Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 47: 464-470, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (97)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:464-470.)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Articles

Characteristics of an Albumin Cobalt Binding Test for Assessment of Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients: A Multicenter Study

Robert H. Christenson1,2,a, Show Hong Duh1, Wendy R. Sanhai1, Alan H.B. Wu3, Verena Holtman3, Pennell Painter4, Elizabeth Branham4, Fred S. Apple5, MaryAnn Murakami5 and Deborah L. Morris6

1 Departments of Pathology and
2 Medical and Research Technology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21201.

3 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford CT 06102.

4 University of Tennessee Medical Center at Knoxville, Dynacare-Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37920.

5 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Hennepin County Medical Center and University of Minnesota School of Medicine, Minneapolis, MN 55415.

6 Ischemia Technologies, Denver, CO 80221.
a Address correspondence to this author at: Clinical Pathology, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 South Greene St., Baltimore, MD 21201. Fax 410-328-5880; e-mail rchriste{at}umaryland.edu.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: The ability of the N-terminal region of human albumin to bind cobalt is diminished by myocardial ischemia. The characteristics of an assay based on albumin cobalt binding were assessed in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients and in a control reference population. The ability of the Albumin Cobalt Binding (ACBTM) Test measurement at presentation to predict troponin-positive or -negative results 6–24 h later was also examined.

Methods: We enrolled 256 acute coronary syndrome patients at four medical centers. Blood specimens were collected at presentation and then 6–24 h later. The dichotomous decision limit and performance characteristics of the ACB Test for predicting troponin-positive or -negative status 6 h-24 h later were determined using ROC curve analysis. Results for 32 patients could not be used because the time of onset of ischemia appeared to have been >3 h before presentation or was uncertain. The reference interval was determined by parametric analysis to estimate the upper 95th percentile of a reference population (n = 109) of ostensibly healthy individuals.

Results: Increased cTnI was found in 35 of 224 patients. The ROC curve area for the ACB Test was 0.78 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.70–0.86]. At the optimum decision point of 75 units/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of the ACB Test were 83% (95% CI, 66–93%) and 69% (95% CI, 62–76%). The negative predictive value was 96% (95% CI, 91–98%), and the positive predictive value was 33% (95% CI, 24–44%). The within-run CV of the ACB Test was 7.3%. Results for the reference population were normally distributed; the one-sided parametric 95th percentile was 80.2 units/mL.

Conclusions: This exploratory study suggests that the ACB Test has high negative predictive value and sensitivity in the presentation sample for predicting troponin-negative or -positive results 6–24 h later.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Acute coronary syndromes represent a continuum of disease ranging from unstable angina, associated with reversible myocardial cell injury, to frank ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI)1 with large areas of necrosis. The common pathophysiological feature of the acute coronary syndrome spectrum is instability and disruption of atherosclerotic plaques in coronary arteries. Although clinical presentation and the electrocardiogram are critically important components for diagnosis and management of the acute coronary syndrome patient (1), biochemical markers, including myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB, and particularly cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and T (cTnT), play a fundamental role in the diagnosis, monitoring, risk stratification, and therapeutic management of these patients (2)(3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8).

The release of currently used myocardial markers into the circulation is believed to require tissue necrosis, whereas the assessment of cardiac ischemia before or in the absence of cell death is frequently an important component of clinical decision-making in the suspected acute coronary syndrome patient (1). The diagnostic performance of commonly used ischemia/coronary artery disease tests must be viewed as imperfect. For example, serial or continuous monitoring electrocardiogram recordings often are used to detect evolving changes of ischemia at rest (1), but the diagnostic benefit has not been confirmed, nor have large randomized studies in appropriate clinical settings been performed. Rest photon emission computed tomography has been reported as a safe and effective tool for assessing acute ischemia (9), but its sensitivity is limited by the requirement that the contrast agent be injected during active chest pain (1). With regard to biochemical markers of ischemia, initial data for glycogen phosphorylase-BB were encouraging (10), but these results have not been confirmed. A sensitive biochemical marker of ischemia would be clinically useful (2)(11)(12), and currently no such marker exists.

Recently, a novel biochemical test has been developed based on the binding between serum albumin and the transition metal cobalt. This test, termed the Albumin Cobalt Binding (ACBTM) Test (Ischemia Technologies, Inc., Denver, CO) is based on observations that the binding of Co(II) is reduced in serum from acute coronary syndrome patients (13)(14). This decreased binding reflects changes to the NH2 terminus of albumin, the binding site for the transition metals Co(II), Cu(II), and Ni(II) (13)(14)(15). Conditions that can alter albumin’s N-terminal region, and therefore albumin cobalt binding, can occur within minutes of an ischemic event via induced endothelial and extracellular hypoxia, acidosis, free radical injury, and sodium and calcium pump disruptions (16)(17)(18)(19). This effect on albumin could be detectable up to 6 h after the ischemic event (16)(17)(18)(19). The ACB Test may be a very early indicator of myocardial ischemia before necrosis.

The main objective of this study was to describe the performance characteristics of the ACB Test in suspected acute coronary syndrome patients who presented to a medical institution early after the onset of ischemic events. There is no "gold standard" for accurately assessing myocardial ischemia; therefore, we used cTnI in samples collected 6–24 h later in the course of care as a surrogate for cardiac ischemia at presentation. Using this strategy, we examined the ability of the ACB Test result for samples collected at presentation to predict a cardiac troponin-positive result in the subsequent 6–24 h timeframe, which reflects myocardial injury caused by ischemia, or a cardiac troponin-negative outcome 6–12 h after presentation.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This multicenter study was performed at the four independent sites listed in Table 1 . The protocol for this study was approved by each site’s local Institutional Review Board.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Centers participating in the study and associated data.

reference control subjects
A single serum or plasma specimen collected from 109 apparently healthy individuals (55 men and 54 women; age range, 20–85 years) was utilized to determine the 95th percentile of a control reference population for the ACB Test.

study subjects
As indicated in Fig. 1 , 256 patients were recruited for this study in the 5-month period between January and June 2000. All patients arrived at the Emergency Department at participating centers within 3 h of clinical signs and symptoms of acute coronary syndrome, as determined by medical record review. All enrolled patients had blood collected within 1 h of arrival, hereafter referred to as "presentation", and at least one other specimen collected between 6 and 24 h later. The ACB Test and a cTnI assay were performed for each presentation sample; all enrolled patients had a negative cTnI result for this early sample, as classified by the cutoffs listed in Table 1Up . cTnI testing was also performed for all samples from the 6–24 h timeframe.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Flow chart for categorization of patients enrolled in this study.

*, Eight patients were excluded because MI may have occurred >3 h before presentation, as indicated by increased values of other biochemical markers, including myoglobin and/or cTnT. Sixteen other patients were excluded because of uncertainty caused by inconsistencies between their cTnI results and other biochemical marker data in the 6–24 h timeframe.

The design of this study required knowledge of the timeframe and nature of acute cardiac ischemia with as much confidence as possible. For this reason, 32 of the 256 patients enrolled were excluded from analysis because of uncertainties surrounding their clinical event. Of these 32 patients, 8 were excluded because MI may have occurred >3 h before presentation, as indicated by increased values of other biochemical markers, including myoglobin and/or cTnT at the time of admission. Sixteen other patients were excluded because of uncertainty in that their cTnI results did not match other biochemical marker data in the 6–24 h timeframe. In the remaining 8 of these 32 patients (Fig. 1Up ), ACB Test results were negative at presentation, but cTnI results were positive 12–24 h later. Categorization was indeterminate because no specimen was available in the 6–12 h timeframe to determine whether ischemia and MI had occurred by the time of presentation, in which case the negative ACB Test would be classified as falsely negative, or at a time after presentation, in which case the negative ACB Test result would be classified as a true negative. The study population comprised the remaining 224 patients included in data analysis.

specimen collection
Blood was collected in red-top or green-top Vacutainer Tubes, containing no anticoagulant or containing lithium heparin, respectively. Specimens were routinely centrifuged within 2 h of collection for 10 min at 1000g, and serum or heparinized plasma was harvested. Specimens were stored at 2–8 °C for a maximum of 2 weeks; if a delay in testing was anticipated, samples were frozen at -20 °C or colder within 96 h. Frozen samples were mixed thoroughly after thawing and recentrifuged before analysis. Specimens handled in this way showed no significant loss of recovery (data on file). Repeat freeze-thaw cycles were avoided.

cTnI assays
The assays used at individual sites are listed in Table 1Up . The characteristics of the Abbott AxSYM cTnI system (Abbott Diagnostics Inc., Abbott Park, IL) (20), the Dimension RxL cTnI system (Dade-Behring, Inc, Glasgow, DE) (21), and the Vitros ECi cTnI (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, Raritan, NJ) (22) have been reported previously. The typical imprecision (CV) of each troponin assay was <8% at the cutoffs listed in Table 1Up .

Patients were considered troponin positive if any sample collected during the 6–24 h period exceeded the institutional cutoff listed in Table 1Up .

sample preparation for the acb test
Serum or heparinized plasma (500 µL) was added to a centrifuge tube containing 0.45 g of CaCl2. Without premixing, the sample and CaCl2 were centrifuged for 10 min at 1000–1200g. After centrifugation, 300 µL of the resulting supernatant was transferred to a COBAS MIRA or FARA sample cup (Roche Diagnostics), taking care not to resuspend the CaCl2. This pretreatment procedure was performed to remove chelators used as preservatives that might be present in samples from patients receiving intravenous medications.

acb test
All measurements were performed using either the COBAS MIRA or FARA instrument systems (Roche Diagnostics); Table 1Up lists the instrument system used at each site. Maintenance and operation of instruments were performed in accordance with the manufacturer’s specifications.

In the ACB Test method, 95 µL of a patient’s sample and 5 µL of Co(II), in the form of cobalt chloride, are incubated in the instrument cuvette for 5 min. During incubation, the Co(II) (final concentration, 0.58 mmol/L) binds to the NH2 terminus of unaltered albumin in the sample; albumin for which the NH2 terminus is altered as a result of ischemic processes binds the added Co(II) to a far lesser extent (13)(14). After incubation, 25 µL of dithiothreitol is added to the mixture. Dithiothreitol (final concentration, 1.67 mmol/L) forms a colored complex with Co(II) that is not bound at the NH2 terminus of albumin, and this complex can be measured spectrophotometrically at 500 nm. The ACB Test results were obtained from a calibration curve produced using five calibrators with assigned ACB Test values of 6–186 units/mL. The ACB Test was designed so that all samples are measured in duplicate, with the higher reading being the result of the assay.

reproducibility
The imprecision (CV) of the ACB Test was calculated from the duplicate results for each sample at each test site.

categorization criteria of the acb test results
A flow chart showing the categorization of patients in the study is shown in Fig. 1Up . If the ACB Test was equal to or above the cutoff from ROC curve analysis, then the result was positive; otherwise the test result was negative. True-positive results occurred when the ACB Test was positive and the cTnI result for the subsequent 6–24 h sample(s) was also positive. A true-negative result occurred when the ACB Test was negative and the cTnI result was also negative for the next sample(s) collected within the subsequent 6 to 12 h. A false-positive result occurred when the ACB Test was positive but the cTnI results for samples collected in the subsequent 6–24 h were negative. A false-negative result occurred when the ACB Test was negative and the cTnI result within the subsequent 6–12 h was positive.

statistical methods
ROC curve analysis and calculation of the area under the curve was done for the ACB Test in the 224 patients included in the study population according to the method of Hanley and McNeil (23). The optimum cutoff for the ACB Test was selected from the ROC analysis to minimize the number of false-positive and false-negative results in this study population. This optimum cutoff was used to dichotomously classify each patient as ACB Test positive or ACB Test negative. Diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to determine the ability of the dichotomous ACB Test value at presentation to predict a later positive or negative troponin value at 6–24 h after presentation. The exact 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using binomial distribution statistics. Goodness of fit to a gaussian distribution for the ACB Test results for the control reference population was evaluated using the {chi}2 method. The upper 95th percentile ACB Test value for apparently healthy individuals was calculated using parametric statistics. The Wilcoxon rank test was used to compare the ACB Test values between the cTnI-positive and cTnI-negative patients. P <0.05 was considered significant.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The numbers of suspected acute coronary syndrome and healthy control subjects enrolled at each site are shown in Table 1Up . Table 1Up also shows that the CVs for the ACB Test at each site were similar (mean CV, 7.3%; range, 6.0–8.7%).

The ACB Test values for the control reference population are shown in Fig. 2 . These data were normally distributed ({chi}2 = 0.693; P = 0.9946). Values for the control reference population (n = 109) were 25.7–84.5 units/mL (mean, 58.7 units/mL; median, 59.5 units/mL). The upper 95th percentile was 80.2 units/mL.



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Distribution of ACB Test values for the control reference population (n = 109).

The baseline characteristics of the enrolled and excluded subjects are displayed in Table 2 . ACB Test results for the 224 acute coronary syndrome patients are shown in Fig. 3 . The top panel of Fig. 3 displays the distribution of the ACB Test results that were used to plot the ROC curve shown in the bottom panel of Fig. 3 . Differences in the ACB Test results between the cTnI-positive and -negative patients (Fig. 3 , top panel) were highly significant (P <0.00001). The area under the ROC curve (Fig. 3 , bottom panel) was 0.78 (95% CI, 0.70–0.86). The optimum decision point for the ACB Test was determined to be 75 units/mL, and this decision limit was used in subsequent analyses.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Demographic characteristics of enrolled patients.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Distribution of ACB Test results at patient presentation (top) and ROC curve for predictive ability of the ACB Test (bottom).

(Top), distribution of ACB Test results at patient presentation for the troponin-positive and -negative groups 6–24 h after presentation. The difference between the two groups was significant (P <0.00001). (Bottom), ROC curve for the ability of the ACB Test result for samples collected at patient presentation to predict troponin-positive or -negative results at 6–24 h.

ACB Test data for the 32 patients excluded from this study are displayed in Fig. 4 . These data were not analyzed because of issues described in Materials and Methods.



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 4. ACB Test data for the 32 patients excluded from the study.

Eight patients were excluded because MI may have occurred >3 h before presentation. Sixteen patients were excluded because their cTnI results did not match other biochemical marker data in the 6–24 h timeframe. Eight patients were excluded who had negative ACB Test results at presentation but no cTnI data available in the 6–12 h timeframe.

Categorization of the 224 patients is summarized in Fig. 1Up . Table 3 displays truth tables for the ACB Test using a cutoff of >=75 units/mL. The data shown yielded a sensitivity for the ACB Test of 83% (95% CI, 66–93%), a specificity of 69% (95% CI, 62–76%), a PPV of 33% (95% CI, 24–44%), and a NPV of 96% (95% CI, 91–98%).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 3. Truth table for the ability of the ACB Test result at patient presentation to predict troponin-positive or -negative results at 6–24 h after presentation.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
This report is the first to demonstrate that ACB Test results for samples collected at the time of presentation at the Emergency Department may be an early predictor of cTnT-positive or -negative results 6–24 h later in acute coronary syndrome patients. This early prediction would be significant, particularly given the knowledge that troponin status can be utilized for reliable risk stratification (5)(21) and may be useful for therapeutic guidance with inhibitors of the platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor (6)(7) or with low-molecular weight heparin (8).

ROC curve analysis of the ACB Test results for suspected acute coronary syndrome patients, all of whom were initially troponin negative at presentation and either troponin negative or positive at 6–24 h after presentation, was used to determine the optimum decision limit. At the optimum cutoff, the sensitivity and specificity were 70–80%, and the NPV was high at 96% (95% CI, 91–98%). The 75 units/mL optimum cutoff for the ACB Test derived from ROC curve analysis was lower than the 80.2 units/mL value representing the upper 95th percentile of the control reference population included in this study. Although the difference between the cTnI-positive and -negative groups was highly significant, the ACB Test values between the groups overlapped (Fig. 3Up , top panel). Use of an ACB Test cutoff of 75 units/mL was a balance between maximizing sensitivity and the tradeoff of increasing false-positive results. This lowered diagnostic specificity (69%) and the PPV (33%). Overlap between high-risk (disease) and control reference (non-disease) populations is not ideal but is also seen with numerous useful diagnostic laboratory tests, including total cholesterol, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, and total creatine kinase. Additional research is needed to determine the meaning of positive ACB Test results.

As with any new marker, there were several issues and limitations that require additional research. One caveat is that the diagnostic performance must be viewed as preliminary because it was derived from the same study population that was used to determine the optimum ACB Test decision limit and for calculating diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV. These diagnostic parameters need to be confirmed in another group of acute coronary syndrome patients. A second issue is related to the fact that no reference standard for cardiac ischemia currently exists. For this reason, troponin-positive or -negative results 6–24 h after ACB Test performance was the surrogate outcome used for classification. This use of troponin required that the timeframe of acute cardiac ischemia be known with as much confidence as possible, necessitating exclusion of 12.5% of enrolled patients because of uncertainties in their clinical course. A third issue is that unlike troponin, ACB Test measurements do not indicate necrosis; rather, ACB measurements reflect modifications in the NH2 terminus of albumin produced by extracellular hypoxia, acidosis, free radical injury, and sodium and calcium pump disruptions (16)(17)(18)(19). Therefore, ischemia in the absence of necrosis may cause bias toward apparent false-positive ACB data by yielding a positive ACB Test result associated with a negative cTnI. Studies comparing the ACB Test with technologies such as rest and stress nuclear imaging may provide additional interpretive insight.

If these performance characteristics are confirmed, the high NPV of the ACB Test could allow clinicians to more safely and cost-effectively identify low-risk patients at the time of presentation at the Emergency Department. In this way, the ACB Test could have large impact for the estimated 8 million patients who present annually with symptoms suspicious for acute coronary syndromes (1). The ACB test could bring a new dimension to the care of acute coronary syndrome patients and would add substantially to troponin measurements, which have low diagnostic sensitivity (30–50%) in the first hours after presentation (24)(25). This early benefit of the ACB Test is important because the REACT study showed that the median time from onset of symptoms to presentation was only 2.0 h for acute coronary syndrome patients, with only 25% of patients delaying presentation longer than 5.2 h (26). The high sensitivity and NPV demonstrated by ACB Test results for samples collected at the time of presentation at the Emergency Department may substantially reduce delays in patient disposition from the 6–24 h required for reliable troponin-negative classification. Provided that the high NPV can be confirmed, the ACB Test could have an important role, either alone or in combination with markers of necrosis, in greatly reducing the inappropriate admission of low-risk patients.


   Acknowledgments
 
This study was sponsored in part by Ischemia Technologies, Inc., Denver, CO. Dr. Christenson is a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for Ischemia Technologies.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; cTnI, cardiac troponin I; cTnT, cardiac troponin T; ACB, albumin cobalt binding; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value; and CI, confidence interval.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Storrow AB, Gibler WB. Chest pain centers: diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes. Ann Emerg Med 2000;35:449-461.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Christenson RH, Azzazy HME. Biochemical markers of the acute coronary syndromes. Clin Chem 1998;44:1855-1864.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Keffer JH. Myocardial markers of injury evolution and insights. Am J Clin Pathol 1996;105:305-320.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Christenson RH, Ohman EM, Topol EJ, O’Hanesian MA, Sigmon KN, Duh SH, et al. Combining myoglobin, creatine kinase-MB and clinical variables for assessing coronary reperfusion after thrombolytic therapy. Circulation 1997;96:1776-1782.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Newby LK, Christenson RH, Ohman EM, Armstrong PW, Thompson TD, Lee KL, et al. Value of serial troponin T measures for early and late risk stratification in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Circulation 1998;98:1853-1859.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Hamm CW, Heeschen C, Goldmann B, Vahanian A, Adgey J, Migues CM, et al. Benefit of aciximab in patients with refractory unstable angina in relation to serum troponin T levels. N Engl J Med 1999;340:1623-1629.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Heeschen C, Hamm CW, Goldmann B, Deu A, Langenbrink L, White HD. Troponin concentration for stratification of patients with acute coronary syndromes in relation to therapeutic efficacy of tirofiban. Lancet 1999;354:1757-1762.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Lindahl B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Troponin T identifies patients with unstable coronary artery disease who benefit from long-term antithrombotic protection. J Am Coll Cardiol 1997;29:43-48.[Abstract]
  9. Tatum JL, Jesse RL, Kontos MC, Nicholson CS, Schmidt KL, Roberts CS, Ornato JP. Comprehensive strategy for the evaluation and triage of the chest pain patient. Ann Emerg Med 1997;29:116-125.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Rabitzsch G, Mair J, Lechleitner P, Noll F, Hofmann U, Krause E, et al. Immunoenzymometric assay of human glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB in diagnosis of ischemic myocardial injury. Clin Chem 1995;41:966-978.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Zalenski RJ, McCarren M, Roberts R, Rydman RJ, Jovanovic B, Das K, et al. An evaluation of chest pain diagnostic protocol to exclude acute cardiac ischemia in the emergency department. Arch Intern Med 1997;157:1085-1091.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Karagounis LA, Muhlestein JB, Mooers FB. An emergency medicine based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense. Results of a randomized study (ROMIO). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28:25-33.[Abstract]
  13. Bar-Or D, Lau E, Rao N, Bampos N, Winkler JV, Curtis CG. Reduction in the cobalt binding capacity of human albumin with myocardial ischemia [Abstract]. Ann Emerg Med 1999;34:S56.
  14. Bar-Or D, Lau E, Winkler JV. A novel assay for cobalt-albumin binding and its potential as a marker for myocardial ischemia—a preliminary report. J Emerg Med 2000;19:311-315.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Chan B, Dodsworth N, Woodrow J, Tucker A, Harris R. Site-specific N-terminal auto-degradation of human serum albumin. Eur J Biochem 1995;227:524-528.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  16. McCord J. Oxygen-derived free radicals in post ischemic tissue injury. N Engl J Med 1985;312:159-163.[Abstract]
  17. Cobbe SM, Poole-Wilson PA. The time of onset and severity of acidosis in the myocardial ischemia. J Mol Cell Biol 1980;12:745-760.
  18. Berenshtein E, Mayer B, Goldberg C, Kitrossky N, Chevion M. Patterns of mobilization of copper and iron following myocardial ischemia: possible predictive criteria for tissue injury. J Mol Cell Cardiol 1997;29:3025-3034.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Reimer KA, Lowe JE, Rasmussen MM, Jennings RB. The wavefront phenomenon of ischemic cell death. 1. Myocardial infarct size vs. duration of coronary occlusion in dogs. Circulation 1977;56:786-793.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  20. Apple FS, Maturen AJ, Mullins RE, Painter PC, Pessin-Minsley MS, Webster RA. Multicenter clinical and analytical evaluation of the AxSYM troponin-I immunoassay to assist in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1999;45:206-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Tanasijevic MJ, Wybenga DR, de Lemos JA, Antman EM. Clinical efficacy of three assays for cardiac troponin I for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 11B Substudy. Clin Chem 2000;46:453-460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Apple F, Koplen B, Murakami M. Clinical and analytical evaluation of the Vitros Immunodiagnostics Products Troponin I assay for detection of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 2000;46:A83.
  23. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Mair J, Morandell D, Genser N, Lechleitner P, Dienstl F, Puschendorf M. Equivalent early sensitivities of myoglobin, creatine kinase MB mass, creatine kinase isoform ratios and cardiac troponins I and T for acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1995;41:1266-1272.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Antman EM, Grudzien C, Sacks DB. Evaluation of a rapid bedside assay for detection of serum cardiac troponin T. JAMA 1995;273:1279-1282.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Goff DC, Feldman HA, McGovern PG, Goldberg RJ, Simons-Morton DG, Cornell CE, et al. Prehospital delay in patients hospitalized with heart attack symptoms in the United States: the REACT trial. Am Heart J 1999;138:1046-1057.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Ann Clin BiochemHome page
E. Sbarouni, P. Georgiadou, M. Koutelou, I. Sklavainas, D. Panagiotakos, and V. Voudris
Ischaemia-modified albumin in dilated cardiomyopathy
Ann Clin Biochem, May 1, 2009; 46(3): 241 - 243.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Mol. Cell. ProteomicsHome page
A. V. G. Edwards, M. Y. White, and S. J. Cordwell
The Role of Proteomics in Clinical Cardiovascular Biomarker Discovery
Mol. Cell. Proteomics, October 1, 2008; 7(10): 1824 - 1837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Clin. Pathol.Home page
P O Collinson and D C Gaze
Ischaemia-modified albumin: clinical utility and pitfalls in measurement
J. Clin. Pathol., September 1, 2008; 61(9): 1025 - 1028.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
S. S. Talwalkar, M. Bon-Homme, J. J. Miller, and R. J. Elin
Ischemia Modified Albumin, a Marker of Acute Ischemic Events: A Pilot Study
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., January 1, 2008; 38(2): 132 - 137.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, D. A. Morrow, C. P. Cannon, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, J. Ravkilde, A. B. Storrow, A. H.B. Wu, and R. H. Christenson
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Circulation, April 3, 2007; 115(13): e356 - e375.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
NACB WRITING GROUP MEMBERS, D. A. Morrow, C. P. Cannon, R. L. Jesse, L. K. Newby, J. Ravkilde, A. B. Storrow, A. H.B. Wu, R. H. Christenson, NACB COMMITTEE MEMBERS, et al.
National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines: Clinical Characteristics and Utilization of Biochemical Markers in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 552 - 574.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
EuropaceHome page
E. Sbarouni, P. Georgiadou, D. Panagiotakos, E. G. Livanis, G. N. Theodorakis, and D. Th. Kremastinos
Ischaemia modified albumin in radiofrequency catheter ablation
Europace, February 1, 2007; 9(2): 127 - 129.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. Sbarouni, P. Georgiadou, G. N. Theodorakis, and D. Th. Kremastinos
Ischemia-Modified Albumin in Relation to Exercise Stress Testing
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., December 19, 2006; 48(12): 2482 - 2484.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M Can, S Demirtas, O Polat, and A Yildiz
Evaluation of effects of ischaemia on the albumin cobalt binding (ACB) assay in patients exposed to trauma.
Emerg. Med. J., July 1, 2006; 23(7): 537 - 539.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Exp PhysiolHome page
N. Middleton, R. Shave, K. George, G. Whyte, J. Forster, D. Oxborough, D. Gaze, and P. Collinson
Novel application of flow propagation velocity and ischaemia-modified albumin in analysis of postexercise cardiac function in man
Exp Physiol, May 1, 2006; 91(3): 511 - 519.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
P O Collinson, D C Gaze, K Bainbridge, F Morris, B Morris, A Price, and S Goodacre
Utility of admission cardiac troponin and "Ischemia Modified Albumin" measurements for rapid evaluation and rule out of suspected acute myocardial infarction in the emergency department.
Emerg. Med. J., April 1, 2006; 23(4): 256 - 261.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. M. Mitchell, M. D. Brown, I. B.A. Menown, and J. A. Kline
Novel Protein Markers of Acute Coronary Syndrome Complications in Low-Risk Outpatients: A Systematic Review of Potential Use in the Emergency Department
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2005; 51(11): 2005 - 2012.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. M. van der Zee, H. J. Verberne, J. P. van Straalen, G. T.B. Sanders, B. L.F. Van Eck-Smit, R. J. de Winter, and J. C. Fischer
Ischemia-Modified Albumin Measurements in Symptom-Limited Exercise Myocardial Perfusion Scintigraphy Reflect Serum Albumin Concentrations but Not Myocardial Ischemia
Clin. Chem., September 1, 2005; 51(9): 1744 - 1746.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CMAJHome page
A. Worster, P.J. Devereaux, D. Heels-Ansdell, G. H. Guyatt, J. Opie, F. Mookadam, and S. A. Hill
Capability of ischemia-modified albumin to predict serious cardiac outcomes in the short term among patients with potential acute coronary syndrome
Can. Med. Assoc. J., June 21, 2005; 172(13): 1685 - 1690.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. S. Apple, A. H.B. Wu, J. Mair, J. Ravkilde, M. Panteghini, J. Tate, F. Pagani, R. H. Christenson, M. Mockel, O. Danne, et al.
Future Biomarkers for Detection of Ischemia and Risk Stratification in Acute Coronary Syndrome
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 810 - 824.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. Borderie, Y. Allanore, C. Meune, J. Y. Devaux, O. G. Ekindjian, and A. Kahan
High Ischemia-Modified Albumin Concentration Reflects Oxidative Stress But Not Myocardial Involvement in Systemic Sclerosis
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2004; 50(11): 2190 - 2193.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
M. Panteghini
Role and importance of biochemical markers in clinical cardiology
Eur. Heart J., July 2, 2004; 25(14): 1187 - 1196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
E. Zapico-Muniz, M. Santalo-Bel, J. Merce-Muntanola, J. A. Montiel, A. Martinez-Rubio, and J. Ordonez-Llanos
Ischemia-Modified Albumin during Skeletal Muscle Ischemia
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2004; 50(6): 1063 - 1065.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
B. Lumbreras-Lacarra, J. M. Ramos-Rincon, and I. Hernandez-Aguado
Methodology in Diagnostic Laboratory Test Research in Clinical Chemistry and Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 530 - 536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Emerg. Med. J.Home page
M K Sinha, D Roy, D C Gaze, P O Collinson, and J-C Kaski
Role of "Ischemia Modified Albumin", a new biochemical marker of myocardial ischaemia, in the early diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes
Emerg. Med. J., January 1, 2004; 21(1): 29 - 34.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
M. K. Sinha, D. C. Gaze, J. R. Tippins, P. O. Collinson, and J. C. Kaski
Ischemia Modified Albumin Is a Sensitive Marker of Myocardial Ischemia After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Circulation, May 20, 2003; 107(19): 2403 - 2405.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. A. Morrow, J. A. de Lemos, M. S. Sabatine, and E. M. Antman
The Search for a Biomarker of Cardiac Ischemia
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2003; 49(4): 537 - 539.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
N. V. Bhagavan, E. M. Lai, P. A. Rios, J. Yang, A. M. Ortega-Lopez, H. Shinoda, S. A.A. Honda, C. N. Rios, C. E. Sugiyama, and C.-E. Ha
Evaluation of Human Serum Albumin Cobalt Binding Assay for the Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia and Myocardial Infarction
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2003; 49(4): 581 - 585.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. S. Apple, H. E. Quist, A. P. Otto, W. E. Mathews, and M. M. Murakami
Release Characteristics of Cardiac Biomarkers and Ischemia-modified Albumin as Measured by the Albumin Cobalt-binding Test after a Marathon Race
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2002; 48(7): 1097 - 1100.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (97)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, D. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Christenson, R. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morris, D. L.
Related Collections
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS