HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (76) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duffy, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duffy, M. J. Related Collections Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)

Urokinase Plasminogen Activator and Its Inhibitor, PAI-1, as Prognostic Markers in Breast Cancer: From Pilot to Level 1 Evidence Studies

¹ Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Dublin 4, and Department of Surgery and Conway Institute of Biomolecular and Biomedical Science, University College Dublin, Dublin 4, Ireland.

Address for correspondence: Department of Nuclear Medicine, St. Vincent’s University Hospital, Elm Park, Dublin 4, Ireland. Fax 353-1-2696018; e-mail Michael.J.Duffy{at}ucd.ie.

	Abstract

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
Background: For optimum management of patients with cancer, accurate assessment of prognosis is essential. The primary determinant of outcome in malignancy is the formation of distant metastases. Urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) is a serine protease causally involved in invasion and metastasis.

Content: Data from model systems show that uPA is unequivocally involved in cancer dissemination. Consistent with its role in metastasis, multiple independent groups have shown that high uPA concentrations in primary breast cancers correlate with poor prognosis. For determining outcome, the prognostic impact of uPA was both independent of traditionally used factors and prognostic in patients with axillary node-negative disease. Paradoxically, high concentrations of plasminogen activator inhibitor (PAI-1), an endogenous inhibitor of uPA, also correlate with poor prognosis in patients with breast cancer, including the subgroup with node-negative disease. The prognostic value of uPA/PAI-1 in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients was recently confirmed in both a prospective randomized trial and a pooled analysis, i.e., two different level 1 evidence (LOE-1) studies.

Conclusions: uPA and PAI-1 are among the first biological prognostic factors to have their clinical value validated using LOE-1 evidence studies. Determination of these analytes may help identify low-risk node-negative breast cancer patients for whom adjuvant chemotherapy is unnecessary.

	Introduction

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
The main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with cancer is the formation of distant metastases. The process of metastasis is a multistep event involving local invasion, degradation of the extracellular matrix (ECM),¹ angiogenesis, intravasation (entry of malignant cells into the circulation), evasion of apoptosis and survival in the circulation, extravasation (exiting from bloodstream), and growth at a secondary site [for a review, see Ref. (1)]. One of the key mediators of this process is the serine protease urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA).

uPA is a 53-kDa trypsin-like protease that converts the zymogen plasminogen into active plasmin (2). Although uPA is a relatively specific protease, plasmin acts on a wide variety of protein substrates. These include most components in the ECM, such as laminin, fibronectin, and fibrin (2). Plasmin can also mediate ECM degradation indirectly by activation of certain latent matrix metalloproteases (MMPs) such as MMP-3, MMP-9, MMP-12, and MMP-13 (3). The formation of the active MMPs allows further proteolysis of the ECM. Degradation of the ECM is a prerequisite for cancer invasion and metastasis.

In vivo, uPA catalytic activity can be inactivated by several inhibitors, including PAI-1, PAI-2 (4), and maspin (5). Of these three, PAI-1 is thought to be the primary inhibitor of uPA. PAI-1 inhibits uPA by forming a stable complex with a 1:1 stoichiometry. In addition to binding to uPA, PAI-1 can also attach itself to the ECM protein, vitronectin. Binding to vitronectin allows PAI-1 to modulate cellular adhesion and migration (6). The ability of PAI-1 to control adhesion and migration appears to be independent of its protease inhibitory capacity (6).

	Role of uPA in Cancer Invasion and Metastasis

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
Results from experiments carried out on model systems show that uPA is causally involved in cancer invasion and metastasis [for a review, see Ref. (7)]. Briefly, this evidence is as follows:

• Correlations exist between uPA concentrations and the metastatic potential of different cell lines;
  
• Antibodies and inhibitors against uPA prevent or reduce metastasis;
  
• Prevention of uPA from binding to the receptor uPAR decreases the formation of metastases;
  
• Transfection of nonmetastatic cells with cDNA for uPA enhances metastasis in recipient cells; and
  
• Neoplastic lesions in mice deficient in either plasminogen or uPA exhibit slower growth and show less progression than similar lesions in wild-type animals.
  

It was originally believed that uPA promoted cancer dissemination simply by degrading the ECM, thus allowing invasion and metastasis. Although controlled degradation is indeed likely to clear a path for the migration of malignant cells, it is now clear that uPA has additional activities that permit it to play a role in cancer spread. These other roles include its ability to stimulate angiogenesis, mitogenesis, and cell migration and to modulate cell adhesion [for a review, see Ref. (2)]. Recently, uPA was also shown to prevent apoptosis (8). Inhibition of apoptosis could increase the survival potential of malignant cells during the metastatic process, thus increasing the possibility for the establishment of a secondary deposit. This multifunctional capability may explain why uPA is such a potent mediator of cancer spread.

	Role of PAI-1 in Cancer Invasion and Metastasis

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
Because PAI-1 is an inhibitor of uPA, it might be expected to prevent invasion and metastasis. Indeed, in some model systems, overexpression of PAI-1 reduced the formation of metastases (9)(10). Other studies, however, have shown that PAI-1 promotes, rather than inhibits, invasion and metastasis. For example, coexpression of uPA and PAI-1 was found to be necessary for optimal invasion of lung carcinoma cells through an artificial membrane (11). In other studies, PAI-1 deficiency in mice decreased angiogenesis and prevented cancer cell invasion (12). Possible mechanisms by which PAI-1 contributes to cancer dissemination include preventing excess degradation of the ECM, modulating cell adhesion (6), playing a role in angiogenesis (12), and stimulating cell proliferation (13).

	Prognostic Value of uPA in Different Cancers

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
breast cancer
Because uPA is directly involved in metastasis, it is an ideal candidate for investigation as a prognostic marker (14). In a pilot study carried out in the late 1980s, Duffy et al. (15) were the first to show that breast cancer patients with high uPA activity in their primary tumors had a worse disease-free interval than patients in whom uPA activity was low. The results presented in this preliminary report have now been confirmed by at least 20 independent groups [for reviews, see Refs. (16)(17)]. As a marker for breast cancer, the prognostic information provided by uPA is independent of the traditional prognostic factors for this disease, such as tumor size, tumor grade, axillary node status, and steroid receptor status; is stronger than most of these factors; and most important, is prognostic in axillary node-negative patients (16)(17).

other cancers
In addition to being a prognostic factor in breast cancers, high uPA concentrations have also been shown to correlate with aggressive disease in patients with gastric, colorectal, esophageal, bladder, ovarian, and endometrial cancers [for reviews, see Refs. (16)(17)].

	Prognostic Value of PAI-1 in Different Cancers

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
In 1991, Janicke et al. (18) first reported that high concentrations of PAI-1 predicted an adverse outcome in patients with breast cancer. As with uPA, these early results have been confirmed by multiple investigators [for reviews, see Refs. (2)(17)]. Similar to uPA in breast cancer, PAI-1 is also an independent prognostic factor and predicts outcome in node-negative patients (2)(17). Other malignancies in which PAI-1 was shown to correlate with outcome include gastric, ovarian, and endometrial cancers as well as neuroblastomas (2)(17).

	Preparing uPA and PAI-1 for Routine Clinical Use

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
The above-mentioned studies clearly show that high concentrations of both uPA and PAI-1 are predictive of a poor prognosis in multiple cancers, especially breast cancer. The question therefore arises as to whether uPA and PAI-1 should now enter routine clinical use. Two important criteria should be met before a new marker is used for clinical purposes: (a) assay validation, including evaluation in external quality assurance schemes, and (b) clinical validation. Clinical validation should be carried out using a level 1 evidence (LOE-1) study, i.e., in either a large randomized prospective trial in which evaluation of the marker is the primary objective of the study or a metaanalysis/pooled analysis of small-scale prospective or retrospective trials (19). Both these validation requirements have now been met for uPA and PAI.

assay validation
Although activity assays, immunohistochemistry, and ELISAs have all been used to measure uPA and PAI-1, it is the last type of assay that has undergone the most detailed evaluation. In 1996, Benraad et al. (20) evaluated six different ELISA systems for uPA determination. The main conclusions to emerge from this study were:

• All the assays developed for measuring uPA in tissue extracts had a lower limit of detection of <32 ng/L uPA and thus had adequate sensitivity for detecting uPA in breast cancer extracts;
  
• Within-assay precision for all the assays investigated was satisfactory;
  
• All assays displayed an acceptable degree of parallelism after dilution of tissue extracts; and
  
• Although the absolute concentration of uPA detected varied with the different methods, in general, good correlations were found between the different assays.
  

Assays for uPA and PAI-1 have also been studied in external quality assurance trials (21). For example, in a multicenter study involving six laboratories in Germany, the between-laboratory CV for uPA varied between 6.2% and 8.2%. For PAI-1, the CVs varied between 13.2% and 16.6%. It should be stated that in this study, all participating laboratories used commercially available ELISAs from the same supplier.

clinical validation
As mentioned above, clinical validation can be performed using either a prospective randomized trial or a metaanalysis/pooled analysis of small-scale retrospective and prospective studies. Both types of studies have recently been carried out for uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer.

The prospective randomized investigation was a multicenter study of almost 600 patients carried out in Germany (22). In this trial, node-negative breast cancer patients with low uPA and PAI-1 concentrations did not receive any systemic adjuvant chemotherapy. On the other hand, patients with high concentrations of the protease and/or its inhibitor were randomized to receive adjuvant cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-fluorouracil treatment or to be observed. Following an interim analysis after a medium follow-up of 32 months, patients with low concentrations of both proteins had an estimated 3-year recurrence rate of 6.7%, whereas those with high concentrations of the protease and/or its inhibitor had a recurrence rate of 14.7% (P = 0.006). Multivariate analysis showed that the prognostic impact of uPA/PAI-1 was independent of tumor grade, tumor size, and steroid receptor status.

The second type of LOE-1 study that validated the prognostic value of uPA and PAI-1 in breast cancer involved a pooled analysis of 18 different data sets containing >8377 patients (23). After a median follow-up of 79 months, both uPA and PAI-1 were found to be independent prognostic factors. Although less powerful than axillary nodal status, both uPA and PAI-1 were stronger predictors of outcome than tumor size, tumor grade, hormone receptor status, or patient age. As well as being prognostic in the total population of patients, high concentrations of the two markers also predicted adverse outcomes in both the node-positive and node-negative subgroups. Most important, both uPA and PAI-1 predicted outcome in the node-negative subgroup that did not receive any adjuvant treatment.

To my knowledge, uPA and PAI-1 are the first biological factors to have their prognostic value validated using either a prospective randomized trial or a pooled analysis of published and unpublished data. The results of these two studies suggest that node-negative breast cancer patients with low uPA and PAI-1 concentrations have a low risk of disease relapse. For these low-risk patients, adjuvant chemotherapy may be avoided, thus increasing the quality of life and reducing healthcare costs.

	Conclusion

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 
uPA and PAI-1 are among the first tumor markers to have their clinical value confirmed in LOE-1 studies. These markers can therefore be now considered for the routine assessment of prognosis in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. For determining prognosis, uPA and PAI-1 are likely to be most useful in the axillary node-negative subgroup. Approximately 70% of node-negative women are cured of their disease by surgery and radiotherapy, whereas 30% relapse within 10 years. Current prognostic factors are not sufficiently sensitive to identify the subgroup of patients who are likely to develop recurrent disease. uPA and PAI-1 may therefore may be the first biological markers to assist in the differentiation of aggressive and indolent node-negative breast cancers. In this scenario, women with node-negative disease and high concentrations of uPA and PAI-1 could be given adjuvant chemotherapy, whereas those with low concentrations of both proteins could be spared the side effects and costs of this treatment. Finally, uPA and PAI-1 may be of value in selecting appropriate therapies for patients with breast cancer. Preliminary results suggest that patients with increased concentrations of either uPA or PAI-1 fail to respond to hormone therapy in advanced disease (24). On the other hand, those with high concentrations of both uPA and PAI-1 appear to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy (22)(25). Clearly, assays for uPA and PAI-1 have the potential to lead to individualized treatment strategies in patients with breast cancer (23).

	Footnotes

 
¹ Nonstandard abbreviations: ECM, extracellular matrix; uPA, urokinase plasminogen activator; MMP, matrix metalloprotease; and LOE-1, level 1 evidence.

	References

Top Abstract Introduction Role of uPA in... Role of PAI-1 in... Prognostic Value of uPA... Prognostic Value of PAI-1... Preparing uPA and PAI-1... Conclusion References

 

1. Zetter B. Angiogenesis and tumor metastasis. Annu Rev Med 1998;49:407-414.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
2. Andreasen PA, Kjoller L, Christensen L, Duffy MJ. The urokinase-type plasminogen activator system in cancer metastasis: a review. Int J Cancer 1997;72:1-22.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
3. Carmeliet P, Moons L, Lijnen R, Baes M, Lemaitre V, Tipping P, et al. Urokinase-generated plasmin activates matrix metalloproteinase during aneurysm formation. Nat Genet 1997;17:439-444.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
4. Andreasen PA, Georg B, Lund LR, Riccio A, Stacey SN. Plasminogen activator inhibitors: hormonally regulated serpins. Mol Cell Endocrinol 1990;68:1-19.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
5. Biliran H, Sheng S. Pleiotrophic inhibition of pericellular urokinase-type plasminogen activator system by endogenous tumor suppressive maspin. Cancer Res 2001;15:8676-8682.
6. Loskutoff DJ, Curriden SA, Hu G, Deng G. Regulation of cell adhesion by PAI. APMIS 1999;107:54-61.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
7. Duffy MJ. The biochemistry of metastasis. Adv Clin Chem 1996;32:135-166.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
8. Ma Z, Webb DJ, Jo M, Gonias SL. Endogenously produced urokinase-type plasminogen activator is a major determinant of the basal level activated ERK/MAP kinase and prevents apoptosis in MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. J Cell Sci 2001;114:3387-3396.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
9. Alizadeh H, Ma D, Berman M, Bellingham D, Comerford SA, Gething MJH, et al. Tissue-type plasminogen activator-induced invasion and metastasis of murine melanomas. Curr Eye Res 1995;14:449-458.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
10. Ma D, Gerard RD, Li X-Y, Alizadeh H, Nierderkorn JY. Inhibition of metastasis of intraocular melanomas by adenovirus-mediated gene transfer of plasminogen activator inhibitor type-1 in an athymic mouse model. Blood 1997;90:2738-2746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
11. Liu G, Shuman MA, Cohen RL. Co-expression of urokinase, urokinase receptor and PAI-1 is necessary for optimum invasiveness of cultured lung cancer cells. Int J Cancer 1995;60:501-506.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
12. Bajou K, Noel A, Gerard RD, Masson V, Brunner N, Holst-Hansen C, et al. Absence of host plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 prevents cancer invasion and vascularization. Nat Med 1998;4:923-928.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
13. Webb DJ, Thomas KS, Gonias SL. Plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 functions as a urokinase response modifier at the level of cell signalling and thereby promotes MCF-7 cell growth. J Cell Biol 2001;152:741-752.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
14. Duffy MJ. Do proteases play a role in cancer invasion and metastasis?. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol 1987;23:583-589.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
15. Duffy MJ, O’Grady P, Devaney D, O’Siorain L, Fennelly JJ, Lijnen HJ. Urokinase-plasminogen activator, a marker for aggressive breast cancer. Preliminary report. Cancer 1988;62:531-533.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
16. Duffy MJ, Maguire TM, McDermott EW, O’Higgins N. Urokinase plasminogen activator: a prognostic marker in multiple types of cancer. J Surg Oncol 1999;71:130-135.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
17. Schmitt M, Harbeck N, Thomssen C, Wilhelm O, Magdolen V, Reuning U, et al. Clinical impact of the plasminogen activation system in tumor invasion and metastasis: prognostic relevance and target for therapy. Thromb Haemost 1997;78:285-296.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
18. Janicke F, Schmitt M, Graeff H. Clinical relevance of the urokinase-type and tissue-type plasminogen activators and their type 1 inhibitor in breast cancer. Semin Thromb Hemost 1991;17:303-312.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
19. Hayes D, Bast RC, Desch CE, Fritsche H, Kemeny NE, Jessup JM, et al. Tumor marker utility grading system: a framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers. J Natl Cancer Inst 1996;88:1456-1466.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
20. Benraad TH, Geurts-Moespot J, Grondahl-Hansen J, Schmitt M, Heuvel J, De Witte JH, et al. Immunoassays (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA): report of an EORTC/BIOMED-1 Workshop. Eur J Cancer 1996;32:1371-1381.
21. Sweep CGJ, Geurts-Moespot J, Grebenschikov N, De Witt JH, Heuvel J, Schmitt M, et al. External quality assessment of trans-European multicenter antigen determination (enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay) of urokinase plasminogen activator (uPA) and its type-1 inhibitor (PAI-1) in human breast cancer extracts. Br J Cancer 1998;78:1434-1441.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
22. Janicke F, Prechtl A, Thomssen C, Harbeck N, Meisner C, Sweep F, et al. Randomized adjuvant chemotherapy trial in high-risk node-negative breast cancer patients identified by urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1. German Chemo N_o Study Group. J Natl Cancer Inst 2001;93:913-920.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
23. Look M P, van Putten WLJ, Duffy MJ, Harbeck N, Christensen IJ, Thomssen C, et al. Pooled analysis of prognostic impact of urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1 in 8377 breast cancer patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000;94:116-128.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
24. Foekens JA, Look MP, Peters HA, van Putten WL, Portengen H, Klijn JG. Urokinase-type plasminogen activator and its inhibitor PAI-1: predictors of poor response to tamoxifen therapy in recurrent breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87:751-756.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
25. Harbeck N, Kates RE, Schmitt M. Clinical relevance of invasion factors urokinase-type plasminogen activator and plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 for individualised therapy decisions in primary breast cancer is greatest when used in combination. J Clin Oncol 2002;20:1000-1007.[Abstract/Free Full Text]

The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:

				C. M. Sturgeon, M. J. Duffy, U.-H. Stenman, H. Lilja, N. Brunner, D. W. Chan, R. Babaian, R. C. Bast Jr., B. Dowell, F. J. Esteva, et al. National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers Clin. Chem., December 1, 2008; 54(12): e11 - e79. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. Harris, H. Fritsche, R. Mennel, L. Norton, P. Ravdin, S. Taube, M. R. Somerfield, D. F. Hayes, and R. C. Bast Jr American Society of Clinical Oncology 2007 Update of Recommendations for the Use of Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., November 20, 2007; 25(33): 5287 - 5312. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. M. McGowan, B. M. Ryan, A. D.K. Hill, E. McDermott, N. O'Higgins, and M. J. Duffy ADAM-17 Expression in Breast Cancer Correlates with Variables of Tumor Progression Clin. Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 13(8): 2335 - 2343. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Meng, D. Tripathy, S. Shete, R. Ashfaq, H. Saboorian, B. Haley, E. Frenkel, D. Euhus, M. Leitch, C. Osborne, et al. uPAR and HER-2 gene status in individual breast cancer cells from blood and tissues PNAS, November 14, 2006; 103(46): 17361 - 17365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B.-H. Bay, R. Jin, J. Huang, and P.-H. Tan Metallothionein as a prognostic biomarker in breast cancer. Experimental Biology and Medicine, October 1, 2006; 231(9): 1516 - 1521. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M Burkhardt, E Mayordomo, K-J Winzer, F Fritzsche, T Gansukh, S Pahl, W Weichert, C Denkert, H Guski, M Dietel, et al. Cytoplasmic overexpression of ALCAM is prognostic of disease progression in breast cancer J. Clin. Pathol., April 1, 2006; 59(4): 403 - 409. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Duffy Serum Tumor Markers in Breast Cancer: Are They of Clinical Value? Clin. Chem., March 1, 2006; 52(3): 345 - 351. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				T. W. Bauer, W. Liu, F. Fan, E. R. Camp, A. Yang, R. J. Somcio, C. D. Bucana, J. Callahan, G. C. Parry, D. B. Evans, et al. Targeting of Urokinase Plasminogen Activator Receptor in Human Pancreatic Carcinoma Cells Inhibits c-Met- and Insulin-like Growth Factor-I Receptor-Mediated Migration and Invasion and Orthotopic Tumor Growth in Mice Cancer Res., September 1, 2005; 65(17): 7775 - 7781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Hu, D. Lin, J. Yuan, T. Xiao, H. Zhang, W. Sun, N. Han, Y. Ma, X. Di, M. Gao, et al. Overexpression of Osteopontin Is Associated with More Aggressive Phenotypes in Human Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., July 1, 2005; 11(13): 4646 - 4652. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Kwon, C.-S. Yoon, W. Jeong, S. G. Rhee, and D. M. Waisman Annexin A2-S100A10 Heterotetramer, a Novel Substrate of Thioredoxin J. Biol. Chem., June 24, 2005; 280(25): 23584 - 23592. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S O Wurtz, A-S Schrohl, N M. Sorensen, U Lademann, I J Christensen, H Mouridsen, and N Brunner Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 in breast cancer Endocr. Relat. Cancer, June 1, 2005; 12(2): 215 - 227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. Pakneshan, B. Tetu, and S. A. Rabbani Demethylation of Urokinase Promoter as a Prognostic Marker in Patients with Breast Carcinoma Clin. Cancer Res., May 1, 2004; 10(9): 3035 - 3041. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Duffy, C. Duggan, R. Keane, A. D.K. Hill, E. McDermott, J. Crown, and N. O'Higgins High Preoperative CA 15-3 Concentrations Predict Adverse Outcome in Node-Negative and Node-Positive Breast Cancer: Study of 600 Patients with Histologically Confirmed Breast Cancer Clin. Chem., March 1, 2004; 50(3): 559 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Jo, K. S. Thomas, L. Wu, and S. L. Gonias Soluble Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Inhibits Cancer Cell Growth and Invasion by Direct Urokinase-independent Effects on Cell Signaling J. Biol. Chem., November 21, 2003; 278(47): 46692 - 46698. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. V. Offersen, B. S. Nielsen, G. Hoyer-Hansen, F. Rank, S. Hamilton-Dutoit, J. Overgaard, and P. A. Andreasen The Myofibroblast Is the Predominant Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1-Expressing Cell Type in Human Breast Carcinomas Am. J. Pathol., November 1, 2003; 163(5): 1887 - 1899. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Kristiansen, K.-J. Winzer, E. Mayordomo, J. Bellach, K. Schluns, C. Denkert, E. Dahl, C. Pilarsky, P. Altevogt, H. Guski, et al. CD24 Expression Is a New Prognostic Marker in Breast Cancer Clin. Cancer Res., October 15, 2003; 9(13): 4906 - 4913. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				W. Qin, W. Zhu, C. Wagner-Mann, and E. R. Sauter Nipple Aspirate Fluid Expression of Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator, Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor-1, and Urokinase-Type Plasminogen Activator Receptor Predicts Breast Cancer Diagnosis and Advanced Disease Ann. Surg. Oncol., October 1, 2003; 10(8): 948 - 953. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L. M. Matrisian, G. W. Sledge Jr., and S. Mohla Extracellular Proteolysis and Cancer: Meeting Summary and Future Directions Cancer Res., October 1, 2003; 63(19): 6105 - 6109. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Hirashima, H. Kobayashi, M. Suzuki, Y. Tanaka, N. Kanayama, and T. Terao Transforming Growth Factor-{beta}1 Produced by Ovarian Cancer Cell Line HRA Stimulates Attachment and Invasion through an Up-regulation of Plasminogen Activator Inhibitor Type-1 in Human Peritoneal Mesothelial Cells J. Biol. Chem., July 11, 2003; 278(29): 26793 - 26802. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. M. Yousef, M.-E. Polymeris, G. M. Yacoub, A. Scorilas, A. Soosaipillai, C. Popalis, S. Fracchioli, D. Katsaros, and E. P. Diamandis Parallel Overexpression of Seven Kallikrein Genes in Ovarian Cancer Cancer Res., May 1, 2003; 63(9): 2223 - 2227. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. Witowsky, A. Abell, N. L. Johnson, G. L. Johnson, and B. D. Cuevas MEKK1 Is Required for Inducible Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator Expression J. Biol. Chem., February 14, 2003; 278(8): 5941 - 5946. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Bass, A.-M. M. Fernandez, and V. Ellis Maspin Inhibits Cell Migration in the Absence of Protease Inhibitory Activity J. Biol. Chem., November 27, 2002; 277(49): 46845 - 46848. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

This Article Abstract Full Text (PDF) Submit an electronic Letter to the Editor about this paper Alert me when this article is cited Alert me when eLetters are posted Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in ISI Web of Science Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (76) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Duffy, M. J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Duffy, M. J. Related Collections Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)