Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 1209-1211, 2003; 10.1373/49.7.1209
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trapé, J.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trapé, J.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:1209-1211.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Reference Change Value for {alpha}-Fetoprotein and Its Application in Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients with Hepatic Disease

Jaume Trapé1,a, Josep M. Botargues2, Francesc Porta2, Carmen Ricós4, Josep M. Badal3, Ramon Salinas1, Maria Sala1 and Angels Roca1

1 Laboratori d’Analisis Clíniques,
2 Secció de Gastroenterologia, and
3 Servei d’Anatomia Patologica, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Althaia Xarxa Assistencial de Manresa, Dr. Joan Soler, s/n 08243 Manresa, Barcelona, Spain

4 Laboratoris Clínics Hospital Vall d’Hebron, 08035. Barcelona, Spain

aauthor for correspondence: fax 34-93-8743859, e-mail hgmlaboratorio{at}aehh.org

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most frequent types of cancer worldwide, with an incidence of 150 cases per 100 000 inhabitants per year in Asia and Africa and ~5 cases per 100 000 per year in Europe, North America, and Australia (1). HCC can occur in healthy livers, but it is generally associated with hepatic disease. Cirrhosis is the most important risk factor for its development (2).

Many studies have been dedicated to the early detection of HCC in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD), based on semiannual or annual measurement of serum {alpha}-fetoprotein (AFP) and ultrasound study of the liver. The interpretation of AFP results usually involves comparison with a fixed cutoff ranging from 20 to 500 µg/L, with sensitivities ranging from 33% to 64% (3)(4)(5). Another approach would be to assess changes in consecutive results from the same patient.

To establish a criterion for dynamic assessment of a specific biological constituent, the first step is to define when a difference between two consecutive results indicates a change in a patient’s health status. The most widely accepted approach for this purpose is the so-called reference change value (RCV), a concept described by Harris and Brown (6). Using serial analytic results from the same individual for a specific constituent, it is possible to calculate the RCV that defines how large a difference between two consecutive determinations is statistically significant (P <0.05). The RCV encompasses both biological and analytical variation.

The RCV has been determined for various constituents in healthy persons and in some pathologies (7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13). In diseases that can modify the homeostatic set point and the degree of fluctuation of a specific constituent, the within-subject biological variation (BV) may be different from that of persons who do not have these diseases (13)(14)(15). This is seen in AFP determinations for the early detection of HCC in patients with CLD. These patients present with higher AFP values than healthy individuals and with abnormal patterns of AFP release because of processes of hepatic necrosis/regeneration (16)(17).

The index of individuality (I.I.) of an analyte indicates whether significant changes in a patient’s health status can be detected by comparing the analytic results with a population-based cutoff value or whether each patient should be evaluated against him- or herself (18).

The aims of this study were as follows: (a) to estimate the BV of AFP in patients with hepatic disease and in patients with nonhepatic conditions, comparing the two groups; (b) to establish analytic quality goals for AFP determinations; and (c) to calculate the RCV of AFP and evaluate its application in the early detection of HCC in a separate group of CLD patients.

Two subgroups, a non-hepatic and a hepatic disease group, were studied to determine the components of analytical variation and BV for AFP. The RCV value obtained was then validated by applying it to a third group consisting of patients with CLD who were included in a program for early detection of HCC.

Thirty patients (15 men and 15 women) with colon adenocarcinoma (Astler–Coller classification stages A or B1) treated surgically were studied to determine the BV components for AFP. For 3 years after the procedure, three samples from each patient were assayed every 6 months. During the study period, there was no evidence of recurrence.

BV values for AFP were also determined in 85 clinically stable patients, 40 with chronic hepatitis and no clinical evidence of cirrhosis and 45 with evidence of cirrhosis, classified according to the Child–Pugh Index (CPI) as A (18 cases), B (15 cases), or C (12 cases).

The RCV value obtained for AFP was applied to 124 CLD patients [67 men and 57 women; mean (SD) age, 60.4 (13.7) years] from July 1997 to June 2001. The CLD etiologies included 67 with hepatitis C viral infections, 48 with alcoholism, and 9 with miscellaneous conditions; 49 patients had chronic active hepatitis and no clinical evidence of cirrhosis, and 75 had clinical evidence of cirrhosis (CPI A, n = 35; CPI B, n = 26; CPI C, n = 14). The clinical criteria to define cirrhosis included CLD and one or more of the following signs: ascites, encephalopathy, upper digestive tract bleeding attributable to esophageal varices, portal hypertension as determined by ultrasound or endoscopy, bilirubin >25 µmol/L, albumin <36 g/L, and prothrombin time (international normalized ratio) >1.3.

The sensitivity and specificity of the RCV were compared with two cutoff values for AFP (20 µg/L, for high sensitivity; and 200 µg/L, for high specificity) that are widely reported in the literature (5)(19)

The mean monitoring period was 20 months (range, 12–48 months), with AFP measurements and abdominal ultrasound studies every 6 months. The mean number of determinations per patient was 4.4 (range, 3–10). When the difference between two consecutive AFP results was higher than the RCV criteria but ultrasound findings were normal, abdominal computed tomography (CT) was performed.

HCC was diagnosed by ultrasound- or CT-guided fine-needle puncture aspiration of the lesion and histologic study. In addition, one patient suspicious by ultrasound, CT scan, and AFP >200 µg/L was entered in the liver transplant program. HCC was diagnosed by observation of the lesion in the extracted organ.

Serum AFP concentrations were measured by electrochemiluminescent analysis on an ELECSYS 2010 instrument (Roche Diagnostics). Samples from the non-hepatic group were tested in a single analytical run. Samples from the hepatic disease group were determined on the same day of collection.

Statistical analyses were performed with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov and Mann–Whitney U-tests. Within-run imprecision, as the CV, was 2.5% (n = 10) for a mean AFP value of 4.1 µg/L (obtained with replicates of a patient sample). Between-run imprecision was 7.1% (n = 720) for a mean AFP value of 8.1 µg/L obtained with Precinorm (Roche Diagnostics).

The variations of AFP values around the mean in the two study groups (non-hepatic and hepatic disease) did not follow a gaussian distribution; thus, logarithmic transformation was applied (9).

The within-subject BV (CVw) was calculated from the experimental variation, using the following formula:

in which Sw+a2 is the experimental variance of AFP results from each group of patients, Sa2 is the analytical variance, and M is the mean AFP value of each group of patients studied.

The between-subject BV (CVg) was calculated with the following formula:

in which St2 is the total variation, obtained from all AFP values from all the patients.

The I.I. was calculated according to the following formula:

The RCV was determined using the formula:

Shown in Table 1 are the numbers of samples, the median AFP concentrations, and the analytical, within-subject, and between-subject CVs, as well as the I.I. and RCV values for the groups studied.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Patients, samples, AFP values, components of analytical and biological variation, and the calculations derived from these values.

Fifteen of the 124 patients in the validation group were diagnosed with HCC. In four patients, the first sign of HCC was a significant increase in AFP concentrations as determined by the RCV, giving a sensitivity of 26.7% as the first sign. A simultaneous increase in AFP and ultrasound features indicative of HCC were present in 5 of the 15 HCC cases detected; 1 patient had values of 5–18 µg/L (<20 µg/L), with a significant RCV. Six of 15 presented with ultrasound findings as the first sign; 5 of these did not show an increase in AFP over the RCV (or >20 µg/L), and 1 presented with an increase (from 24 to 40 µg/L) that was below the RCV. Among the four cases in which an increase in AFP was the first sign of HCC, abdominal CT disclosed tumors smaller than 3 cm in three patients; in the fourth patient, the tumor was seen on the following ultrasound control at 6 months.

The sensitivity and specificity of the RCV for detecting HCC compared with those of the corresponding fixed cutoff values in the validation group are shown in Fig. 1A . The diagnostic efficacy was also calculated, based only on the subset of patients with AFP values >20 µg/L (Fig. 1B ).



View larger version (41K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Specificity ( ) and sensitivity ( ) of the RCV and cutoff to predict HCC in all patients in the program for early detection of HCC (A) and in patients with AFP >20 µg/L (B).

AFP measurements and ultrasound examination of the liver have been used to detect small, asymptomatic tumors in cirrhotic patients, allowing application of effective therapy with increased survival rates (20)(21). The laboratory can provide early evidence of changes in the health status of these patients if it is able to maintain its between-run imprecision below one-half the within-subject BV (22)(23)(24)(25) for AFP.

The incidence of HCC in CLD obtained in this study was 3.02%, similar rates reported for the northern Mediterranean geographic area (3)(21).

These additional findings are worthy of mention:

In conclusion, the RCV is a useful tool for dynamic monitoring of AFP in patients with hepatic disease, demonstrating good sensitivity and specificity that increase when applied to patients with high AFP values.


References

  1. Di Bisceglie AM, Rustgi VK, Hoofnagle JH, Dusheiko GM, Lotze MT. Hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Intern Med 1988;108:390-401.
  2. Johnson PJ, Williams R. Cirrhosis and aetiology of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 1987;4:140-147.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Imberti D, Fornari F, Sbolli G, Buscarini E, Squassante L, Buscarini L. Hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis. A prospective study. Scand J Gastroenterol 1993;28:540-544.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Oka H, Tamori A, Kuroki T, Kobayashi K, Yamamoto S. Prospective study of {alpha}-fetoprotein in cirrhotic patients monitored for development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 1994;19:61-66.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Cedrone A, Covino M, Caturelli E, Pompili M, Lorenzelli G, Villani MR, et al. Utility of {alpha}-fetoprotein (AFP) in the screening of patients with virus-related chronic liver disease: does different viral etiology influence AFP levels in HCC? A study in 350 Western patients. Hepatogastroenterology 2000;47:1654-1658.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Harris EK, Brown SS. Temporal changes in the concentration of serum constituents in healthy men. Distributions of within-person variances and their relevance to the interpretation of differences between successive measurements. Ann Clin Biochem 1979;16:169-176.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Queraltó JM, Boyd JC, Harris EK. On the calculation of reference change values, with examples from long-term study. Clin Chem 1993;39:1398-1403.[Abstract]
  8. Harris EK, Yasaka T. On the calculation of a "reference change" for comparing two consecutive measurements. Clin Chem 1983;29:25-30.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Philipou G, Philips PJ. Intraindividual variation of glycohemoglobin: implications for interpretation and analytical goals. Clin Chem 1993;39:2305-2308.[Abstract]
  10. Hölzel WGE, Beer R, Deschner W, Griesmacher A, Müller MM. Individual reference ranges of CA15-3, MCA and CEA in recurrence of breast cancer. Scand J Clin Lab Invest Suppl 1995;221:93-101.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Panteghini M, Pagani F, Bonora R. Pre-analytical and biological variability of prostatic acid phosphatase and prostate specific antigen in serum from patients with prostatic pathology. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1992;30:135-139.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Mora J, Queraltó JM. Within-subject variation of carcinoembryonic antigen in colorectal cancer—application of reference change values and individual reference ranges to patient follow-up. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1997;35:453-457.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Trapé J, Aliart M, Brunet M, Dern E, Abadal E, Queraltó JM. Reference change value for HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Chem Lab Med 2000;38:1283-1287.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Kilpatrick ES, Maylor PW, Keevil BG. Biological variation of glycated hemoglobin. Implications for diabetes screening and monitoring. Diabetes Care 1998;21:261-264.[Abstract]
  15. Biosca C, Ricós C, Jimenez CV, Lauzurica R, Galimany R. Model for establishing biological variation in non-healthy situations: renal posttransplantation data. Clin Chem 1997;43:2206-2208.[Free Full Text]
  16. Kuwahara T, Sakai T, Majima Y, Hirai Y, Tanikawa K. Serial changes in serum {alpha}-fetoprotein prior to detection of hepatocellular carcinoma in liver cirrhosis. Hepatogastroenterology 1993;40:347-351.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Fujiyama S, Tanaka M, Maeda S, Ashihara H, Hirata R, Tomita K. Tumor markers in early diagnosis, follow-up and management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Suppl 2002;63:57-63.
  18. Fraser CG, Harris EK. Generation and application of data on biological variation in clinical chemistry. Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 1989;27:409-437.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Nguyen MH, Garcia RT, Simpson PW, Wright TL, Keeffe EB. Racial differences in effectiveness of {alpha}-fetoprotein for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in hepatitis C virus cirrhosis. Hepatology 2002;36:410-417.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sarasin FP, Giostra E, Hadengue A. Cost-effectiveness of screening for detection of small hepatocellular carcinoma in western patients with Child-Pugh class A cirrhosis. Am J Med 1996;101:422-434.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  21. Bolondi L, Sofia S, Siringo S, Gaiani S, Casali A, Zironi G, et al. Surveillance programme of cirrhotic patients for early diagnosis treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a cost effectiveness analysis. Gut 2001;48:251-259.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  22. Ricós C, Baadenhuijsen H, Libeer CJ, Petersen PH, Stockl D, Thienpont L, et al. External quality assessment: currently used criteria for evaluating performance in European countries, and criteria for future harmonization. Eur J Clin Chem Clin Biochem 1996;34:159-165.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  23. Fraser CG. General strategies to set quality specifications for reliability performance characteristics. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:487-490.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  24. Harris EK, Boyd JC. Statistical bases of reference change values in laboratory medicine 1995:221-258 Marcel Dekker New York. .
  25. Kenny D, Fraser CG, Petersen PH, Kallner A. Consensus agreement. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1999;59:585.[CrossRef]
  26. Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, Garcia-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. Desirable specifications for total error, and bias, derived from biologic variation. in http://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm (Accessed December 2002)..



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. K. Aarsand, P. H. Petersen, and S. Sandberg
Estimation and Application of Biological Variation of Urinary {delta}-Aminolevulinic Acid and Porphobilinogen in Healthy Individuals and in Patients with Acute Intermittent Porphyria.
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2006; 52(4): 650 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
B. Comin-Anduix, A. Gualberto, J. A. Glaspy, E. Seja, M. Ontiveros, D. L. Reardon, R. Renteria, B. Englahner, J. S. Economou, J. Gomez-Navarro, et al.
Definition of an Immunologic Response Using the Major Histocompatibility Complex Tetramer and Enzyme-Linked Immunospot Assays
Clin. Cancer Res., January 1, 2006; 12(1): 107 - 116.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. Trape, J. Perez de Olaguer, J. Buxo, and L. Lopez
Biological Variation of Tumor Markers and Its Application in the Detection of Disease Progression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Clin. Chem., January 1, 2005; 51(1): 219 - 222.
[Full Text] [PDF]

eLetters:

Read all eLetters

Alpha fetoprotein-linked immunoglobulin complex in blood
Toshio Okazaki, et al.
Clinical Chemistry Online, 5 Oct 2004 [Full text]

This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow View responses
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Trapé, J.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Trapé, J.
Right arrow Articles by Roca, A.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS