Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 655-658, 2003; 10.1373/49.4.655
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:655-658.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Detection of Donor-specific DNA Polymorphisms in the Urine of Renal Transplant Recipients

Ying Li1, Deirdré Hahn2, Xiao Yan Zhong1, Peter D. Thomson2, Wolfgang Holzgreve1 and Sinuhe Hahn1,a

1 University Women’s Hospital/Department of Research, University of Basel, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland

2 Division of Paediatric Nephrology, University of the Witwatersrand and Johannesburg Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Laboratory for Prenatal Medicine, University Women’s Hospital/Department of Research, Schanzenstrasse 46, CH 4031 Basel, Switzerland; fax 41-61-325-9399, e-mail shahn{at}unbs.ch

Recently, a novel form of chimerism, termed urinary DNA chimerism, has been described in kidney transplant recipients in that cell-free DNA from the donor kidney was detected in the recipient’s urine (1). Quantitative analysis of this urinary donor-derived DNA has indicated that it may serve as a new marker to monitor kidney transplant engraftment because increased concentrations were present under conditions of graft rejection, which decreased to basal values after immunosuppressive treatment (2). A caveat of these studies was that they relied on sex-disparate donor–recipient conditions: because the PCR assays used were specific for the Y chromosome, cell-free DNA from the donor kidney could be detected only in the urine of female recipients who had received male kidneys (1)(2).

We examined whether other kidney donor-derived DNA sequences could be detected in the urine of transplant recipients, using PCR assays specific for highly polymorphic short tandem repeat (STR) loci, also termed microsatellite markers. Previous examinations using such polymorphic genetic loci have shown that they can be used for differentiating female fetal cells from maternal ones (3)(4) or for the gender-independent detection of cell-free fetal DNA in maternal plasma (5)(6). For this purpose, we tested for the presence of donor-specific STR loci in the urine of cases in which the donor and recipient were either of the same sex or the donor was female and the recipient was male.

For our study, which was approved by our respective ethics review boards, five cases involving living-donor (four related and one unrelated) transplants were enrolled.

Blood samples from both the recipient and donor were obtained before the transplantation, and spontaneous urine samples were obtained from the previously anuric recipients post transplantation. Because there is some tentative evidence that DNA in urine can be stabilized by the presence of the chelating agent EDTA (7), the urine samples were collected and shipped in standard Monovette tubes (Sarstedt) used for the collection of blood samples (containing 1.6 mg of potassium EDTA/mL of total volume).

Whole-blood DNA and cell-free urinary DNA were extracted with use of the High Pure PCR Template reagent set (Roche), according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

The donor–recipient pairs were first genotyped using 100 ng of total genomic DNA to monitor microsatellite markers on chromosome 21 in a fluorescent PCR assay established previously in our laboratory (3):

The D21S11 and D21S1435 forward primers were 5'-labeled with the fluorescent dyes carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and 2,7-dimethyloxy-4,5-dichloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (HEX), whereas the D21S1432 and D21S1440 reverse primers were 5'-labeled with tetrachlorofluorescein (TET) and HEX, respectively. All primers were obtained form Microsynth Incorporated. This step allowed us to determine which of the STR loci on chromosome 21 were informative, in that a particular STR allele present in the donor genome was absent from that of the recipient. We should then be able to determine whether we could detect this donor-specific informative STR allele in the urine of the transplant recipient.

Because the concentration of cell-free DNA in urine was previously found to be very low (2), this material was examined by use of a seminested PCR assay we have used previously for the analysis of single cells (3). In this assay the following external seminested primers were used:

In brief, PCR amplification was performed in a total volume of 30 µL containing 100 ng of template DNA, 200 nM deoxynucleotide triphosphates, 10 pM each of the primers, 3.5 mM MgCl2, and 1.5 U of AmpliTaq Gold (Applied Biosystems Inc.). After denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, PCR was performed for 25 cycles at 95 °C for 30 s, 55 °C for 30 s, and 72 °C for 45 s, with a final extension step at 72 °C for 7 min. For the urine samples, 1 µL of the PCR amplicon was used as template for a subsequent seminested PCR amplification. This nested PCR was performed as above except that the annealing temperature was increased to 58 °C. After amplification, the PCR products were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on a ABI 310 gene analyzer (Applied Biosystems) equipped with GeneScan software (Applied Biosystems). Fluorescently labeled GeneScan 500 molecular weight markers were included in each run.

Our analysis of these STR loci showed that informative allelic differences could be obtained in each of the cases studied (Table 1 ). These were then used to study the corresponding urine samples. Subsequent analysis showed that donor-specific STR alleles could be detected in each case examined (Table 1 and Fig. 1 ). In general, the recipient urine samples contained both recipient- and donor-derived STR sequences (e.g., cases 1, 2, and 5) in that informative donor and recipient alleles could be detected in these samples. In one recipient (case 3), donor-derived sequences appeared to dominate in that the informative recipient allele was lacking. In case 4, the recipient was homozygous for both of the STR markers tested. In the urine of this patient, however, the unique donor-derived STR allele as well as the allele common to both donor and recipient were detectable for both the STR markers examined.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Microsatellite analysis of donor–recipient pairs and recipient urine.



View larger version (28K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Capillary electropherograms of D21S1432 microsatellite amplicons as detected with use of the ABI 310 automated sequencer.

(A), donor genotype; (B), recipient genotype; (C), recipient urine.

Because our investigation used a nested PCR assay in which a post-linear amplification phase amplicon was reamplified, no statement concerning the relative quantities of the donor and recipient cell-free DNA species is possible. For this reason, we examined two genetic polymorphisms in the glutathione S-transferase M1 (GSTM1) and angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) genes, recently described for the quantitative analysis of fetomaternal cell traffic and transfer of cell-free DNA (8). Unfortunately, in our study, we were able to obtain an informative constellation only in a solitary instance for only one of these loci, i.e., the GSTM1 gene, in which instance the gene was absent from the recipient. Of interest is that this case involved the transplantation of a kidney from an unrelated donor. Our analysis of this sample indicated that the recipient’s urine contained >77 000 copies of cell-free donor-derived DNA/mL immediately post transplantation, which decreased to slightly more than 100 copies/mL of urine by day 7. The concentration of total cell-free DNA was initially determined to be >92 000 copies/mL of recipient urine, which decreased to 560 copies/mL of urine by day 7, based on a real-time PCR assay for the GAPDH gene (9). This analysis indicated that almost all of the cell-free DNA in the recipient urine was donor-derived, a feature that is in good accord with previous reports (1)(2).

The limited usefulness of the polymorphic ACE and GSTM1 loci in our study could be a reflection of the rather small study size (only five cases). Nevertheless, it does indicate that assays for other markers will need be developed in the future to guarantee effective analysis of all donor–recipient constellations. Because we were readily able to detect informative donor-derived STR alleles in all of the samples tested, our results do suggest that it should be possible to detect other polymorphic markers more amenable to quantification by real-time PCR.


References

  1. Zhang J, Tong KL, Li PK, Chan AY, Yeung CK, Pang CC, et al. Presence of donor- and recipient-derived DNA in cell-free urine samples of renal transplantation recipients: urinary DNA chimerism. Clin Chem 1999;45:1741-1746.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Zhong XY, Hahn D, Troeger C, Klemm A, Stein G, Thomson P, et al. Cell-free DNA in urine: a marker for kidney graft rejection, but not for prenatal diagnosis?. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;945:250-257.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Garvin AM, Holzgreve W, Hahn S. Highly accurate analysis of heterozygous loci by single cell PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 1998;26:3468-3472.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Tang NL, Leung TN, Zhang J, Lau TK, Lo YMD. Detection of fetal-derived paternally inherited X-chromosome polymorphisms in maternal plasma. Clin Chem 1999;45:2033-2035.[Free Full Text]
  5. Samura O, Pertl B, Sohda S, Johnson KL, Sekizawa A, Falco VM, et al. Female fetal cells in maternal blood: use of DNA polymorphisms to prove origin. Hum Genet 2000;107:28-32.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Pertl B, Sekizawa A, Samura O, Orescovic I, Rahaim PT, Bianchi DW. Detection of male and female fetal DNA in maternal plasma by multiplex fluorescent polymerase chain reaction amplification of short tandem repeats. Hum Genet 2000;106:45-49.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Milde A, Haas-Rochholz H, Kaatsch HJ. Improved DNA typing of human urine by adding EDTA. Int J Legal Med 1999;112:209-210.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Lo YMD, Lau TK, Chan LY, Leung TN, Chang AM. Quantitative analysis of the bidirectional fetomaternal transfer of nucleated cells and plasma DNA. Clin Chem 2000;46:1301-1309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Zhong XY, Burk MR, Troeger C, Jackson LR, Holzgreve W, Hahn S. Fetal DNA in maternal plasma is elevated in pregnancies with aneuploid fetuses. Prenat Diagn 2000;20:795-798.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
Y. Li, D. Hahn, W. Holzgreve, and S. Hahn
Ready Detection of Donor-Specific Single-Nucleotide Polymorphisms in the Urine of Renal Transplant Recipients by Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2005; 51(10): 1903 - 1904.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
Y. Li, B. Zimmermann, C. Rusterholz, A. Kang, W. Holzgreve, and S. Hahn
Size Separation of Circulatory DNA in Maternal Plasma Permits Ready Detection of Fetal DNA Polymorphisms
Clin. Chem., June 1, 2004; 50(6): 1002 - 1011.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Reproductive SciencesHome page
Y. Li, X. Y. Zhong, A. Kang, C. Troeger, W. Holzgreve, and S. Hahn
Inability to Detect Cell Free Fetal DNA in the Urine of Normal Pregnant Women nor in Those Affected by Preeclampsia Associated HELLP Syndrome
Reproductive Sciences, December 1, 2003; 10(8): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Li, Y.
Right arrow Articles by Hahn, S.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS