this practice.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our clinical laboratory provides results of blood counts during the day of collection (maximum delay is 9 h). The results arrive by electronic mail to the clinics and are checked by the physician within 1–3 days. Our laboratory’s policy is immediate notification of results of the complete blood count if the hemoglobin value is <80 g/L and no record of previous similar values are found in the laboratory archives. We notified the attending physicians in 100 consecutive cases of outpatients with hemoglobin <80 g/L and reviewed the medical charts of these patients with them 1–2 months later. We considered transfusions unnecessary only when given to a clinically stable patient with probable iron deficiency anemia in the absence of chronic diseases that produce the anemia.

Over a 3-month period, we performed 48 972 blood counts using one of the following analyzers: CD3500 (Abbott), Sysmex9000 (Sysmex Corporation), and H-2 (Miles Inc.). The performance of these analyzers is harmonized, and we use internal and external (United Kingdom National External Quality Assessment Scheme) quality-control programs. All tests with a hemoglobin values <80 g/L (n = 183) were repeated using another counter. If discordant results were obtained, the test was repeated until a consistent result was obtained. Repeat testing revealed one technical error, in which the hemoglobin concentration was actually 121 g/L. The other 182 tests showed almost identical results. In 81 cases, a previous test from the patient was similar to the current test, and no attempt was made to contact the physician. We attempted to notify the attending physician in 101 consecutive cases of patients with hemoglobin <80 g/L. One to 2 months after the original telephone call, 100 patient medical charts were reviewed. In one case, we were unable to contact the physician.

Patients were divided into groups by age and disease categories to determine the frequency of unnecessary ER referrals and transfusions. There were three age groups: children (<18 years), young adults (18–49 years), and older adults (>=50 years). Diseases were categorized into five groups: cancer, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic renal failure, other diseases, and probable iron deficiency (mean corpuscular volume <=70 fL and no reduction in either white blood cell or platelet counts). After the review, we considered as "necessary" those acute referrals in which the patient had an acute bleeding episode, was unstable as judged by vital signs or symptoms (e.g., chest pain), or had hemoglobin <50 g/L, where there might be an increased risk for acute events (2)(3). Because the indication for transfusion in patients with chronic disease is subjective, we defined unnecessary transfusions as those given to a clinically stable patient with probable iron deficiency in the absence of chronic diseases that might be the cause of the anemia.

statistical analysis
The rate of anemia (hemoglobin <80 g/L) per 1000 tests was calculated by dividing the number of cases of anemia for each age group by the total tests done per age group. ANOVA for parametric data and the {chi}2 test for nonparametric data were used to determine statistical significance of differences in univariate analyses. All significant variables were entered into a logistic regression model. Variables with P values >0.2 were removed and subsequently reentered sequentially to determine whether they improved the model.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Females predominated in those >17 years (Table 1 ). The rates of anemia were highest in females of all ages and in males >=50 years. The overall rate was 3.7 cases of hemoglobin <80 g/L per 1000 tests, 1.2 per 1000 of cases with hemoglobin <70 g/L, and only 0.2 per 1000 for hemoglobin <60 g/L. Only one patient had hemoglobin <50 g/L, and he received a transfusion. Forty-seven percent of the patients were referred to the ER. Referral rates were higher in those with lower hemoglobin and in older patients (Table 2 ). Hemoglobin of 70–79 g/L was associated with transfusion in 12 of 66 patients (18%) compared with 19 of 34 patients (56%) with hemoglobin <70 g/L. Of 11 patients with hemoglobin <60 g/L, 10 were sent to the ER, and all were transfused.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Frequency of low hemoglobin values in the tested population.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Numbers (%) of ER referrals and emergency transfusions in relation to age and hemoglobin concentration.

Most patients with cancer, myelodysplastic syndrome, chronic renal failure, and other serious diseases were >=50 years. In these patients, referral rates to the ER were 47–71%, with a high rate of transfusions (Table 3 ). On the other hand, of patients with iron deficiency, only 33% were sent to the ER, and 14% were transfused. There were only two patients with an acute bleed, and they were neither unstable in the clinic nor when they reached the hospital. Of those referred to the ER, 66% (31 of 47) were transfused.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Disposition of patients by disease category.

On logistic regression (Table 4 ), both increasing age and decreasing hemoglobin influenced decisions to refer patients to the ER. There was also a trend for more ER referrals of males. None of the other variables improved the model. Of those referred to the ER, the decision to transfuse was also strongly influenced by age (odds ratio, 1.45 per 10 years; 95% confidence interval, 1.13–1.86) and hemoglobin concentrations (0.14 per g/L; 95% confidence interval, 0.05–0.35).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 4. Logistic regression model to predict referral to the ER.

analysis of the decision to transfuse
Of 11 patients under age 18, 3 received a transfusion. One 3-year-old child with chronic hemolytic anemia, usually transfused with a hemoglobin ~60 g/L, received red cells with a hemoglobin of 69 g/L. This was not an emergency, and a transfusion could have been given more conveniently in an outpatient clinic. There were also two females 14 and 16 years of age who were clinically stable and transfused with hemoglobin values of 66 and 60 g/L, low mean corpuscular volumes, and red blood cell counts >3 x 1012/L. These two patients were clinically stable and could have been given a trial of oral iron.

Among patients 18–49 years of age, five females were transfused. In four, the transfusion was not indicated because they had probable iron deficiency anemia and could have been given a trial of oral iron. A 40-year-old female, with chronic renal failure and a hemoglobin of 53 g/L, also received a transfusion. She was clinically stable, and this transfusion too was not an emergency.

In patients >50 years, two had acute bleeds: one had epistaxis, the other an acute gastrointestinal bleed. The patient with the gastrointestinal bleed and a hemoglobin of 76 g/L was transfused and operated on, and a gastrointestinal non-Hodgkin lymphoma was discovered. The patient with epistaxis had a hemoglobin of 65 g/L, received a transfusion, and was hospitalized for closer follow-up. These two patients might have benefited from the acute referral because notification of the laboratory test result helped the physician correct a clinical evaluation error. Another patient 78 years of age had a hemoglobin of 49 g/L, and although the patient was clinically stable, an emergency blood transfusion was indicated. It is uncertain whether delayed referral would have led to a different outcome in the three patients. All other patients transfused had chronic disease, no acute symptoms, and no need for emergency transfusion, but probably required transfusions on an outpatient basis.

follow-up
There were no deaths among patients not referred to the ER during the 1- to 2-month follow-up period, and none were hospitalized with acute symptoms related to low hemoglobin values. Two patients with metastatic cancer died in the hospital, and one 87-year-old bedridden patient died of unspecified causes; anemia did not contribute to these three deaths. Those with iron deficiency received oral iron, and those with chronic disease were transfused as indicated in outpatient specialty clinics. Two females were referred for surgery to remove uterine myomas.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Our principal finding was that physician notification of hemoglobin <80 g/L in an outpatient setting leads to unnecessary ER visits, without any definite benefits.

In 1972, Lundberg (9) introduced the concept of critical values to identify patients with "a pathophysiological state at such variance with normal as to be life-threatening unless something is done promptly and for which some corrective action could be taken". In outpatients, another purpose of the critical value might be to identify patients who require hospitalization to prevent a condition from becoming life-threatening. Although no patients were identified with a life-threatening condition, two patients had acute bleeding and another had hemoglobin <50 g/L.

Clinical diagnoses of anemia often are incorrect because physical examination alone is inaccurate. Pallor of the conjunctiva, tongue, palm, or nail beds is only 66% sensitive and 68% specific in distinguishing children with hemoglobin concentrations of 50–80 g/L from those with higher values (5). Thus, the likelihood ratio of a positive physical examination is only ~2, and laboratory confirmation is needed for accurate diagnosis of anemia.

In the absence of acute blood loss, the hemoglobin concentration alone does not predict the need for transfusion. For those with chronic anemia, response to pharmacological agents and the patient’s symptoms need to be considered (2). From animal studies and anecdotal patient reports, it is generally believed that there is an increased risk of mortality in stable patients only when the hemoglobin is <50 g/L (2)(3), but in patients with coronary stenosis, the hemoglobin concentration associated with an increased risk might be as high as 75 g/L. In our study, only one patient had hemoglobin <50 g/L, and none of the patients were clinically unstable. Although transfusion in most of our patients might have been indicated, values that trigger emergency transfusion and the low hemoglobin critical limit value need not be identical (10). The patients could have been given a transfusion as outpatients, and perhaps some of these patients would have responded to pharmacological agents.

There were at least six patients who were inappropriately transfused. They had microcytic anemia, were clinically stable, and should have been given iron replacement instead. Inappropriate use of transfusions by hospital personnel has been reported (11)(12)(13). This is attributable to widespread deficiencies in physicians’ knowledge of transfusion indications (13) and insufficient use of guidelines for red blood cell transfusions that have been shown to decrease the number of transfusions by 10–30% (11)(12). Once a patient has been referred for emergency transfusion, it might be more difficult for the ER physician to decide against such intervention.

An American national survey of trauma and medical centers found that the range of hemoglobin critical limits was extremely wide (40–120 g/L), with a mean value of 66 g/L (7). The College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Committee abandoned an attempt to establish, by consensus, a national standard critical values list (6), but suggested a critical value of <70 g/L as a starting point for setting specific values. In a hospital setting, surveyed physicians indicated that the hemoglobin critical limit could be lowered from <80 g/L to <70 g/L (10). The uncomplicated course of the 44 (of 66) patients in our study with hemoglobin concentrations of 70–79 g/L who were not referred to the ER supports the College of American Pathologists recommendations for outpatients. If we had used that strategy, only the patient with an acute gastrointestinal bleed would not have been hospitalized acutely.

An alternative strategy might be to leave the critical value of 80 g/L but exclude those with blood counts suggestive of chronic iron deficiency unless the hemoglobin value is <50 g/L. In our setting, this would reduce the number of telephone calls for critical hemoglobin values from 100 to 47 per 48 972 tests (~1 per 1000) without missing the two patients with the acute bleeding. For those with a hemoglobin of 50–79 g/L, the telephone call also might include the caveat that, if the patient is stable, without chest pain, and not bleeding acutely, emergency intervention is not indicated. Perhaps fewer patients would be referred to the ER if physicians were given this additional information. Our findings should be extrapolated to other settings with caution because variation in medical practice and patient behavior might lead to different results.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Stehling LC, Doherty DC, Faust RJ, Greenburg AG, Harrison CR, Landers DF, et al. Practice guidelines for blood component therapy: a report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Blood Component Therapy. Anesthesiology 1996;84:732-747.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Simon TL, Alverson DC, AuBuchon J, Cooper S, DeChristopher PJ, Glen GC, et al. Practice parameter for the use of red blood cell transfusions: developed by the Red Blood Cell Administration Practice Guideline Development Task Force of the College of American Pathologists. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1998;122:130-138.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Viele MK, Weiskopf RB. What can we learn about the need for transfusion from patients who refuse blood? The experience with Jehovah’s Witnesses. Transfusion 1994;34:396-401.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Hetzel TM, Losek JD. Unrecognized severe anemia in children presenting with respiratory distress. Am J Emerg Med 1998;16:386-389.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Luby SP, Kazembe PN, Redd SC, Ziba C, Nwanyanwu OC, Hightower KAW, et al. Using clinical signs to diagnose anaemia in African children. Bull World Health Organ 1995;73:477-482.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Emancipator K. Critical values: ASCP practice parameter. Am J Clin Pathol 1997;108:247-253.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Kost GJ. Critical limits for urgent clinician notification at US medical centers. JAMA 1990;263:704-707.[Abstract]
  8. Nicholls MD. Transfusion: morbidity and mortality. Anaesth Intensive Care 1993;21:15-19.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Lundberg GD. When to panic over abnormal values. Med Lab Observ 1972;4:47-54.
  10. Lum G. Should the transfusion trigger and hemoglobin low critical limit be identical?. Ann Clin Lab Sci 1977;27:130-134.
  11. Soumerai SB, Salem-Schatz S, Avorn J, Casteris CS, Ross-Degnan R, Popovsky MA. A controlled trial of educational outreach to improve blood transfusion practice. JAMA 1993;270:961-966.[Abstract]
  12. Brandis K, Richards B, Ghent A, Weinstein S. A strategy to reduce inappropriate red blood cell transfusion. Med J Aust 1994;160:721-722.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Stehling L, Luban NLC, Anderson KC, Sayers MH, Attar LS, Leitman SF, et al. Guidelines for blood utilization review. Transfusion 1994;34:438-448.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Hematology


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS