Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 594-600, 2003; 10.1373/49.4.594
This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:594-600.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.

New ELISA System for Myeloid-related Protein Complex (MRP8/14) and Its Clinical Significance as a Sensitive Marker for Inflammatory Responses Associated with Transplant Rejection

Masaki Ikemoto1,a, Tomoko Tanaka1, Yuri Takai1, Hiroshi Murayama2, Koichi Tanaka3 and Masatoshi Fujita1

1 College of Medical Technology, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

2 Immunological Laboratory, Diagnostic Division, Yamasa Shoyu Co., Ltd, Choshi, Chiba 288-0056, Japan.

3 Department of Transplantation Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan.

aAddress correspondence to this author at: College of Medical Technology, Kyoto University, 53 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto 606-8507, Japan. Fax 81-75-751-3909; e-mail mmas{at}kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp.


   Abstract
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Background: C-reactive protein (CRP), a useful marker for inflammatory diseases, is not always sensitive to inflammatory reaction in the liver or other tissues. The aim of this study was to develop a sensitive and specific method for detecting inflammatory responses associated with transplant rejection.

Methods: We developed a new, highly sensitive ELISA system for the measurement of serum human myeloid-related protein complex (MRP8/14), using monoclonal antibodies against MRP8/14, and applied it to specimens obtained from patients undergoing small intestine or liver transplantation.

Results: This assay could detect MRP8/14 concentrations as low as 2 µg/L. Within-run CVs were 3.7–6.1% and between-day CVs were 5.6–8.7% for MRP8/14 concentrations of 117-3300 µg/L. Mean recovery was 104% (range, 80–128%). We observed a marked increase in serum MRP8/14 postoperatively in most recipients of transplants, followed by an increase in CRP 1–7 days after the increase in the complex. The increase in serum MRP8/14 occurred simultaneously with permeation of lymphocytes into the transplanted tissues as a result of rejection of the graft tissues.

Conclusions: Accurate measurement of serum MRP8/14 provides a useful clinical diagnostic method tool for detecting inflammation associated with rejection of transplanted tissues.


   Introduction
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
Human granulocytes and monocytes are two major effector cells involved in inflammatory processes in the body. To acquire the potential ability of inactive granulocytes and monocytes, cells must generally be activated intracellularly in a calcium-dependent manner or by other factors (1)(2)(3). Excessive activation of these cells may, however, induce pathophysiologically unfavorable conditions in many acute and/or chronic inflammatory diseases (4)(5). The myeloid-related protein complex (MRP8/14), 1 consisting of two subunits with low molecular mass (8 and 14 kDa), is a member of the S100 family and contains two calcium-binding sites per molecule (2)(6)(7)(8). The two subunits are expressed in activated human granulocytes and monocytes in the inflammatory phase (1)(3)(8)(9)(10). Both proteins form covalently associated complexes in a calcium-dependent manner (11)(12). Translocation of the complexes from the cytosol to membrane is induced under increased intracellular calcium concentrations and correlates with the inflammatory action of granulocytes and monocytes (3)(13). Thus, MRP8 or MRP14 and their heterodimeric complex, MRP8/14, seem to be key proteins in cell-cycle regulation and cell activation with calcium to motivate phagocytosis (14)(15)(16). The calcium-induced change in the complex pattern of these two proteins is important for their biological function.

Odink et al. (1), on the other hand, reported that neither MRP8 or MRP14 was detectable in resident macrophages in sections of healthy human tissue, but in acutely inflamed tissue, such as in gingivitis, psoriasis, neurodermatitis, and erythrodermia, MRP14 was present in macrophages of the perivascular infiltrate in 15 of 32 cases analyzed, whereas MRP8 was always absent. Both MRP8 and MRP14 are involved in acute or chronic inflammation. Recently, we purified MRP8/14 protein from human leukocytes, prepared specific monoclonal antibodies against the complex, and used these antibodies to develop an ELISA system.

To date, there have been few reports on the clinical importance of MRP8/14 as a marker of inflammatory reaction associated with transplant rejection in graft tissues, particularly in the acute phase (17)(18). The present study was based on our hypothesis that MRP8/14 could serve as a useful marker for acute inflammation associated with rejection in the grafted tissues.


   Materials and Methods
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
materials
We obtained 96-well polycarbonate plates for ELISA and Block-AceTM solution for blocking the plate from Dainippon Pharmacology Co. Ltd. CM Sephadex C-50 and molecular weight markers were from Pharmacia. Poros HS was from the Applied Biochemistry Co. Ltd. Purified recombinant human liver-type arginase (ARG) was used as a calibrator for the ELISA (19). All analytical reagents were obtained from Nacalai Tesque Co. Ltd.

preparation of human leukocyte lysate
Human whole blood was anticoagulated with ACD-A solution (22 g/L sodium citrate, 8 g/L citrate, and 22 g/L glucose in distilled water). The blood and plasma gel solution (30 g/L gelatin and 9 g/L NaCl) was gently mixed at a ratio of 6:1 and then incubated at 37 °C for 1 h. The supernatant was collected in a 50-mL plastic tube with a plastic pipette and then centrifuged at 1500g for 5 min at room temperature. The supernatant was discarded. We added 15 mL of 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) containing 1 g/L NH4Cl to the remaining cell fraction to hemolyze contaminated erythrocytes, mixed the cell fraction gently with the same plastic pipette, and then incubated it at 37 °C for ~5 to 7 min. After termination of hemolysis, the cells were washed three times with Hanks’ balanced salts solution (HBSS). The recovered leukocytes were resuspended in ~30 mL of 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4) buffer solution. After sonication, the solution was centrifuged at 11 000g at 4 °C for 30 min; the supernatant was collected and then applied to a CM Sephadex C-50 column.

purification of mrp8/14 protein complex
Partial purification of MRP8/14 was achieved with use of CM Sephadex C-50 (19 x 100 mm) and Poros HS [100 x 4.6 mm (i.d.); 20 µm; Vision Workstation FPC] columns. The buffer solution used was 10 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.4). Proteins were eluted with a linear gradient of 0–1.0 mol/L NaCl in the same buffer. Sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) was carried out to confirm that the fractions contained proteins with molecular masses of ~26 kDa, as described by Edgeworth et al. (8). Finally, affinity-purified MRP8/14 proteins were obtained with use of an anti-MRP8/14 complex monoclonal antibody (Mo2B9)-Sepharose 4B column according to the procedure described previously (20). In addition, MRP8 and MRP14 proteins were purified electrophoretically. Briefly, SDS-PAGE (15% gel) of partially purified MRPs (~90%) was carried out in the absence of 2-mercaptoethanol (2-ME). After SDS-PAGE, the proteins in the gel were stained with Coomassie Brilliant Blue. Two 3-mm gel slices corresponding to 8 and 14 kDa were carefully cut out and separately placed in seamless cellulose tubing for dialysis, together with an adequate volume of the buffer solution for SDS-PAGE. Electrophoresis was again carried out in sufficient volume of the same buffer, using an apparatus for electrophoresis of DNA. MRP8 and MRP14 were electrophoretically released from the gel slices into the buffer solution. MRP8 or MRP14 in the buffer was concentrated and kept refrigerated until use.

production of monoclonal antibodies for anti-mrp8/14 protein and their specificities
Anti-MRP8/14 complex monoclonal antibodies were prepared as described previously (21). These antibodies were biotinylated with NHS-biotin (Pierce) according to commercial instructions for application to ELISA and stored refrigerated as the second antibody until use. The specificities and affinities of these antibodies were examined by Western blot analysis that was carried out at room temperature using nitrocellulose membranes, anti-MRP8/14 complex monoclonal IgGs, and commercially available anti-mouse IgG IgG-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugate as described previously by Towbin et al. (22). Antibody-bound protein was visualized with use of a color reagent [3–5 mg of 3,3'-diaminobenzidine tetrachloride in 20 mL of 0.1 mol/L Tris-HCl (pH 7.6) and 0.1 mL/L hydrogen peroxide]. Briefly, the crude MRP8/14 protein (~200 µg of protein) was added to each lane (see Fig. 1 , A, C, and D). The first antibodies (Mo1B12, Mo2B9, Mo3D2, and Mo3F3), adequately diluted, were used to examine their specificities for the MRP8/14 complex. The MRP8, MRP14, and MRP8/14 proteins, which were electrophoretically purified from 15% gels by SDS-PAGE in the absence of 2-ME, were used (see Fig. 1 , B–D). These MRPs were used for SDS-PAGE in the presence and the absence of 2-ME; the proteins in the gels were then transferred on nitrocellulose membranes electrophoretically.



View larger version (126K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Immunologic specificity of monoclonal antibodies against human MRP8/14 protein complex.

A, crude MRP8/14 sample (lanes 1–4). The first antibodies were Mo1B12 (lane 1), Mo2B9 (lane 2), Mo3D2 (lane 3), and Mo3F3 (lane 4), and the second antibody was an anti-mouse IgG (goat) IgG-HRP conjugate. B, MRP8 and MRP14 proteins (electrophoretically purified) and MRP8/14 (see Materials and Methods). Proteins on nitrocellulose membrane in lanes 1, 2, and 3 are MRP8/14, MRP14, and MRP8, respectively, under nonreducing conditions; those in lanes 4 and 5 are MRP8/14 and MRP8, respectively, under reducing conditions. C, purified MRP8/14 protein (lanes 1–4). To show that the two monoclonal antibodies, Mo2B9 and Mo3D2, recognize different epitopes on the MRP8/14 complex, Western blotting was carried out with Mo2B9 (lanes 1 and 2) and Mo3D2 (lanes 3 and 4) as the first antibodies and Mo2B9-HRP (lanes 1 and 4) and Mo3D2-HRP (lanes 2 and 3) as the second antibodies. D, specificities of Mo2B9 and Mo3D2 for MRP8/14 complex. MRP8 (lanes 1 and 4), MRP14 (lanes 2 and 5), and MRP8/14 (lanes 3 and 6) were used. The HRP-conjugated antibodies were Mo2B9-HRP (lane 3) and Mo3D2-HRP (lane 6). Lanes M (without 2-ME) and N (with 2-ME) contain molecular mass markers.

amino acid sequence analysis
The purified MRP8/14 complexes were subjected to SDS-PAGE (15% gel) under reducing conditions with 2-ME. Two subunits of MRP8 and MRP14 in the polyacrylamide gel were transferred to a PVDF membrane (Sequi-BlotTM; Bio-Rad Laboratories) and used for amino acid sequence analysis. Amino acid sequence analysis of the purified MRP8/14 was carried out to investigate the homology with MRP8/14 reported by Odink et al. (1). The peptide sequences of both MRP8 and MRP14 subunits purified in this study were identical to those of MRP8 and MRP14, respectively, reported by Odink et al. (1) (data not shown).

elisa procedures for mrp8/14 complex and arg
The basic examination of optimal conditions for the ELISA was carried out in detail as described previously (21). Concentrations of 0.166 and 0.834 mg/L for the first and the second antibodies, respectively, were the most effective for the ELISA system (data not shown). A 96-well polycarbonate plate coated with the first antibody (Mo2B9) was used for ELISA. We added 100 µL of diluent solution to each well; we then added 25 µL of the serum sample, previously diluted 41-fold with Block-Ace diluted 10-fold with distilled water (a working Block-Ace solution), or the MRP8/14 complex calibrator solution and mixed the plate for 15 s with a plate mixer. The plate was incubated for 1 h to allow the immunologic reaction to proceed (first incubation). After the plate was washed five times with washing buffer solution, we added 100 µL of the F(ab')2-biotin conjugate (second antibody; Mo3D2 in the working Block-Ace solution, containing 0.5 g/L thimerosal) and incubated the plate for 1 h (second incubation). After washing the plate as above with the same washing solution, we added 100 µL of streptavidin-HRP conjugate diluted 1500-fold with the working Block-Ace solution and incubated the plate for 30 min (third incubation). Finally, we determined HRP activity colorimetrically by the method of Ikemoto et al. (20) as described previously. If the patient’s serum contains a high concentration of MRP8/14, the serum samples should be diluted adequately with a solution containing 10 g/L bovine serum albumin. A lower dilution of the sample can be used, however, to shorten the time for the first and second incubations in the ELISA system. ELISA for ARG was carried out as described previously (21). Using the ELISA system, we determined the ARG concentrations in the sera of a large number of liver recipients and a few recipients receiving small intestine transplants.


   Results
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
We performed SDS-PAGE (15% gel) on partially purified MRP8/14 protein complex from human leukocytes, without a reducing agent, and then performed Western blot analysis using 16 monoclonal antibodies. The representative results are presented in Fig. 1Up . Of these antibodies, regardless of the crude MRP8/14 sample, two antibodies (Mo2B9 and Mo3D2) revealed a single band, indicating the specificity of these antibodies for the MRP8/14 complex (Fig. 1AUp , lanes 2 and 3). The reactivity of Mo2B9 with MRP8/14 was a little stronger than that of Mo3D2. SDS-PAGE of MRP8, -14, and -8/14 was carried out in the absence (Fig. 1BUp , lanes M, 1, 2, and 3) and the presence (Fig. 1BUp , lanes 4, 5, and N) of 2-ME. MRP8/14 (Fig. 1BUp , lane 1) was reduced to two smaller subunits corresponding to MRP8 and MRP14 (Fig. 1BUp , lane 4), respectively, indicating that the 26-kDa protein is a MRP8/14 complex comprising the MRP8 and -14 subunits. For comparison, the MRP8 band under reducing conditions was also present (Fig. 1BUp , lane 5). However, the gel in Fig. 1AUp does not necessarily show that Mo2B9 and Mo3D2 recognize different epitopes of the MRP8/14 molecule. To elucidate the specificities of the two antibodies for their different epitopes in the MRP8/14 complex, we performed an inhibition assay (Fig. 1CUp ).

The reactivity of Mo2B9-HRP as second antibody was completely inhibited when we used Mo2B9 as the first antibody (Fig. 1CUp , lane 1), but when Mo3D2-HRP was used as the second antibody with Mo2B9 as the first antibody, we observed a strong positive band (Fig. 1CUp , lane 2). Similar to Mo2B9, the reactivity of the Mo3D2-HRP was completely inhibited when we used Mo3D2 as the first antibody (Fig. 1CUp , lane 3), but when we used Mo2B9-HRP as the second antibody and Mo3D2 as the first antibody, we observed a positive band (Fig. 1CUp , lane 4). These facts indicate that the epitope detected by Mo3D2 was different from that detected by Mo2B9. In addition, both of the antibodies reacted with MRP8/14 protein specifically but not at all with the individual subunits, MRP8 or MRP14 (Fig. 1DUp ). It therefore is likely that these antibodies recognized the higher dimensional structure of MRP8/14 complex characterized by special epitopes and recognized different epitopes in the MRP8/14 molecule. On the basis of these results, we used Mo2B9 and Mo3D2 as the first and the second antibodies, respectively, to develop an ELISA system for MRP8/14.

To examine the specificity of the 16 monoclonal antibodies for the MRP8/14 complex, we performed Western blotting. When we used a crude extract of the MRP8/14 complex from human leukocytes, the antibody Mo2B9 reacted most specifically with the MRP8/14 complex, whereas the antibody Mo3D2 had the highest affinity for the complex, revealing a single, strongly positive band by Western blotting (data not shown). In addition, we examined which pair of monoclonal antibodies was the best combination for a sandwich ELISA and found that the sensitivity and specificity were highest when we used Mo2B9 as the first antibody and previously biotinylated Mo3D2 as the second antibody, with a fixed concentration of streptavidin-HRP conjugate adequately diluted with 10 g/L bovine serum albumin in the working Block-Ace solution (Fig. 2 ). The ELISA enabled us to measure MRP8/14 protein at concentrations as low as 2 µg/L in serum (Fig. 2 ) and was linear to 873 µg/L.



View larger version (58K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 2. Analysis of the best combination of monoclonal antibodies and calibration curve for ELISA of MRP8/14 complex.

First antibody, Mo2B9; second antibodies (biotinylated), Mo1B12 ({square}), Mo2D9 ({diamondsuit}), Mo3D2 (•), Mo3F3 ({blacksquare}), Mo4H6 ({circ}), Mo6G5 ({diamond}), Mo6E9 ({triangleup}), and Mo10C2 ({blacktriangledown}). Values are means of triplicate determinations.

We assessed the reproducibility of the method using purified MRP8/14 calibrator and pooled sera from healthy individuals and patients undergoing liver or small intestine transplantation. When we used the MRP8/14 calibrator (936 µg/L) and the pooled serum (312 µg/L), the within-day CVs were 3.7% and 6.1%, respectively (n = 44). When we used the pooled sera of 3300 and 312 µg/L, the between-day CVs were 5.6% and 8.7%, respectively (n = 35). The mean recovery of endogenous plus exogenous MRP8/14 was 104% (range, 80–128%). The MRP8/14 concentrations in the sera obtained from 85 healthy individuals (32 males and 53 females; mean age, 19 years; range, 18–25 years), were 52–468 µg/L [mean (SD), 260 (104) µg/L].

To assess the clinical usefulness of our new ELISA system for MRP8/14, we examined sera from 225 patients undergoing either small intestine or liver transplantation from living related donors. Postoperative changes in serum MRP8/14 concentrations in one representative case are presented. For comparison, the serum concentrations of ARG, aspartate aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and other markers were also measured.

A female patient (7 years of age) with congenital intestine absorption disorders underwent a partial small intestine transplantation from her mother. Approximately 6 months after the operation, a dramatic increase in the patient’s serum MRP8/14 was observed, followed by an increase in CRP (Fig. 3 ). Approximately 1 month after the initial increase, transplantation of a part of the small intestine was repeated (indicated by a vertical arrow in Fig. 3 ). However, rejection occurred progressively, and the patient died ~1 year later. At 6 months after the repeat transplantation, serum MRP8/14 increased markedly to 50 times the upper limit of the reference interval, with two prominent peaks. The first, and less prominent, peak emerged ~4 months before death. The concentration continued to increase with repeated fluctuations. At the terminal stage, the second prominent peak increased to 100 times the upper limit of the reference interval just before the patient’s death. At the time points of the three peaks, rejections in the grafted tissues were confirmed histochemically (data not shown). Thus, the time periods in which rejection appeared coincided with the prominent MRP8/14 peaks. CRP, on the other hand, increased only before the patient’s death, to 40 times the upper limit of the reference interval.



View larger version (22K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 3. Changes in MRP8/14, CRP, and other hepatic markers in the serum of a patient who underwent partial small intestine transplantation.

Days on which the operation and death occurred are indicated by {triangledown} and {blacktriangledown}, respectively. The day of retransplantation is indicated by a vertical arrow. The days when rejection was observed are indicated by *. Values are the marker concentrations (fold) relative to the upper reference limits (upper reference limit = 1 on the y axis). WBC, white blood cells.


   Discussion
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 
In the present study, we described a new ELISA system for measuring the MRP8/14 protein and presented data supporting its clinical usefulness. The value of serum MRP8/14 as an indicator of acute inflammation in transplanted tissues is based on its origin and characteristics as a protein in relation to acute inflammation. Two new aspects of MRP8/14 as a useful marker for acute inflammation associated with transplant rejection were found in the present study: one is that the appearance of MRP8/14 precedes that of CRP (Fig. 3Up ); the other is that fluctuations in serum MRP8/14 concentrations are much more sensitive for acute inflammatory responses associated with rejection in the transplanted tissues than are those of the other markers, such as CRP, AST, and ALT (Fig. 3Up ).

CRP has been recognized as a good marker for inflammation by many clinicians and reported to be produced in the liver by stimulation of several cytokines, such as interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor-{alpha}, in a complex manner (23). It is also generally accepted that CRP becomes detectable in the blood at least 2 to 3 days after the stimulation. On the other hand, MRP8/14 complex is likely to be simultaneously produced in human granulocytes in the acute inflammatory phase because MRPs (MRP8 and MRP14), particularly MRP14, are expressed exclusively in human activated granulocytes, mainly neutrophils, in response to acute inflammatory reaction at the early stage (1)(13). This property of the MRP8/14 complex is a potential benefit that is more advantageous for detecting acute inflammation than is CRP. Although the mechanism for leakage of the MRP8/14 complex from human activated granulocytes is unclear, it is different from that of CRP (3). Differences in the kinetics of MRP8/14 and CRP in serum, i.e., differences in the fluctuations of their concentrations in serum, provide another useful marker for inflammation caused by rejection.

There were no significant increases in AST, ALT, and ARG throughout our monitoring of the representative case of small intestine transplantation, indicating no damage to the liver and other organs, such as the heart and kidney (24)(25). At 1, 3, and 6 months before the patient’s death, however, high concentrations of MRP8/14 were detected in her serum, suggesting that a severe inflammatory reaction occurred elsewhere in nonhepatic tissues (Fig. 3Up ). Indeed, transplant rejection was confirmed microscopically in the transplanted tissues at each time point, as indicated by the asterisks in Fig. 3Up (data not shown). These facts support our hypothesis that the overexpression of MRP8/14 in human granulocytes in the inflammatory phase and its appearance in the serum is probably the result of inflammatory reactions associated with rejection in the transplanted tissues. Thus, the increase in CRP was not necessarily concomitant with that in MRP8/14 and may be attributable to bacterial infection in the recipient (18). Therefore, serum MRP8/14 seemed to be more sensitive for inflammatory responses associated with transplant rejection than was CRP. Throughout the whole course, serum MRP8/14 tended to increase earlier and rather independently in comparison with CRP, which indicated that MRP8/14 is not a critical marker as an ultimate index for death in recipients, but rather serves as a prospective marker to detect acute immune changes relating to rejection or inflammation occurring in the body.

Some roles of MRP8 and MRP14 in the cells have been reported (6)(11)(14)(26), whereas those of the MRP8/14 complex are poorly understood. Although the reason that MRP8 is covalently associated with MRP14 at the time of acute inflammation remains unclear, such an association may enhance their potential pathophysiologic functions that down-regulate acute inflammatory reaction in the transplanted tissues in a complex manner.

In conclusion, we described the possibility of the MRP8/14 complex being a reliable marker for inflammatory reactions associated with rejection in transplanted tissues. In future studies, the expression mechanism of MRP8/14 and its functions in human activated granulocytes, and the relationship between MRP8/14 and CRP should be investigated.


   Acknowledgments
 
We thank Tadashi Takasaki and Hirotatsu Ueno (College of Medical Technology, Kyoto University) for helping us technically and the many healthy volunteers in the same university for providing us with blood samples. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C: 13672419) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan (to M.I.)


   Footnotes
 
1 Nonstandard abbreviations: MRP, myeloid-related protein; ARG, liver-type arginase; HBSS, Hanks’ balanced salts solution; SDS-PAGE, sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis; 2-ME, 2-mercaptoethanol; HRP, horseradish peroxidase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; ALT, alanine aminotransferase; and CRP, C-reactive protein.


   References
Top
Abstract
Introduction
Materials and Methods
Results
Discussion
References
 

  1. Odink K, Cerletti N, Bruggen J, Clerc RG, Tarcsay L, Zwadlo G, et al. Two calcium-binding proteins in infiltrate macrophages of rheumatoid arthritis. Nature 1987;330:80-82.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Kerkhoff C, Klempt M, Sorg C. Novel insights into structure and function of MRP8 (S100A8) and MRP14 (S100A9). Biochim Biophys Acta 1998;1448:200-211.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Rammes A, Roth J, Goebeler M, Klempt M, Hartmann M, Sorg C. Myeloid-related protein (MRP) 8 and MRP14, calcium-binding proteins of the S100 family, are secreted by activated monocytes via novel, tubulin-dependent pathway. J Biol Chem 1997;272:9496-9502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Rugtveit J, Nilsen EM, Bakka A, Carlsen H, Brandtzaeg P, Scott H. Cytokine profiles differ in newly recruited and resident subsets of mucosal macrophages from inflammatory bowel disease. Gastroenterology 1997;112:1493-1505.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Burmester ER, Stuhlmuller B, Keysqer G, Kinne RW. Mononuclear phagocytes and rheumatoid synovitis. Mastermind or workhorse in arthritis?. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:5-18.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Van den Bos C, Roth J, Koch HG, Hartmann M, Sorg C. Phosphorylation of MRP14, an S100 protein expressed during monocytic differentiation, modulates Ca2+-dependent translocation from cytoplasm to membranes and cytoskeleton. J Immunol 1996;156:1247-1254.[Abstract]
  7. Vogl T, Propper C, Hartmann M, Strey A, Strupat K, Van den Bos C, et al. S100A12 is expressed exclusively by granulocytes and acts independently from MRP8 and MRP14. J Biol Chem 1999;274:25291-25296.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Edgeworth J, Gorman M, Bennett R, Freemont P, Hogg N. Identification of p8, 14 as a highly abundant heterodimeric calcium binding protein complex of myeloid cells. J Biol Chem 1991;266:7706-7713.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Dorin JR, Novak M, Hill RE, Brock DJH, Secher DS, Van Heyningen V. A clue to the basic defect in cystic fibrosis from cloning the CF antigen gene. Nature 1987;326:614-617.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Lagasse E, Clerc RG. Cloning and expression of two human genes encoding calcium-binding proteins that are regulated during myeloid differentiation. Mol Cell Biol 1988;8:2402-2410.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Teigelkamp S, Bhardwaj RS, Roth J, Meinardus-Hager G, Karas M, Sorg C. Calcium-dependent complex assembly of the myeloic differentiation proteins MRP-8 and MRP-14. J Biol Chem 1991;266:13462-13467.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Vogl T, Roth J, Sorg C, Hillenkamp F, Strupat K. Calcium-induced noncovalently linked terramers of MRP8 and MRP14 detected by ultraviolet matrix-assisted laser desorption. ionization mass spectrometry. J Am Soc Mass Spectrom 1992;10:1124-1130.
  13. Bhardwaj R, Zotz C, Zwadlo-Klarwasser G, Roth J, Goebeler M, Mahnke K, et al. The calcium-binding proteins MRP8 and MRP14 form a membrane-associated heterodimer in a subset of monocytes/macrophages present in acute but absent in chronic inflammatory lesions. Eur J Immunol 1992;22:1891-1897.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Propper C, Huang X, Roth J, Sorg C, Nacken W. Analysis of the MRP8-MRP14 protein-protein interaction by the two-hybrid system suggests a prominent role of the C-terminal domain of S100 proteins in dimer formation. J Biol Chem 1999;274:183-188.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Roth J, Burwinkel CF, van den Bos M, Goebeler E, Vollmer E, Sorg C. MRP8 and MRP14, S-100-like proteins associated with myeloid differentiation, are translocated to plasma membrane and intermediate filaments in calcium-dependent manner. Blood 1993;82:1875-1883.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Lemarchand P, Vaglio M, Mauel J, Markert M. Translocation of a small cytosolic calcium-binding protein (MRP-8) to plasma membrane correlates with human neutrophil activation. J Biol Chem 1992;267:19379-19382.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Burkhardt K, Radespiel-Troger M, Rupprecht HD, Goppelt-Struebe M, Riess R, Renders L, et al. An increase in myeloid-related protein serum levels precedes acute renal allograft rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2001;12:1947-1957.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Ivanov GE, Misuno NI, Ivanov VE. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for human MRP-8/MRP-14 proteins and their quantitation in plasma of hematological patients. Immunol Lett 1996;49:7-13.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Ikemoto M, Tabata M, Miyake T, Kono T, Mori M, Totani M, et al. Expression of human liver arginase in Escherichia coli. Purification and properties of the product. Biochem J 1990;270:697-703.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Ikemoto M, Ishida A, Tsunekawa S, Ozawa K, Kasai Y, Totani M, et al. Enzyme immunoassay of liver-type arginase and its potential clinical application. Clin Chem 1993;39:794-799.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  21. Ikemoto M, Tsunekawa S, Awane M, Fukuda Y, Murayama H, Igarashi M, et al. A useful ELISA system for human liver-type arginase, and its utility in diagnosis of liver diseases. Clin Biochem 2001;34:455-461.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  22. Towbin H, Staehelin T, Gordon J. Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: Procedure and some applications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1979;76:4350-4354.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  23. Weinhold B, Bader A, Poli V, Ruther U. Interleukin-6 is necessary, but not sufficient for induction of the human C-reactive protein gene in vivo. Biochem J 1997;325:617-621.
  24. Schmidt E, Schmidt FW. Enzyme diagnosis in diseases of the liver and the biliary system. Adv Clin Enzymol 1979;1:239-292.
  25. Ikemoto M, Tsunekawa S, Tanaka K, Tanaka A, Yamaoka Y, Ozawa K, et al. Liver-type arginase in serum during and after liver transplantation: a novel index in monitoring conditions of the liver graft and its clinical significance. Clin Chim Acta 1998;271:11-23.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  26. Nacken W, Sopalla C, Propper C, Sorg C, Kerkhoff C. Biochemical characterization of the murine S100A9 (MRP14) protein suggests that it is functionally equivalent to its human counterpart despite its low degree of sequence homology. Eur J Biochem 2000;267:560-565.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
HeartHome page
S Miyamoto, M Ueda, M Ikemoto, T Naruko, A Itoh, S Tamaki, R Nohara, F Terasaki, S Sasayama, and M Fujita
Increased serum levels and expression of S100A8/A9 complex in infiltrated neutrophils in atherosclerotic plaque of unstable angina
Heart, August 1, 2008; 94(8): 1002 - 1007.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Abstract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (9)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Ikemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Ikemoto, M.
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS