Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 186-188, 2003; 10.1373/49.1.186
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gnat, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gnat, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Pediatric Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Nutrition
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:186-188.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Fast Colorimetric Method for Measuring Urinary Iodine

Daniella Gnat1, Ann D. Dunn2, Samar Chaker1, Francois Delange1,3, Francoise Vertongen1 and John T. Dunn2,3a

1 Centre Hospitalier Universitaire St. Pierre, Free University of Brussels, 1000 Brussels, Belgium

2 Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA 22908

3 International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders, Box 801416, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, VA 22908

aauthor for correspondence: fax 434-243-9195, e-mail jtd{at}virginia.edu

International groups recommend the following median urinary iodine concentration as the best single indicator of iodine nutrition in populations: severe deficiency, 0–0.15 µmol/L (0–19 µg/L); moderate deficiency, 0.16–0.38 µmol/L (20–49 µg/L); mild deficiency, 0.40–0.78 µmol/L (50–99 µg/L); optimal iodine nutrition, 0.79–1.56 µmol/L (100–199 µg/L); more than adequate iodine intake, 1.57–2.36 µmol/L (200–299 µg/L); and excessive iodine intake, >=2.37 µmol/L (>=300 µg/L) (1). The range in which the median falls is more important than the precise number (2)(3).

Many methods for assessing urinary iodine exist (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8), most based on the Sandell–Kolthoff reaction (9), in which iodide catalyzes the reduction of ceric ammonium sulfate (yellow) to the colorless cerous form in the presence of arsenious acid. Although iodide is the chemical form for both the catalytic reaction and in urine, some preliminary treatment is needed to rid urine of impurities, most commonly by acid digestion (3)(5). We have extended previous approaches (5)(6)(10) with improved conditions and here present a new method ("Fast B") that is rapid, inexpensive, reliable, and flexible.

The equipment required for the Fast B method includes a heating block, Pyrex test tubes (13 x 100 mm), two fixed-volume pipettes (0.5 mL and 1.0 mL), one adjustable pipette (0–200 µL), and a multipet (Eppendorf) for quick reagent volume additions of 0.125 and 0.1 mL. The basic chemicals used are potassium iodate, arsenic trioxide, ammonium persulfate, ammonium cerium(IV) sulfate dihydrate, sodium chloride, ferroine, and sulfuric acid.

The solutions used in the assay are as follows:

We obtained fresh samples from healthy individuals and hospitalized patients in Brussels and frozen samples from epidemiologic studies in Europe and Africa. The urine samples were not treated with acid, but thymol crystals had been added to some of the samples in their country of origin before transfer to the laboratory. Results were compared with those obtained with the Technicon AutoAnalyzer II (Bayer/Technicon Instruments) (11) in use in our Brussels laboratory for more than 20 years and periodically subjected to routine external quality control.

We investigated several conditions to improve the previously described method (10), including use of ammonium persulfate in place of the more toxic chloric acid, a longer time for color development, and smaller sample volumes.

The final procedure developed is as follows. Each tube, containing 0.15 mL of urine or of calibrator and 1.0 mL of ammonium persulfate solution, is heated for 1 h in the block at 100 °C. After the solution is cooled at room temperature, 0.5 mL of arsenious acid solution is added to each tube and mixed on a vortex-mixer. At least 15 min later, 0.125 mL of fresh ferroine–arsenious acid solution is added. Tubes are mixed on a vortex-mixer and ranged in racks as follows: three calibrators [0.40 µmol/L (50 µg/L), 0.79 µmol/L (100 µg/L), and 2.37 µmol/L (300 µg/L)], followed by the urine samples and controls, and at the end, a second set of the same three calibrators. Each batch contains a total of 45–55 tubes, including samples, blanks, and controls. To each tube we rapidly add 0.1 mL of ceric ammonium sulfate solution with the multipipetter, with rapid shaking of each rack, and observe all tubes closely. After an initial blue color, samples first turn purple and then orange/brown. The speed of the color change depends on the iodine concentration. As each sample turns purple, it is placed in another rack in order of color change after addition of the ceric ammonium sulfate. Thus, all tubes, including calibrators and samples, are now ranked in order of color change. We then count the number of samples falling into each of the four categories [>2.37 µmol/L (>300 µg/L), 0.79–2.37 µmol/L (100–300 µg/L), 0.40–0.78 µmol/L (50–99 µg/L), and <0.40 µmol/L (<50 µg/L)] from the position of each tube relative to the positions of the calibrators.

When we compared the results obtained for 286 urine samples by the Fast B method with the results obtained with the AutoAnalyzer II method (Table 1 ), 275 (96.2%) were placed in the correct category by Fast B. Of the 11 discordant values, all were close to range cutoffs: 6 were false positives (samples with concentrations of 0.63, 0.71, 0.74, and 0.76 µmol/L by the AutoAnalyzer II method were placed in the 0.79–2.37 µmol/L range by the Fast B, and samples with concentrations of 2.22 and 2.24 µmol/L were placed in the >2.37 range), and 5 were false negatives (samples with concentrations of 0.83 and 0.83 µmol/L by the AutoAnalyzer II method were placed in the 0.40–0.78 range by the Fast B, and samples with concentrations of 2.46, 2.52, and 2.39 µmol/L were placed in the 0.79–2.37 range).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Comparison of iodine concentrations in 286 urine samples measured by Fast B and AutoAnalyzer II.

Approximately 45 samples, including 39 unknowns, can be handled in each analytical run. The color change is readily recognized visually. Under our conditions, samples with an iodine concentration >2.37 µmol/L (>300 µg/L) change color in <2 min, those with a concentration of 2.37 µmol/L (300 µg/L) change color at ~2 min, those with a concentration of 0.79 µmol/L (100 µg/L) change color at ~5 min, those with a concentration of 0.40 µmol/L (50 µg/L) change color at ~10 min, and those with a concentration of 0.08 µmol/L (10 µg/L) change color at ~40 min. For most purposes, it is satisfactory simply to record the number that have not changed before the 0.40 µmol/L (50 µg/L) calibrator and not wait. We have focused on calibrators that bracket the recommended ranges for defining iodine nutrition (1). Other calibrators between 0.40 and 2.37 µmol/L can be used to define other ranges of interest. Our experiments were conducted at a laboratory temperature of 20–25 °C. The speed of the Sandell–Kolthoff reaction is influenced by temperature and may need to be carried out at controlled temperatures in hot or cold climates (12).

From three urine samples with different iodine concentrations [0.30 µmol/L (38 µg/L), 0.76 µmol/L (96 µg/L), and 2.01 µmol/L (255 µg/L), respectively, authenticated by the AutoAnalyzer], we ran 10 aliquots of each sample separately in the same run; all 30 were correctly placed in the three categories: <0.40 µmol/L (<50 µg/L), 0.40–0.78 µmol/L (50–99 µg/L), and 0.79–2.37µmol/L (100–300 µg/L). We also analyzed an aliquot of each of the three samples for 13 consecutive days (a total of 39 samples); 38 of the 39 (97.5%) were placed correctly, and the 39th was placed in the category immediately above the correct category.

We diluted a urine sample containing 6.3 µmol/L iodine to give the following concentrations: 3.15, 2.10, 1.58, 1.05, 0.79, 0.63, and 0.53 µmol/L. The Fast B placed each in the correct range except the last, which was classified as <0.40 µmol/L. For comparison, the AutoAnalyzer gave respective values of >1.97, >1.97, 1.45, 1.03, 0.79, 0.61, and 0.54 µmol/L. We added KIO3 to a low-iodine sample (0.35 µmol/L) to produce samples containing 0.67, 0.98, 1.30, and 1.62 µmol/L iodine. Measurement by Fast B placed each in the correct range. For comparison, the AutoAnalyzer gave values of 0.64, 1.03, 1.34, and 1.54 µmol/L, respectively.

Ascorbic acid at concentrations of 0, 3.78, 7.96, or 15.92 mmol/L added to a sample containing 1.15 µmol/L (146 µg/L) iodine did not change the iodine concentration measured by the AutoAnalyzer (1.14–1.15 µmol/L) or by Fast B [remaining in the 0.79–1.18 µmol/L (100–150 µg/L) category]; for this experiment, other KIO3 calibrators were used to create the category of 0.79–1.18 µmol/L (100–150 µg/L).

No change in iodine concentration was detected by either the AutoAnalyzer or Fast B after the addition of potassium thiocyanate at concentrations of 0.172, 0.344, or 0.688 mmol/L or of D-glucose up to 56 mmol/L (10.14 g/L).

The placement of values within the ranges described here satisfies most epidemiologic purposes (1) and is more cost-effective than analyzing and reporting individual samples. One technician can easily measure 200 samples in a working day, and depending on salaries, the cost may be less than US $0.10/sample. One of us (D.G.) trained two technicians from a developing country in African to be proficient in the method after 3 days of instruction and practice. The investment in equipment is low, and except for pipettes, the only instrument is the heating block, which might be replaced by a boiling water bath if necessary.

In conclusion, the Fast B method described here is rapid, simple, reliable, flexible, and inexpensive and provides an attractive means for assessing iodine nutrition in populations, especially in developing countries.


Acknowledgments

We thank the Micronutrient Initiative (Ottawa, Canada) for financial support, and colleagues in the International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders (ICCIDD) for providing samples and helpful discussion.


References

  1. . International Council for the Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders. WHO. UNICEF. Assessment of iodine deficiency disorders and monitoring their elimination. A guide for programme managers, 2nd ed 2001 World Health Organization Geneva, Switzerland. .
  2. Bourdoux P, Thilly C, Delange F, Ermans AM. A new look at old concepts in laboratory evaluation of endemic goiter. Dunn JT Pretell EA Daza CH Viteri FE eds. Towards the eradication of endemic goiter, cretinism, and iodine deficiency 1986:115-129 Pan American Health Organization Washington. .
  3. Dunn JT, Crutchfield HE, Gutekunst R, Dunn AD. Methods for measuring iodine in urine 1993 International Council for Control of Iodine Deficiency Disorders Charlottesville, VA. .
  4. Standardization of ultrasound and urinary iodine determination for assessing iodine status: report of a technical consultation. IDD Newslett 2000;16:19-23.
  5. Pino S, Fang SL, Braverman LE. Ammonium persulfate: a safe alternative oxidizing reagent for measuring urinary iodine. Clin Chem 1996;42:239-243.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Dunn JT, Crutchfield HE, Gutekunst R, Dunn AD. Two simple methods for measuring iodine in urine. Thyroid 1993;3:119-123.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Rendl J, Bier D, Groh T, Reiners C. Rapid urinary iodide test. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1998;83:1007-1012.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ohashi T, Yamaki M, Pandav CS, Karmarkar MG, Irie M. Simple microplate method for determination of urinary iodine. Clin Chem 2000;46:529-536.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Sandell EB, Kolthoff IM. Micro determination of iodine by a catalytic method. Mikrochem Acta 1937;1:9-25.
  10. Dunn JT, Myers HE, Dunn AD. Simple method for assessing urinary iodine, including preliminary description of a new rapid technique ("Fast B"). Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 1998;106(Suppl 3):1005-1007.
  11. Riley M, Gochman N. A fully automated method for the determination of serum protein-bound iodine 1964 Technicon Symposium Tarrytown, NY. .
  12. Dung NT, Wellby ML. Effect of high room temperature on urinary iodine assay. Clin Chem 1997;43:1084-1085.[Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gnat, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gnat, D.
Right arrow Articles by Dunn, J. T.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Pediatric Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Nutrition
Right arrow Endocrinology and Metabolism
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS