Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 444-450, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (176)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ockene, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stanek, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ockene, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stanek, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:444-450.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Variability and Classification Accuracy of Serial High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Measurements in Healthy Adults

Ira S. Ockene1,a, Charles E. Matthews3, Nader Rifai4, Paul M. Ridker5, George Reed2 and Edward Stanek6

1 Department of Medicine, Divisions of Cardiovascular Medicine and
2 Preventive and Behavioral Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Ave. North, Worcester, MA 01655.

3 Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, School of Public Health, Columbia, SC 29208.

4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Children’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Ave., Boston, MA 02115.

5 Division of Preventive Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 900 Commonwealth Ave. East, Boston, MA 02215.

6 Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Health Sciences, University of Massachusetts, Arnold House Box 30430, Amherst, MA 01003.
a Author for correspondence. Fax 508-856-4571, email ira.ockene{at}umassmed.edu.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Increased concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), a marker of systemic inflammation, are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease. Because of its relationship to inflammation, hs-CRP has considerable biologic variation. This study was carried out to characterize CRP variation and to compare it to another risk factor, total serum cholesterol.

Methods: One hundred thirteen individuals were scheduled to have five measurements each of hs-CRP and total cholesterol carried out at quarterly intervals over a 1-year period. Variations of hs-CRP and total cholesterol were characterized, and classification accuracy was described and compared for both.

Results: The relative variation was comparable for hs-CRP and total cholesterol. When classified by quartile, 63% of first and second hs-CRP measurements were in agreement; for total cholesterol it was 60%. Ninety percent of hs-CRP measurements were within one quartile of each other. This relationship was not altered by the use of log-transformed hs-CRP data.

Conclusion: hs-CRP has a degree of measurement stability that is similar to that of total cholesterol.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Recent prospective studies have reported that modest increases in markers of low-level systemic inflammation are associated with increased risk for coronary heart disease (CHD)1 (1). In a prospective study of apparently healthy middle-aged men, the risk for first myocardial infarction was increased 2.9-fold among those with baseline concentrations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) in the highest compared with the lowest quartile (2). Similar findings have been reported in women (3)(4) and the elderly (5)(6). Thompson et al. (7) found a direct correlation between the incidence of coronary events and CRP concentrations, but adjustment for fibrinogen explained much of the association.

hs-CRP has been noted to add to the prediction of first myocardial infarction when combined with blood lipid measures (8). Given these findings, hs-CRP has been suggested as a potential risk factor for CHD (9)(10), and investigators have begun to seek therapies that may lower hs-CRP concentrations and, presumably, CHD risk (9)(11)(12).

CRP differs from other markers for CHD risk obtained from blood (e.g., lipoproteins) because it is an acute phase reactant (13). Increased hs-CRP concentrations reflect the presence and intensity of inflammation and, in response to injury or acute infection, can rapidly increase as much as 1000-fold from basal concentrations, declining to baseline over a period of 7–12 days (13). Studies of the distribution of hs-CRP that have excluded individuals with acutely increased values have found median values of ~1–2 mg/L with the upper end of the reference interval (i.e., 97.5th percentile) between 3.2 and 5.5 mg/L (14)(15). Higher hs-CRP concentrations have been noted in smokers (16), individuals with osteoarthritis (17), and in the obese (18). For measurement of hs-CRP to have clinical utility as a CHD risk factor, the biologic variability of hs-CRP must be quantified and be low enough to enable reliable risk stratification with one or two blood samples. In a recent study of 214 postinfarction patients, the correlation coefficient between baseline hs-CRP concentrations (obtained at least 6 months post infarction) and values obtained 5 years later was 0.60 (P <0.001), a degree of correlation that compares favorably to that for total cholesterol (r = 0.37) (19). Most other longitudinal studies of hs-CRP variability have been conducted in small (n <30) homogeneous cohorts over relatively short periods of follow-up (6 months) (14)(20) and were limited by lack of gender- and age-specific comparisons. Moreover, the reliability of risk classification using serial hs-CRP measurements has not been formally examined. The purpose of the present investigation was to quantify the biologic variability of hs-CRP and to examine the risk classification accuracy of serial hs-CRP samples within the reference interval in a large heterogeneous cohort of healthy adults who were each followed for a 1-year period.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
participant recruitment and study design
The Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol Study (SEASON) was an observational longitudinal study of 641 healthy adults designed to quantify the magnitude and timing of seasonal changes in blood lipids and to identify the major factors contributing to this variation (21). These factors included dietary intake, physical activity, exposure to light, psychological variables, weather patterns, and changes in body mass. A subgroup of SEASON participants (n = 113) were recruited to participate in an ancillary study examining seasonal variation in additional blood indices, including hemostatic factors, apolipoproteins, antioxidants, and hs-CRP. Participants in this subgroup of the SEASON study form the cohort of the present investigation.

SEASON participants were recruited from the Fallon Healthcare System, a health maintenance organization serving the central Massachusetts area. Additional minority participants were recruited from the greater Worcester area. Individuals were eligible if they were residents of Worcester County, 20–70 years of age, had telephone service, and were not taking cholesterol-lowering medication. Recruitment was carried out between December 1994 and February 1997, and follow-up was completed in March 1998. The Institutional Review Boards of the Fallon Healthcare System and the University of Massachusetts Medical School approved all participant recruitment and data collection procedures. Each participant read and signed an approved informed consent.

At baseline and in each of four subsequent quarters of follow-up (at 90-day intervals), individuals came to the clinic to provide blood samples, have their body mass measured, and to return a series of self-administered questionnaires. Physical activity, diet, and light exposure data were collected using three 24-h recall interviews of each of the five data collection points.

clinical measurements
Demographic data (e.g., age, gender, marital status, education, employment) were collected by self-administered questionnaire at study baseline. Anthropometric data, including body mass (kg), height (m), and waist and hip circumferences (cm) were measured during clinic visits by the SEASON staff.

Information regarding infections was collected by self-report of the number of cold or flu episodes in the previous 90 days. The mean (SD) annual number of upper-respiratory tract infections was 1.4 (1.5) events per year. The occurrence of upper-respiratory tract infections peaked in the winter months (~40%) and was lowest in the summer (~10%). These data closely resemble annual and seasonal incidence of upper-respiratory tract infections reported in other investigations using more intensive self-report methods (22)(23).

blood measurements
Fasting (>12 h) venous blood samples were collected into EDTA-containing tubes between 0700 and 0900. Blood plasma was harvested by low-speed centrifugation at 4 °C, aliquoted into individual tubes, and quickly frozen to -70 °C. On a regular basis, plasma samples were packed in dry ice and shipped for analysis via courier service to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention standardized laboratory for lipid testing at the University of Massachusetts at Lowell (24). Total cholesterol and triglycerides were measured in plasma by enzymatic methods using a Beckman System 700 automated analyzer (25)(26). HDL-cholesterol was measured in the resulting supernatant after heparin manganese precipitation of apolipoprotein-B-containing proteins (27). LDL-cholesterol values were calculated by the Friedewald equation using total cholesterol, triglycerides, and HDL-cholesterol in individuals with triglyceride values <4.52 mmol/L (400 mg/dL) (28).

hs-CRP methodology
hs-CRP concentrations were determined at Children’s Hospital in Boston using latex-enhanced immunonephelometric assays on a BN II analyzer (Dade Behring) as described previously (29). The assay has a detection limit of 0.15 mg/L and day-to-day imprecision (CV) of ~5% for concentrations of 0.35 and 0.5 mg/L.

statistical methodology
Variance components and intraclass correlations were estimated using a random effects analysis of variance model using the loneway procedure in Stata, Ver. 6.0 (30). Categorical variables were compared by Fisher exact tests. Unweighted {kappa} statistics were computed for comparison of classification of the first and second measurements of cholesterol and hs-CRP (31).


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
One-hundred thirteen subjects (20–70 years of age) in the SEASON blood substudy had measured hs-CRP values. Of the 113 subjects, 64 (56.6%) were male and 49 (43.4%) were female. Seventy-five (66.4%) had all five quarterly measurements. Twenty-six (23%) had four quarterly measurements and 12 (10.6%) had three quarterly measurements. The mean (SD) interval between blood measures was 96.4 (19.6) days. Table 1 lists the participant characteristics. The values in Table 1 are based on averaged values over all quarterly measurements.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Participant characteristics.

The gender difference in hs-CRP was significant based on a rank-sum test (P = 0.04). This difference was entirely explained by differences in body mass index (BMI), and after controlling for BMI, there was no longer a significant difference between males and females in mean hs-CRP. Gender differences in hs-CRP have not been previously described (14)(32), but the relationship between BMI and hs-CRP has been noted by others (32). Overall concentrations of hs-CRP were comparable to values noted previously in the literature, as obtained by similar methodologies (3)(33).

Further analyses were carried out using pooled gender data, both because of the lack of independent significance for this variable and to maintain comparability with total cholesterol, which despite important gender differences does not have gender-specific guidelines (34).

Values of hs-CRP >10 mg/L were relatively rare in both men (4.8% of 292 h-CRP measurements) and women (2.8% of 214 measurements). The gender difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.36). Eighty percent of the 20 values >10 mg/L were associated with a report of an episode of cold or flu within the prior 90 days, vs only 30.2% for those <10 mg/L. In subsequent analyses, values >10 mg/L were removed under the assumption that they represented acute illness or inflammation. After hs-CRP values >10 mg/L were excluded, the mean (SD) hs-CRP value was 2.05 (1.8) mg/L based on an mean (SD) of 4.4 (1.8) measurements per subject.

In characterizing the variation of hs-CRP, the scale used is an important factor. Fig. 1 illustrates the distribution of hs-CRP and, for comparison, that of total cholesterol (all subjects represented by their mean values for all measurements). The data for total cholesterol are relatively symmetric and can be modeled appropriately by a gaussian distribution. The distribution of hs-CRP was highly skewed even with the higher values removed. Fig. 1C shows the log distribution (hs-CRP), which is much more symmetric and less skewed. A Kolmogorov–Smirnov test indicated that there was no statistical evidence of a deviation from normality for total cholesterol (P = 0.78) or for log hs-CRP (P = 0.20), but the test rejected normality for hs-CRP (P <0.001). Variation estimates were made in both scales for comparative purposes.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution of measurements for total cholesterol (A), hs-CRP (B), and log hs-CRP (C).

Data represent the means of all measurements for each individual (n = 113).

The within-subject data for total cholesterol and hs-CRP, rank-ordered by mean values, are illustrated in Fig. 2 . The first hs-CRP plot (Fig. 2 , middle panel) is in the measured scale, the second plot (Fig. 2 , bottom panel) is in a log scale.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Range of variation in total cholesterol and hs-CRP measurements for each individual, presented in rank order for individual mean values.

The total cholesterol plot (top) omits one subject with low values. Leaving this subject in the plot tended to give a different view of the variation because it compressed the remaining data into a smaller frame.

Variation is usually separated into analytic, within-individual (biologic), and between-individual variation. Analytic variation is the variation attributable to measurement error (a sample is analyzed multiple times and variation is estimated). Individual, or biologic, variation is the variation within an individual accounting for or adjusting for analytic variation. Multiple measures within a subject are used to estimate variation, and analytic variation is subtracted out. Between-individual variation is the variation in average response between individuals. With these data, we can estimate within- and between-individual variation where within-individual variation is a combination of analytic and biologic variation.

Variation can be expressed by dividing overall variation into between- and within-subject variation and describing the percentage of overall variation attributable to each component. If we let {sigma}b2 be the between-subject variance and {sigma}w2 be the within-subject variance, then {sigma}b2/({sigma}b2+ {sigma}w2) is the intraclass correlation and 100 x intraclass correlation is the percentage of variation explained by between-subject variation. The remaining variation is the within-subject variation, which is the combined biologic and analytic variation. This is an appropriate comparison if we have a representative sample of individuals.

A random-effects analysis of variance estimated the between-subject standard deviation for total cholesterol to be 0.946 mmol/L (36.6 mg/dL) and the within-subject standard deviation to be 0.447 mmol/L (17.3 mg/dL); for hs-CRP, the between-subject standard deviation was 1.66 mg/L and the within-subject standard deviation was 1.19 mg/L. The estimated intraclass correlation for total cholesterol was 0.82 (82% of variation explained by between-subject variation and 18% by within-subject variation); for hs-CRP, the estimated intraclass correlation was 0.66. Table 2 lists the variance components for each of the measures.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Variance components for total cholesterol and hs-CRP.

classification accuracy
To determine classification accuracy, values of hs-CRP were divided into four groups: <0.50, 0.50–0.99, 1.00–1.99, and >=2.0 mg/L (2).

The agreement between the first and second measurements in all 113 individuals is shown in Fig. 3 , which for comparison provides equivalent data for total cholesterol divided into quartiles. Overall, for hs-CRP, 71 of 113 (62.8%) of the results were in agreement. The {kappa} statistic was estimated to be 0.479 (95% confidence interval, 0.39–0.60). When we removed measurement pairs where a value was >10 mg/L, there was a small increase in overall agreement (63.5%), with a {kappa} statistic of 0.511 (95% confidence interval, 0.40–0.62). When we examined the classification accuracy across the 12-month follow-up period (excluding pairs with values >10 mg/L), correct classification was observed for 237 of 374 pairs (63.4%). For total cholesterol, agreement between the first and second measurements was 59.3% with a {kappa} value of 0.456 (95% confidence interval, 0.35–0.56). Thus, variability of repeat hs-CRP measurements was comparable to that of total cholesterol.



View larger version (40K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Agreement between first and second measurements for hs-CRP and total cholesterol.

In those individuals having at least four hs-CRP measurements, a similar analysis was carried out comparing the average of two randomly selected measures with the average of two other randomly selected measures. The use of four measurements in this manner increased overall agreement to 68%.

We also carried out a similar analysis classifying cholesterol into three groups using the classification methodology of the National Cholesterol Education Program (<200, 200–240, and >240 mg/dL) (34). Use of this scheme improved overall agreement between the first and second measurements to 71.7%, but the improvement was related to the smaller number of groups (three vs four).


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In epidemiologic studies, hs-CRP has been shown to be a useful predictor of future cardiac events (35). In making the transition from large-scale epidemiologic studies to clinical utility in individual patients, several requirements must be met, including a sensitive, accurate, and affordable assay and demonstration of relative stability of classification into risk categories (10). Although hs-CRP is an acute phase reactant, and as such is subject to marked and rapid shifts secondary to intercurrent illness, we have demonstrated that there is considerable stability in the measurement of hs-CRP and that correction for outlying high values yielded only minor changes in these findings. In particular, the stability of hs-CRP measurements compares favorably with that of total serum cholesterol, a standard measurement widely accepted in CHD risk stratification methodology. The analytic component of hs-CRP variability is relatively small, with between-subject variation accounting for most of the observed variability.

Although the stability of hs-CRP measurements is similar to that of total cholesterol, considerable within-subject variability does exist in both, and a single test will have a wide confidence interval (36). Because an analysis using four measurements per individual yielded only a modest increase in classification agreement (68% vs 63% with two measurements), the use of two sequential measures is appropriate for clinical use.

We are not recommending the use of log-transformed data for the clinical use of hs-CRP. A log-transformed number has a fixed relationship to the original number from which it is derived and so is not intrinsically of greater value. The use of log-transformed data does produce interquartile distances that are equal on a measurement scale, but in a clinical setting this is not important because the guideline cutpoints are defined for the clinician, and log-transformed data are not used for other measurements that are equally skewed (e.g., serum triglycerides).

Because hs-CRP is an acute phase reactant, it could be argued that the lowest of several measurements should be used as the predictive value, as opposed to the mean. Although this approach has biologic as well as clinical appeal, insufficient data exist at the present time to make this recommendation.

In conclusion, we believe the current data have several important clinical implications. (a) In a recent study directly comparing the magnitude of predictive value of 12 putative risk factors, including lipoprotein(a), homocysteine, and a full lipid panel, hs-CRP was the single strongest marker of risk for future myocardial infarction and stroke (3), data that underscore the critical role of inflammation in atherothrombosis. (b) Several studies have now shown that hs-CRP concentrations predict coronary risk even in the absence of hyperlipidemia (2)(3)(8), an important issue because one-half of all cardiovascular events occur among individuals with cholesterol concentrations not defined as increased by National Cholesterol Education Program criteria (37). (c) Because statin therapy appears to lower hs-CRP in a cholesterol-independent fashion (19), monitoring the inflammatory response has been suggested as a method to improve utilization of statin therapy, particularly in the primary prevention of vascular events. Thus, the observation in the current data that hs-CRP has a measurement stability similar to that of total cholesterol provides further evidence of the potential clinical utility of hs-CRP screening as a novel tool for vascular risk prediction (38).

Supported by NHLBI Grant R01-HL52745 (to Dr. Ockene).


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: CHD, coronary heart disease; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; SEASON, Seasonal Variation of Blood Cholesterol Study; and BMI, body mass index.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Danesh J, Whincup P, Walker M, Lennon L, Thomson A, Appleby P, et al. Low grade inflammation and coronary heart disease: prospective study and updated meta-analyses. BMJ 2000;321:199-204.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Ridker P, Cushman M, Stampfer M, Tracy R, Hennekens C. Inflammation, aspirin, the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997;336:973-979.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Ridker PM, Hennekens CH, Buring JE, Rifai N. C-Reactive protein and other markers of inflammation in the prediction of cardiovascular disease in women. N Engl J Med 2000;342:836-843.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Ridker PM, Buring JE, Shih J, Matias M, Hennekens CH. Prospective study of C-reactive protein and the risk of future cardiovascular events among apparently healthy women. Circulation 1998;98:731-733.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Tracy RP, Lemaitre RN, Psaty BM, Ives DG, Evans RW, Cushman M, et al. Relationship of C-reactive protein to risk of cardiovascular disease in the elderly. Results from the Cardiovascular Health Study and the Rural Health Promotion Project. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:1121-1127.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Harris TB, Ferrucci L, Tracy RP, Corti MC, Wacholder S, Ettinger WH, Jr, et al. Associations of elevated interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein levels with mortality in the elderly. Am J Med 1999;106:506-512.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Thompson SG, Kienast J, Pyke SD, Haverkate F, Van De Loo JC. Hemostatic factors and the risk of myocardial infarction or sudden death in patients with angina pectoris. European Concerted Action on Thrombosis and Disabilities Angina Pectoris Study Group. N Engl J Med 1995;332:635-641.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ridker PM, Glynn RJ, Hennekens CH. C-Reactive protein adds to the predictive value of total and HDL cholesterol in determining risk of first myocardial infarction. Circulation 1998;97:2007-2011.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lagrand WK, Visser CA, Hermens WT, Niessen HW, Verheugt FW, Wolbink GJ, Hack CE. C-Reactive protein as a cardiovascular risk factor: more than an epiphenomenon? [Review]. Circulation 1999;100:96-102.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Libby P, Ridker PM. Novel inflammatory markers of coronary risk: theory versus practice [Editorial; comment]. Circulation 1999;100:1148-1150.[Free Full Text]
  11. Kluft C, de Maat MP, Gevers Leuven JA, Potter van Loon BJ, Mohrschladt MF. Statins and C-reactive protein [Letter]. Lancet 1999;353:1274.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Strandberg TE, Van Hanen H, Tikkanen MJ. Effect of statins on C-reactive protein in patients with coronary artery disease [Letter]. Lancet 1999;353:118-119.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Gabay C, Kushner I. Acute-phase proteins and other systemic responses to inflammation. N Engl J Med 1999;340:448-454.[Free Full Text]
  14. Macy EM, Hayes TE, Tracy RP. Variability in the measurement of C-reactive protein in healthy subjects: implications for reference intervals and epidemiological applications. Clin Chem 1997;43:52-58.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Price CP, Calvin J, Walker SA, Trull A, Newman DJ, Gorman EG. A rapid and sensitive automated light scattering immunoassay for serum C-reactive protein and the definition of a reference range in healthy blood donors. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:109-113.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. Tracy RP, Psaty BM, Macy E, Bovill EG, Cushman M, Cornell ES, Kuller LH. Lifetime smoking exposure affects the association of C-reactive protein with cardiovascular disease risk factors and subclinical disease in healthy elderly subjects. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1997;17:2167-2176.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Spector TD, Hart DJ, Nandra D, Doyle DV, Mackillop N, Gallimore JR, Pepys M. Low-level increases in serum C-reactive protein are present in early osteoarthritis of the knee and predict progressive disease. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:723-727.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Yudkin JS, Stehouwer CD, Emeis JJ, Coppack SW. C-Reactive protein in healthy subjects: associations with obesity, insulin resistance, and endothelial dysfunction: a potential role for cytokines originating from adipose tissue?. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1999;19:972-978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Ridker PM, Rifai N, Pfeffer MA, Sacks F, Braunwald E. Long-term effects of pravastatin on plasma concentration of C-reactive protein. The Cholesterol and Recurrent Events (CARE) Investigators. Circulation 1999;100:230-235.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. de Maat MP, de Bart AC, Hennis BC, Meijer P, Havelaar AC, Mulder PG, Kluft C. Interindividual and intraindividual variability in plasma fibrinogen, TPA antigen, PAI activity, and CRP in healthy, young volunteers and patients with angina pectoris. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 1996;16:1156-1162.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Merriam PA, Ockene IS, Hebert JR, Rosal MC, Matthews CE. Seasonal variation of blood cholesterol levels: study methodology. J Biol Rhythms 1999;14:330-339.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Gwaltney JM, Jr, Hendley JO, Simon G, Jordan WS, Jr. Rhinovirus infections in an industrial population. I. The occurrence of illness. N Engl J Med 1966;275:1261-1268.
  23. Graham NM. The epidemiology of acute respiratory infections in children and adults: a global perspective. Epidemiol Rev 1990;12:149-178.[Free Full Text]
  24. Karge WH, Weiner EJ, Rogers EJ, Nicolosi RJ. Evaluation of cholesterol measurement with the Beckman System 700 analyzer in the Centers for Disease Control-National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute Lipid Standardization Program. Clin Chem 1989;35:1790-1791.[Free Full Text]
  25. Alain C, Poon L, Chan W. Enzymatic determination of total serum cholesterol. Clin Chem 1974;20:470-475.[Abstract]
  26. Bucolo G, David H. Quantitative determination of serum triglycerides by the use of enzymes. Clin Chem 1973;19:476-482.[Abstract]
  27. Warnick GR, Albers JJ. A comprehensive evaluation of the heparin-manganese precipitation procedure for estimating high density lipoprotein cholesterol. J Lipid Res 1978;19:65-76.[Abstract]
  28. Friedewald W, Levy R, Frederickson D. Estimation of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentration without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem 1972;18:499-502.[Abstract]
  29. Rifai N, Tracy R, Ridker P. Clinical efficacy of an automated high-sensitivity C-reactive protein assay. Clin Chem 1999;45:2136-2141.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Stata reference manual, Release 6.0, Vol. 2 H-O. College Station, TX: Stata Press, 1999:240–6..
  31. Woolson R. Statistical methods for analysis of biomedical data 1987:255-256 John Wiley & Sons New York. .
  32. Visser M, Bouter LM, McQuillan GM, Wener MH, Harris TB. Elevated C-reactive protein levels in overweight and obese adults. JAMA 1999;282:2131-2135.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Rohde LE, Hennekens CH, Ridker PM. Survey of C-reactive protein and cardiovascular risk factors in apparently healthy men. Am J Cardiol 1999;84:1018-1022.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  34. . Expert Panel on Detection, Evaluation, And Treatment Of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults. Summary of the second report of the National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) Expert Panel On Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment Of High Blood Cholesterol In Adults (Adult Treatment Panel II). JAMA 1993;269:3015-3023.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  35. Ridker PM. C-Reactive protein and risks of future myocardial infarction and thrombotic stroke [Editorial]. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1-3.[Free Full Text]
  36. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409-437.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  37. Kannel WB. Range of serum cholesterol values in the population developing coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1995;76:C69-C77.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  38. Ridker PM. Evaluating novel cardiovascular risk factors: can we better predict heart attacks?. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:933-937.[Abstract/Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
P. P. Cavicchia, S. E. Steck, T. G. Hurley, J. R. Hussey, Y. Ma, I. S. Ockene, and J. R. Hebert
A New Dietary Inflammatory Index Predicts Interval Changes in Serum High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein
J. Nutr., December 1, 2009; 139(12): 2365 - 2372.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
D. I. Buckley, R. Fu, M. Freeman, K. Rogers, and M. Helfand
C-Reactive Protein as a Risk Factor for Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force
Ann Intern Med, October 6, 2009; 151(7): 483 - 495.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
LupusHome page
M Nikpour, D. Gladman, D Ibanez, and M. Urowitz
Variability and correlates of high sensitivity C-reactive protein in systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus, October 1, 2009; 18(11): 966 - 973.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Psychosom. Med.Home page
R. E. Marioni, M. C. Stewart, G. D. Murray, I. J. Deary, F. G. R. Fowkes, G. D. O. Lowe, A. Rumley, and J. F. Price
Peripheral Levels of Fibrinogen, C-Reactive Protein, and Plasma Viscosity Predict Future Cognitive Decline in Individuals Without Dementia
Psychosom Med, October 1, 2009; 71(8): 901 - 906.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
D. J. A. Jenkins, J. M. W. Wong, C. W. C. Kendall, A. Esfahani, V. W. Y. Ng, T. C. K. Leong, D. A. Faulkner, E. Vidgen, K. A. Greaves, G. Paul, et al.
The Effect of a Plant-Based Low-Carbohydrate ("Eco-Atkins") Diet on Body Weight and Blood Lipid Concentrations in Hyperlipidemic Subjects
Arch Intern Med, June 8, 2009; 169(11): 1046 - 1054.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
T. W McDade, J. N Rutherford, L. Adair, and C. Kuzawa
Population differences in associations between C-reactive protein concentration and adiposity: comparison of young adults in the Philippines and the United States
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2009; 89(4): 1237 - 1245.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. E. Chiriboga, Y. Ma, W. Li, E. J. Stanek III, J. R. Hebert, P. A. Merriam, E. S. Rawson, and I. S. Ockene
Seasonal and Sex Variation of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein in Healthy Adults: A Longitudinal Study
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 313 - 321.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. Shemesh, K. G. Rowley, A. J. Jenkins, J. D. Best, and K. O'Dea
C-Reactive Protein Concentrations Are Very High and More Stable over Time Than the Traditional Vascular Risk Factors Total Cholesterol and Systolic Blood Pressure in an Australian Aboriginal Cohort
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 336 - 341.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. J. Glynn, J. G. MacFadyen, and P. M Ridker
Tracking of High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein after an Initially Elevated Concentration: The JUPITER Study
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 305 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. M Ridker
C-Reactive Protein: Eighty Years from Discovery to Emergence as a Major Risk Marker for Cardiovascular Disease
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2009; 55(2): 209 - 215.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Rheumatology (Oxford)Home page
C. D. Poole, P. Conway, and C. J. Currie
An evaluation of the association between C-reactive protein, the change in C-reactive protein over one year, and all-cause mortality in chronic immune-mediated inflammatory disease managed in UK general practice
Rheumatology, January 1, 2009; 48(1): 78 - 82.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Nutr.Home page
T. W. McDade, J. N. Rutherford, L. Adair, and C. Kuzawa
Adiposity and Pathogen Exposure Predict C-Reactive Protein in Filipino Women
J. Nutr., December 1, 2008; 138(12): 2442 - 2447.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Bio.Home page
P. Aukrust, B. Halvorsen, A. Yndestad, T. Ueland, E. Oie, K. Otterdal, L. Gullestad, and J. K. Damas
Chemokines and Cardiovascular Risk
Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol, November 1, 2008; 28(11): 1909 - 1919.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev.Home page
J. S. Johansen, T. Lottenburger, H. J. Nielsen, J. E. B. Jensen, M. N. Svendsen, G. Kollerup, and I. J. Christensen
Diurnal, Weekly, and Long-Time Variation in Serum Concentrations of YKL-40 in Healthy Subjects
Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev., October 1, 2008; 17(10): 2603 - 2608.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
C J Currie, C D Poole, and P Conway
Evaluation of the association between the first observation and the longitudinal change in C-reactive protein, and all-cause mortality
Heart, April 1, 2008; 94(4): 457 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. Khuseyinova, S. Greven, R. Ruckerl, G. Trischler, H. Loewel, A. Peters, and W. Koenig
Variability of Serial Lipoprotein-Associated Phospholipase A2 Measurements in Post Myocardial Infarction Patients: Results from the AIRGENE Study Center Augsburg
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2008; 54(1): 124 - 130.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
J. Dierkes, C. Weikert, K. Klipstein-Grobusch, S. Westphal, C. Luley, M. Mohlig, J. Spranger, and H. Boeing
Plasma pyridoxal-5-phosphate and future risk of myocardial infarction in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition Potsdam cohort
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, July 1, 2007; 86(1): 214 - 220.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JNCI J Natl Cancer InstHome page
S. M. Zhang, J. Lin, N. R. Cook, I-M. Lee, J. E. Manson, J. E. Buring, and P. M. Ridker
C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Breast Cancer
J Natl Cancer Inst, June 6, 2007; 99(11): 890 - 894.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
S. Kinlay
Low-Density Lipoprotein-Dependent and -Independent Effects of Cholesterol-Lowering Therapies on C-Reactive Protein: A Meta-Analysis
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., May 22, 2007; 49(20): 2003 - 2009.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch OphthalmolHome page
D. A. Schaumberg, W. G. Christen, J. E. Buring, R. J. Glynn, N. Rifai, and P. M. Ridker
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein, Other Markers of Inflammation, and the Incidence of Macular Degeneration in Women
Arch Ophthalmol, March 1, 2007; 125(3): 300 - 305.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Am. Coll. Nutr.Home page
L. Deutsch
Evaluation of the Effect of Neptune Krill Oil on Chronic Inflammation and Arthritic Symptoms
J. Am. Coll. Nutr., February 1, 2007; 26(1): 39 - 48.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
N. A. Shadick, N. R. Cook, E. W. Karlson, P. M Ridker, N. E. Maher, J. E. Manson, J. E. Buring, and I.-M. Lee
C-Reactive Protein in the Prediction of Rheumatoid Arthritis in Women
Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2490 - 2494.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
G. Schett, S. Kiechl, S. Weger, A. Pederiva, A. Mayr, M. Petrangeli, F. Oberhollenzer, R. Lorenzini, K. Redlich, R. Axmann, et al.
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Nontraumatic Fractures in the Bruneck Study
Arch Intern Med, December 11, 2006; 166(22): 2495 - 2501.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Respir JHome page
C. P. Hersh, D. T. Miller, D. J. Kwiatkowski, and E. K. Silverman
Genetic determinants of C-reactive protein in COPD
Eur. Respir. J., December 1, 2006; 28(6): 1156 - 1162.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
R. Schmidt, H. Schmidt, M. Pichler, C. Enzinger, K. Petrovic, K. Niederkorn, S. Horner, S. Ropele, N. Watzinger, M. Schumacher, et al.
C-Reactive Protein, Carotid Atherosclerosis, and Cerebral Small-Vessel Disease: Results of the Austrian Stroke Prevention Study
Stroke, December 1, 2006; 37(12): 2910 - 2916.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
C. Siemes, L. E. Visser, J.-W. W. Coebergh, T. A.W. Splinter, J. C.M. Witteman, A. G. Uitterlinden, A. Hofman, H. A.P. Pols, and B. H.Ch. Stricker
C-Reactive Protein Levels, Variation in the C-Reactive Protein Gene, and Cancer Risk: The Rotterdam Study
J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2006; 24(33): 5216 - 5222.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. J. Bos, C. M. A. Schipper, P. J. Koudstaal, J. C.M. Witteman, A. Hofman, and M. M.B. Breteler
High Serum C-Reactive Protein Level Is Not an Independent Predictor for Stroke: The Rotterdam Study
Circulation, October 10, 2006; 114(15): 1591 - 1598.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
I. Aeberli, L. Molinari, G. Spinas, R. Lehmann, D. l'Allemand, and M. B Zimmermann
Dietary intakes of fat and antioxidant vitamins are predictors of subclinical inflammation in overweight Swiss children.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, October 1, 2006; 84(4): 748 - 755.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
S F P Man, J E Connett, N R Anthonisen, R A Wise, D P Tashkin, and D D Sin
C-reactive protein and mortality in mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Thorax, October 1, 2006; 61(10): 849 - 853.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Montaner
Response to Letter by Topakian et al
Stroke, October 1, 2006; 37(10): 2455 - 2456.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Appl. Physiol.Home page
C. K. Roberts, D. Won, S. Pruthi, S. Kurtovic, R. K. Sindhu, N. D. Vaziri, and R. J. Barnard
Effect of a short-term diet and exercise intervention on oxidative stress, inflammation, MMP-9, and monocyte chemotactic activity in men with metabolic syndrome factors
J Appl Physiol, May 1, 2006; 100(5): 1657 - 1665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
Y. Ma, J. A Griffith, L. Chasan-Taber, B. C Olendzki, E. Jackson, E. J Stanek III, W. Li, S. L Pagoto, A. R Hafner, and I. S Ockene
Association between dietary fiber and serum C-reactive protein.
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2006; 83(4): 760 - 766.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Holvoet, E. Macy, M. Landeloos, D. Jones, J. S. Nancy, F. Van de Werf, and R. P. Tracy
Analytical Performance and Diagnostic Accuracy of Immunometric Assays for the Measurement of Circulating Oxidized LDL
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 760 - 764.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. Pagano, G. Soardo, C. Pilon, C. Milocco, L. Basan, G. Milan, D. Donnini, D. Faggian, M. Mussap, M. Plebani, et al.
Increased Serum Resistin in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Is Related to Liver Disease Severity and Not to Insulin Resistance
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2006; 91(3): 1081 - 1086.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes CareHome page
M. Soinio, J. Marniemi, M. Laakso, S. Lehto, and T. Ronnemaa
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein and Coronary Heart Disease Mortality in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes: A 7-year follow-up study
Diabetes Care, February 1, 2006; 29(2): 329 - 333.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANGIOLOGYHome page
J.-J. Li, C.-H. Fang, H.-Y. Qian, and W.-L. Hu
Time Course of Rapid C-Reactive Protein Reduction by Pravastatin in Patients with Stable Angina
Angiology, January 1, 2006; 57(1): 1 - 7.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
ThoraxHome page
V M Pinto-Plata, H Mullerova, J F Toso, M Feudjo-Tepie, J B Soriano, R S Vessey, and B R Celli
C-reactive protein in patients with COPD, control smokers and non-smokers
Thorax, January 1, 2006; 61(1): 23 - 28.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. W. F. Wilson, B.-H. Nam, M. Pencina, R. B. D'Agostino Sr, E. J. Benjamin, and C. J. O'Donnell
C-Reactive Protein and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease in Men and Women From the Framingham Heart Study
Arch Intern Med, November 28, 2005; 165(21): 2473 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Diabetes and Vascular Disease ResearchHome page
A. M Carter
Inflammation, thrombosis and acute coronary syndromes
Diabetes and Vascular Disease Research, October 1, 2005; 2(3): 113 - 121.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
A. Viardot, P. Huber, J. J. Puder, H. Zulewski, U. Keller, and B. Muller
Reproducibility of Nighttime Salivary Cortisol and Its Use in the Diagnosis of Hypercortisolism Compared with Urinary Free Cortisol and Overnight Dexamethasone Suppression Test
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., October 1, 2005; 90(10): 5730 - 5736.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Pathol.Home page
H. Sun, T. Koike, T. Ichikawa, K. Hatakeyama, M. Shiomi, B. Zhang, S. Kitajima, M. Morimoto, T. Watanabe, Y. Asada, et al.
C-Reactive Protein in Atherosclerotic Lesions: Its Origin and Pathophysiological Significance
Am. J. Pathol., October 1, 2005; 167(4): 1139 - 1148.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
L. W. Cho, V. Jayagopal, E. S. Kilpatrick, and S. L. Atkin
The Biological Variation of C-Reactive Protein in Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1905 - 1907.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
I. E. Widmer, J. J. Puder, C. Konig, H. Pargger, H. R. Zerkowski, J. Girard, and B. Muller
Cortisol Response in Relation to the Severity of Stress and Illness
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4579 - 4586.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Devaraj, G. O'Keefe, and I. Jialal
Defining the Proinflammatory Phenotype Using High Sensitive C-Reactive Protein Levels as the Biomarker
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., August 1, 2005; 90(8): 4549 - 4554.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
C. A. Blum, B. Muller, P. Huber, M. Kraenzlin, C. Schindler, C. De Geyter, U. Keller, and J. J. Puder
Low-Grade Inflammation and Estimates of Insulin Resistance during the Menstrual Cycle in Lean and Overweight Women
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2005; 90(6): 3230 - 3235.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
M. Di Napoli, M. Schwaninger, R. Cappelli, E. Ceccarelli, G. Di Gianfilippo, C. Donati, H. C.A. Emsley, S. Forconi, S. J. Hopkins, L. Masotti, et al.
Evaluation of C-Reactive Protein Measurement for Assessing the Risk and Prognosis in Ischemic Stroke: A Statement for Health Care Professionals From the CRP Pooling Project Members
Stroke, June 1, 2005; 36(6): 1316 - 1329.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. G. Dik, C. Jonker, C. E. Hack, J. H. Smit, H. C. Comijs, and P. Eikelenboom
Serum inflammatory proteins and cognitive decline in older persons
Neurology, April 26, 2005; 64(8): 1371 - 1377.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
J. Genius, T. Dong-Si, A. P. Grau, and C. Lichy
Postacute C-Reactive Protein Levels Are Elevated in Cervical Artery Dissection
Stroke, April 1, 2005; 36(4): e42 - e44.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ANN INTERN MEDHome page
S. M. Zhang, J. E. Buring, I-M. Lee, N. R. Cook, and P. M. Ridker
C-Reactive Protein Levels Are Not Associated with Increased Risk for Colorectal Cancer in Women
Ann Intern Med, March 15, 2005; 142(6): 425 - 432.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
P. Bogaty, J. M. Brophy, L. Boyer, S. Simard, L. Joseph, F. Bertrand, and G. R. Dagenais
Fluctuating Inflammatory Markers in Patients With Stable Ischemic Heart Disease
Arch Intern Med, January 24, 2005; 165(2): 221 - 226.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. L. Myers, N. Rifai, R. P. Tracy, W. L. Roberts, R. W. Alexander, L. M. Biasucci, J. D. Catravas, T. G. Cole, G. R. Cooper, B. V. Khan, et al.
CDC/AHA Workshop on Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: Report From the Laboratory Science Discussion Group
Circulation, December 21, 2004; 110(25): e545 - e549.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
R. Rej
Clinical Chemistry through Clinical Chemistry: A Journal Timeline
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2004; 50(12): 2415 - 2458.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur J Heart FailHome page
K. Sliwa, A. Woodiwiss, E. Libhaber, F. Zhanje, C. Libhaber, R. Motara, and R. Essop
C-reactive protein predicts response to pentoxifylline in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy
Eur J Heart Fail, October 1, 2004; 6(6): 731 - 734.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Lambert, E. E. Delvin, G. Paradis, J. O'Loughlin, J. A. Hanley, and E. Levy
C-Reactive Protein and Features of the Metabolic Syndrome in a Population-Based Sample of Children and Adolescents
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2004; 50(10): 1762 - 1768.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Clin. Nutr.Home page
C. Gillespie, C. Ballew, B. A Bowman, R. Donehoo, and M. K Serdula
Intraindividual variation in serum retinol concentrations among participants in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994
Am. J. Clinical Nutrition, April 1, 2004; 79(4): 625 - 632.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
J. Danesh, J. G. Wheeler, G. M. Hirschfield, S. Eda, G. Eiriksdottir, A. Rumley, G. D.O. Lowe, M. B. Pepys, and V. Gudnason
C-Reactive Protein and Other Circulating Markers of Inflammation in the Prediction of Coronary Heart Disease
N. Engl. J. Med., April 1, 2004; 350(14): 1387 - 1397.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
G. Tsirpanlis, P. Bagos, D. Ioannou, A. Bleta, I. Marinou, A. Lagouranis, S. Chatzipanagiotou, and C. Nicolaou
The variability and accurate assessment of microinflammation in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2004; 19(1): 150 - 157.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. J. MacGregor, J. R. Gallimore, T. D. Spector, and M. B. Pepys
Genetic Effects on Baseline Values of C-Reactive Protein and Serum Amyloid A Protein: A Comparison of Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2004; 50(1): 130 - 134.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
H. D. Sesso, J. E. Buring, N. Rifai, G. J. Blake, J. M. Gaziano, and P. M. Ridker
C-Reactive Protein and the Risk of Developing Hypertension
JAMA, December 10, 2003; 290(22): 2945 - 2951.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol.Home page
G. J. Blake and P. M. Ridker
C-reactive protein: a surrogate risk marker or mediator of atherothrombosis?
Am J Physiol Regulatory Integrative Comp Physiol, November 1, 2003; 285(5): R1250 - R1252.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am J EpidemiolHome page
W. Koenig, M. Sund, M. Frohlich, H. Lowel, W. L. Hutchinson, and M. B. Pepys
Refinement of the Association of Serum C-reactive Protein Concentration and Coronary Heart Disease Risk by Correction for Within-Subject Variation over Time: The MONICA Augsburg Studies, 1984 and 1987
Am. J. Epidemiol., August 15, 2003; 158(4): 357 - 364.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
T. B. Ledue and N. Rifai
Preanalytic and Analytic Sources of Variations in C-reactive Protein Measurement: Implications for Cardiovascular Disease Risk Assessment
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1258 - 1271.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. F. Carroll and D. S. Schade
Timing of Antioxidant Vitamin Ingestion Alters Postprandial Proatherogenic Serum Markers
Circulation, July 8, 2003; 108(1): 24 - 31.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CVIHome page
N. Aziz, J. L. Fahey, R. Detels, and A. W. Butch
Analytical Performance of a Highly Sensitive C-Reactive Protein-Based Immunoassay and the Effects of Laboratory Variables on Levels of Protein in Blood
Clin. Vaccine Immunol., July 1, 2003; 10(4): 652 - 657.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab.Home page
S. Davison and S. R. Davis
New Markers for Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Women: Impact of Endogenous Estrogen Status and Exogenous Postmenopausal Hormone Therapy
J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., June 1, 2003; 88(6): 2470 - 2478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M Ridker
Clinical Application of C-Reactive Protein for Cardiovascular Disease Detection and Prevention
Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 363 - 369.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
T. A. Pearson, G. A. Mensah, R. W. Alexander, J. L. Anderson, R. O. Cannon III, M. Criqui, Y. Y. Fadl, S. P. Fortmann, Y. Hong, G. L. Myers, et al.
Markers of Inflammation and Cardiovascular Disease: Application to Clinical and Public Health Practice: A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American Heart Association
Circulation, January 28, 2003; 107(3): 499 - 511.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Campbell, R. Flatman, T. Badrick, D. Kanowski, I. S. Ockene, C. E. Matthews, N. Rifai, P. M. Ridker, G. Reed, and E. Stanek
Problems with High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein * The authors of the article discussed in the above letter respond:
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2003; 49(1): 201 - 202.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
P. M. Ridker, N. Rifai, L. Rose, J. E. Buring, and N. R. Cook
Comparison of C-Reactive Protein and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Levels in the Prediction of First Cardiovascular Events
N. Engl. J. Med., November 14, 2002; 347(20): 1557 - 1565.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. D. Pradhan, J. E. Manson, J. E. Rossouw, D. S. Siscovick, C. P. Mouton, N. Rifai, R. B. Wallace, R. D. Jackson, M. B. Pettinger, and P. M Ridker
Inflammatory Biomarkers, Hormone Replacement Therapy, and Incident Coronary Heart Disease: Prospective Analysis From the Women's Health Initiative Observational Study
JAMA, August 28, 2002; 288(8): 980 - 987.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
D. L. Bhatt and E. J. Topol
Need to Test the Arterial Inflammation Hypothesis
Circulation, July 2, 2002; 106(1): 136 - 140.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
W.F. Riesen, H. Engler, M. Risch, W. Korte, and G. Noseda
Short-term effects of atorvastatin on C-reactive protein
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2002; 23(10): 794 - 799.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch Intern MedHome page
I. Kushner and A. R. Sehgal
Is High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein an Effective Screening Test for Cardiovascular Risk?
Arch Intern Med, April 22, 2002; 162(8): 867 - 869.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Cardiovasc ResHome page
M. A Vickers, F. R Green, C. Terry, B. M Mayosi, C. Julier, M. Lathrop, P. J Ratcliffe, H. C Watkins, and B. Keavney
Genotype at a promoter polymorphism of the interleukin-6 gene is associated with baseline levels of plasma C-reactive protein
Cardiovasc Res, March 1, 2002; 53(4): 1029 - 1034.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Rothkrantz-Kos, M. P.J. Schmitz, O. Bekers, P. P.C.A. Menheere, and M. P. van Dieijen-Visser
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein Methods Examined
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2002; 48(2): 359 - 362.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Circ. Res.Home page
G. J. Blake and P. M. Ridker
Novel Clinical Markers of Vascular Wall Inflammation
Circ. Res., October 26, 2001; 89(9): 763 - 771.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JAMAHome page
A. D. Pradhan, J. E. Manson, N. Rifai, J. E. Buring, and P. M. Ridker
C-Reactive Protein, Interleukin 6, and Risk of Developing Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
JAMA, July 18, 2001; 286(3): 327 - 334.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
P. M. Ridker
High-Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein : Potential Adjunct for Global Risk Assessment in the Primary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease
Circulation, April 3, 2001; 103(13): 1813 - 1818.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (176)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ockene, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stanek, E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ockene, I. S.
Right arrow Articles by Stanek, E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Laboratory Management
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS