Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 826-829, 2003; 10.1373/49.5.826
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:826-829.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Sandwich ELISA for Measurement of Cytosolic Aspartate Aminotransferase in Sera from Patients with Liver Diseases

So Young Jeong1, Kwang Joong Kim1, Dong Joon Kim2, Sang Wook Oh1 and Eui Yul Choi1,3,a

1 Central Research Institute, Boditech Inc., Chuncheon, South Korea 200-160
Departments of
2 Internal Medicine and
3 Genetic Engineering, Hallym University, Chuncheon, South Korea 200-702

aauthor for correspondence: fax 82-33-258-6889, e-mail euichoi{at}hallym.ac.kr

With the introduction of modern biochemical techniques, more than 50 enzymes have been developed for diagnostics in liver tests. Among the enzymes, aspartate aminotransferase (AST; EC 2.6.1.1; formerly known as GOT) was introduced in the mid-1950s and has remained the mainstay of enzyme diagnosis for liver disease for more than half a century (1). AST is widely distributed among human organs as cytosolic and mitochondrial isotypes (2). Increased activity of this enzyme is considered one of the most sensitive indicators of hepatocellular damage (3). Previously, several attempts were made to develop an immunoassay procedure for measuring AST mass rather than enzyme activity, but they are currently not used for the diagnosis of liver diseases (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). In this study, we generated monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) to AST and used them to develop a sandwich ELISA to measure the enzyme mass in sera.

Because the amino acid sequences of the human and porcine enzymes are similar, we used porcine AST as an immunogen for the production of mAbs (9). The porcine enzyme is commercially available as a highly purified form in large quantities. Twenty hybridoma cells to porcine AST were initially screened by ELISA from several fusions, and four clones were selected for further characterization.

To confirm the specificity of the mAbs to the human enzyme, we immunoblotted partially purified human enzyme and total proteins extracted from a human liver with the mAbs. The antibodies specifically recognized a single protein band of 45 kDa, which coincided well with the expected size of AST. To evaluate whether the mAbs recognized a cytosolic or a mitochondrial form of AST in human tissues, we prepared cytosolic and mitochondrial fractions from a human liver and processed them for Western blotting. The mAbs recognized a single protein band in the cytosolic fraction only, and we observed no detectable band in the mitochondrial fraction, indicating that the mAbs were specific for the cytosolic form.

The sandwich ELISA assay was optimized by a standard procedure with porcine AST as a calibrator to achieve assay precision appropriate for the concentrations seen in sera. The limit of determination in serum was 3 µg/L, calculated as the AST concentration whose signal corresponded to the mean + 3 SD for 20 replicates of a zero calibrator. The measurement range was 3–100 µg/L.

The patients enrolled in this study were from the Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital (Table 1 ). Healthy volunteers were defined by analysis of various biochemical tests, including alanine aminotransferase (ALT)/AST, albumin, bilirubin, {gamma}-glutamyltransferase, alkaline phosphatase, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), which were performed on a Hitachi 747 (Roche Diagnostics). Hepatitis C (HCV) and B (HBV) tests were serologically confirmed with an AxSYM system (Abbott Laboratories). The mean ages of the various patient groups were similar to those of the control group.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. AST and ALT values in healthy controls and liver disease patients.1

Informed consent was obtained from all patients and healthy volunteers before their participation in the study. Statistical differences between means were calculated using the Student t-test and ANOVA with Bonferroni adjustment. Pearson correlation coefficients and linear regression with the least-squares method were used to evaluate correlations between the patient and control groups. P values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

The mean (SD) AST concentration in healthy individuals was 34 (10) µg/L (Table 1Up , control group), which was lower than the values reported earlier by others: 84 (18) µg/L (7) and 65–145 µg/L (10). The 2.5th percentile of the general population was 19 µg/L, and the 97.5th percentile was 58 µg/L. There was no significant difference in AST mass between males or females, which is consistent with the results obtained by other groups (10)(11). However, some studies showed that AST and ALT activities are higher in males than in females and vary with age (12)(13).

We next measured AST mass in different groups of liver disease patients. The distribution of AST mass in patient groups is shown in Table 1Up . The mean (SD) AST mass for liver disease patients was 119 (101) µg/L compared with 34 (10) µg/L for healthy individuals, demonstrating a significant difference between healthy individuals and all liver disease groups (P <0.0001). The difference in AST mass between groups, including the control group, was statistically significant (P <0.05) except between the chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis groups. Patients with acute hepatitis had the highest AST concentration [194 (138) µg/L], followed by those with chronic hepatitis [101 (58) µg/L]. The patients with cirrhosis had the lowest serum AST mass [75 (53) µg/L]. Because there was a bias of gender distribution in some patient groups, e.g., only 5 females of 41 patients with chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis, we reevaluated the data with males only, but we did not find a significant difference between the males-only and total groups. When we compared specific activities, the values were much higher than those reported by other groups (7)(14). One explanation for the high specific activity may be the porcine AST that we used to construct the calibration curve. The antibodies differed in their cross-reactivities between human and porcine AST, which could account for the discrepancy in specific activities.

When we examined the relationship between the two methods by plotting AST activity against AST mass from the control and patient groups, there appeared to be distinct regions with different slopes in the linear regression plot. We observed a poor correlation in the range <50 U/L (Fig. 1A ). The correlation was not as good in the range 50–200 U/L (Fig. 1B ). The poor correlation at activities <200 U/L, such as those we observed for most of chronic hepatitis and liver cirrhosis patients, may be explained by the loss of AST catalytic activity on release into circulation, whereas the enzyme protein remains immunologically active in the circulation for some time (6)(7). In contrast, we observed a good correlation at activities >200 U/L (Fig. 1C ). AST activities for most patients with acute liver disease were in this range.



View larger version (15K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Distribution and correlation of AST mass and activity at three different ranges of enzyme activity: <50 U/L (A), 50–200 U/L (B), and >200 U/L (C).

•, healthy controls; x, patients with cirrhosis; {square}, patients with acute hepatitis; {triangleup}, patients with chronic hepatitis.

Attempts to develop an immunochemical procedure for the quantification of serum AST have been published previously (4). Other, more recent reports have described more accurate and sophisticated AST immunoassays (5)(6)(7)(8)(14), but immunoassays have not replaced the conventional enzyme activity assays. Previously, authors observed that there is a considerable excess of immunologically active but catalytically inactive AST in the sera of healthy individuals and patients with liver disease (6)(7). There appear to be some similarities and differences between the results of previous studies and our results. One difference is the antibody specificity. We used mAbs that specifically recognized AST, with a single band in the Western blot, but others used polyclonal antibodies, which could have caused cross-reactivity. Suzuki et al. (8) generated mAbs to human mitochondrial AST but failed to detect the mitochondrial AST by their ELISA method. Another possible explanation for the different results is that autoantibodies may combine with enzymes in the serum and modulate enzyme activity or interfere with the binding of polyclonal antibodies to the protein. The addition of polyclonal antibodies to cytosolic AST produced complete inhibition of the enzyme activity (5).

The proposed immunologic method for measuring AST seems to have potential advantages over the conventional enzyme activity assay. In a single liver cell, two types of AST are present: a mitochondrial and a cytosolic form. The mitochondrial form is released into circulation in cases of more severe liver cell damage (2)(15). Thus, the degree of liver cell injury may be estimated by determining the ratio of serum mitochondrial and cytosolic AST. A higher concentration of mitochondrial AST may indicate more severe liver damage. Another issue to be considered is the degradation of enzymes in the circulation, with loss of activity by denaturation or degradation.


Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. K.W. Jeon (University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN) for reading the manuscript and critical comments. This work was supported by a grant from the National Research Laboratory Program (M1-0104-00-0164) of the Korean Ministry of Science and Technology.


References

  1. Rej R. Aminotransferases in disease [Review]. Clin Lab 1989;9:667-687.
  2. Wada H, Kamiike W. Aspartate aminotransferase isozymes and their clinical significance. Prog Clin Biol Res 1990;344:853-875.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Dufour DR, Lott JA, Nolte FS, Gretch DR, Koff RS, Seeff LB. Diagnosis and monitoring of hepatic injury. I. Performance characteristics of laboratory tests. Clin Chem 2000;46:2027-2049.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Rej R. Quantitation of aspartate aminotransferase isoenzymes by immunologic methods: use of antibodies directed against the mitochondrial isoenzyme. Clin Biochem 1979;12:250-254.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Rej R. An immunological procedure for determination of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase in human serum. Clin Chem 1980;26:1694-1700.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Rej R. Immunochemical quantitation of isoenzymes of aspartate aminotransferase and lactate dehydrogenase. Clin Biochem 1983;16:17-19.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Hirano K, Matsuda K, Adachi T, Watanabe Y, Sugiura M, Sawaki S. Enzyme immunoassay of human cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase. Clin Chim Acta 1984;144:49-57.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Suzuki T, Kishi Y, Totani M, Kagamiyama H, Murachi T. Monoclonal and polyclonal antibodies against porcine mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase: their inhibition modes and application to enzyme immunoassay. Biotechnol Appl Biochem 1987;9:170-180.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Doyle J, Schinina E, Bossa F, Doonan S. The amino acid sequence of cytosolic aspartate aminotransferase from human liver. Biochem J 1990;270:651-657.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Niblock AE, Jablonsky G, Leung FY, Henderson AR. Changes in mass and catalytic activity concentrations of aspartate aminotransferase isoenzymes in serum after a myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1986;32:496-500.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Panteghini M. Aspartate aminotransferase isoenzymes. Clin Biochem 1990;23:311-319.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Siest G, Schiele F, Galteau M-M, Panek E, Steinmetz J, Fagnani F, et al. Aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase activities in plasma: statistical distributions, individual variations, and reference values. Clin Chem 1975;21:1077-1087.[Abstract]
  13. Siest G, Henry J, Schiele F, Young DS. Interpretation of clinical laboratory tests: reference values and their biological variation 1985:459pp Biomedical Publications Foster City, CA. .
  14. Varasteh A, Wellman M, Artur Y, Schiele F, Siest G. An avidin-biotin ELISA for the measurement of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase in human serum. J Immunol Methods 1990;128:203-209.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Nishimura T, Yoshida Y, Watanabe F, Koseki M, Nishida T, Tagawa K, et al. Blood level of mitochondrial aspartate aminotransferase as an indicator of the extent of ischemic necrosis of the rat liver. Hepatology 1986;6:701-707.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jeong, S. Y.
Right arrow Articles by Choi, E. Y.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS