Clinical Chemistry Siemens Point of Care - Urinalysis
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1768-1769, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.055483
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dillner, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1768-1769.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Editorials

Toward "Serolomics": Papillomavirus Serology Is Taking a Technologic Lead in High-Throughput Multiplexed Antibody Analysis

Joakim Dillner

Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden

aAddress for correspondence: Department of Medical Microbiology, Lund University, Malmö University Hospital, Malmö SE-20502, Sweden.

The report by Waterboer et al. (1) in this issue represents one of the most thorough attempts to develop a high-throughput system for simultaneous analysis of antibodies against a large number of antigens. High-throughput assays, notably through various types of arrays, are increasingly important research tools in modern molecular medicine, but almost all the technologic development has been directed toward the analysis of DNA, RNA, and proteins (2), with more limited technologic progress in the field of serology. Will we see multiplexed antibody analysis, "serolomics", arising as a new research field alongside genomics, RNomics, and proteomics?

Measurements of groups of antibodies can have application in multiple areas of medicine. Analysis of a broad spectrum of autoantibodies is increasingly used in predictive diagnostics of autoimmune diseases (3), and autoantibodies against oncogene products are being studied in predictive oncology (4). The most interesting medical application, however, would be to rapidly assay the spectrum of microbiological agents to which a person has been exposed because past infections can be highly predictive of the risk of future diseases. Important examples include cardiovascular diseases, allergies, and cancer. Exposure to infections accounts for ~17% of human cancers, with human papillomavirus (HPV) being one of the most important oncogenic infections (5). HPV infection causes almost all cervical cancers as well as a significant proportion of cancers of the vulva, vagina, penis, anus, and oropharynx; together these HPV-related cancers account for >5% of all human cancers (5).

The HPV group of viruses today consists of >100 completely characterized types. Partial sequences of additional isolates indicate that at least another 100 HPVs exist. Of these, 15 genital HPVs are established as oncogenic in humans. HPV type 16 is by far the most important virus, accounting for more than 50% of all cervical cancers. HPV16 is even more dominating as an etiology of the noncervical HPV-associated cancers. HPV18 is another virus of particular interest because it is the dominant factor in adenocarcinomas of the cervix (5). Several prophylactic HPV vaccines have shown high efficacy against HPV infection and HPV-induced cervical precancers (6)(7), and it is highly likely that programs attempting HPV eradication by vaccination will be launched in the near future.

The antibody response to HPV is, in general, type-specific, and HPV serology is an important technology for determining the spread of type-specific HPV infections in populations and monitoring of the effect of HPV vaccines in inducing protective antibodies (5). Today, HPV serology is performed mostly in a limited number of expert laboratories, but it is likely to become widely used in clinical laboratories in the post-HPV vaccination era. The high efficiency and low variability of the Luminex method reported in this issue of Clinical Chemistry (1) make it an attractive method for HPV serology in high-throughput laboratories. Major HPV vaccination trials already use a Luminex-based method of HPV serology to monitor the immunogenicity of the vaccines (8). The method described by Waterboer et al. (1) represents a further advance because it does not require an inhibition step and allows standardized scale-up to a large number of antigens (up to 100) by use of simple expression methods that are likely to be adopted by many laboratories involved in high-throughput serology.

Waterboer et al. (1) deal with two different classes of antibodies that will be of interest in serolomics. The antibodies against the viral transforming proteins E6 and E7 are rare among healthy HPV-exposed individuals, but are common among patients with cervical cancer, particularly in late-stage disease. E6 and E7 antibodies have been studied extensively as potential tumor markers in HPV-associated cancers; they are not in clinical use, however, because their diagnostic sensitivity has not been very high and because these antibodies appear too late in the course of disease to give clinical benefit from early diagnosis (9). Will the increased sensitivity and low imprecision of the Luminex-based method and the possibility for easy combination of different antibody assays lead to renewed interest in the use of these antibodies in predictive oncology? The study by Waterboer et al. (1) certainly appears to represent a major advance in the technology.

The antibodies against the major HPV capsid protein, L1, are induced after infection and usually stay detectable for many years after clearance of the infection, i.e., they belong to the class of antibodies that mark past exposure to an infection. The concentrations of these antibodies correlate well with protection (neutralizing ability), and it is for L1 antibodies that there is an urgent need for efficient, standardized HPV serologic methods for use in vaccination implementation/evaluation efforts and for epidemiologic monitoring of the type-specific spread of HPV infections (5). Although the method described (1) has not been compared directly against more established HPV serologic methods such as the virus-like particle–based ELISA, competitive RIA, and neutralizing assays, it certainly seems promising. One hopes that further epidemiologic evaluation of the technology will be pursued with a high priority.

From an epidemiologic point of view, high-throughput technologies have, to some extent, been problematic. They typically provide data on a very large number of variables, but at substantial cost per tested individual, and they can cause problems with multiple-hypothesis testing. The major exceptions are the high-throughput methods that allow testing of very large numbers of patients but usually for a more limited number of variables. Examples include tissue microarrays that assemble tissues from up to 1000 patients per slide and "DNA arrays", a term coined in the Swedish National Biobank Programme to denote the construction of arrays of purified DNA from large population cohorts (10). The multiple antibody testing approach described by Waterboer et al. (1) is a compromise in this regard. The main principle is to increase the number of variables tested per individual, but advantages such as speed and low consumption of serum and reagents are also likely to enable testing of sufficiently large numbers of individuals at low cost so that the method can become a popular tool in molecular epidemiologic studies. These studies could encompass a wide variety of research areas in which assaying of antibodies could be informative.


References

  1. Waterboer T, Sehr P, Michael KM, Franceschi S, Nieland JD, Joos TO, et al. Multiplex human papillomavirus serology based on in situ–purified glutathione S-transferase fusion proteins. Clin Chem 2005;51:1845-1853.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Landegren U, Schallmeiner E, Nilsson M, Fredriksson S, Baner J, Gullberg M, et al. Molecular tools for a molecular medicine: analyzing genes, transcripts and proteins using padlock and proximity probes. J Mol Recognit 2004;17:194-197.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Graham KL, Robinson WH, Steinman L, Utz PJ. High-throughput methods for measuring autoantibodies in systemic lupus erythematosus and other autoimmune diseases. Autoimmunity 2004;37:269-272.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Lenner P, Wiklund F, Emdin SO, Arnerlöv C, Eklund C, Hallmans G, et al. Serum antibodies against p53 in relation to cancer risk and prognosis in breast cancer: A population-based epidemiological study. Br J Cancer 1999;79:927-932.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Dillner J, Brown DR. Can genital-tract human Papillomavirus infection and cervical cancer be prevented with a vaccine?. Expert Rev Mol Med 2004;9:1-21.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Koutsky LA, Ault KA, Wheeler CM, Brown DR, Barr E, Alvarez FB, et al. A controlled trial of a human papillomavirus type 16 vaccine. N Engl J Med 2002;347:1645-1651.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Harper DM, Franco EL, Wheeler C, Ferris DG, Jenkins D, Schuind A, et al. Efficacy of a bivalent L1-virus-like particle vaccine in prevention of infection with human papillomavirus types 16 and 18 in young women: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2004;364:1757-1765.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Opalka D, Lachman CE, MacMullen SA, Jansen KU, Smith JF, Chirmule N, et al. Simultaneous quantitation of antibodies to neutralizing epitopes on virus-like particles for human papillomavirus types 6, 11, 16, and 18 by a multiplexed Luminex assay. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003;10:108-115.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Lehtinen M, Pawlita M, Zumbach K, Lie K, Hakama M, Jellum E, et al. Evaluation of antibody response to human papillomavirus early proteins in women whom cervical cancer developed 1 to 20 years later. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2003;188:49-55.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  10. Swedish National Biobank Programme. http://www.biobanks.se (accessed July 2005)..



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
JCOHome page
D. A.M. Heideman, T. Waterboer, M. Pawlita, P. Delis-van Diemen, I. Nindl, J. A. Leijte, J. M.G. Bonfrer, S. Horenblas, C. J.L.M. Meijer, and P. J.F. Snijders
Human Papillomavirus-16 Is the Predominant Type Etiologically Involved in Penile Squamous Cell Carcinoma
J. Clin. Oncol., October 10, 2007; 25(29): 4550 - 4556.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Dillner, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Dillner, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Automation and Analytical Techniques


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS