Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 1974-1979, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devaraj, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jialal, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devaraj, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jialal, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:1974-1979.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Divergence between LDL Oxidative Susceptibility and Urinary F2-Isoprostanes as Measures of Oxidative Stress in Type 2 Diabetes

Sridevi Devaraj1, Shaina V. Hirany1, Raymond F. Burk2 and Ishwarlal Jialal1a

1 Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Human Metabolism and the Center for Human Nutrition, Department of Pathology and Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX 75390-9073.

2 Clinical Nutrition Research Unit, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, C-2104 MCN, Nashville, TN 37232-2279.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Division of Clinical Biochemistry and Human Metabolism, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390-9073. Fax 214-648-8037; e-mail jialal.i{at}pathology.swmed.edu.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Oxidative stress is pivotal in atherogenesis. Although the most widely used indirect assay to quantify oxidative stress is LDL oxidative susceptibility, direct assays such as urinary F2-isoprostanes have shown great promise.

Methods: We evaluated the utility of both a direct measure of oxidative stress (urinary F2-isoprostanes) and an indirect measure of copper-catalyzed, LDL oxidation in a model of increased oxidative stress (diabetes). We also evaluated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for urinary F2-isoprostanes with a gas chromatography–mass spectrometry method.

Results: Excellent intraassay and interassay CVs of <4% were obtained with our EIA method. A good correlation was obtained between the two methods (r = 0.80; n = 68) of F2-isoprostane measurement. An excellent correlation for F2-isoprostane concentrations was obtained between a timed collection vs 24-h urine (r = 0.96; n = 46). Baseline F2-isoprostane concentrations by EIA were significantly higher in both type 2 diabetics with and without macrovascular complications compared with controls (P <0.001). Supplementation with {alpha}-tocopherol led to a significant reduction in F2-isoprostane concentrations in all diabetic patients compared with baseline values (2.51 ± 1.76 compared with 1.69 ± 1.32 ng/mg creatinine; P <0.001). There were no significant differences in LDL oxidation in both diabetic groups compared with controls. {alpha}-Tocopherol supplementation led to significant increases in the lag phase of oxidation as measured by 3 indices in all groups.

Conclusions: The measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes provides a direct measure of in vivo lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress and appears to be superior to an indirect measure, e.g., LDL oxidative susceptibility, in type 2 diabetes.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Atherosclerotic vascular disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in the US. Data continue to accrue supporting the hypothesis that oxidative stress is pivotal in the genesis of the atherosclerotic lesion (1)(2). There are several direct as well as indirect measures for assaying oxidative stress. Although the most widely used indirect method for measuring oxidative stress is the measurement of LDL oxidative susceptibility (3), direct assays such as measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes have shown great promise.

Much evidence implicates oxidative modification of LDL in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis (4)(5). The diabetic state confers an increased propensity to accelerated atherosclerosis. Factors that may contribute to increased oxidative stress in diabetic patients include antioxidant deficiencies (decreased ascorbate, glutathione, and superoxide dismutase), protein glycation (glucooxidation), and increased production of reactive oxygen species (superoxide, hydrogen peroxide) (6)(7). Other evidence for increased oxidative stress in diabetes includes increased oxidative DNA damage as well as increased titers of autoantibodies to oxidized LDL (8)(9)(10). However, data on the oxidizability of LDL in diabetic patients are conflicting (8)(11)(12)(13)(14).

Recently, the discovery of F2-isoprostanes, which are prostaglandin-like compounds produced in vivo by free radical peroxidation of arachidonic acid, has allowed for the direct assessment of in vivo lipid peroxidation in plasma (15)(16)(17). Thus, quantification of F2-isoprostanes may provide a reliable direct measure of oxidative stress in vivo. Increased concentrations of F2-isoprostanes have been reported in type 2 diabetic patients (18)(19), further underscoring the increased oxidative stress present the diabetic state. The major drawback in measurement of F2-isoprostanes is that the methodology involves gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), 1 which, although sensitive and accurate, is laborious and time- consuming and may not be available in many laboratories. This has prompted development of commercial immunoassay methods for the measurement of F2-isoprostanes.

To date, no studies have compared a direct and indirect measure of increased oxidative stress; the present study was undertaken to evaluate the utility of these indices of oxidative stress, i.e., F2-isoprostanes and LDL oxidative susceptibility in a model of increased oxidative stress, type 2 diabetes. We also evaluated an enzyme immunoassay (EIA) method for measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes and validated it against the "gold standard" GC-MS method. Furthermore, we assessed the effect of {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation on urinary F2-isoprostanes in these diabetic patients.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
patients
This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board. Volunteers (n = 75) were recruited after giving informed consent. They were divided into three groups: type 2 diabetic patients without macrovascular complications [(DM2); n = 25]; type 2 diabetic patients with macrovascular complications (DM2-MV; n = 25); and age- and sex-matched healthy controls (n = 25). Selection criteria for the participants have been described previously (20). All volunteers gave informed consent. Fasting blood was obtained from all the participants at baseline and after 3 months of supplementation with all-rac {alpha}-tocopherol (1200 IU/day) and after a 2-month washout phase. Urine samples collected after 24 h were stored at -70 °C for F2-isoprostane analysis by EIA and GC-MS. Plasma samples were stored at -70 °C and analyzed for {alpha}-tocopherol by HPLC and for LDL oxidation as described previously (20).

For comparison of F2-isoprostane concentrations in timed vs 24-h urine collection, 46 volunteers were requested to collect a first morning urine sample and a 24-h collection sample on different days. Samples were frozen at -70 °C until analysis of F2-isoprostane concentrations by EIA.

ldl isolation and oxidation
Fasting blood (60 mL) anticoagulated with EDTA was obtained for studies of LDL oxidation. LDL (density, 1.019–1.063 kg/L) was isolated by preparative ultracentrifugation from plasma collected in EDTA (1 g/L) as described previously (21). After dialysis against 150 mmol/L NaCl and 1 mmol/L EDTA (pH 7.4), LDL was filtered and protein content was measured as described previously (21). After overnight dialysis against phosphate-buffered saline, pH 7.4, LDL (100 ng/L protein) was oxidized with 5 µmol/L copper at 37 °C for 8 h. The time points were 0, 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 8 h, respectively. At the respective time points, LDL oxidation was arrested with 200 µmol/L EDTA and 40 µmol/L butylated hydroxytoluene followed by refrigeration. We used three assays to quantify LDL oxidation to better appreciate lipid peroxidation and aldehydic modification of apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B-100) (4)(22). We determined the amount of conjugated dienes formed by monitoring the absorbance of the LDL sample at 234 nm at various time points using a phosphate-buffered saline blank (21). We measured the lipid peroxide content of LDL by the ferrous oxide-xylenol orange method (23), and we measured apo B fluorescence of LDL samples after dilution in a spectrofluorometer with excitation set at 360 nm and emission at 430 nm using a 5-nm slit width (21). We computed the lag phase of oxidation using the time course curve (21) from the three indices of oxidation.

eia analysis of f2-isoprostanes
Purification and extraction of urine samples was performed before EIA analysis as reported previously (24). The pH of the urine samples was adjusted to <4.0 with 1.0 mol/L HCl, and a 1-mL aliquot of urine was extracted on a Bakerbond SPE C18 column (JT Baker) that had previously been rinsed with 5 mL of methanol followed by 5 mL of ultrapure water (Cayman Chemical; catalog no. 400000). The columns were then washed with ultrapure water, allowed to dry, and then equilibrated with 5 mL of hexane. After eluting with ethyl acetate and 10 ml/L methanol, sodium acetate was added to the eluate, which was then vortex-mixed and subjected to silica gel chromatography. Elution was carried out with ethyl acetate and methanol (1:1 by volume); eluates were then dried under nitrogen and reconstituted with EIA buffer (1 mL). The extracted samples were diluted 1:5 to 1:8 with EIA buffer and assayed according to manufacturer’s protocol for the 8-Isoprostane Enzyme Immunoassay method (Cayman Chemical). The EIA exhibits >1% cross-reactivity with 8-isoprostaglandin F3 {alpha} (21%), 8-isoprostaglandin E2 (1.8%), 2,3,dinor 8-isoprostaglandin F2 {alpha} (1.7%), and 8-isoprostaglandin E1 (1.6%). We measured urine creatinine on the Olympus (Redondo, CA) by the Jaffe reaction using standard techniques. F2-Isoprostane concentrations are expressed as ng/mg of creatinine.

gc-ms analysis of f2-isoprostane
We measured F2-isoprostanes in urine on frozen samples after thin-layer chromatographic purification by GC negative-ion chemical ionization and electron-ionization MS using a deuterated internal standard in the laboratory of Dr. Raymond F. Burk (Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN) (25). Catalytic hydrogenation and formation and analyses of boronate derivatives were carried out as described previously (25).

statistics
Linear regression analysis was performed using the Microsoft Excel software. Comparison of differences between groups was determined by Wilcoxon signed-rank test with the use of Sigma Stat software. The degree of significance was set at <0.05.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
precision
Intraassay (n = 5) and interassay (n = 5) CVs of <4% for three concentrations of F2-isoprostanes were obtained for the EIA method. The precision and accuracy for the GC-MS method were ± 6% and 96%, respectively (25). The lowest limits of detection with the EIA and GC-MS methods were 4 ng/L and 5 ng/L, respectively.

validation of eia vs gc-ms
The EIA assay was validated for F2-isoprostanes determination in urine by comparison with the GC-MS method. A good correlation was obtained between the two methods (r = 0.80; n = 68; Fig. 1 ). The median F2-isoprostane concentrations for the EIA and GC-MS methods were 1.74 and 1.70 ng/mg of creatinine, respectively.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Validation of enzyme immunoassay for F2-isoprostanes with GC-MS.

F2-Isoprostane concentrations were analyzed in urine samples (n = 68) by both the EIA method and by the GC-MS as described in Materials and Methods.

comparison of timed vs 24-h urine collection
We assessed the variation in F2-isoprostane excretion between the first morning urine collection and 24-h urine collection in 46 volunteers. F2-Isoprostane concentrations were 0.41–10.6 ng/mg of creatinine. An excellent correlation for F2-isoprostane concentrations was obtained between the two collection methods (r = 0.96; n = 46, Fig. 2 ). The mean F2-isoprostane concentrations in timed vs 24-h collection were 2.26 ± 1.79 and 2.38 ± 2.11 ng/mg of creatinine, respectively.



View larger version (14K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Comparison of early morning vs 24-h urine for measurement of isoprostanes.

Volunteers (n = 46) were asked to collect an early morning urine sample as well as a 24-h urine collection on different days. Samples were frozen at -70 °C, and F2-isoprostanes were analyzed in both samples by EIA as described in Materials and Methods.

f2-isoprostane concentrations in diabetic patients
F2-Isoprostane concentrations by EIA were significantly higher in DM2 and DM2-MV patients compared with age- and sex-matched controls (2.03 ± 1.17 and 2.61 ± 1.53 ng/mg creatinine, respectively, compared with 0.71 ± 0.35 ng/mg creatinine; P <0.001, Fig. 3 ); however, no significant differences existed at baseline between DM2 and DM2-MV for F2-isoprostane concentrations (P = 0.37). We examined the effect of {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation (1200 IU/day) on urinary excretion of F2-isoprostane in diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications, using the EIA and GC-MS methods.



View larger version (10K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. F2-Isoprostane concentrations in type 2 diabetic patients.

Twenty-four-hour urine samples were obtained from controls and DM2-MV and DM2 patients and stored at -70 °C. Data represent 25th percentile, median, and 75th percentile of F2-isoprostane concentrations by EIA in the three groups. *, P <0.001 by Wilcoxon signed-rank test.

{alpha}-Tocopherol supplementation was associated with an increase in plasma {alpha}-tocopherol concentrations as reported previously (20). Supplementation with {alpha}-tocopherol led to a significant reduction in F2-isoprostane concentrations in the combined diabetic group compared with baseline values (2.51 ± 1.76 ng/mg of creatinine compared with 1.69 ± 1.32 ng/mg of creatinine; P <0.001). However, when the diabetic patients were subgrouped into DM2 and DM2-MV, only the reduction in DM2-MV was significant after supplementation (P <0.001; Table 1 ) in both the EIA and GC-MS methods. In addition, F2-isoprostane concentrations returned to baseline values after the 6-week washout phase in all groups (P >0.6).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Effect of {alpha}-tocopherol on F2-isoprostane concentrations in diabetic patients.1

ldl oxidative susceptibility in diabetic patients
LDL oxidative susceptibility was monitored by three indices of oxidation: (a) conjugated dienes, (b) lipid peroxides, and (c) apo B fluorescence. We found no significant differences in lag phase, using all three indices of LDL oxidative susceptibility, in both diabetic groups compared with controls. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the DM2 and DM2-MV groups (Table 2 ). {alpha}-Tocopherol supplementation led to significant increases in lag phase of oxidation as measured by all three indices in the control, DM2, and DM2-MV groups, respectively, as reported previously for conjugated dienes (20).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. LDL oxidative susceptibility in type 2 diabetic patients and matched controls.1


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Cardiovascular disease is the major cause of mortality and morbidity in the US. Oxidative stress plays a crucial role in the genesis and progression of the atherosclerotic lesion. There are several direct as well as indirect measures for assaying oxidative stress. Although the most widely used indirect method for measuring oxidative stress is measurement of LDL oxidative susceptibility, direct assays such as measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes have shown great promise. In this report, we have validated an EIA method for quantification of urinary F2-isoprostanes, sensitive markers of in vivo oxidative stress, and compared the method with the gold standard GC-MS method. In addition, using a model of oxidative stress, type 2 diabetes, we highlighted the divergence between LDL oxidative susceptibility as assessed by three techniques and urinary F2-isoprostanes.

F2-Isoprostanes are prostaglandin-like compounds formed in vivo from free radical-catalyzed peroxidation of arachidonic acid, mainly via a noncycloxygenase-dependent mechanism. F2-Isoprostanes are found in body tissues in the esterified form and in biologic fluids, such as plasma and urine, in the free form (15)(16)(17). The relevance of measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes with regard to atherosclerosis has been brought forth in many studies (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). F2-Isoprostanes are increased after LDL oxidation by macrophages, endothelial cells, or copper. Increased concentrations have been detected in oxidized LDL and also in patients with established risk factors for premature atherosclerosis, such as diabetes, hypercholesterolemia, and smoking (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). F2-Isoprostanes have been found to localize in foam cells in human atherosclerotic lesions. Furthermore, {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation has been found to suppress F2-isoprostanes and atherogenesis in apo-E-deficient mice. In humans, {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation has been shown to lower urinary F2-isoprostanes in patients with hypercholesterolemia or diabetes (15)(16)(17)(18)(19). Also, in a recent report, we showed that {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation (400 IU/day) can decrease urinary F2-isoprostanes in healthy volunteers (4), but this was not confirmed by another recent study (26), probably because of the study’s small sample size (n = 5).

F2-Isoprostanes can be measured accurately and sensitively by a solid-phase extraction procedure, followed by selective-ion monitoring GC-MS, using tritiated prostaglandin F2-{alpha} as internal standard (25). However, although GC-MS methods are the method of choice, they are technique dependent and involve sophisticated instrumentation that is not available in most laboratories. We have shown excellent intra- and interassay precision for the EIA method, as is seen for the GC-MS method. We also demonstrate an excellent correlation with the GC-MS method, and we show that the EIA method can measure accurately on a timed vs 24-h specimen. We show substantial increases in a model of oxidative stress, type 2 diabetes, using this assay and also show that it can be modulated with antioxidant therapy. Proudfoot et al. (27) previously compared the measurement of F2-isoprostanes in urine by EIA and GC-MS and showed a poor correlation; however, only 14 samples were assayed from healthy volunteers, and it is not clear whether both methods were conducted at the same time. Wang et al. (28), however, measured F2-isoprostanes by both GC-MS and EIA in 9 healthy volunteers and showed a good correlation between the two methods (r = 0.99). Thus, the measurement of F2-isoprostanes by EIA may provide a sensitive, specific, and noninvasive method for the assessment of in vivo lipid peroxidation in humans, a method that is simpler and less expensive. Furthermore, large numbers of samples can be quantified at the same time with this method. Whereas the measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes is a direct measure of oxidative stress, LDL oxidative susceptibility is an indirect measure of oxidative stress. LDL is isolated from plasma and then subjected to oxidative stress, whereas F2-isoprostanes are directly measured in urine (29). Furthermore, in disease states, the patients are on drugs that could potentially partition in LDL and alter its oxidative susceptibility. Thus, isoprostanes appear to be superior in this case. Also, it is possible that we may have seen significant differences in LDL oxidizability with larger sample sizes. Because urinary F2-isoprostanes could also derive from local production in the kidney, caution should be exercised in using this as a measure of oxidative stress in patients with chronic renal failure (25). It should also be pointed out that the EIA, although largely specific for 8-isoprostane, also exhibits cross-reactivity with certain other prostaglandins. Furthermore, as pointed out by Lawson et al. (30), all of the 64 possible isomers of F2-isoprostanes share the same ring structure, and it is believed that prostaglandin antigenicity is largely directed toward the ring. Thus, it is possible that the antibody in this EIA also recognizes other isoprostanes, accounting for the similar concentrations obtained with GC-MS.

Although the diabetic state has been shown to have increased oxidant stress, as evidenced by increased concentrations of superoxide release and antioxidant deficiencies as well as increased F2-isoprostane concentrations by GC-MS, there is conflict in the literature with regard to in vitro susceptibility of LDL to oxidation, as assessed by the lag phase in type 2 diabetic patients (8)(11)(12)(13)(20)(31). In our study, LDL oxidative susceptibility, as measured by lag phase using three indices, conjugated dienes, lipid peroxides, and apo B fluorescence, was not significantly increased in type 2 diabetic patients (20). In this report, we also show that {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation leads to a decrease in LDL oxidative susceptibility (20). This finding confirms the reports of previous investigators (32)(33).

Thus, measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes provides direct measure of lipid peroxidation and whole body oxidative stress and appears to be superior to indirect measures, such as LDL oxidative susceptibility, in certain conditions of increased oxidative stress, such as type 2 diabetes.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (1 RO1 AT00005, K24 AT 00596, DK 26657) and the American Diabetes Association. We thank Amy Motley for assistance with the GC-MS assays.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: GC-MS, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry; EIA, enzyme immunoassay; DM2, type 2 diabetic patients without macrovascular complications; DM2-MV, type 2 diabetic patients with macrovascular complications; and apo, apolipoprotein.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Kunsch C, Medford RM. Oxidative stress as a regulator of gene expression in the vasculature. Circ Res 1999;85:753-766.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Witztum JL, Berliner JA. Oxidized phospholipids and isoprostanes in atherosclerosis. Curr Opin Lipidol 1998;9:441-448.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Jialal I, Devaraj S. Low density lipoprotein oxidation, antioxidants and atherosclerosis: a clinical biochemistry perspective. Clin Chem 1996;42:498-506.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Devaraj S, Jialal I. Oxidized low density lipoprotein and atherosclerosis. Int J Clin Lab Res 1996;26:178-184.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Berliner JA, Heinecke JW. The role of oxidized lipoproteins in atherogenesis. Free Radic Biol Med 1992;92:127-143.
  6. Bierman E. Atherogenesis in diabetes. Arterioscler Thromb 1992;12:647-656.[Free Full Text]
  7. Banga JD, Sixma JJ. Diabetes mellitus, vascular disease and thrombosis. Clin Hematol 1986;15:465-492.
  8. Babiy A, Gebicki J, Sullivan DR, Willey K. Increased oxidizability of plasma lipoproteins in diabetic patients can be decreased by probucol therapy and is not due to glycation. Biochem Pharmacol 1992;43:995-1000.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Dandona P, Thusu K, Cook S, Snyder B, Makowski J, Armstrong D, Nicotera T. Oxidative damage to DNA in diabetes mellitus. Lancet 1996;347:444-445.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Bellomo G, Maggi E, Poli M, Agosta FG, Bollati P, Finardi G. Autoantibodies against Ox-LDL in NIDDM. Diabetes 1995;44:60-66.[Abstract]
  11. Yoshida H, Ishikawa T, Nakamura H. Vitamin E/Lipid peroxide ratio and susceptibility of LDL to oxidative modification in NIDDM. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:1438-1446.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Beaudeux JL, Guillausseau PJ, Peynet J, Flourie F, Assayag M, Tielmans D, et al. Enhanced susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation in type 1 and 2 diabetic patients. Clin Chim Acta 1995;239:131-141.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Cominacini L, Garbin U, Pastorino AM, Fratta Pasini A, Campagnola M, De Santis A, et al. Increased susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation in patients with IDDM and NIDDM. Diabetes Res 1994;26:173-184.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Mironova MA, Klein RL, Virella GT, Lopes-Virella MF. Anti-modified LDL antibodies, LDL-containing immune complexes, and susceptibility of LDL to in vitro oxidation in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes 2000;49:1033-1041.[Abstract]
  15. Pratico D. F2-Isoprostanes: sensitive and specific non-invasive indices of lipid peroxidation in vivo. Atherosclerosis 1999;147:1-10.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Roberts LJ, II, Morrow J. The generation and actions of isoprostanes. Biochim Biophys Acta 1997;1345:121-135.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Patrono C, Fitzgerald G. Isoprostanes—potential markers of oxidant stress in atherothrombotic disease. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2309-2315.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Davi G, Ciabattoni G, Consoli A, Mezzetti A, Falco A, Santarone G, et al. In-vivo formation of 8-ep PGF2-{alpha} and platelet activation in diabetes mellitus-effect of improved metabolic control and vitamin E supplementation. Circulation 1999;99:224-229.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Gopaul NK, Anggard EE, Mallet AI, Betteridge DJ, Wolff SP, Nourooz-zadeh J. Plasma 8-epi PGF2 {alpha} levels are increased in individuals with NIDDM. FEBS Lett 1995;368:225-229.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Devaraj S, Jialal I. LDL. Post-secretory modification, monocyte function and circulating adhesion molecules in type 2 diabetic patients with and without macrovascular complications: the effect of {alpha} tocopherol supplementation. Circulation 2000;102:191-196.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Jialal I, Fuller CJ, Huet BA. The effect of a-tocopherol supplementation on LDL oxidation: a dose-response study. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:90-97.
  22. Devaraj S, Jialal I. Assessment of lipoprotein peroxidation. Rifai N Warnick GR Dominiczak MH eds. Handbook of lipoprotein testing 2001:465-479 AACC Press Washington. .
  23. Marangon K, Devaraj S, Jialal I. Measurement of protein carbonyls by a sensitive ELISA. Clin Chem 1999;45:577-578.[Free Full Text]
  24. Marangon K, Devaraj S, Tirosh O, Packer L, Jialal I. Comparison of the effect of {alpha}-lipoic acid and {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation on measures of oxidative stress. Free Radic Biol Med 1999;27:1114-1121.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Morrow JD, Jackson Roberts L. Mass spectrometric quantitation of F2-isoprostanes in biological fluids and tissues as a measure of oxidant stress. Methods Enzymol 1998;300:3-12.[Web of Science]
  26. Meagher EA, Barry OP, Lawson JA, Rokach J, FitzGerald GA. Effects of vitamin e on lipid peroxidation in healthy persons. JAMA 2001;285:1178-1182.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  27. Proudfoot J, Barden A, Mori TA, Burke V, Croft KD, Beilin LJ, Puddey IB. Measurement of urinary F2-isoprostanes as markers of in vivo lipid peroxidation–a comparison of EIA with GC/MS. Anal Biochem 1999;272:209-215.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Wang Z, Ciabattoni G, Creminon C, Lawson J, Fitzgerald GA, Patrono C, Maclouf J. Immunological characterization of urinary 8-epi PGF2 {alpha} excretion in man. J Pharmacol Exp Ther 1995;275:94-100.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  29. Jialal I. Evolving lipoprotein risk factors: lipoprotein 9a and oxidized LDL. Clin Chem 1998;44:1827-1832.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Lawson JA, Rokach J, Fitzgerald GA. Isoprostanes: formation, analysis and use as indices of lipid peroxidation in vivo. J Biol Chem 1999;274:24441-24444.[Free Full Text]
  31. Oranje WA, Wolffenbuttel HR. Lipid peroxidation and atherosclerosis in type 2 diabetes. J Lab Clin Med 1999;134:19-32.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Reaven PD, Herold DA, Barnett J, Edelman S. Effects of vitamin E on susceptibility of LDL and LDL subfractions to oxidation and on protein glycation in NIDDM. Diabetes Care 1995;18:807-816.[Abstract]
  33. Fuller CJ, Chandalia M, Garg A, Grundy SM, Jialal I. RRR-AT supplementation at pharmacological doses decreases LDL oxidative susceptibility but not protein glycation in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Clin Nutr 1996;63:753-759.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
S. Devaraj, S. Mathur, A. Basu, H. H. Aung, V. T. Vasu, S. Meyers, and I. Jialal
A Dose-Response Study on the Effects of Purified Lycopene Supplementation on Biomarkers of Oxidative Stress
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., April 1, 2008; 27(2): 267 - 273.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Ophthalmol.Home page
H.-Z. Pan, H. Zhang, D. Chang, H. Li, and H. Sui
The change of oxidative stress products in diabetes mellitus and diabetic retinopathy
Br. J. Ophthalmol., April 1, 2008; 92(4): 548 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Devaraj, R. Tang, B. Adams-Huet, A. Harris, T. Seenivasan, J. A de Lemos, and I. Jialal
Effect of high-dose {alpha}-tocopherol supplementation on biomarkers of oxidative stress and inflammation and carotid atherosclerosis in patients with coronary artery disease
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, November 1, 2007; 86(5): 1392 - 1398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. Sircar and P. V. Subbaiah
Isoprostane Measurement in Plasma and Urine by Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry with One-Step Sample Preparation
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2007; 53(2): 251 - 258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Pharmacol. Rev.Home page
A. Kontush and M. J. Chapman
Functionally Defective High-Density Lipoprotein: A New Therapeutic Target at the Crossroads of Dyslipidemia, Inflammation, and Atherosclerosis
Pharmacol. Rev., September 1, 2006; 58(3): 342 - 374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. Brownlee and I. B. Hirsch
Glycemic Variability: A Hemoglobin A1c-Independent Risk Factor for Diabetic Complications
JAMA, April 12, 2006; 295(14): 1707 - 1708.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Wang, H. Zhu, H. Sun, J. Pan, Z. Yuan, and R. Yu
Plasma 8-Isoprostane Concentrations in Patients with Age-Related Cataracts
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1541 - 1544.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
R. H Boger, E. Schwedhelm, R. Maas, S. Quispe-Bravo, and C. Skamira
ADMA and oxidative stress may relate to the progression of renal disease: rationale and design of the VIVALDI study
Vascular Medicine, July 1, 2005; 10(1_suppl): S97 - S102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Vasc MedHome page
R. H Boger, E. Schwedhelm, R. Maas, S. Quispe-Bravo, and C. Skamira
ADMA and oxidative stress may relate to the progression of renal disease: rationale and design of the VIVALDI study
Vascular Medicine, May 1, 2005; 10(2_suppl): S97 - S102.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
S. Vega-Lopez, K.-J. Yeum, J. L Lecker, L. M Ausman, E. J Johnson, S. Devaraj, I. Jialal, and A. H Lichtenstein
Plasma antioxidant capacity in response to diets high in soy or animal protein with or without isoflavones
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, January 1, 2005; 81(1): 43 - 49.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
I. S. Young
Oxidative Stress and Vascular Disease: Insights from Isoprostane Measurement
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 14 - 15.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
C. Vassalle, M. G. Andreassi, E. Schwedhelm, R. Maas, R. H. Boger, J. Brummer, J. Berger, A. Bartling, H. Lenzen, D. Tsikas, et al.
8-Iso-Prostaglandin F2{alpha} as a Risk Marker in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease * Response
Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): e49 - e50.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Endocr. Rev.Home page
A. M. Vincent, J. W. Russell, P. Low, and E. L. Feldman
Oxidative Stress in the Pathogenesis of Diabetic Neuropathy
Endocr. Rev., August 1, 2004; 25(4): 612 - 628.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
J. A. Beckman, A. B. Goldfine, M. B. Gordon, L. A. Garrett, J. F. Keaney Jr., and M. A. Creager
Oral antioxidant therapy improves endothelial function in Type 1 but not Type 2 diabetes mellitus
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2003; 285(6): H2392 - H2398.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
D. J O'Byrne, S. Devaraj, S. M Grundy, and I. Jialal
Comparison of the antioxidant effects of Concord grape juice flavonoids {alpha}-tocopherol on markers of oxidative stress in healthy adults
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, December 1, 2002; 76(6): 1367 - 1374.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
S. Mathur, S. Devaraj, S. M. Grundy, and I. Jialal
Cocoa Products Decrease Low Density Lipoprotein Oxidative Susceptibility but Do Not Affect Biomarkers of Inflammation in Humans
J. Nutr., December 1, 2002; 132(12): 3663 - 3667.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol.Home page
C. Hermenegildo, M. C. Garcia-Martinez, J. J. Tarin, and A. Cano
Estradiol reduces F2alpha -isoprostane production in cultured human endothelial cells
Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol, December 1, 2002; 283(6): H2644 - H2649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
M. J. Sheetz and G. L. King
Molecular Understanding of Hyperglycemia's Adverse Effects for Diabetic Complications
JAMA, November 27, 2002; 288(20): 2579 - 2588.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
DiabetesHome page
S. K. Venugopal, S. Devaraj, T. Yang, and I. Jialal
{alpha}-Tocopherol Decreases Superoxide Anion Release in Human Monocytes Under Hyperglycemic Conditions Via Inhibition of Protein Kinase C-{alpha}
Diabetes, October 1, 2002; 51(10): 3049 - 3054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
S. Devaraj, A. V. C. Chan Jr., and I. Jialal
{alpha}-Tocopherol Supplementation Decreases Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1 and P-Selectin Levels in Type 2 Diabetic Patients
Diabetes Care, March 1, 2002; 25(3): 524 - 529.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow A correction has been published
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (56)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Devaraj, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jialal, I.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Devaraj, S.
Right arrow Articles by Jialal, I.
Related Collections
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS