Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 49: 1248-1249, 2003; 10.1373/49.8.1248
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory
(Clinical Chemistry. 2003;49:1248-1249.)
© 2003 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

99th Percentile and Analytical Imprecision of Troponin and Creatine Kinase-MB Mass Assays: An Objective Platform for Comparison of Assay Performance

Evangelos Giannitsis1 and Hugo A. Katus1,a

1 Abteilung für Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitäts-Klinikum Heidelberg, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany

aAddress correspondence to this author at: Abt. Innere Medizin III, Medizinische Klinik, Bergheimer Strasse 58, D-69115 Heidelberg, Germany. E-mail hugo_katus{at}med.uni-heidelberg.de.

Cardiac troponins in blood are the most sensitive and specific biochemical markers of myocardial damage and are paramount for classification, risk stratification, and customized therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes (1)(2). Despite the overt advantages, some important obstacles to troponin analysis and interpretation have remained, such as assay standardization, interference, preanalytical variability, and imprecision (3).

Introduction of the 99th percentile reference limit for the diagnosis of myocardial infarction by the European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology (ESC/ACC) Consensus Committee (4)(5) has largely been driven by the demonstration that even the lowest detectable amounts of cardiac troponins in blood are associated with increased cardiac risk (6)(7)(8). Conversely, patients with any detectable troponins benefit from early coronary or pharmacologic intervention (6)(7)(8). Implementation of the new definition of acute myocardial infarction is not trivial because it will almost double the number of patients with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (9)(10)(11). Therefore, to avoid misclassification arising from assay imprecision, the consensus committee proposed that the 99th percentile reference limit should be measured with a total imprecision (CV) <10%. However, many troponin and creatine kinase MB (CKMB) assays have not been validated in large clinical trials, and the relative performance of commercially available assays is not transparent. Until now, clinicians and laboratory physicians have had to rely on the manufacturers’ claims and package inserts (12)(13). There are, however, some caveats with such claims and inserts. Frequently, package inserts still suggest the 97.5 percentiles or do not provide adequate information. There is strong market competition, and it should be kept in mind that several assays have never been evaluated in the peer-reviewed literature.

In this issue of Clinical Chemistry, Apple et al. (14) evaluate the detection limits and analytical imprecision of different widely used commercial assays for cardiac troponins and CKMB mass. The authors carefully collected a very large reference population according to NCCLS standards (15), which consisted of 696 healthy adults. The authors mainly determined the 99th percentile and analytical imprecision of each method. Thus, for the first time, Apple et al. (14) provide an objective platform to compare assays directly with each other independently of the manufacturers’ information. In addition, the sample size of the reference population allowed them to look for ethnic, age, and gender differences at the lower end of the troponin and CKMB mass ranges.

Interestingly, Apple et al. (14) found little divergence between manufacturers’ claims and their own laboratory findings. The authors confirmed the large diversity of troponin assays with respect to 99th percentile reference values and total imprecision. Not surprisingly, none of the troponin assays except for the Tosoh AIA 600 II cardiac troponin I test met the precision requirements of the new definition of acute myocardial infarction.

Differences among assay calibrators largely explain the divergence of the concentrations at the lower limit of detection and the 99th percentile. Thus, lower detectable troponin concentrations do not automatically mean higher clinical sensitivity. Therefore, all assays, including the Tosoh AIA 600II, must document their clinical performance.

Measurements at the lowest concentration range bear some unexpected caveats. The first caveat is that the reason for and the role of lowest detectable troponin concentrations in apparently healthy persons remains unclear. Moving the decision limits to lower concentrations will enforce the need to differentiate background noise from subclinical cardiac pathology. Currently, the next (fourth) generation troponin T assay is being tested for analytical and clinical performance. Preliminary data suggest a fivefold reduction of the lower detection limit with adequate precision. Thus, it is tempting to speculate that differentiation between "background noise" and "subclinical cardiac pathology" will become an ever more challenging task.

The second caveat, which is probably linked to the first, is that the authors address the issue of age-, gender-, and race-dependent differences in 99th percentile reference values. Some troponin and CKMB mass assays showed significantly higher 99th percentile cutoffs for males than for females and for blacks than for Caucasians. In addition, age-dependent increases in the 99th percentile reference concentrations were found with all CKMB mass assays. Thus, regardless of the reason for troponin or CKMB mass release, these data suggest the need for specific cutoff values that consider age, gender, and ethnic differences, at least for some troponin and CKMB mass assays.

In summary, the study by Apple et al. (14) provides a platform for objective comparison of troponin and CKMB mass assay performance. The data underscore the need for introduction of improved troponin assays that comply with the new definition and precision requirements. Although the present study made an important step, enormous efforts are still needed to resolve assay differences and to provide tools for comparison of assays using predetermined cut-points such as the 99th percentile or the 10% CV limit.


References

  1. Braunwald E, Antman EM, Beasley JW, Califf RM, Cheitlin MD, Hochman JS, et al. ACC/AHA guideline update for the management of patients with unstable angina and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction—2002: summary article: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on the Management of Patients With Unstable Angina). Circulation 2002;106:1893-1900.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Bertrand ME, Simoons ML, Fox KA, Wallentin LC, Hamm CW, McFadden E, et al. Management of acute coronary syndromes in patients presenting without persistent ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2002;23:1809-1840.[Free Full Text]
  3. Panthegini M. Quality specifications for cardiac troponin assays. Clin Chem Lab Med 2001;39:174-178.
  4. Alpert JS, Thygesen K, Antman E, Bassand JP. Myocardial infarction redefined: a Consensus document of The Joint European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology Committee for the redefinition of myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000;36:959-969.[Free Full Text]
  5. Jaffe AS, Ravkilde J, Roberts R, Naslund U, Apple FS, Galvani M, et al. It’s time for a change to a troponin standard. Circulation 2000;102:1216-1220.[Free Full Text]
  6. Lindahl B, Diderholm E, Lagerqvist B, Venge P, Wallentin L. Mechanisms behind the prognostic value of troponin T in unstable coronary artery disease: a FRISC II substudy. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001;38:979-986.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Venge P, Lagerqvist B, Diderholm E, Lindahl B, Wallentin L. Clinical performance of three cardiac troponin assays in patients with unstable coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 2002;89:1035-1041.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Morrow DA, Cannon CP, Rifai N, Frey MJ, Vicari R, Lakkis N, et al. Ability of minor elevations of troponins I and T to predict benefit from an early invasive strategy in patients with unstable angina and non-ST elevation myocardial infarction: results from a randomized trial. JAMA 2001;286:2405-2412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Meier MA, Al-Badr WH, Cooper JV, Kline-Rogers EM, Smith DE, Eagle KA, et al. The new definition of myocardial infarction. Diagnostic and prognostic implications in patients with acute coronary syndromes. Arch Intern Med 2002;162:1585-1589.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Gitt AK, Schiele R, Meiser F, Weinbergen H, Heer T, Gottwik M. Myocardial infarction redefined: implication of the new definition of non-St elevation myocardial infarction on clinical practice: results of the ACOS-registry [Abstract]. Circulation 2001;104:II709.
  11. Kontos MC, Fritz ML, Anderson FP, Ornato JP, Tatum JL, Jesse RL, et al. Where do you draw the line? Implications of the new troponin standard on the prevalence of myocardial infarction [Abstract]. Circulation 2001;104:II709-.
  12. Collinson PO, Boa FG, Gaze DC. Measurement of cardiac troponins. Ann Clin Biochem 2001;38:423-449.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Apple FS, Wu AH, Jaffe AS. European Society of Cardiology and American College of Cardiology guidelines for redefinition of myocardial infarction: how to use existing assays clinically and for clinical trials. Am Heart J 2002;144:981-986.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Apple FS, Doyle PJ, Quist HE, Otto A, Murakami MM, et al. Plasma 99th percentile reference limits for cardiac troponin and creatine kinase MB mass along European Society of Cardiology/American College of Cardiology consensus recommendations for detection of myocardial injury. Clin Chem 2003;49:1331-1336.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  15. Sasse EA. How to define and determine reference intervals in the clinical laboratory; approved guideline, 2nd ed. NCCLS Document C28–A2 2000 NCCLS Wayne, PA. .



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
D. A. Waxman, S. Hecht, J. Schappert, and G. Husk
A Model for Troponin I as a Quantitative Predictor of In-Hospital Mortality
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., November 7, 2006; 48(9): 1755 - 1762.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
M. Kemp, J. Donovan, H. Higham, and J. Hooper
Biochemical markers of myocardial injury
Br. J. Anaesth., July 1, 2004; 93(1): 63 - 73.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Giannitsis, E.
Right arrow Articles by Katus, H. A.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
Right arrow Heart Health and the Clinical Laboratory


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS