Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 2179-2180, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerbruch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerbruch, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:2179-2180.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Letters

Low-Molecular Weight Proteins as Markers for Glomerular Filtration Rate

Rainer P. Woitas1a, Birgit Stoffel-Wagner2, Uwe Poege1, Peter Schiedermaier1, Ulrich Spengler1 and Tilman Sauerbruch1

1 Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Allgemeine Innere Medizin and
2 Institute of Clinical Biochemistry, University of Bonn, D 53105 Bonn, Germany

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Universität Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D 53105 Bonn, Germany. Fax 49-228-287-4323; e-mail Woitas{at}uni-bonn.de


To the Editor:

Inulin clearance (CIn) is the usual gold standard for evaluating glomerular filtration rate (GFR), but technical difficulties and patient inconvenience prevent its widespread use (1). The most commonly used marker for GFR is serum creatinine, but muscle wasting and tubular secretion may lead to overestimation of GFR (2)(3). Serum concentrations of the low-molecular weight proteins cystatin C (CysC) (4), ß2-microglobulin (B2M) (5)(6), and ß-trace protein (BTP) (7) maybe useful alternatives for detecting reduced GFR, but no study to date has compared all of these proteins directly to CIn.

We studied 62 patients (20 females, 42 males). All had their GFR determined by steady-state CIn as described previously and adjusted to a standard body surface of 1.73 m2. We had reported on CysC and creatinine in 44 patients with various degrees of liver cirrhosis (1). We include here 41 of these patients for whom samples were available and 3 new patients with liver diseases; 31 had alcoholic etiologies; 10 had viral hepatitis, and 3 had other etiologies. The remaining 18 patients had renal diseases: 5 with chronic renal failure, 2 with acute renal failure, and 11 others.

After an overnight fast, GFR was tested with participants in a supine position. Serum creatinine was determined by a Jaffe method (1). Serum CysC, B2M, and BTP were analyzed by fully automated, latex-enhanced immunonephelometric methods (N latex Cystatin C, N latex ß2-microglobulin, N latex ß-trace protein, respectively, on a Nephelometer II; Dade-Behring). Central 95% reference intervals established from a representative cohort of 100 female and 100 male healthy blood donors (median age, 31 years; 2.5–97.5 percentiles, 19.0–60.5 years) were 0.402–0.738 mg/L for BTP, 1.085–2.015 mg/L for B2M, 0.475–0.820 mg/L for CysC, and 53.04–106.08 µmol/L for creatinine (1).

Statistical analysis was performed with Statview 4.5 for Macintosh (Abacus Concepts) and MedCalc® for Windows. P <0.05 (two-tailed) was considered significant. The study was performed in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 1985.

The mean [95% confidence interval (CI)] age of our patient cohort was 49.4 (45.7–53.2) years; the mean GFR was 40.3 (34.6–46.0) mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2. The mean (2 SD) concentrations of CysC, B2M, BTP, and creatinine were 1.15 (1.035–1.264) mg/L, 2.68 (2.386–2.974) mg/L, 0.894 (0.797–0.991) mg/L, and 91.75 (82.0–101.5) µmol/L, respectively.

The reciprocals of CysC, B2M, and BTP correlated significantly with GFR [1/CysC, r = 0.686 (95% CI, 0.525–0.80), P <0.0001; 1/ß2M, r = 0.646 (95% CI, 0.471–0.772), P <0.0001; 1/BTP, r = 0.567 (95% CI, 0.368–0.717), P <0.0001]. Although 1/creatinine also correlated with GFR [r = 0.392 (95% CI, 0.155–0.586), P = 0.0016], this correlation coefficient was the weakest. Only 1/CysC correlated significantly better with GFR than did 1/creatinine (P = 0.021; z-statistic, -2.29). The reciprocals 1/BTP and 1/B2M showed statistically insignificantly higher correlation coefficients than 1/creatinine alone (1/BTP, P = 0.22, z-statistic, -1.23; 1/B2M, P = 0.056, z-statistic, -1.91).

ROC plots for CysC, B2M, BTP, and creatinine assessed their ability to detect a GFR <=70 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 (Fig. 1 ). GFR was >70 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2 in 8 patients and lower in 54 patients. The ROC areas for CysC and B2M were significantly greater than the ROC area for creatinine (CysC, P = 0.014; B2M, P = 0.028; BTP, P = 0.062, paired statistical comparisons). The 95% CIs for the areas under the curves for creatinine and CysC did not overlap (Fig. 1 ).



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. ROC curves for CysC (——–), B2M (- - -), BTP (· · · ·), and creatinine (- · · -), demonstrating the ability of each analyte to detect GFR <70 mL · min-1 · 1.73 m-2.

The cutoffs shown for each analyte are those with the highest diagnostic accuracy (minimum false-negative and -positive results) with the corresponding 95% CIs (in parentheses). For CysC, the area under the ROC curve is 0.880 (0.772–0.948; SE, 0.049), and the cutoff is 0.93 mg/L [sensitivity, 77.8% (64.4–87.9%); specificity, 100.0% (100–100%)]. For B2M, the area under the ROC curve is 0.859 (0.747–0.934; SE, 0.055), and the cutoff is 2.26 mg/L [sensitivity, 72.2% (58.4–83.5%); specificity, 100.0% (100–100%)]. For BTP, the area under the ROC curve is 0.809 (0.689–0.898; SE, 0.067), and the cutoff is 0.762 mg/L [sensitivity, 64.8% (50.6–77.3%); specificity, 100.0% (100–100%)]. For creatinine, the area under the ROC curve is 0.647 (0.515–0.764; SE, 0.096), and the cutoff is 76.908 µmol/L [sensitivity, 64.8% (50.6–77.3%); specificity, 87.5% (47.4–97.9%)].

The first study that described increased BTP in renal insufficiency showed only a weak linear correlation with creatinine in the serum of controls (8), but we found a rather good and significant correlation for the reciprocals of both analytes with the GFR (data not shown). The correlations of CysC and B2M with GFR were in the range of previously published studies (4)(6)(9).

Our data are at variance with a study by Priem et al. (7), which showed a higher diagnostic efficiency for BTP to detect a reduced GFR. However, this investigation evaluated only B2M and BTP in comparison with creatinine and CIn. The production rate of B2M varies considerably with immune reactions because it is part of the histocompatibility antigen complex and is produced predominantly by lymphocytes; this may account for the divergent study results (10)(11)(12). With respect to BTP, we found a lower area under the ROC curve than did Priem et al. (7), despite the fact that we used the same assay. Therefore, differences in the results may be attributable to patient characteristics. Their study population comprised solely diabetics, whereas our patient cohort included patients with various degrees of liver cirrhosis, renal disease, and only two patients with diabetes (7).

BTP is filtered by the kidney, and its concentrations in urine range from 600 to 1200 µg/L (13). It seems likely that increased BTP concentrations in serum reflect reduced clearance of the protein (8). Unlike CysC, which is catabolized in the kidney, other mechanisms may influence the serum concentration of BTP, especially because this 25-kDa protein can serve as a lipophilic transporter (14).

In summary, our data support the view that CysC, although not an ideal marker, is better than B2M and BTP as an indicator of reduced GFR and as a possible replacement for creatinine in clinical practice.


Acknowledgments

We thank Claudia Blasius, Department of Clinical Biochemistry, and Doris Ehlert, Department of Medicine, University of Bonn, Germany for excellent technical assistance and Drs. S. Flommersfeld and H.U. Klehr for providing patient samples. Our reference values for BTP, B2M, CysC, and creatinine are available as a data supplement that can be accessed through the on-line version of this journal (http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol47/issue12).


References

  1. Woitas RP, Stoffel-Wagner B, Flommersfeld S, Poege U, Schiedermaier P, Klehr HU, et al. Correlation of serum concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine to inulin clearance in liver cirrhosis. Clin Chem 2000;46:712-715.[Free Full Text]
  2. Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD. Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int 1985;28:830-838.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Caregaro L, Menon F, Angeli P, Amodio P, Merkel C, Bortoluzzi A, et al. Limitations of serum creatinine level and creatinine clearance as filtration markers in cirrhosis. Arch Intern Med 1994;154:201-205.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Bökenkamp A, Domanetzki M, Zinck R, Schumann G, Byrd D, Brodehl J. Cystatin C—a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in children independent of age and height. Pediatrics 1998;101:875-881.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Dommergues M, Muller F, Ngo S, Hohlfeld P, Oury JF, Bidat L, et al. Fetal serum ß-microglobulin predicts postnatal renal function in bilateral uropathies. Kidney Int 2000;58:312-316.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Filler G, Witt I, Priem F, Ehrich JH, Jung K. Are cystatin C and ß2-microglobulin better markers than serum creatinine for prediction of a normal glomerular filtration rate in pediatric subjects?. Clin Chem 1997;43:1077-1078.[Free Full Text]
  7. Priem F, Althaus H, Birnbaum M, Sinha P, Conradt HS, Jung K. ß-Trace protein in serum: a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in the creatinine-blind range. Clin Chem 1999;45:567-568.[Free Full Text]
  8. Melegos DN, Grass L, Pierratos A, Diamandis EP. Highly elevated levels of prostaglandin D synthase in the serum of patients with renal failure. Urology 1999;53:32-37.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Helin I, Axenram M, Grubb A. Serum cystatin C as a determinant of glomerular filtration rate in children. Clin Nephrol 1998;49:221-225.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Donaldson MD, Chambers RE, Woolridge MW, Whicher JT. {alpha}1-Microglobulin, ß2-microglobulin and retinol binding protein in childhood febrile illness and renal disease. Pediatr Nephrol 1990;4:314-318.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Grubb A, Simonsen O, Sturfelt G, Truedsson L, Thysell H. Serum concentration of cystatin C, factor D and ß2-microglobulin as a measure of glomerular filtration rate. Acta Med Scand 1985;218:499-503.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Jung K, Schulze BD, Sydow K, Pergande M, Precht K, Schreiber G. Diagnostic value of low-molecular mass proteins in serum for the detection of reduced glomerular filtration rate. J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1987;25:499-503.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Melegos DN, Diamandis EP, Oda H, Urade Y, Hayaishi O. Immunofluorometric assay of prostaglandin D synthase in human tissue extracts and fluids. Clin Chem 1996;42:1984-1991.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Tanaka T, Urade Y, Kimura H, Eguchi N, Nishikawa A, Hayaishi O. Lipocalin-type prostaglandin D synthase (ß-trace) is a newly recognized type of retinoid transporter. J Biol Chem 1997;272:15789-15795.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Gerhardt, U. Poge, B. Stoffel-Wagner, B. Klein, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas
Serum levels of beta-trace protein and its association to diuresis in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. A. White, A. Akbari, S. Doucette, D. Fergusson, N. Hussain, L. Dinh, G. Filler, N. Lepage, and G. A. Knoll
A Novel Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Beta-Trace Protein
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1965 - 1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. R. Huber and L. Risch
Recent Developments in the Evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate: Is There a Place for {beta}-Trace?
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1329 - 1330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
U. Poge, T. M. Gerhardt, B. Stoffel-Wagner, H. Palmedo, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas
{beta}-Trace Protein Is an Alternative Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Renal Transplantation Patients
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1531 - 1533.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
U. Poge, T. Gerhardt, A. Bokenkamp, B. Stoffel-Wagner, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas
Time course of low molecular weight proteins in the early kidney transplantation period--influence of corticosteroids
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., November 1, 2004; 19(11): 2858 - 2863.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. Priem, H. Althaus, K. Jung, and P. Sinha
{beta}-Trace Protein Is Not Better than Cystatin C as an Indicator of Reduced Glomerular Filtration Rate
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2001; 47(12): 2181 - 2181.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Supplemental Table
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (23)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerbruch, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Articles by Sauerbruch, T.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS