Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 438-443, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tai, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tai, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:438-443.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Compound Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia and Familial Defective Apolipoprotein B-100 Produce Exaggerated Hypercholesterolemia

E. Shyong Tai1,2,a, Evelyn S.C. Koay2,3,2, Edmund Chan1, Tzer Jing Seng3, Lih Ming Loh1, Sunil K. Sethi2,3 and Chee Eng Tan1

1 Lipid Unit, Department of Endocrinology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore 169608, Republic of Singapore.

2 Department of Laboratory Medicine, National University Hospital, Singapore 119074, Republic of Singapore.

3 Department of Pathology, National University of Singapore, Singapore 119260, Republic of Singapore.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 65-227-3576; e-mail eshyong{at}pacific.net.sg.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) represent ligand-receptor disorders that are complementary. Individuals with both FH and FDB are unusual. We report a family with both disorders and the impact of the mutations on the phenotypes of the family members.

Methods: We used single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) for genetic analysis of all 18 exons and the promoter region of the LDL receptor and DGGE for genetic analysis of the apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B-100) gene. The functional significance of the apo B-100 mutation was studied using a U937 cell proliferation assay. Fasting serum lipid profiles were determined for the index case and seven first-degree relatives.

Results: One of the patient’s sisters had a missense mutation (Asp407->Lys) in exon 9 of the LDL receptor and a serum LDL-cholesterol concentration of 4.07 mmol/L. Four other first-degree relatives had hyperlipidemia but no LDL-receptor mutation. However, these subjects had a mutation of the apo B-100 gene (Arg3500->Trp). The cell proliferation rate of U937 cells fed with LDL from other subjects with the same mutation was fourfold less than that of controls. The index case had both FH- and FDB-related mutations. Her serum LDL-cholesterol (9.47 mmol/L) was higher than all other relatives tested.

Conclusions: Existence of both FH and FDB should be considered in families with LDL-receptor mutations in some but not all individuals with hypercholesterolemia or when some individuals in families with FH exhibit exaggerated hypercholesterolemia.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH),1 an autosomally dominant inherited defect of LDL receptors, produces premature coronary artery disease (CAD) and occurs in 1 in 500 individuals (1)(2). Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 (FDB) results from a mutation at the apolipoprotein B-100 (apo B-100) locus on chromosome 2, leading to defective binding of LDL to the LDL receptor (3). It also occurs in ~1 in 500 individuals and leads to premature CAD. FDB cannot be differentiated from FH phenotypically (4). Subjects with both FH and FDB are rare, and there have been only three reports in the literature of such compound heterozygotes (5)(6)(7).

Here we describe a proband who was identified to have both FH and FDB, detected as part of a family screening program for the detection of FH.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The proband was identified based on the presence of severe hypercholesterolemia and the presence of tendon xanthomata in accordance with established diagnostic criteria (8). Seven first-degree relatives of the proband, ages 14–63 years, were studied. All were free of symptoms of CAD and had normal resting electrocardiograms. Nephrotic syndrome and hypothyroidism were excluded. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the Singapore General Hospital. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects studied.

Blood was taken after a 10-h fast. Cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations were measured by enzymatic methods using Kodak Ektachem chemistry slides, which were then read on a Vitros 700 Chemistry Analyzer. HDL-cholesterol was measured after precipitation with dextran sulfate and magnesium chloride. LDL-cholesterol (LDL-C) was calculated using Friedewald’s formula (9). Only the pretreatment lipid profile is presented.

DNA was extracted from whole blood using phenol-chloroform extraction and salt precipitation.

Mutations in the LDL-receptor gene were detected independently using PCR-single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis and denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in two laboratories.

pcr-sscp
Each PCR was performed in a final volume of 50 µL containing 0.2 µg of genomic DNA, 25 pmol of each oligonucleotide primer, 200 µmol of deoxynucleotide triphosphates, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase in the reaction buffer supplied (Promega). PCR was carried out using the GeneAmp 9700 PCR system (Perkin-Elmer). The oligonucleotide primers for the promoter region and the translated exon sequences were as described previously (10). The PCR and SSCP conditions are shown in Table 1 . After amplification, 5 µL of the PCR product was added to 5 µL of loading buffer (950 mL/L formamide, 0.5 g/L bromphenol blue, 50 g/L EDTA), denatured by heating at 95 °C for 5 min, and quenched on ice. SSCP analysis was carried out using the DCode Universal Mutation Detection System (Bio-Rad). Samples were electrophoresed in acrylamide gel without glycerol in Tris-borate-EDTA (89 mmol/L Tris base, pH 8.3, 89 mmol/L boric acid, 2 mmol/L disodium EDTA) at room temperature for 18–20 h at 120 V. The gel was stained with silver nitrate (Silver Sequence DNA Sequencing System; Promega).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. PCR1 and SSCP conditions for analysis of the LDL receptor.

pcr-dgge
PCR amplification of the LDL-receptor gene was performed according to Nissen et al. (11). Twenty pairs of GC-clamped primers were used to amplify the promoter region and all 18 LDL-receptor exons, including at least 5 intron bases on both sides of the exons (for exon 4, two sets of primers were designed for the 5' and 3' halves because of the exceedingly long exon length). The standard PCR mixture for LDL-receptor gene amplification in a total reaction volume of 25 µL was as follows: 300 ng of genomic DNA, 50 pmol of each primer, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 200 µmol of deoxynucleotide phosphates, and 1 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Promega), in a reaction buffer supplied by Promega. Deviations from the standard PCR mixture were for the 3' end of exon 4 (1.0 mM MgCl2) and for exon 15 (2.5 mM MgCl2 and 600 ng of genomic DNA). The standardized thermal cycling profile consisted of an initial denaturation step at 95 °C for 5 min, 40 cycles at 94 °C for 1 min and 66 °C for 5 min, and a final extension step at 72 °C for 10 min. This was then followed by a denaturation/renaturation program at 99 °C for 7 min, 65 °C for 1 h, and 37 °C for 1 h, with a final soak at 4 °C, to generate hetero- and/or homoduplexes from the amplified PCR products.

Parallel denaturing gradient gels of 20–60%, 30–70%, or 40–80% denaturant (100% denaturant, 7 mol/L urea plus 400 mL/L formamide) were made with a gradient gel mixer. In brief, amplified PCR products from the apo B-100 gene were loaded onto 20–60% gels; PCR products from exons 2, 3, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, and 17 and the promoter region (LDL-receptor gene) were loaded onto 30–70% gels; and those from the remaining LDL-receptor exons (1, 4–5', 4–3', 7, 8, 9, 14, 15, 16, and 18) were loaded onto 40–80% gels and then electrophoresed for 6 h at 150 V.

Analysis of the apo B-100 gene used DGGE as described previously (12). The primers used were 5'-CGCCCGCCGCGCCCCGCGCCCGTCCCGCCGCCCCCGCCCGGGAGCAGTTGACCACAAGCTTAGC-3' with a 40-bp GC-clamp at the 5' end, and 5'-GGTGGCTTTGCTTGTTATGTTCTCC-3'. The putative LDL-receptor binding region containing nucleotides 10551–10892 (corresponding to codons 3448–3562) of exon 26 of the apo B-100 gene was amplified and screened for mutations.

All mutations found by SSCP or DGGE were confirmed by DNA sequencing. For the LDL receptor, we used the ABI Prism 310 Genetic Analyzer (Perkin-Elmer). Genomic DNA was amplified using the primers for the exon in which SSCP or DGGE revealed a mutation. PCR conditions were in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendation. The product was cleaned with QIAquick PCR purification reagent set (Qiagen) before sequencing. The apo B-100 gene was sequenced using the same primers without the GC-clamp as described previously (12). apo E was genotyped by the method of Hixson and Vernier (13).

LDL from the patients in this family was not available for studies to assess the functional significance of the apo B-100 mutation found. However, we were able to obtain material from 8 other patients with the same mutation, and the functional significance of the mutation was assessed by comparing the results of a U937 cell proliferation assay (14)(15) in these 8 subjects against those of 10 healthy controls. Because Van den Broek et al. (15) found that the cell density at the beginning of the experiment influenced U937 cell proliferation, standardized conditions were strictly followed in this study: (a) A fixed number of cells (1 x 105 cells/mL) was used in all experiments. (b) The cells were incubated in medium without serum for 24 h to ensure intracellular cholesterol depletion. (c) Frostegard et al. (14) observed that oxidized LDL reduced the ability to stimulate U937 cell proliferation. Because naturally occurring antioxidants in the d >1.21 kg/L fraction may prevent oxidation of the LDL, only pure LDL was used for the experiments.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The pedigree for the family is shown in Fig. 1 . A mutation in exon 9 of the LDL receptor was detected in the proband (subject II-4) and one sibling (subject II-1) by both PCR-SSCP (Fig. 2 ) and PCR-DGGE analyses. Subsequent sequencing showed that this was a C-to-G substitution at nucleotide position 1284 (Asp407->Lys), a mutation that has previously been shown to cause FH in South Africans (16). In addition, a polymorphism in exon 10 (G-to-A substitution at nucleotide 1413) was detected in both the proband and her sister (subject II-1). This has been found to be common in healthy individuals (17). No other abnormalities in the LDL-receptor gene were detected. Clinical and biochemical characteristics of the family members are shown in Table 2 . The father of the proband (subject I-2) suffered a sudden death at the age of 45 years (20 years before the diagnosis of FH in the proband), and no additional information was available for him. Several members of the family (subjects I-1, II-3, II-4, II-5, III-1, and III-2) had increased serum cholesterol (>7.5 mmol/L), which is diagnostic of FH in first-degree relatives of a proband (8), but did not carry the mutation. DGGE of the apo B-100 gene (Fig. 3 ) showed that all but one of these subjects, i.e., the mother of the proband (subject I-1), a brother (subject II-5), and two sons (subjects III-1 and III-2) as well as the proband herself (subject II-4), had the same mutation in the apo B-100 gene (Arg3500->Trp). The proband was thus a compound heterozygote for both FH and FDB. All members of this family had the {epsilon}3{epsilon}3 wild-type genotype for apo E, which is not associated with hypercholesterolemia. The hypercholesterolemia in subject II-3 is currently unexplained. To rule out the possibility of an LDL-receptor mutation that may have been present and undetected by SSCP or DGGE, we sequenced all exons and the promoter region in this subject. No additional abnormalities were detected.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Pedigree for family reported.

The proband was a compound heterozygote for FH and FDB. Six of the family members studied had hypercholesterolemia, and of these, five had either FH or FDB.



View larger version (42K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. SSCP of exon 9 of the LDL receptor for the family members studied demonstrating the abnormal pattern caused by a mutation in exon 9 (Asp407->Lys).

Subjects are the same as in Fig. 1Up .


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Demographic characteristics and lipid profiles of subjects studied.



View larger version (61K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. DGGE demonstrating an abnormal pattern in six members for the family, including the index case, indicating a mutation in the gene for apolipoprotein B-100 (Arg3500->Trp)

The results of the U937 cell proliferation assay are shown in Fig. 4 . The cell proliferation rate at 20 µmol/L LDL-C (mid-point of this assay) was 0.77 for cells fed with LDL from the FDB subjects with the Arg3500->Trp mutation, compared with 4.01 for cells fed with LDL from healthy individuals, a fourfold reduction in the cell proliferation rate. This trend was similar to those seen by Gaffney et al. (18) and Van den Broek et al. (15) with LDL from patients with the classical Arg3500-> Gln mutation.



View larger version (21K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. Results of the U937 cell proliferation assay.

U937 cells (1 x 105 cells/mL) were incubated in medium without serum for 24 h to ensure intracellular cholesterol depletion. Subsequently, LDL isolated from 8 patients with the Arg3500->Trp mutation in the apolipoprotein B-100 gene and from 10 control subjects was added to the culture medium in various concentrations. Results are represented as means ± SD. The cell proliferation rate at 20 µmol/L LDL-C (mid-point of this assay) was 0.77 for cells fed with LDL from the FDB subjects with the Arg3500->Trp mutation compared with 4.01 for cells fed with LDL from healthy individuals.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Exons 7–14 of the LDL-receptor gene encode the epidermal growth factor precursor homology domain of the LDL-receptor protein, consisting of ~400 amino acids (19)(20). This domain is required for the acid-dependent dissociation of the receptor from its ligand during recycling (21). Thus, the amino acid substitution, from asparagine to a positively charged lysine in exon 9, found in some of our study subjects might interfere with receptor recycling. The structure and function of this mutation have yet to be studied.

When it was first described, FDB was thought to be produced by a single mutation at codon 3500 of the apo B-100 gene (22)(23). Since then, several other mutations have been found, some of which were first described in an Asian population (12). It was one of these mutations (Arg3500->Trp) that was found in this family. We have now shown that this mutation leads to a loss of function similar to that observed with the classical Arg3500->Gln mutation (Fig. 4Up ).

FDB represents a ligand-receptor disorder that is complementary to FH. Compound heterozygotes with both FDB and FH are unusual, with only three reports of compound heterozygotes in the literature (5)(6)(7). Of these, only two groups characterized the mutations by DNA analysis (6)(7). They found, as we did, that compound heterozygotes exhibited more severe hypercholesterolemia than did their first-degree relatives heterozygous for either FH or FDB. The proband in this family had a pretreatment serum LDL-C concentration almost twice as high as those of her siblings (Table 2Up ). Such compound heterozygotes, we believe, may account for two other phenomena occasionally observed in FH kindred. (a) Families have been reported in which an LDL-receptor defect was not found in all of the hypercholesterolemic first-degree relatives of patients with FH (24). This was the case in this family, and only DNA analysis of the apo B-100 gene allowed an accurate diagnosis to be reached. The presence of a compound heterozygote in the family must be considered in such cases and apo B-100 mutations sought actively to avoid labeling an affected individual as healthy, especially in children in whom the lipid profiles are less remarkable, such as subjects III-1 and III-2. It is also necessary to look for mutations other than the original Arg3500->Gln mutation because several other mutations are known to cause FDB in Asians. (b) Some FH kindred, like the one presented here, include individuals with exaggerated hypercholesterolemia compared with other family members who have heterozygous FH. We should consider the possibility that these individuals are compound heterozygotes for FH and FDB.

Although the Asp407->Lys mutation found in exon 9 of the LDL receptor in the proband and in subject II-1 has been reported previously as a cause of FH (16), we have not demonstrated functional impairment of the LDL receptor in these individuals. The unexplained hypercholesterolemia seen in subject II-3 (Table 2Up ) raises the possibility that another, currently unidentified mutation may contribute to the hypercholesterolemia seen in the proband as well as in subjects II-1 and II-3. However, no other mutations were found in the LDL receptors of our patients even with direct sequencing of the entire coding region, and we believe that the exon 9 mutation we found is significant. Of course, we cannot rule out the possibility that genes at another locus could interact with mutations at the LDL receptor or apo B-100 locus and may produce variations in phenotype in affected family members. In the first reported family of this type, the compound heterozygote was found to have lipid concentrations similar to the concentrations in individuals with either defect (5). The authors attributed this to other genetic or environmental factors that may have been operating in this individual. Another example of such gene-gene interaction is seen the recent work of Knoblauch et al. (25), in which a locus on chromosome 13q was linked to variations in cholesterol concentrations in a family with FH. Although we agree that this deserves further investigation, we are unable to speculate any further at this time.

Despite the exaggerated hypercholesterolemia, FH/FDB compound heterozygotes retain an ability to respond to lipid-lowering therapy (7). In our proband, treatment with 80 mg/day simvastatin lowered LDL-C from 9.47 mmol/L to 4.82 mmol/L. This represents a 49% reduction, which is similar to the 46% and 48% reductions in total cholesterol seen in the two cases reported by Benlian et al. (7).

When one genetic defect fails to explain the cause of hypercholesterolemia in families who appear to have monogenic hypercholesterolemia, the presence of both LDL receptor and apo B-100 defects should be considered.


   Acknowledgments
 
This work was supported by the National Medical Research Council, Singapore, Grant Number NMRC/0257/1997.


   Footnotes
 
2 These authors contributed equally to this work.

1 Nonstandard abbreviations: FH, familial hypercholesterolemia; CAD, coronary artery disease; FDB, familial defective apolipoprotein B-100; apo, apolipoprotein; LDL-C, LDL-cholesterol; SSCP, single strand conformation polymorphism; and DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Goldstein J, Hobbs H, Brown M. Familial hypercholesterolemia. Scriver CRMD Beaudet AL Sly WL Valle D eds. The metabolic bases of inherited disease 1995:1981-2030 McGraw-Hill New York. .
  2. Maruyama T, Miyake Y, Tajima S, Harada Shiba M, Yamamura T, Tsushima M, et al. Common mutations in the low-density-lipoprotein-receptor gene causing familial hypercholesterolemia in the Japanese population. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1995;15:1713-1718.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Myant NB. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100: a review, including some comparisons with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Atherosclerosis 1993;104:1-18.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Defesche JC, Pricker KL, Hayden MR, van der Ende BE, Kastelein JJ. Familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 is clinically indistinguishable from familial hypercholesterolemia. Arch Intern Med 1993;153:2349-2356.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Rauh G, Schuster H, Fischer J, Keller C, Wolfram G, Zollner N. Identification of a heterozygous compound individual with familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. Klin Wochenschr 1991;69:320-324.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Rubinsztein DC, Coetzee GA, van der Westhuyzen DR, Langenhoven E, Kotze MJ. Familial defective apolipoprotein-B is rare in hypercholesterolaemic South African Afrikaners, coloureds and Indians. S Afr Med J 1995;85:355-357.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Benlian P, de Gennes JL, Dairou F, Hermelin B, Ginon I, Villain E, et al. Phenotypic expression in double heterozygotes for familial hypercholesterolemia and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. Hum Mutat 1996;7:340-345.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Williams RR, Hunt SC, Schumacher MC, Hegele RA, Leppert MF, Ludwig EH, Hopkins PN. Diagnosing heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia using new practical criteria validated by molecular genetics. Am J Cardiol 1993;72:171-176.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502.[Abstract]
  10. Jensen HK, Jensen LG, Hansen PS, Faergeman O, Gregersen N. High sensitivity of the single-strand conformation polymorphism method for detecting sequence variations in the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene validated by DNA sequencing. Clin Chem 1996;42:1140-1146.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Nissen H, Guldberg P, Hansen AB, Petersen NE, Horder M. Clinically applicable mutation screening in familial hypercholesterolemia. Hum Mutat 1996;8:168-177.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Choong ML, Koay ES, Khoo KL, Khaw MC, Sethi SK. Denaturing gradient-gel electrophoresis screening of familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 in a mixed Asian cohort: two cases of arginine3500->tryptophan mutation associated with a unique haplotype. Clin Chem 1997;43:916-923.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Hixson JE, Vernier DT. Restriction isotyping of human apolipoprotein E by gene amplification and cleavage with HhaI. J Lipid Res 1990;31:545-548.[Abstract]
  14. Frostegard J, Hamsten A, Gidlund M, Nilsson J. Low density lipoprotein-induced growth of U937 cells: a novel method to determine the receptor binding of low density lipoprotein. J Lipid Res 1990;31:37-44.[Abstract]
  15. Van den Broek AJ, Hollaar L, Schaefer HI, Van der Laarse A, Schuster H, Defesche JC, et al. Screening for familial defective apolipoprotein B-100 with improved U937 monocyte proliferation assay. Clin Chem 1994;40:395-399.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Callis M, Jansen S, Thiart R, de Villiers JN, Raal FJ, Kotze MJ. Mutation analysis in familial hypercholesterolemia patients of different ancestries: identification of three novel LDLR gene mutations. Mol Cell Probes 1998;12:149-152.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Warnich L, Kotze MJ, Langenhoven E, Retief AE. Detection of a frequent polymorphism in exon 10 of the low-density lipoprotein receptor gene. Hum Genet 1992;89:362.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Gaffney D, Reid JM, Vass K, Packard CJ. Genetics of hypercholesterolaemia: the detection of mutations in the apolipoprotein B gene using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis. Z Gastroenterol 1996;34(Suppl 3):19-20.
  19. Russell DW, Schneider WJ, Yamamoto T, Luskey KL, Brown MS, Goldstein JL. Domain map of the LDL receptor: sequence homology with the epidermal growth factor precursor. Cell 1984;37:577-585.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sudhof T, Goldstein J, Brown M, Russel D. The LDL receptor gene: a mosaic of exons shared with different proteins. Science 1985;228:815-822.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Davis CG, Goldstein JL, Sudhof TC, Anderson RG, Russell DW, Brown MS. Acid-dependent ligand dissociation and recycling of LDL receptor mediated by growth factor homology region. Nature 1987;326:760-765.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Vega GL, Grundy SM. In vivo evidence for reduced binding of low density lipoproteins to receptors as a cause of primary moderate hypercholesterolemia. J Clin Invest 1986;78:1410-1414.
  23. Soria LF, Ludwig EH, Clarke HR, Vega GL, Grundy SM, McCarthy BJ. Association between a specific apolipoprotein B mutation and familial defective apolipoprotein B-100. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:587-591.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Keller C, Harders-Spengel K, Spengel F, Wieczorek A, Wolfram G, Zollner N. Serum cholesterol levels in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia confirmed by tissue culture. Atherosclerosis 1981;39:51-59.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  25. Knoblauch H, Muller-Myhsok B, Busjahn A, Ben Avi L, Bahring S, Baron H, et al. A cholesterol-lowering gene maps to chromosome 13q. Am J Hum Genet 2000;66:157-166.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tai, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tai, E. S.
Right arrow Articles by Tan, C. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS