Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Erratum for Melnyk et al., Clin Chem 46 (2) 265-272.
Clinical Chemistry 47: 612-a, 2001;
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melnyk, S.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Melnyk, S.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. J.
(Clinical Chemistry. 2001;47:612-612 .)
© 2001 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Erratum

Measurement of Plasma and Intracellular S–Adenosylmethionine and S–Adenosylhomocysteine Utilizing Coulometric Electrochemical Detection: Alterations with Plasma Homocysteine and Pyridoxal 5'–Phosphate. Concentrations

Stepan Melnyk, Marta Pogribna, Igor P. Pogribny, Ping Yi and S. Jill James

In the article by S. Melnyk, M. Pogribna, I.P. Pogribny, P. Yi, and S.J. James, entitled "Measurement of Plasma and Intracellular S-Adenosylmethionine and S-Adenosylhomocysteine Utilizing Coulometric Electrochemical Detection: Alterations with Plasma Homocysteine and Pyridoxal 5'-Phosphate Concentrations" (Clin Chem 2000;46:265–72), the values reported for plasma S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) were overestimated by a factor of 2.1 because of a calibration error. The corrected mean for plasma SAM obtained with coulometric electrochemical detection in this article is 73.5 ± 6.7 nmol/L. Please note this correction when referencing this method. The authors apologize for any inconvenience this error may have caused. Readers should be aware that the formula weight (FW) provided by Sigma Chemicals, Inc., for the SAM p-toluenesulfonate standard may be misleading. The FW provided (399) refers to the molecular weight of the free base, not the total FW of the SAM toluenesulfonate salt. The MW for toluenesulfonate (172) is not provided by Sigma, and it is important to note that the formula mole/mole ratio (base/salt) can vary from 2 to 4 between individual lots as does the mole/mole ratio of water. These variables must be properly corrected for each lot.





This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Melnyk, S.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Melnyk, S.
Right arrow Articles by James, S. J.


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS