Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 48: 869-876, 2002;
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (38)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Uettwiller-Geiger, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Uettwiller-Geiger, D.
Right arrow Articles by Chan, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2002;48:869-876.)
© 2002 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

Multicenter Evaluation of an Automated Assay for Troponin I

Denise Uettwiller-Geiger1, Alan H.B. Wu2, Fred S. Apple3, Anthony W. Jevans4, Per Venge5, Marilyn D. Olson6, Claude Darte6, David L. Woodrum6, Sean Roberts6 and Stephen Chan6a

1 John T. Mather Memorial Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY 11777.

2 Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT 06102.

3 Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN 55415.

4 Jewish Hospital, Louisville, KY 40202.

5 University of Uppsala, S-751-85 Uppsala, Sweden.

6 Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA 92835.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Immunoassay Development, Beckman Coulter, Inc., 1000 Lake Hazeltine Dr., Chaska, MN 55318. Fax 952-368-1620; e-mail schan{at}beckman.com.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: Cardiac troponin I (cTnI) is a powerful tool to aid in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction and cardiac muscle damage. We describe an assay that overcomes problems of early assays that were often affected by cTnI degradation, assay interference, poor sensitivity, and imprecision.

Methods: The analytical performance of the Access® AccuTnITM assay (Beckman Coulter) was evaluated at five institutions. Controls, zero calibrator, and diluted patient samples were used to determine precision, detection limit, functional sensitivity, and linearity. The 97.5 and 99 percentiles of a reference population were determined. Common interferents and heterophilic patient samples were tested. Equimolarity was determined by assaying samples with various ratios of free and complexed cTnI. Matched samples drawn into serum, EDTA, lithium heparin, and sodium heparin sample tubes were compared.

Results: Total imprecision (CVs) was 4.0–8.8% between 0.40 and 31 µg/L cTnI. The detection limit was <0.01 µg/L. The 97.5 percentile upper reference limit (URL) was 0.03 µg/L (CV = 20%), and the 99 percentile URL was 0.04 µg/L (CV = 14%). Total CVs of 10% and 20% were seen at and above 0.06 and 0.03 µg/L, respectively. The assay was linear to >60 µg/L and not affected by common assay interferents. An equimolar response was observed with free, complexed, phosphorylated, and dephosphorylated forms of cTnI. Results were 4% lower in serum and 14% lower in EDTA plasma than in lithium heparin plasma (P <0.01), independent of cTnI concentration.

Conclusion: AccuTnI is a sensitive and precise assay for the measurement of cTnI.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Previously, the WHO defined myocardial infarction (MI) 1 by the presence of a combination of two of three clinical symptoms: chest discomfort, an increase in cardiac-associated enzymes, and/or a typical electrocardiogram pattern involving the development of Q-waves or ST-segment elevations (1). The high specificity of cardiac troponins for myocardial necrosis caused by prolonged ischemia has led the National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB), IFCC, and the joint committee of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology (ACC) to reexamine the definition of MI to recommend that any increase in cardiac troponin [above the upper reference limit (URL) of a reference population] be viewed as indicative of myocardial injury in the clinical setting of ischemic MI (2)(3)(4)(5). As such, treatment decisions may be made on the basis of relatively small increases in cardiac troponin. This necessitates the use of highly specific, sensitive, and precise troponin assays.

The design of the AccuTnITM assay for cardiac troponin I (cTnI) and the criteria for analytical evaluation were tailored in accordance with NCCLS guidelines (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) and NACB, IFCC (2)(3)(4), and ESC/ACC recommendations (5). A cTnI assay should include the use of antibodies directed to stable cardiac-specific epitopes and should recognize all the molecular forms of cTnI in an equimolar manner (3). The assay must also be free of heparin interference and interference from blood constituents, common drugs, heterophilic antibodies, human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMAs), and rheumatoid factors (RFs) (3)(8). Finally, low-end precision is critical and should be evaluated in accordance with NACB, IFCC, and ESC/ACC recommendations. The purpose of this study was to characterize the analytical performance of the Access® AccuTnI assay in regard to these criteria.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
assay method
AccuTnI is a new assay for cTnI that uses two new murine monoclonal antibodies, one (directed to amino acids 24–40) is conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, and the other (directed to amino acids 41–49) is coated on paramagnetic particles. The Access Immunoassay System is a random access, bench-top analyzer that has been described in detail elsewhere (11). Time to first result for this assay is 12 min, with successive results in 36-s increments.

calibration curves and precision
Calibration curves.
The assay system was calibrated according to manufacturer’s instructions throughout the course of the evaluation. Calibrator curve precision and stability were determined from these data.

Precision.
On the basis of NCCLS guideline EP5-A (6), each of the five institutions tested three commercial controls and two manufacturer’s serum pools in triplicate in two runs/day for 20 days, using two lots of reagents. Within-run and total imprecision were calculated for each control at each site.

functional sensitivity, detection limit, and url
Functional sensitivity was determined as described by Spencer et al. (12) for thyroid-stimulating hormone and as modified by Yeo et al. (13) for cTnI or cardiac troponin T (cTnT). A pool of lithium heparin (LiHep) plasma samples with increased cTnI was diluted in a pool of normal LiHep plasma until the recoveries of the dilutions were no longer distinguishable from zero. The detection limit, defined as the concentration of cTnI corresponding to a signal 2 SD above the mean of 10 replicates of the zero calibrator, was determined three times at each of five institutions.

The 97.5 and 99 percentile URLs were determined by testing 254 apparently healthy individuals (88 males and 166 females; age range, 19–88 years). Of the 254 reference control individuals, 14% were same-day surgery patients (collected before surgery), 20% were healthy volunteers (out-of-hospital controls), and 66% were outpatients. The same-day surgery patients and outpatients were from noncardiac-related clinics, e.g., dermatology. There was no known cardiac involvement from the enrolled participants at the time the blood was collected. The study was performed in compliance with the requirements of each institution’s Institutional Review Board (14).

cross-reactivity
Analytical specificity was determined by comparing a serum sample with a low but measurable concentration of cTnI to aliquots of a sample to which 1000 µg/L skeletal TnI, cardiac troponin C (cTnC), cTnT (Hytest Ltd.), recombinant cTnT (gift from James Potter, University of Miami, Miami, FL), actin, myosin, tropomyosin (Vital Products), creatine kinase MB isoform (Fitzgerald Industries), and myoglobin (Cortex Biochem) had been added.

recognition of free and complexed troponin forms
Recombinant fragments of cTnI (Spectral Diagnostics), synthetic peptides (Genemed Synthesis), and phosphorylated and dephosphorylated cardiac troponin ICT ternary complexes (cTnICT; Hytest Ltd.) were serially diluted in normal human serum and tested. In a second experiment, increasing amounts of cTnC or cTnT (up to 200 µg/L) were added to LiHep-plasma and serum samples, each containing 20 µg/L purified free cTnI, and incubated for 1 h at room temperature before being tested (15). Additionally, increasing amounts of cTnT (up to 800 µg/L) were added to samples containing 20 µg/L cTnI and 80 µg/L cTnC and incubated before being tested.

interfering substances
Various blood components and cardiac-related drugs obtained from commercial sources were tested according to NCCLS EP7-P Appendix C guideline (8). Results for samples enriched with these possible interferents that were within 5% of the results for control samples were considered acceptable. In addition, samples from 254 controls, 22 HAMA samples obtained from patients treated therapeutically with mouse monoclonal antibodies, 101 samples containing heterophilic antibodies, and 17 RF samples were tested for assay interferences (Scantibodies and internal sources).

linearity on dilution
Four LiHep-plasma samples with increased cTnI were used to prepare five intermediary dilutions (80%, 60%, 40%, 20%, and 10%) of each specimen in assay sample diluent as described in NCCLS guideline EP6-P (7).

sample type
We compared 89 matched samples drawn into serum, EDTA plasma, LiHep plasma, and sodium heparin (NaHep) plasma tubes. Recoveries for fresh LiHep-plasma samples and samples frozen for at least 3 days at -20 °C were also compared.

method comparison
The Access AccuTnI was compared with the Ortho Vitros ECiTM (16), Abbott AxSYMTM (17), and Dade-Behring Dimension RxLTM (18) cTnI assays 2 using LiHep-plasma samples selected to represent the range of values likely to be encountered in clinical practice. The comparison data were analyzed by Deming regression, by Bland–Altman bias plots, and by concordance analyses. Two-by-two concordance analysis at the acute MI (AMI) cutoffs published in the manufacturers’ inserts was performed.

high-dose hook effect
Purified human cTnICT (BioStrategic Solutions, Inc.) was added to pooled human serum at concentrations up to 14 000 µg/L and tested.

statistical analysis
Sample type and method-comparison regression analyses were performed according to the Deming method described by Mandel (19). Linearity on dilution was determined by least-squares regression analysis (7). The agreement between two methods was assessed by the method described by Bland and Altman (20). Probabilities for t-tests were calculated using Analyze-it Software for Microsoft EXCEL, Ver. 1.5 (April 2000; Analyze-it Software, Ltd.).

role of the sponsor
Beckman Coulter participated in the study design, data collection and analysis, and manuscript preparation.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
calibration curves and precision
Calibration curves stored for up to 79 days were compared with fresh calibration curves. Calibration stability observed for the two lots of reagent were the same. Values for individual control samples recovered from stored calibration were 91–104% of the values recovered from fresh calibration and were not statistically different (P >0.4). The maximum interlaboratory within- and between-run imprecisions (CVs) of the five concentrations of non-zero calibrators were 7.7% and 10%, respectively. The within-run and total imprecisions (CVs) of the five controls between 0.40 and 31 µg/L were 2.6–4.6% and 4.0–8.8%, respectively, across two lots of reagents and five institutions. Total interlaboratory CVs were 6.1–7.2% for all the controls across institutions (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Precision data from five institutions with two lots of reagents over 40 analytical runs.

functional sensitivity, detection limit, and upper reference limit
The functional sensitivity, defined as the concentration with a total imprecision (CV) <=20%, ranged from 0.02 to 0.04 µg/L with a median of 0.03 µg/L. At a total imprecision (CV) of 10%, the functional sensitivity ranged from 0.05 to 0.11 µg/L with a median of 0.06 µg/L. The detection limit ranged from 0.001 to 0.018 µg/L with a median of 0.004 µg/L (Table 2 ). At the 97.5 and 99 percentiles for 254 control individuals, the URLs for AccuTnI were 0.03 and 0.04 µg/L, respectively (Fig. 1 ). The median total imprecisions (CV) corresponding to the 97.5 and 99 percentiles were 20% (range, 15–25%) and 14% (range, 11–18%), respectively.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 2. Access AccuTnl assay detection limit, functional sensitivity, and URLs.



View larger version (19K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Precision profile of Access AccuTnI assay.

Shown are the median and range (error bars) of the CV (%) for each plasma pool from nine combinations of reagent lots and instruments for total imprecision. Columns indicate the frequency distribution in a reference population.

cross-reactivity
The cross-reactivities of the AccuTnI assay to cTnC, cTnT, recombinant cTnT, actin, myosin, tropomyosin, creatine kinase MB isoenzyme, and myoglobin were <=0.001%, and the cross-reactivity to skeletal TnI was 0.034%.

recognition of free and complexed troponin forms
A recombinant fragment containing amino acid (AA) sequence 1–99 was quantitatively recovered by the assay, whereas a recombinant fragment containing AA sequence 55–210 recovered <1% of AA sequence 1–99. A commercially produced synthetic peptide covering AA sequence 20–79 was also quantitatively recovered by the assay. The ratio of the recoveries of dephosphorylated and phosphorylated cTnI forms was 93% for serial dilutions through the analytical range. The titration of up to 200 µg/L cTnC into 20 µg/L free cTnI produced recoveries of 100% in LiHep plasma and 117% in serum. The titration of up to 200 µg/L cTnT into 20 µg/L free cTnI produced recoveries of 94% in LiHep plasma and 99% in serum. The titration of up to 800 µg/L cTnT into the cardiac troponin IC binary complex (cTnIC) gave recoveries of 96% in LiHep plasma and 97% in serum. The AccuTnI equally measured free cTnI and cTnI complexed with cTnT or cTnC (binary complex) or complexed with cTnC and cTnT (ternary complex) in both LiHep plasma and serum.

interfering substances
One of 254 samples from the control individuals, 2 of 22 HAMA samples, 2 of 101 samples containing heterophilic antibodies, and none of 17 RF samples tested above 0.04 µg/L, the 99 percentile URL. Of the samples that tested above 0.04 µg/L, only one HAMA sample (0.07 µg/L) and one heterophilic antibody sample (0.24 µg/L) tested above 0.06 µg/L, the functional sensitivity at a CV of 10%. Incubation of the sample containing heterophilic antibodies in a Scantibodies HBT tube caused the cTnI value to decrease from 0.24 to 0.07 µg/L, indicating that the initial response was most likely attributable to interference from the heterophilic antibodies. None of the various blood components (bilirubin, human serum albumin, hemoglobin, triglycerides, fibrinogen, and alkaline phosphatase) or cardiac-related drugs (abciximab, acetaminophen, allopurinol, ambroxol, ampicillin, ascorbic acid, aspirin, atenolol, caffeine, captopril, cinnarizine, cocaine, diclofenac, digoxin, dopamine, erythromycin, furosemide, ibuprofen, low-molecular weight heparin, methyldopa, nifedipine, nitrofurantoin, nystatin, oxytetracycline, phenytoin, propranolol, quinidine, sodium heparin, theophylline, trimethoprim, and verapamil) tested interfered with the assay; all results were within 5% of controls.

linearity on dilution
Dilution of the four samples with initial values of 0.82, 2.39, 13.51, and 60.48 µg/L provided mean recoveries of 106%, 100%, 98%, and 94%, respectively. Slopes of the lines of observed vs expected values ranged from 0.984 (± 0.020) to 1.028 (± 0.062), and the correlation coefficient ranged from 0.999 to 1.000. The slopes were not significantly different from 1.0 (P >0.1).

sample type
On average, recoveries for serum, EDTA-plasma, and NaHep-plasma samples were 4%, 14%, and 2% lower than the recoveries for the matched LiHep-plasma samples, respectively (n = 89; P <0.01 for test of mean difference). Sample type comparisons yielded the following: EDTA = 0.895(± 0.011)serum + 0.883 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.471); NaHep = 0.978(±0.007)LiHep - 0.043 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.486); serum = 0.961(±0.008)LiHep - 0.188 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.607); EDTA = 0.864(±0.009)LiHep - 0.049 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.626). All sample types exhibited a good correlation to paired fresh heparin-plasma samples.

Recoveries for LiHep-plasma samples (cTnI concentration range, 0.03–97.54 µg/L) that had been frozen for a minimum of 3 days before thawing were 5% lower than recoveries for matched fresh samples: frozen = 0.952(±0.007)fresh + 0.129 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.712; n = 169; P <0.01 for test of mean difference). When the range was truncated to 0.03–4.93 µg/L, the recovery for the frozen samples was 2% higher than that of the matched fresh samples: frozen = 1.019(±0.018)fresh - 0.011 (r = 0.999; Sy|x = 0.140; n = 115; P = 0.2 for test of mean difference).

method comparison
Comparisons of different assay systems produced a wide range of slopes and correlation coefficients, confirming the large degree of heterogeneity from one manufacturer’s product to another product (Fig. 2 ). Although the three methods that were compared showed significant differences in slope (0.183–1.109), there was relatively good correlation (r = 0.946–0.980) when patient sample recoveries across the full range of the assays were compared. When the cTnI range was truncated to 0–1.5 µg/L (by the AccuTnI method), the correlations between methods were different. Comparisons of the AccuTnI range of 0–1.5 µg/L with the RxL, ECi, and AxSYM methods by bias plots assessed the methods’ agreement at the concentration range of the clinical decision points (Fig. 3 ). The total concordance at the AMI cutoffs between the AccuTnI (0.5 µg/L) and the RxL (1.5 µg/L), ECi (0.8 µg/L), and AxSYM (2.0 µg/L) methods was 94% (±3.75%), 91% (±3.20%), and 91% (±4.93%), respectively. The high concordance demonstrated good agreement in clinical AMI diagnosis between the AccuTnI and the commercial methods evaluated.



View larger version (27K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Method comparison using LiHep-plasma samples.

For comparisons across the full ranges of the comparison methods (top panels): AccuTnI = 0.932(±0.029)RxL - 1.039 (r = 0.980; Sy|x = 1.810; n = 157); AccuTnI = 1.109(±0.031)ECi - 0.473 (r = 0.968; Sy|x = 2.135; n = 316); AccuTnI = 0.183(±0.010)AxSYM + 0.062 (r = 0.946; Sy|x = 0.658; n = 128). For comparisons using LiHep-plasma samples containing 0–1.5 µg/L cTnI (bottom panels): AccuTnI = 0.553(±0.039)RxL - 0.032 (r = 0.941; Sy|x = 0.129; n = 92); AccuTnI = 0.747(±0.087)ECi + 0.100 (r = 0.733; Sy|x = 0.296; n = 134); AccuTnI = 0.153(±0.020)AxSYM + 0.104 (r = 0.835; Sy|x = 0.243; n = 54).



View larger version (13K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Bias plots of the difference against the means between the AccuTnI (0–1.5 µg/L) and the RxL (left), ECi (middle), or AxSYM (right) methods.

The RxL values were on average two times higher (anti-log 0.3), and 95% of the RxL values were between one and four times higher than the Access values. There was no evidence of systematic bias between ECi and Access methods. The 95% confidence interval for the individual differences between ECi and Access values was 0.04 (±0.76) µg/L. The AxSYM values were on average 5.4 times higher (anti-log 0.73), and 95% of the AxSYM values were between 1.8 and 16.2 times higher than the Access values. Solid line; mean difference; dashed lines, ± 2 SD.

high-dose hook effect
No high-dose hook effect was seen with concentrations tested up to 14 000 µg/L.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
The Access AccuTnI assay is an accurate and robust assay that provides reproducible results within an assay and from assay to assay, lot to lot, and site to site. The assay dynamic range is 0.01–100 µg/L. The 97.5 percentile and the 99 percentile URLs were 0.03 and 0.04 µg/L, respectively. The total imprecision (CV) at the 97.5 and 99 percentiles was 20% and 14%, respectively. The lowest concentrations with a total imprecision (CV) of 10% and 20% ("functional sensitivities") were 0.06 and 0.03 µg/L, respectively. Cross-reactivity and assay interference were minimal. The assay gave an equimolar response to free cTnI, the various complexed forms of cTnI, and phosphorylated and dephosphorylated cTnI complexes. No statistically significant bias in linearity was observed when samples were diluted. Serum and heparin-plasma sample types were substantially equivalent, and EDTA plasma showed an average -14% bias.

The AccuTnI assay uses two anti-human cTnI monoclonal antibodies that react with epitopes located between amino acids 24 and 49. The targeting of this cTnI AA region reflects a balance between the needed specificity to cardiac-derived troponin I and stability to in vivo and in vitro degradation and to modifications to the cTnI molecule (21)(22)(23)(24)(25). In vitro stability of matched serum and heparin-plasma sample types stored up to 48 h has been reported by Venge et al. (26), who found recoveries for stored samples within 10% of baseline. Ser-23 and Ser-24 are susceptible to phosphorylation (27). Phosphorylation of cTnI was shown to have no effect on the AccuTnI assay. After blood collection, cTnI may oxidize to form intramolecular disulfide linkages between Cys-80 and Cys-97 (28)(29). We did not test the effects of oxidation. However, analysis of the antibody pair binding region and the stability data reported by Venge et al. (26) imply that this should not be a significant source of assay interference.

cTnI is released into the circulation predominantly as cTnIC binary complex with cTnC and in smaller amounts as free cTnI and ternary troponin complex cTnICT (23)(30). Recent publications have suggested that assays from different manufacturers recognize complexed and free cTnI forms differently (24)(30). The AccuTnI assay recognizes the binary cTnIC or cTnIT or ternary cTnICT complexes and free cTnI equally as deduced by reconstitution experiments using purified intact cTnI, cTnT, and cTnC. The difference in antibody affinity to in vivo-modified or -truncated TnI complexes reported by Labugger et al. (22) remains to be investigated pending future characterization. The diagnostic and prognostic values of the spectrum of in vivo-modified troponin products in clinical practice have yet to be established.

The NACB has recommended the use of plasma as the preferred sample type because it allows more rapid analysis than serum (2). Matched-sample studies suggest that serum and heparin-plasma samples are acceptable but should not be used interchangeably (3). The use of heparinized plasma samples in some commercial assays may lead to lower recoveries for cTnI and cTnT than would be obtained with serum because heparin may bind directly to the troponin molecules and block the antibody epitope or may cause conformational changes in the molecules (31)(32)(33). It has also been shown that the use of EDTA plasma may affect cTnI assay results (34). The mechanism for the -14% average bias for EDTA-plasma results is not completely understood. EDTA may affect the alkaline phosphatase enzyme conjugate directly or change the stability of the cTnI molecule. EDTA plasma may be acceptable to aid in the diagnosis of MI and cardiac muscle damage. Different decision cutoffs may be required for this sample type. The absence of cross-reactivity in the AccuTnI assay to other myofibrillar proteins demonstrates its high specificity for cTnI. Analytical interference from circulating anti-animal antibodies, especially HAMAs, heterophilic antibodies, or RFs, has been a serious problem in many commercial two-site sandwich cTnI immunoassays (35). This incidence was very low in the AccuTnI assay.

Low abnormal troponin values within the indeterminate zone (i.e., between the URL and AMI cutoff points) have been proposed to be indicative of myocardial injury in the clinical setting of ischemic MI (2)(3). The 97.5 percentile URL, recommended by the NACB, has been replaced by the more recent ESC/ACC expert committee consensus proposal that an increased value for cardiac troponin be defined as a measurement exceeding the 99 percentile of a reference control group, using an assay with a CV <10% at this value. Two recent editorials provided further clarification (36)(37). To date, no troponin assays appear to achieve this target (13)(37). The functional sensitivity of the AccuTnI assay corresponding to an imprecision (CV) of 10% ranged from 0.05 to 0.11 µg/L (median, 0.06), which exceeds the 99 percentile of reference controls at 0.04 µg/L. In the current study, none of the 254 control individuals had a cTnI value >=0.06 µg/L. In a separate clinical study, 62 of 68 (91%) non-AMI patients that had Access AccuTnI values above the 99 percentile URL (0.04 µg/L) were found to have cardiac conditions, such as unstable angina, congestive heart failure, and myocarditis, or severe noncardiac conditions, such as trauma or renal failure (14).

In conclusion, the Access AccuTnI assay system provides sensitive, precise determination of cTnI. Serum and heparin-plasma samples are acceptable. EDTA-plasma samples exhibited an average -14% bias vs matched LiHep-plasma samples. The AccuTnI assay demonstrates minimal cross-reactivities and analytical interferences and excellent low-end precision. Method comparison data confirmed the heterogeneity in current commercial assays manufactured with different standardization, antibody pairs, and reagent formulations and reflected the expected differences in troponin values, specificity, stability, and analytical interferences. Nevertheless, strong agreements in classification of samples (as above or below respective cutoffs) were observed between AccuTnI and other commercial methods.


   Acknowledgments
 
This study was funded by Beckman Coulter, Inc. We thank Judith Gray, Jennifer Gray, and James Carr (John T. Mather Memorial Hospital, Port Jefferson, NY); Stacy J. Wieczorek and Kathryn R. Bailly (Hartford Hospital, Hartford, CT); Mary Ann Murakami, Heidi Quest, and Wendy Mathews (Hennepin County Medical Center, Minneapolis, MN); Ing-Britt Persson and Kerstin Lindblad (University of Uppsala, Uppsala, Sweden); and Jeff Todtleben, Susan Smith, Matthew Page, Yongyi Yu, and Robert Parson (Beckman Coulter, Inc., Fullerton, CA) for help in this study. Beckman Coulter, in collaboration with the principal investigators, developed the study design, collated and analyzed the multicenter data, and prepared this manuscript.


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: MI, myocardial infarction; NACB, National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry; ESC, European Society of Cardiology; ACC, American College of Cardiology; URL, upper reference limit; (95% confidence interval appears as ± x); cTnC, cTnI, and cTnT, cardiac troponin C, I, and T; HAMA, human anti-mouse antibody; RF, rheumatoid factor; LiHep, lithium heparin; cTnICT, cardiac troponin ICT ternary complex; NaHep, sodium heparin; AMI, acute MI; AA, amino acid; and cTnIC and cTnIT, cardiac troponin IC and IT binary complexes.

2 All trademarks are properties of the respective owners.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. . World Health Organization. Report of the joint International Society and Federation of Cardiology/World Health Organization task force on standardization of clinical nomenclature. Nomenclature and criteria for diagnosis of ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1979;59:607-609.[Free Full Text]
  2. Wu AHB, Apple FS, Gibler B, Jesse RL, Warshaw MM, Valdes R. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry standards of laboratory practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases. Clin Chem 1999;45:1104-1121.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Wu AHB, Apple FS, Warshaw MM. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry standards of laboratory practice: recommendations for the use of cardiac markers in coronary artery diseases 1999;Vol. 5:44 National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Washington, DC. .
  4. Dati F, Panteghini M, Apple FS, Christenson RH, Mair J. Proposals from IFCC Committee on Standardization of Markers of Cardiac Damage (C-SMCD): recommendations on use of biochemical markers of cardiac damage in acute coronary syndromes. In: Markers for cardiac damage—current status and future trends. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59(Suppl 230):103–12..
  5. . The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee. Myocardial infarction redefined—a consensus document of the joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959-969.[Free Full Text]
  6. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices; approved guideline. NCCLS guideline EP5-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, February 1999..
  7. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative analytical methods; proposed guideline. NCCLS guideline EP6-P. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, September 1986..
  8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Interference testing in clinical chemistry; proposed guideline. NCCLS guideline EP7-P. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, August 1986..
  9. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Method comparison and bias estimation using patient samples; approved guideline. NCCLS guideline EP9-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, December 1995..
  10. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Preliminary evaluation of quantitative clinical laboratory methods; approved guideline. NCCLS guideline EP10-A. Wayne, PA: NCCLS, May 1998..
  11. Patterson W, Werness P, Payne J, Matsson P, Leflar C, Melander T, et al. Random and continuous-access immunoassays with chemiluminescent detection by Access automated analyzer. Clin Chem 1994;40:2042-2045.[Abstract]
  12. Spencer CA, Takeuchi M, Kararosyan M, MacKenzie F, Beckett GJ, Wilkinson E. Interlaboratory/intermethod differences in functional sensitivity of immunometric assays of thyrotropin (TSH) and impact of measurement of subnormal concentrations of TSH. Clin Chem 1995;41:367-374.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Yeo KTJ, Quinn-Hall KS, Bateman SW, Fischer GA, Wieczorek S, Wu AHB. Functional sensitivity of cardiac troponin assays and its implications for risk stratification for patients with acute coronary syndromes. Adams JE Apple FS Jaffe AS Wu AHB eds. Markers in cardiology: current and future clinical applications. Am Heart Association Monograph Series 2001:23-30 American Heart Association Armonk, NY. .
  14. Jevans AW, Apple FS, Wu AHB, Venge P, Uettwiller-Geiger DL, Darte C, et al. Clinical performance of Beckman Coulter’s Access® AccuTnITM (troponin I) in a multicenter clinical trial. [Abstract]Clin Chem 2001;47(Suppl 6):A205.
  15. Gomez B, Zuk R, Gibbons I. Accuracy and specificity of the Alpha Dx System cardiac troponin I assay. [Abstract]Clin Chem 1998;44(Suppl 6):A121.
  16. Apple FS, Koplen B, Murakami MM. Preliminary evaluation of the Vitros ECi cardiac troponin I assay. [Technical Brief]Clin Chem 2000;46:572-574.
  17. Apple FS, Maturen AJ, Mullins RE, Painter PC, Pessin-Minsley MS, Webster RA, et al. Multicenter clinical and analytical evaluation of the AxSYM troponin-I immunoassay to assist in the diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1999;45:206-212.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Morrow DA, Rifai N, Tanasijevic MJ, Wybenga DR, Lemos JA, Antman EM. Clinical efficacy of three assays for cardiac troponin I for risk stratification in acute coronary syndromes: a Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) IIB substudy. Clin Chem 2000;46:453-460.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  19. Mandel J. Fitting straight lines when both variables are subject to error. J Qual Technol 1984;16:1-15.
  20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;i:307-310.
  21. Wu AHB eds. Cardiac markers 1998:300 Humana Press Totowa, NJ. .
  22. Labugger R, Organ L, Collier C, Atar D, Van Eyk J. Extensive troponin I and T modification detected in serum from patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation 2000;102:1221-1226.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Katrukha AG, Bereznikova AV, Esakova TV, Pettersson K, Lovgre T, Severina ME, et al. Troponin I is released in bloodstream of patients with acute myocardial infarction not in free form but as complex. Clin Chem 1997;43:1379-1385.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  24. Katrukha AG, Bereznikova AV, Filatov VL, Esakova TV, Kolosova OV, Petterson K, et al. Degradation of cardiac troponin I: implication for reliable immunodetection. Clin Chem 1998;44:2433-2440.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  25. Shi Q, Ling M, Zhang X, Zhang M, Kadijevic L, Liu S, et al. Degradation of cardiac troponin I in serum complicates comparisons of cardiac troponin I assays. Clin Chem 1999;45:1018-1025.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  26. Venge P, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. New generation cardiac troponin I assay for the Access immunoassay system. [Technical Brief]Clin Chem 2001;47:959-961.[Free Full Text]
  27. Chandra M, Dong WJ, Pan BS, Cheung HC, Solaro RJ. Effects of protein kinase A phosphorylation on signaling between cardiac troponin I and the N-terminal domain of cardiac troponin C. Biochemistry 1997;36:13305-13311.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  28. Ingraham RF, Hodges RS. Effects of Ca2+ and subunit interaction on surface accessibility of cysteine residues of cardiac troponin. Biochemistry 1988;27:5891-5898.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  29. Wu AHB, Feng YJ, Moore R, Apple FS, McPherson PH, Buechler KF, et al. Characterization of cardiac troponin I forms in the blood of patients with acute myocardial infarction and comparison of assays for troponin T and I. Clin Chem 1998;44:1198-1208.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  30. Newman DJ, Olabiran Y, Bedzyk WD, Chance S, Gorman EG, Price CP. Impact of antibody specificity and calibration material on the measure of agreement between methods for cardiac troponin I. Clin Chem 1999;45:822-828.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  31. Katrukha AG, Bereznikova AV, Filatov V, Esakova TV. Biochemical factors influencing measurement of cardiac troponin I. Clin Chem Lab Med 1999;37:1091-1095.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  32. Gerhardt W, Nordin G, Herbert A, Linaker Burzell B, Isaksson A, Gustavsson E, et al. Troponin T and I assays show decreased concentrations in heparin plasma compared with serum: lower recoveries in early than in late phases of myocardial injury. Clin Chem 2000;46:817-821.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  33. Stiegler H, Fischer Y, Vazquez-Jimenez JF, Graf J, Filzmaier K, Fausten B, et al. Lower cardiac troponin T and I results in heparin-plasma than in serum. Clin Chem 2000;46:1338-1344.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  34. Liao R, Wang CK, Cheung HC. Coupling of calcium to the interaction of troponin I with troponin C from cardiac muscle. Biochemistry 1994;33:12729-12734.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  35. Fitzmaurice T, Brown C, Rifai N, Wu AHB, Yeo KT. False increase of cardiac troponin I with heterophilic antibodies. [Technical Brief]Clin Chem 1998;44:2212-2214.[Free Full Text]
  36. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, Naslund U, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. It’s time for a change to a troponin standard. Circulation 2000;102:1216-1220.[Free Full Text]
  37. Apple FS, Wu AHB. Myocardial infarction redefined: role of cardiac troponin testing. Clin Chem 2001;47:377-379.[Free Full Text]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
K. M. Eggers, L. Lind, H. Ahlstrom, T. Bjerner, C. Ebeling Barbier, A. Larsson, P. Venge, and B. Lindahl
Prevalence and pathophysiological mechanisms of elevated cardiac troponin I levels in a population-based sample of elderly subjects
Eur. Heart J., September 2, 2008; 29(18): 2252 - 2258.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
N. Kilcullen, K. Viswanathan, R. Das, C. Morrell, A. Farrin, J. H. Barth, A. S. Hall, and for the EMMACE-2 Investigators
Heart-Type Fatty Acid-Binding Protein Predicts Long-Term Mortality After Acute Coronary Syndrome and Identifies High-Risk Patients Across the Range of Troponin Values
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 20, 2007; 50(21): 2061 - 2067.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
K. M. Eggers, B. Lagerqvist, P. Venge, L. Wallentin, and B. Lindahl
Persistent Cardiac Troponin I Elevation in Stabilized Patients After an Episode of Acute Coronary Syndrome Predicts Long-Term Mortality
Circulation, October 23, 2007; 116(17): 1907 - 1914.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Eur Heart JHome page
D. Vancraeynest, J. Kefer, C. Hanet, C. Fillee, C. Beauloye, A. Pasquet, B. L. Gerber, M. Philippe, and J.-L. J. Vanoverschelde
Release of cardiac bio-markers during high mechanical index contrast-enhanced echocardiography in humans
Eur. Heart J., May 2, 2007; 28(10): 1236 - 1241.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Patti, V. Pasceri, G. Colonna, M. Miglionico, D. Fischetti, G. Sardella, A. Montinaro, and G. Di Sciascio
Atorvastatin Pretreatment Improves Outcomes in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the ARMYDA-ACS Randomized Trial
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., March 27, 2007; 49(12): 1272 - 1278.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
G. Patti, M. Chello, V. Pasceri, D. Colonna, A. Nusca, M. Miglionico, A. D'Ambrosio, E. Covino, and G. Di Sciascio
Protection From Procedural Myocardial Injury by Atorvastatin Is Associated With Lower Levels of Adhesion Molecules After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA-CAMs (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty-Cell Adhesion Molecules) Substudy
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., October 17, 2006; 48(8): 1560 - 1566.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. James, M. Flodin, N. Johnston, B. Lindahl, and P. Venge
The Antibody Configurations of Cardiac Troponin I Assays May Determine Their Clinical Performance
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2006; 52(5): 832 - 837.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
B. Zethelius, N. Johnston, and P. Venge
Troponin I as a Predictor of Coronary Heart Disease and Mortality in 70-Year-Old Men: A Community-Based Cohort Study
Circulation, February 28, 2006; 113(8): 1071 - 1078.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
Q. Lam, M. Black, O. Youdell, H. Spilsbury, and H.-G. Schneider
Performance Evaluation and Subsequent Clinical Experience with the Abbott Automated Architect STAT Troponin-I Assay
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2006; 52(2): 298 - 300.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Annals of Clinical & Laboratory ScienceHome page
Y.-S. Wang, C.-F. Feng, T.-K. Er, L.-Y. Tsai, C.-Y. Chen, S.-J. Chang, and B.-H. Chen
Comparison of Cardiac Troponin I Levels in Serum and Sodium-Citrate Plasma Using the ACCESS 2 Immunoassay
Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci., October 1, 2005; 35(4): 453 - 454.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Panteghini
Selection of Antibodies and Epitopes for Cardiac Troponin Immunoassays: Should We Revise Our Evidence-Based Beliefs?
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 803 - 804.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
S. Eriksson, T. Ilva, C. Becker, J. Lund, P. Porela, K. Pulkki, L.-M. Voipio-Pulkki, and K. Pettersson
Comparison of Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassays Variably Affected by Circulating Autoantibodies
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2005; 51(5): 848 - 855.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
G. Patti, G. Colonna, V. Pasceri, L. L. Pepe, A. Montinaro, and G. Di Sciascio
Randomized Trial of High Loading Dose of Clopidogrel for Reduction of Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study
Circulation, April 26, 2005; 111(16): 2099 - 2106.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
A. Boulier, I. Jaussent, N. Terrier, F. Maurice, J.-P. Rivory, L. Chalabi, A.-M. Boularan, C. Delcourt, A.-M. Dupuy, B. Canaud, et al.
Measurement of circulating troponin Ic enhances the prognostic value of C-reactive protein in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., September 1, 2004; 19(9): 2313 - 2318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
V. Pasceri, G. Patti, A. Nusca, C. Pristipino, G. Richichi, G. Di Sciascio, and on behalf of the ARMYDA Investigators
Randomized Trial of Atorvastatin for Reduction of Myocardial Damage During Coronary Intervention: Results From the ARMYDA (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) Study
Circulation, August 10, 2004; 110(6): 674 - 678.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. Pagani, F. Stefini, and M. Panteghini
Innotrac Aio! Second-Generation Cardiac Troponin I Assay: Imprecision Profile and Other Key Characteristics for Clinical Use
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2004; 50(7): 1271 - 1272.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
HeartHome page
K A A Fox, J Birkhead, R Wilcox, C Knight, and J Barth
British Cardiac Society Working Group on the definition of myocardial infarction
Heart, June 1, 2004; 90(6): 603 - 609.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Panteghini
The Interfering Component in Cardiac Troponin I Immunoassays: Need for Further Experimental Evidence
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 676 - 677.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Panteghini, F. Pagani, K.-T. J. Yeo, F. S. Apple, R. H. Christenson, F. Dati, J. Mair, J. Ravkilde, and A. H.B. Wu
Evaluation of Imprecision for Cardiac Troponin Assays at Low-Range Concentrations
Clin. Chem., February 1, 2004; 50(2): 327 - 332.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Toxicol PatholHome page
K. B. Wallace, E. Hausner, E. Herman, G. D. Holt, J. T. Macgregor, A. L. Metz, E. Murphy, I.Y. Rosenblum, F. D. Sistare, and M. J. York
Serum Troponins as Biomarkers of Drug-Induced Cardiac Toxicity
Toxicol Pathol, January 1, 2004; 32(1): 106 - 121.
[PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
F. S. Apple, H. E. Quist, P. J. Doyle, A. P. Otto, and M. M. Murakami
Plasma 99th Percentile Reference Limits for Cardiac Troponin and Creatine Kinase MB Mass for Use with European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Consensus Recommendations
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1331 - 1336.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
D. A. Morrow, N. Rifai, M. S. Sabatine, S. Ayanian, S. A. Murphy, J. A. de Lemos, E. Braunwald, and C. P. Cannon
Evaluation of the AccuTnI Cardiac Troponin I Assay for Risk Assessment in Acute Coronary Syndromes
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2003; 49(8): 1396 - 1398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Venge, N. Johnston, B. Lagerqvist, L. Wallentin, and B. Lindahl
Clinical and Analytical Performance of the Liaison Cardiac Troponin I Assay in Unstable Coronary Artery Disease, and the Impact of Age on the Definition of Reference Limits. A FRISC-II Substudy
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2003; 49(6): 880 - 886.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
M. Herrmann, J. Scharhag, M. Miclea, A. Urhausen, W. Herrmann, and W. Kindermann
Post-Race Kinetics of Cardiac Troponin T and I and N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide in Marathon Runners
Clin. Chem., May 1, 2003; 49(5): 831 - 834.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page