|
|
||||||||
Articles |
1-Antitrypsin to Trypsinogen-1 Discriminates Biliary and Alcohol-induced Acute Pancreatitis
kan Stenman1,a
1
Department of Clinical Chemistry and
2
Second Department of Surgery, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4, FIN 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Department of Clinical Chemistry, Helsinki University Central Hospital, FIN-00290 Helsinki, Finland. Fax 358-9-47174804; e-mail
ulf-hakan.stenman{at}huch.fi.
| Abstract |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin (AAT), and trypsin-2-AAT in
serum to identify the etiology of AP. Methods: The study consisted of 67 consecutive patients with AP admitted to Helsinki University Central Hospital. Forty-two had alcohol-induced AP, 16 had biliary AP, and 9 had unexplained etiology. Serum samples were drawn within 12 h after admission. Trypsinogen-1, trypsinogen-2, trypsin-1-AAT, and trypsin-2-AAT were determined by time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. Logistic regression was used to estimate the ability of the serum analytes to discriminate between alcohol-induced and biliary AP. The validity of the tests was evaluated by ROC curve analysis.
Results: Patients with alcohol-induced AP had higher median values of trypsin-1-AAT (P = 0.065), trypsinogen-2 (P = 0.034), and trypsin-2-AAT (P <0.001) than those with biliary AP, who had higher values of amylase (P = 0.002), lipase (P = 0.012), and alanine aminotransferase (P = 0.036). The ratios of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1, lipase, or amylase efficiently discriminated between biliary and alcohol-induced AP (areas under ROC curves, 0.920.96).
Conclusions: Trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-AAT are markedly increased in AP of all etiologies, whereas trypsinogen-1 is increased preferentially in biliary AP. The trypsin-2-AAT/trypsinogen-1 ratio is a promising new marker for discrimination between biliary and alcohol-induced AP.
| Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
The etiology can often be determined on the basis of an accurate history and imaging procedures, but in 510% of AP episodes, the etiology remains uncertain (2). Ultrasonography is the most sensitive method in evaluating the etiologic role of the biliary system in AP, but its usefulness is often limited by the presence of overlying bowel gas (3). Repeated ultrasonography may occasionally show gallstones despite no prior evidence of disease (4)(5). Determination of the etiology of AP is important because patients with severe gallstone-induced AP benefit from early treatment by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography and common bile-duct clearance (6)(7)(8)(9). In biliary AP, elective cholecystectomy should be performed after the pancreatitis resolves to avoid recurrent disease (2).
Biochemical markers are of some value in determining the etiology of AP. Serum amylase concentrations at admission are typically lower in patients with alcohol-induced AP than in those with nonalcoholic AP, (10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17), and serum amylase is normal at admission in 1032% of the patients (18)(19). In some studies, increased serum lipase has been found equally as often in alcohol-induced and nonalcoholic AP (10)(11)(16), whereas higher lipase concentrations in nonalcoholic AP have been reported in others (13)(14)(15)(17). An increased ratio of lipase to amylase in serum has been reported to discriminate between alcohol-induced and nonalcoholic AP in some studies (10)(11), but not in others (13)(14)(15)(17).
Metaanalysis has shown that alanine aminotransferase (ALT) is the most useful marker of biliary AP, and a cutoff of 150 U/L has a specificity of 96%, but a sensitivity of only 48%. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) performed nearly as well, whereas bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were not useful (20).
Trypsin is produced in the exocrine pancreas as two major proenzymes,
trypsinogen-1 (cationic) and trypsinogen-2 (anionic), which typically
are activated in the duodenum by enterokinase to trypsin-1 and
trypsin-2, respectively. Once it reaches the circulatory system, active
trypsin is rapidly inactivated by complexation with
2-macroglobulin and
1-antitrypsin (AAT) (21). Premature
intrapancreatic activation of trypsinogen to trypsin is thought to be a
key mechanism in the development of AP (21)(22)(23). This is
supported by the finding that hereditary pancreatitis is associated
with mutations in the trypsinogen-1 gene (24)(25)(26).
Significantly increased trypsin activity has been found in patients
with alcohol-induced AP, and it discriminates between alcohol-induced
and nonalcoholic AP (27). In spite of these promising
results, this method has not become accepted.
Previously, we developed immunofluorometric assays for the measurement of trypsinogen-1, trypsinogen-2, trypsin-1-AAT, and trypsin-2-AAT in serum (28)(29). In AP, trypsinogen-2 is markedly more increased than trypsinogen-1 (28). Trypsin-2-AAT has been found to be an accurate marker for severe pancreatitis (30)(31). Here we report the results of our studies on whether determination of trypsinogen-1, trypsinogen-2, trypsin-1-AAT, and trypsin-2-AAT in serum can be used to identify the etiology of AP.
| Materials and Methods |
|---|
|
|
|---|
|
The severity of the disease was classified according to the 1992 Atlanta Symposium criteria (1). AP was classified as severe if one or several local or systemic complications were present (e.g., shock, renal failure, respiratory insufficiency, disseminated intravascular coagulation, pancreatic necrosis, an abscess, a pseudocyst, or intestinal perforation or bleeding).
The etiology was regarded as biliary when gallstones were demonstrated by ultrasonography, endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, or laparotomy (16 patients). An alcohol-induced etiology was deduced when there was a history of marked alcohol use before admission and there was no evidence of gallstones (42 patients). The etiology was considered as "unexplained" when evidence of alcohol consumption or gallstones could not be detected (9 patients).
Patients were excluded from the study when the primary admission was at another hospital or the patient had preexisting chronic pancreatitis. The study was done with the approval of the ethics committee of the hospital.
samples
Serum samples from all patients were collected within 12 h
after admission. The samples were stored at -20 °C until analyzed.
laboratory methods
Serum amylase was measured by an enzymatic method. The reference
interval for amylase was 70300 U/L. Serum C-reactive protein
(CRP) was assayed by an immunoturbidimetric method. The upper
reference limit for CRP was 10 mg/L. Serum AST, ALT, and ALP were
measured enzymatically with kinetic methods and bilirubin with a
colorimetric method. The reference intervals for AST and ALT were
1035 U/L in women and 1050 U/L in men. The reference intervals were
60275 U/L for ALP and 220 mg/L for bilirubin. All analyses were
performed on a Vitros 250 analyzer with reagents from the manufacturer
(Johnson & Johnson Clinical Diagnostics). Lipase was measured on stored
samples with a Roche Cobas Integra using reagent set 07 6300 4
(Roche Diagnostics). The upper reference limit for
lipase was 190 U/L.
Trypsinogen-1, trypsinogen-2, trypsin-1-AAT, and trypsin-2-AAT were determined on stored samples by time-resolved immunofluorometric assays. The reference intervals were 5.669 µg/L for trypsinogen-1, 1890 µg/L for trypsinogen-2, 8.933 µg/L for trypsin-1-AAT, and 2.312 µg/L for trypsin-2-AAT (28)(29)(32).
statistical analysis
The distribution of the analytes was log-normal, and logarithmic
transformation was performed before analysis by logistic regression and
Pearson correlation. The MannWhitney U-test was used to
compare the concentrations of serum analytes between diagnostic groups.
The
2 test was used for assessing the
correlation between discrete variables and the Pearson correlation for
the correlation between continuous variables. Logistic regression was
used to estimate the ability of the analytes to discriminate between
alcoholic and biliary AP. P <0.05 was considered
statistically significant.
The diagnostic accuracy of the tests was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. The area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC plot describes the accuracy of the test: 1 indicates 100% sensitivity and specificity, and 0.5 indicates no discriminatory power (33). A univariate z-score test was used to estimate the significance of the difference between the areas under the ROC curves (34).
| Results |
|---|
|
|
|---|
2 test).
Trypsinogen-1 correlated with amylase (r = 0.59;
P <0.001) and lipase (r = 0.74;
P <0.001), which also correlated with each other
(r = 0.76; P <0.001).
|
|
We tested the discriminative ability of single analytes and their combinations using unconditional logistic regression with biliary or alcohol-induced AP as the binary outcome. ALT (P = 0.014), amylase (P = 0.002), lipase (P = 0.009), trypsin-2-AAT (P = 0.001), and trypsinogen-2 (P = 0.050) differentiated between biliary and alcohol-induced AP as single variables. Trypsinogen-1 did not contribute to the diagnosis alone, but when combined bivariately with trypsin-1-AAT, trypsinogen-2, or trypsin-2-AAT, it contributed significantly to the discrimination. Because trypsinogen-1, amylase, and lipase were highly correlated, only one of these variables could be used at a time in the regression model. ALT was the only variable to contribute independently when added as a third variable to bivariate combinations. Sex, age, and severity did not affect these results when added to the model.
The ability of various analytes to differentiate between biliary and
alcohol-induced AP was evaluated by ROC analyses (Table 3
). Trypsin-2-AAT had the highest AUC for a single analyte
(AUC = 0.838). In bivariate logistic regression, the combination
of trypsinogen-1 and trypsin-2-AAT had the highest AUC (0.951). When we
used the ratios between two analytes, the AUC values for the ratios of
trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1, lipase, or amylase were 0.920.96
(Table 3
). A logistic regression model with the three variables,
trypsinogen-1, trypsin-2-AAT, and ALT, had an AUC of 0.961. The AUC for
the ratio of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1 was significantly better
than ALT (P = <0.001) and amylase (P =
0.005), but not significantly better than the AUC for trypsin-2-AAT
alone (P = 0.156) or for ALT, trypsinogen-1, and
trypsin-2-AAT combined by logistic regression (P =
0.689).
|
A ratio of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1
1.5 identified biliary AP
with a sensitivity of 0.81, a specificity of 0.95, and a positive
predictive value of 0.87 (Fig. 2
).
|
| Discussion |
|---|
|
|
|---|
It has recently been shown that trypsinogen is expressed in the epithelium of benign intrahepatic bile ducts (35) and extrahepatic peribiliary glands (36), and increased concentrations of serum trypsinogen-1 and normal or slightly increased concentrations of trypsin-1-AAT have been observed in patients with benign biliary tract diseases (37). We have also found increased concentrations of trypsin-1-AAT in patients with biliary tract cancer (32). It is therefore tempting to speculate that a portion of the trypsinogen-1 occurring in serum from patients with biliary AP is at least partially derived from the biliary epithelium.
The marked increase of trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-AAT in alcohol-induced AP suggests that early activation of trypsinogen-2 to trypsin-2 is a crucial feature in the pathogenesis of alcohol-induced AP. In contrast, the passage of a biliary stone appears to cause leakage of inactivated trypsinogen-1 into the circulatory system. Interestingly, amylase and lipase were also preferentially increased in patients with biliary AP. Currently, we cannot explain why these pancreatic enzymes are more markedly increased in gallstone-induced AP, whereas trypsinogen-2 is more markedly increased in the alcohol-induced form of the disease. It has been suggested that the pathological events in the acinar cell are different in alcohol- and biliary-induced AP (38). Our results appear to support this hypothesis.
The ratio of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1 was similar in patients
with severe and mild biliary AP (Fig. 2
). Thus, the ratio does not
appear to be related to the severity of AP. In patients with
unexplained etiology of AP, the ratio of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1
was <1.5 in 7 of 10 cases, suggesting that the cause of AP might have
been biliary, e.g., gallstones or biliary sludge, which were not
identified by the imaging techniques used
(4)(5).
Currently, immunoassay of the various forms of trypsin takes
3 h;
however, with an automated analyzer, the time could be reduced to
1530 min. If the assays were available on a daily basis, the results
could be used to support clinical decision making.
In conclusion, trypsinogen-2 and trypsin-2-AAT are markedly increased in all etiologies of AP. They are markedly more increased in alcohol-induced AP than in biliary AP, whereas the opposite is true for trypsinogen-1, amylase, and lipase. The ratio of trypsin-2-AAT to trypsinogen-1 is a promising new indicator for discriminating between biliary and alcohol-induced AP.
| Acknowledgments |
|---|
| Footnotes |
|---|
1-antitrypsin; CRP, C-reactive protein; and AUC, area under the curve. | References |
|---|
|
|
|---|
1-antitrypsin in serum. Clin Chem 1994;40:1761-1765.
-1-antitrypsin as diagnostic and prognostic marker of acute pancreatitis: clinical study in consecutive patients. BMJ 1996;313:333-337.
1 antitrypsin complex values identify endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography induced pancreatitis with high accuracy. Gut 1997;41:690-695.
1-antitrypsin in serum: increased immunoreactivity in patients with biliary tract cancer. Clin Chem 1999;45:1768-1773.
-amylase and trypsin in intrahepatic bile ducts and peribiliary glands. Hepatology 1991;14:1129-1135.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
-amylase isozymes, trypsin and pancreatic lipase: an immunohistochemical analysis. Hepatology 1993;18:803-808.[ISI][Medline]
[Order article via Infotrieve]
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
![]() |
B. Lumbreras-Lacarra, J. M. Ramos-Rincon, and I. Hernandez-Aguado Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 530 - 536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |