Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 2404-2406, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.052183
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koidl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koidl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:2404-2406.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Addition of a Homologous Internal Control to a Real-Time PCR Assay for Detection of Bordetella pertussis

Christoph Koidl1, Michael Bozic1, Jörg Berg2, Markus Stöcher2, Gerhard Mühlbauer3, Egon Marth1 and Harald H. Kessler1,a

1 Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Institute of Hygiene, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria;2 Institute of Laboratory Medicine, General Hospital Linz, Linz, Austria;3 Roche Applied Science, Vienna, Austria;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Molecular Diagnostics Laboratory, Institute of Hygiene, Medical University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 4, A-8010 Graz, Austria; fax 43-316-380-9649, e-mail harald.kessler{at}meduni-graz.at

Pertussis, also called whooping cough, is caused by Bordetella pertussis. The disease may show an atypical course, particularly in neonates and elderly patients. A rapid and safe diagnostic method is thus essential for appropriate treatment and prophylaxis. Culture has been considered the gold standard for detection of B. pertussis, but this method often lacks sensitivity, and a minimum of 4 days may be required to obtain results (1)(2). PCR is a rapid, sensitive, and specific method for the diagnosis of pertussis (3)(4)(5).

In this study, a new molecular assay was established based on real-time PCR and including a homologous internal control (IC). We evaluated the performance of this assay with a commercially available genomic DNA isolate and with clinical samples.

The new molecular assay consisted of a protocol for manual extraction of DNA followed by generation of the amplification product by real-time PCR. The assay was based on the amplification of a 181-bp fragment of the repetitive insertion sequence IS481, which has been described in B. pertussis and Bordetella holmesii and may be present in Bordetella bronchiseptica (6)(7)(8)(9)(10) (see Table 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol51/issue12). We determined assay linearity and detection limit by analyzing 10-fold dilutions of the ATCC genomic DNA isolate 9797D from B. pertussis. Interassay variation was determined with 7 dilutions of the genomic DNA isolate (5 determinations on 5 different days), whereas intraassay variation was determined with 3 samples (5 determinations within a single assay). All assays for determination of inter- and intraassay variation included negative controls.

A total of 219 nasopharyngeal swabs were tested in this study. All specimens were collected with the Copan Venturi Transystem® culture swab transport system (COPAN Italia Spa) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Samples were obtained from patients (99 females, 120 males; mean age, 9.1 years; range, 0–86 years) with a clinical presentation compatible with B. pertussis infection.

We devised the B. pertussis–specific IC as a PCR competitor that contained B. pertussis–specific forward and reverse primer sequences bordering a stretch of the neomycin phosphotransferase gene (neo) as heterologous DNA. The IC was constructed as described recently (11). Briefly, a stretch of neo (bp 471 to 603; GenBank accession no. V00618) was amplified in preparative PCR with composite primers that consisted of the B. pertussis-specific primer sequences in 5' and the neospecific primer sequences in 3'. The obtained product (201 bp) was cloned into the plasmid vector pCR2.1-TOPO by the TOPO TA Cloning Kit according to the manufacturer’s instructions (Invitrogen). Plasmid DNA was purified from transformed bacteria by use of the Quantum Plasmid Miniprep Kit (Bio-Rad) linearized with HindIII restriction enzyme (New England Biolabs, Inc.), and purified with the High Pure Viral Nucleic acid reagent set (Roche Applied Science), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The obtained DNA amounts were assessed by ultraviolet spectrophotometry at 260 nm. To guarantee sufficient stability, the IC was introduced into lambda phage particles, as described recently (12).

Preparation of bacterial DNA started with dipping the swab into a mixture of 200 µL of tissue lysis buffer and 40 µL of proteinase K solution (20 g/L). The tip of the swab was cut, and the suspension (including the swab tip) was incubated at 55 °C for 60 min. After removal of the swab, 5 µL of the IC, equivalent to 20 copies of IC DNA, was added, and the High Pure PCR Template Preparation Kit (Roche) was used for DNA extraction according to manufacturer’s instructions.

Real-time PCR was performed on the LightCycler 2.0 (LC) instrument (Roche). All samples were assayed with the LC Fast Start DNA Master Hybridization Probes Kit (Roche). The PCR master mixture contained 2 µL of Fast Start Master DNA Hybridization Probes reaction mixture, 1.6 µL of MgCl2 (final concentration, 3 mM), 1.0 µL each (final concentration, 0.5 µM) of the forward and reverse primers, 2.0 µL each (final concentration, 0.2 µM) of BP FL and BP LC Red 640 hybridization probes, 0.2 µL each (final concentration, 0.2 µM) of the Neo FL and Neo-LC Red 705 neo-hybridization probes, and PCR-grade sterile water (7.0 µL) to a final volume of 17 µL. A 3-µL aliquot of extracted sample was added to 17 µL of PCR master mixture in each LC glass capillary. The LC capillaries were then sealed, inserted into the specially designed LC Carousel (Roche), and centrifuged at 735 g for 15 s. Finally, the LC Carousel was placed into the LC instrument.

The cycling protocol was as follows: 1 cycle of 95 °C for 7 min followed by 50 cycles consisting of denaturation for 10 s at 95 °C, annealing for 10 s at 50 °C, and elongation for 20 s at 72 °C. After the final cycle, the melting curve analysis was started with the initial temperature set at 95 °C, followed by cooling to 45 °C for 2 min; the thermal chamber temperature was then slowly (0.2 °C/s) increased to 82 °C, and the fluorescence was measured continuously. Fluorescence curves were analyzed with the LC software (Ver. 4.0). Crossing point calculation was done by the automated second-derivative maximum method. Channel 640/530 was selected for the target sequence, with channel 705 selected for the IC.

The results of the linearity testing are shown in Fig. 1 . When 10-fold dilutions of the ATCC genomic DNA isolate were analyzed, positive results were consistently obtained with dilutions 10–2 through 10–8 (corresponding to ~1 genome-equivalent). The calibration curve was quasi-linear over 6 logs (dilutions 10–2 through 10–7). The IC was consistently detected in dilutions 10–6 through 10–9.



View larger version (30K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Detection of B. pertussis DNA.

Results obtained from a dilution series of the ATCC genomic DNA isolate 9797D. (A), plots for the target DNA; (B), calibration curve; (C), plots for the corresponding IC. neg, negative; GE, genome-equivalent.

To determine interassay variation, we assayed 7 clinical samples positive for B. pertussis DNA within the linearity range of the assay 5 times on 5 different days (including reextraction each day). The SD calculated from the crossing points obtained was 0.08–1.09. We determined intraassay variation by assaying 3 B. pertussis-positive clinical samples within the linearity range of the assay 5 times within a single assay (including different extractions). Mean crossing points were calculated, and the SD was 0.14–1.04. The mean melting peak was at 62 °C (range, 61.5–62.5 °C).

When clinical samples were tested, 46 of 219 nasopharyngeal swabs were found to be positive for B. pertussis DNA, with melting points at the expected temperature. Sera were obtained 4 weeks later from all patients with positive results and tested with the Serion ELISA classic for B. pertussis IgA (Institut Virion\Serion GmbH). A positive IgA result was obtained for all sera from patients with a positive PCR result. The new homologous IC was consistently detected in all negative and in 10 (22%) of 46 positive clinical samples. Extraction of samples was completed within 2 h. After the centrifugation step, real-time PCR took another 55 min. No contamination was observed during the entire study.

PCR amplification may fail because of interference from PCR inhibitors; therefore, ICs have been incorporated in molecular assays for detection of B. pertussis (10)(13). The homologous IC used in this study was coextracted with the clinical samples and coamplified with the same primers used for the target DNA. This procedure ensures accurate control of the entire molecular assay and represents the state of the art for ICs. The B. pertussis–specific IC gave positive results for all negative samples throughout the whole study, indicating successful removal of potential inhibitors by the extraction method. Contrary to a recent study using an identical amplification protocol (13), the sensitivity of the assay in this study was not affected by introduction of the homologous IC. Sensitivity to strains other than B. pertussis may also not be affected by introduction of this IC. In 78% of positive samples, competitive inhibition prevented detection of the IC.

In conclusion, the newly established assay includes all of the features required for molecular detection of B. pertussis in the routine diagnostic laboratory. This molecular assay is suitable for the routine diagnostic laboratory and allows rapid and safe diagnosis of B. pertussis.


References

  1. Dragsted DM, Dohn B, Madsen J, Jensen JS. Comparison of culture and PCR for detection of Bordetella pertussis and parapertussis under routine laboratory conditions. J Med Microbiol 2004;53:749-754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Hoppe JE. Bordetella. Murray PR Baron EJ Pfaller MA Tenover TC Yolken RH eds. Manual of clinical microbiology 7th ed 1999:614-624 American Society for Microbiology Washington DC. .
  3. Fredricks DN, Relman DA. Application of polymerase chain reaction to the diagnosis of infectious diseases. Clin Infect Dis 1999;29:475-486.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. He Q, Schmidt-Schlapfer G, Just M, Matter HC, Nikkari S, Viljanen MK, et al. Impact of polymerase chain reaction on clinical pertussis research: Finnish and Swiss experiences. J Infect Dis 1996;174:1288-1295.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Loeffelholz MJ, Thompson CJ, Long KS, Gilchrist MJ. Comparison of PCR, culture, and direct fluorescent-antibody testing for detection of Bordetella pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 1999;37:2872-2876.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  6. Glare EM, Paton JC, Premier RR, Lawrence AJ, Nisbet IT. Analysis of a repetitive DNA sequence from Bordetella pertussis and its application to the diagnosis of pertussis using the polymerase chain reaction. J Clin Microbiol 1990;28:1982-1987.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Kosters K, Reischl U, Schmetz J, Riffelmann M, Wirsing von Konig CH. Real-time LightCycler PCR for detection and discrimination of Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis. J Clin Microbiol 2002;40:1719-1722.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Reischl U, Lehn N, Sanden GN, Loeffelholz MJ. Real-time PCR assay targeting IS481 of Bordetella pertussis and molecular basis for detecting Bordetella holmesii. J Clin Microbiol 2001;39:1963-1966.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Templeton KE, Scheltinga SA, van der Zee A, Diederen BM, van Kruijssen AM, Goossens H, et al. Evaluation of real-time PCR for detection of and discrimination between Bordetella pertussis, Bordetella parapertussis, and Bordetella holmesii for clinical diagnosis. J Clin Microbiol 2003;41:4121-4126.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Farrell DJ, McKeon M, Daggard G, Loeffelholz MJ, Thompson CJ, Mukkur TK. Rapid-cycle PCR method to detect Bordetella pertussis that fulfills all consensus recommendations for use of PCR in diagnosis of pertussis. J Clin Microbiol 2000;38:4499-4502.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Stocher M, Leb V, Holzl G, Berg J. A simple approach to the generation of heterologous competitive internal controls for real-time PCR assays on the LightCycler. J Clin Virol 2002;25(Suppl 3):47-53.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Stocher M, Berg J. Internal control DNA for PCR assays introduced into lambda phage particles exhibits nuclease resistance. Clin Chem 2004;50:2163-2166.[Free Full Text]
  13. Cloud JL, Hymas WC, Turlak A, Croft A, Reischl U, Daly JA, et al. Description of a multiplex Bordetella pertussis and Bordetella parapertussis LightCycler PCR assay with inhibition control. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2003;46:189-195.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
J. Clin. Microbiol.Home page
C. Koidl, M. Bozic, A. Burmeister, M. Hess, E. Marth, and H. H. Kessler
Detection and Differentiation of Bordetella spp. by Real-Time PCR
J. Clin. Microbiol., February 1, 2007; 45(2): 347 - 350.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (1)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koidl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koidl, C.
Right arrow Articles by Kessler, H. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS