Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 50: 673-675, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.028589
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:673-675.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

What Is an Abnormal Test Strip Urinary Erythrocyte Concentration?

Paul Froom1,a, Rachel Etzion1 and Mira Barak1

1 Central Laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Hematology Laboratories, Central Laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee, Clalit Health Services, Nesher, Israel; fax 972-4-8209094, e-mail paulfr{at}clalit.org.il

Although examination of urine for blood hemoglobin by automated analysis of test strips is a common, precise, and efficient method with a maximum throughput of up to 300 test strips per hour (1), the reference interval for this procedure is uncertain. Most laboratories consider only a negative result as normal, based on findings in referred patients and on population studies showing that urinary tract tumors and other serious diseases are found in those with even trace amounts of blood on test strips (2)(3)(4). In two population studies, test strips were positive for blood in 3% of men of all ages (3) and in 13% of those over 60 years (4). A few patients with blood in their urine were found to have urothelial malignancies, but most had only trace results on initial testing, with re-testing yielding intermittently positive results (3)(4); intermittently positive results may be attributable in part to variations from visual inspection by technicians and by patients themselves which is less sensitive and less precise than semiautomated reflectance readings of urinalysis dipsticks (5).

Our laboratory receives complaints from physicians about the high frequency of hematuria in their patients. We are unaware of previous studies reporting the distribution of results in a healthy population tested by semiautomated reflectance readings. Recent studies using a urine flow cytometer (UF-100) suggest that the number of RBCs in the urine in healthy individuals should be in the range of 10–20 cells/µL with even higher estimated counts on dipsticks, which also measure lysed cells (6)(7)(8). In the present study we analyzed the urine of 1000 men and women of various ages seen consecutively for screening examinations and used automated analysis of the test strips to determine the reference interval.

Midstream urine samples from outpatient clinics arrived and were tested within 4 h of collection at a regional laboratory in northern Israel. Consecutive samples (n = 1000) from occupational medicine clinics that routinely perform urinalysis of asymptomatic workers were tested by use of a Supertron automated analyzer (Roche Diagnostics Ltd.) with Combur-10 S strips (Roche Diagnostics Ltd.). The patients were all actively working without chronic renal failure or symptomatic diseases and had no significant exposure to chemicals or dyes. We have shown previously that the Supertron test for erythrocytes is precise and that samples are stable over a 24-h storage period (1). We tested the accuracy of the assay by adding known numbers of erythrocytes to urine specimens. A logistic regression model was used to adjust for the presence of urinary glucose, nitrite, or protein and to determine the independent influence of age and sex on the risk of having >=50 erythrocytes/µL on urinalysis.

After excluding those with leukocyturia, glucosuria, proteinuria, or a positive nitrite result, we were left with 580 of the 744 men (78.0%) and 132 of 256 women (51.6%). After these exclusions the distribution of erythrocytes concentrations in urine for males changed little from that for the entire group (results not shown), whereas after the exclusions a lower proportion of females had >=50 erythrocytes/µL [9 of 132 (6.8%) vs 19 of 124 (15.3%); P <0.05]. The optimum reference interval (95% of the individuals studied, after excluding those with other positive findings on test strips) for erythrocytes in urine for men <40 years of age included values up to 25 cells/µL, whereas for men >=40 years and for females of all ages, the reference interval included values up to 50 cells/µL (Table 1 ). On logistic regression, after we forced glucosuria (yes/no), nitrite (positive/negative), leukocyte esterase (yes/no), and proteinuria >=300 mg/L (yes/no) into the model, the odds ratio for >=50 erythrocytes/µL in females compared with males was 1.90 (1.02–3.55), the odds ratio for individuals with leukocyte esterase vs those without leukocyte esterase was 2.56 (1.35–4.83), and the odds ratio for individuals >=40 years of age compared with younger individuals was 1.93 (1.08–2.45). We found no significant interaction between age and sex.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Number of individuals with various concentrations of erythrocytes in screened urine according to age and sex.1

We added a known number of erythrocytes (counted on an Advia 120 Hematology System; Bayer) to urine to give a final concentration in the range of 6.25–400 cells/µL. The results by dipstick determination were nearly identical to the expected values [expected (test strip determinations): 0 cells added (12 negative tests by dipstick), 6.25 cells/µL added (0, 10, 10, 0, and 0 cells/µL by test strip); 12.5 cells/µL added (10, 10, 10, 25, and 10 cells/µL by test strip); 25 cells/µL added (25, 25, 25, 25, and 25 cells/µL by test strip); 50 cells/µL added (25, 50, 50, 50, and 50 cells/µL by disptick)]. Test strip results were also highly correlated with final concentrations of 100, 200, and 400 cells/µL (results not shown).

The major finding of this study is that the reference interval for erythrocytes in urine should include positive results. We have also shown that after calibration, test strip results are accurate over various known concentrations of erythrocytes in urine. The reference interval was age dependent, increasing with age, as has been reported previously with a high-power-field methodology (9). Our results can probably be extrapolated to other analyzers that use similar technologies after calibration with known concentrations of erythrocytes, a necessary step because adequate commercial controls are not available.

Our semiquantitative results are consistent with those obtained with a urine flow cytometer in a small number of apparently healthy children and adults. In young men, we found that the upper limit of the reference interval should be 25 cells/µL erythrocytes, whereas Lun et al. (6), using the UF-100 urine flow cytometer, reported that the 95th percentile for erythrocytes in 141 children was 25.9 cells/µL. Regeniter et al. (7) tested 91 healthy individuals (both males and females; age range, 11–63 years) but could not consider subgroups because of the small sample size. They reported 97.5% percentiles of 13.9/µL for erythrocytes and 15.7/µL for eukocytes; they also reported that the overall mean UF-100 erythrocyte and leukocyte counts were somewhat lower than the results obtained with the semiquantitative stick method, suggesting that lysed cells contributed to the higher observed values. Recently, Marimoto et al. (8) reported median erythrocyte counts on a flow cytometer of ~10 cells/µL in 64 healthy female students 18–20 years of age. The 90th percentile upper limit ranged from 50 to 600, depending on whether the students were menstruating. The 90th percentile range in our females included 50 cells/µL, which is consistent with the results obtained for nonmenstruating students in that study. The automated quantitative urinalysis analyzer (UF-100) cannot be considered a gold standard because the imprecision of the erythrocyte count for this analyzer is high [CV, 18–31% for 5–60 cells/µL (10)]. Furthermore, such testing does not include lysed erythrocytes.

A major strength of our study is the large number of screening tests done in apparently healthy individuals. Although we did not have complete medical histories available to us, it is unlikely that concomitant diseases biased our results. All participants were actively employed and received medical clearance to work. Chronic diseases are more prevalent in those 50–59 years of age compared with those 40–49 years of age, but the frequency distribution of erythrocytes in urine was nearly identical in the two groups. After exclusion of those with glucosuria, proteinuria, leukocyturia, or nitrites in the urine, the reference intervals were unchanged. Finally, because the prevalence of microhematuria is not affected by physical exercise in the 24 h preceding urinalysis in asymptomatic young men (11), leisure physical activity probably did not significantly affect our results.

Standard textbooks do not consider semiquantitative or quantitative urinary erythrocyte analysis but instead continue to recommend that a complete workup be done for any patient with a persistent finding of >3 erythrocytes per high-power field on urinalysis, regardless of the pretest probability of significant urothelial disease (12)(13). Recent recommendations support a repeat urinalysis after 48 h to confirm positive test strip findings and a work-up that includes confirmation of the dipstick results by microscopic urinalysis (14)(15) and identification of dysmorphic erythrocytes (14)(15). This approach decreases the sensitivity for detecting serious urothelial diseases because of the intermittent nature of hematuria in patients with serious urothelial disease (2)(3)(4)(16), the known problems with the precision and accuracy of microscopic urinalysis (2)(17)(18), with intralaboratory CV of 25–50% (8)(19), and with the possibility of concomitant dysmorphic erythrocytes in the urine in the presence of urothelial cancer (20). It has been pointed out that current data are inadequate to support clear-cut recommendations regarding the management of microscopic hematuria (15).


References

  1. Froom P, Bieganiec B, Ehrenrich Z, Barak M. Stability of common analytes in urine refrigerated for 24 h before automated analysis by test strips. Clin Chem 2000;46:1384-1386.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Messing EM, Young TB, Hunt VB, Emoto SE, Wehbie JM. The significance of asymptomatic microhematuria in men 50 or more years old: findings of a home screening study using urinary dipsticks. J Urol 1987;137:919-925.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Ritchie CD, Bevan EA, Collier SJ. Importance of occult haematuria found at screening. BMJ 1986;292:681-683.
  4. Britton JP, Dowell AC, Whelan P. Dipstick haematuria and bladder cancer in men over 60: results of a community study. BMJ 1989;299:1010-1012.
  5. Peele JD, Gadsden RH, Crews R. Semi-automated vs. visual reading of urinalysis dipsticks. Clin Chem 1977;23:2242-2246.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Lun A, Ziebig R, Hammer H, Otting U, Filler G, Sinha P. Reference values for neonates and children for the UF-100 urine flow cytometer [Letter]. Clin Chem 1999;45:1879-1880.[Free Full Text]
  7. Regeniter A, Haenni V, Risch L, Kochli HP, Colombo JP, Frei R, et al. Urine analysis performed by flow cytometry: reference range determination and comparison to morphological findings, dipstick chemistry and bacterial culture results—a multicenter study. Clin Nephrol 2001;55:384-392.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Morimoto M, Yanai H, Shukuya K, Chiba H, Kobayashi K, Matsuno K. Effects of midstream collection and the menstrual cycle on urine particles and dipstick urinalysis among healthy females. Clin Chem 2003;49:188-190.[Free Full Text]
  9. Froom P, Gross M, Ribak J, Barzilay J, Benbassat J. The effect of age on the prevalence of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria. Am J Clin Pathol 1986;86:656-657.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Ben-Ezra J, Bork L, McPherson RA. Evaluation of the Sysmex UF-100 automated urinalysis analyzer. Clin Chem 1998;44:92-95.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Froom P, Gross M, Froom J, Caine Y, Margaliot S, Benbassat J. Factors associated with microhematuria in asymptomatic young men. Clin Chem 1986;32:2013-2015.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  12. Denker BM, Brenner BM. Cardinal manifestations of renal disease. Fauci AS Braunwald E Isselbacher KJ Wilson JD Martin JB Kasper DLet al eds. Harrison’s principles of internal medicine 1998:281 McGraw-Hill New York. .
  13. Kokko JP. Renal and genitourinary diseases. Goldman L Bennett JC eds. Cecil textbook of medicine 2000:528 WB Saunders Company Philadelphia. .
  14. Grossfeld GD, Litwin MS, Wolf LJ, Jr, Hricak J, Shuler CL, Agerter DC, et al. Evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria in adults: the Americian Urological Association best practice policy. Part II: patient evaluation, cytology, voided markers, imaging, cystoscopy, nephrology evaluation and follow-up. Urology 2001;57:604-610.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Cohen RA, Brown RS. Microscopic hematuria. N Engl J Med 2003;348:2330-2338.[Free Full Text]
  16. Froom P, Froom J, Ribak J. Asymptomatic microscopic hematuria—is investigation necessary?. J Clin Epidemiol 1997;50:1197-1200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Bee DE, James GP, Paul KL. Hemoglobinuria and hematuria: accuracy and precision of laboratory diagnosis. Clin Chem 1979;25:1696-1699.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  18. Gadeholt H. Quantitative estimation of urinary sediment with special regard to sources of error. BMJ 1964;1:1547-1550.
  19. Fenili D, Pirovano B. The automation of sediment analysis using a new urine flow cytometer (UF-100). Clin Chem Lab Med 1998;36:909-917.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Offringa M, Benbassat J. The value of urinary red cell shape in the diagnosis of glomerular and post-glomerular haematuria. A meta-analysis. Postgrad Med J 1992;68:648-654.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Froom, P.
Right arrow Articles by Barak, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow General Clinical Chemistry
Right arrow Evidence Based Laboratory Medicine and Test Utilization


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS