Clinical Chemistry Link to Randox Laboratories Web Site
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 50: 1261-1264, 2004; 10.1373/clinchem.2003.026666
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Immunology
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2004;50:1261-1264.)
© 2004 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Enzyme Immunoassay for Serum Autoantibody to Survivin and Its Findings in Head-and-Neck Cancer Patients

Joseph T. Chang1, Fen-Hwa Wong2, Chun-Ta Liao3, I-How Chen3, Hung-Ming Wang4 and Ann-Joy Cheng5,a

1 Department of Radiation Oncology,3 Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, and4 Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan;2 Institute of Public Health, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan;5 School of Medical Technology, Chang Gung University, Taipei Chang Gung Head and Neck Oncology Group, Taoyuan, Taiwan

aaddress correspondence to this author at: School of Medical Technology, Chang Gung University, 259 Wen-Hwa 1st Road, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan; fax 886-3-2118247, e-mail ajchen{at}mail.cgu.edu.tw

Several proteins associated with malignant transformation of cells can induce autoantibodies (1)(2)(3)(4). These autoantibodies, such as those to p53, are detectable in serum and may serve to monitor tumor progression (4)(5). Survivin, a recently cloned 16.5-kDa apoptosis inhibitor belonging to the IAP3 family (6), is expressed in the G2-M phase of the cell cycle (7). Its overexpression in cancer is thought to overcome an apoptotic checkpoint and favor aberrant progression of transformed cells through mitosis. Survivin is not produced in adult tissues except for the thymus and placenta, but it is abundantly produced in fetal tissues and in various human tumors, including lung, colon, gastric, breast, and bladder cancers as well as high-grade lymphomas (6)(7)(8)(9)(10). We developed an enzyme-labeled assay to measure anti-survivin autoantibody in sera and evaluated the relationship between anti-survivin and clinicopathologic variables.

We obtained blood from 294 consecutive patients, before cancer treatment, at the Otorhinolaryngology or Head and Neck Surgery Clinics at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital with written informed consent. The standard treatment was radical surgery for early-stage patients, plus adjuvant radiotherapy for intermediate-risk patients, such as those with close surgical margins or lymph node metastases. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy was given to patients with lymph node metastases and extracapsular spread. All cancers were histologically graded as well-differentiated, moderately differentiated, or poorly differentiated, according to the WHO classification (11). Tumor pathology staging was classified according to the system of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (12). Blood samples from 40 gender- and age-matched healthy individuals were obtained as controls. After centrifugation, the sera were stored at –20 °C until use.

Survivin cDNA was obtained by reverse transcription-PCR using total RNA from Jurkat cells with survivin-specific primers. The PCR product was ligated into the pET29a expression plasmid (pET-survivin; Novagen), which contains a histidine-tag fusion protein. The correct sequence of the cloned PCR product was verified by sequencing. Escherichia coli BL21 were transformed with pET-survivin. Expression of recombinant survivin (r-survivin) was induced with isopropyl ß-p-thiogalactopyranoside. Sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis was used to assess induction of recombinant protein. The cells were harvested by centrifugation and sonicated on ice in short bursts in a binding buffer solution containing 20 mmol/L imidazole. The r-survivin was purified from the supernatant by His-Bind (Novagen) metal chelate chromatography. The purity of the protein was examined by Western blot analysis using polyclonal anti-survivin antibody.

Purified r-survivin was diluted in 20 mmol/L phosphate buffer (pH 7.4) to a final concentration of 5 mg/L (Coomassie assay; Pierce), dispensed into 96-well plates (150 µL/well), and incubated overnight at 4 °C. After being washed with washing buffer [phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) containing 1 mL of Tween 20 and 1 mL of Nonidet P-40 per liter], the plates were blocked with 10 g/L bovine serum albumin in washing buffer and incubated 2 h at room temperature. The plates were washed five times and dried under reduced pressure. Sera were diluted 1:100 in a washing buffer containing 2 g/L bovine serum albumin and 30 mL/L fetal calf serum, and 100 µL was placed in r-survivin-coated wells and incubated 1 h at 37 °C with gentle shaking. A calibrator was prepared with rabbit antiserum raised against r-survivin protein. After being washed, each well was incubated with 100 µL of a 1:5000 dilution (in sample dilution solution) of goat anti-human IgG F(ab')2 labeled with horseradish peroxidase (Zymed) and incubated for 1 h at 37 °C with gentle shaking, followed by washing. We added 100 µL of tetramethylbenzidine substrate solution (Sigma) and, after 15 min at room temperature, 100 µL of 2 mol/L HCl. The absorbance was then measured at 450 nm. For each patient, the data were calculated as the ratio of absorbance for the unknown patient sample to the absorbance of the calibrator.

We added 4 µg of purified r-survivin protein to a loading buffer and boiled the solution for 5 min. Subsequently, we subjected the r-survivin sample to 15% sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by transfer to a polyvinylidene difluoride membrane. The membrane was then blocked overnight at 4 °C with 50 g/L nonfat dry milk in PBS containing 1 mL/L Tween. After decanting the blocking buffer, we cut the membrane into pieces and incubated the pieces separately with 1:100 diluted serum (in PBS containing 50 g/L bovine serum albumin) for 1 h at 37 °C with agitation. After washing the membrane six times with PBS-Tween, we incubated the membrane with anti-human IgG antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (Santa Cruz) for 1 h at 37 °C. After being washed, the membrane was submerged in ECL developing solution (Amersham) and autoradiographed.

The Pearson {chi}2 test was used to look for an association between anti-survivin and clinicopathologic variables, including tumor extent (tumor, node, and overall stage) and pathology findings (degree of differentiation). All P values presented were two-sided, and significance was set at <0.05.

The r-survivin protein appeared homogeneous on sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1A in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol50/issue7/) and Western blot analysis (Fig. 1B in the online Data Supplement). The assay was linear on dilution (r = 0.988). For three samples with absorbance ratios of 1.6–2.2, the within-run imprecision (CV) was 2.4–2.7% (n = 10) and the between-run CV was 2.7–3.1% (n = 10). Sera with rheumatoid factor (250 kIU/L), anti-streptolysin O (420 kIU/L), and increased C-reactive protein (50 mg/L) were negative for anti-survivin. No bands were detected by Western blot analysis in samples with ELISA signals below the cutoff, but clear bands were found in samples with signals above the cutoff (Fig. 2 in the online Data Supplement).

The median age of the patients was 49.5 years (range, 26–79 years), 94% were male, 66% consumed alcohol, 85% smoked tobacco, and 84% chewed betel quid. The diagnosed cancers were of the hypopharynx (9%), oropharynx (6%), larynx (3.7%), and oral cavity (81%); of the latter, 96 (33%) of the cancers were in the buccal mucosa, 66 (22%) were in the tongue, and 76 (25.8%) were in other sites. All cancers were squamous cell carcinomas, with 106 (36%) well differentiated, 148 (50%) moderately differentiated, and 40 (13.6%) poorly differentiated. The mean age of the controls was 46 years (range, 18–72 years), and 66% were male.

The mean (SD) absorbance ratio was 0.27 (0.14) in sera from controls and 0.60 (0.40) in sera from cancer patients (Fig. 1 ). At a cutoff value equal to the mean + 2 SD in controls (13)(14), anti-survivin was increased in 1 (2.5%) noncancer and 134 (46%) cancer samples (P <0.001). Anti-survivin signals did not differ significantly among cancers at different anatomic sites (data not shown). The relationship between anti-survivin autoantibody and clinicopathologic variables is shown in Table 1 . Anti-survivin was not statistically associated with patient sex or age or lymph node status (N stage). Correlations were significant between anti-survivin and tumor stage (T stage; P = 0.040), overall stage (P = 0.003), and histologic grade (P = 0.012).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Absorbance ratios in anti-survivin ELISA for sera from apparently healthy controls (Normal) and patients with head-and-neck cancer (Tumor).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Association of the presence of anti-survivin autoantibody with clinicopathologic variables.

Autoantibodies can be induced by several cellular molecules when cells are in a high-proliferation state, such as in malignancy (1)(2)(3)(4)(15)(16)(17). Although the clinical value of these antibodies remains subject to debate, consistent results have been observed in breast, colon, and gastric cancers, in which the antibodies have been associated with high-grade tumors or poor prognosis. Although there is no previous report regarding the association of anti-survivin with tumor status, the correlation of survivin expression and more aggressive disease has been found in many cancers (18)(19)(20). In this study, anti-survivin was correlated with tumor aggressiveness, indicating that the serum autoantibody may represent cellular status. These results suggest that the detection of circulating anti-survivin autoantibody could potentially serve as a useful noninvasive marker for determining head-and-neck cancer status.

Detection of serum survivin autoantibody by immunoblotting may be of limited value for routine use in most pathology or diagnostic laboratories. The simple, rapid enzyme-linked assay we have developed, which uses r-survivin protein as the antigen, may be advantageous for screening of healthy individuals or patients with head-and-neck cancer to monitor the development of survivin autoantibody during oncogenesis.

In conclusion, we present the first report of a convenient method to detect survivin antibodies in patients with head-and-neck cancer. This high prevalence of survivin antibody in patients with various cancers makes this molecule an attractive biomarker for assessing such tumors, particularly in patients lacking anti-p53 or other clinically useful serum tumor markers.


Acknowledgments

This work was supported by National Science Research Grant NSC 90-2320-B-182-059 of Taiwan (to A.J.C.) and National Science Research Grant NSC 90-2314-B-182A-105 of Taiwan (to J.T.C.). We thank Mary Jeanne Buttrey, MD, for critical reading and correction of the manuscript.


References

  1. Sahin R, Tureci OE, Schmitt H, Cochlovius B, Johannes T, Schmits R, et al. Human neoplasms elicit multiple specific immune responses in the autologous host. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:11810-11813.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Old LJ, Chen YT. New paths in human cancer serology. J Exp Med 1998;187:1163-1167.[Free Full Text]
  3. Cheever M, Disis ML, Bernhard H, Gralow JR, Hand SL, Huseby ES, et al. Immunity to oncogenic proteins. Immunol Rev 1995;145:33-59.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Angelopoulou K, Diamandis E, Sutherland DJA, Kellen JA, Bunting PS. Prevalence of serum antibodies against the p53 tumor suppressor gene protein in various cancers. Int J Cancer 1994;58:480-487.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Soussi T. p53 antibodies in the sera of patients with various types of cancer: a review. Cancer Res 2000;60:1777-1788.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Ambrosini G, Adida C, Altieri DC. A novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, expressed in cancer and lymphoma. Nat Med 1997;3:917-921.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Li F, Ambrosini G, Chu EY, Plescia J, Tognin S, Marchisio PC, et al. Control of apoptosis and mitotic spindle checkpoint by survivin. Nature 1998;396:580-584.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Smith SD, Wheeler MA, Plescia J, Colberg JW, Weiss RM, Aliter DC. Urine detection of survivin and diagnosis of bladder cancer. JAMA 2001;285:324-328.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lu CD, Altieri DC, Tanigawara N. Expression of a novel anti-apoptosis gene, survivin, correlated with tumor cell apoptosis and p53 accumulation in gastric carcinomas. Cancer Res 1998;58:1808-1812.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Kawasaki H, Altieri DC, Lu CD, Oyoda M, Tenjo T, Tanigawa N. Inhibition of apoptosis by survivin predicts shorter survival rates in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res 1998;58:5071-5074.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Shanmugaratnam K eds. Histological typing of tumours of the upper respiratory tract and ear. International histological classification of tumours, 2nd ed 1991:1-92 Spring-Verlag Berlin. .
  12. Fleming ID Cooper JS Henson DE Hutter RVP Kennedy BJ Murphy GPet al eds. AJCC cancer staging manual, 5th ed 1998:23-76 Lippincott Williams Wilkins Philadelphia. .
  13. Chen IH, Chang JT, Liao CT, Wang HM, Hsieh LL, Cheng AJ. Prognostic significance of EGFR and Her-2 in oral cavity cancer in betel quid prevalent area. Br J Cancer 2003;89:681-686.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Yagihashi A, Asanuma K, Nakamura M, Mano AJ, Torigoe T, Kobayashi D, et al. Detection of anti-survivin antibody in gastrointestinal cancer patients. Clin Chem 2001;47:1729-1731.[Free Full Text]
  15. Douglas CA, Ellershaw J. Anti-Hu antibodies may indicate a positive response to chemotherapy in paraneoplastic syndrome secondary to small cell lung cancer. Palliat Med 2003;17:638-639.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Mozo L, Simo A, Suarez A, Rodrigo L, Gutierrez C. Autoantibodies to Golgi proteins in hepatocellular carcinoma: case report and literature review. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2002;14:771-774.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  17. Asherson RA. Antiphospholipid antibodies, malignancies and paraproteinemias. J Autoimmun 2000;15:117-122.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  18. Schultz IJ, Kiemeney LA, Witjes JA, Schalken JA, Willems JL, Swinkels DW, et al. Survivin mRNA expression is elevated in malignant urothelial cell carcinomas and predicts time to recurrence. Anticancer Res 2003;23:3327-3331.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Dong Y, Sui L, Watanabe Y, Sugimoto K, Tokuda M. Survivin expression in laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas and its prognostic implications. Anticancer Res 2002;22:2377-2383.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  20. Sui L, Dong Y, Ohno M, Watanabe Y, Sugimoto K, Tokuda M. Survivin expression and its correlation with cell proliferation and prognosis in epithelial ovarian tumors. Int J Oncol 2002;21:315-320.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplement
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (7)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A.-J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Chang, J. T.
Right arrow Articles by Cheng, A.-J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Clinical Immunology
Right arrow Cancer Diagnostics (since 2002)
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS