Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 2409-2411, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.054585
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Findeisen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Neumaier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Findeisen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Neumaier, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:2409-2411.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Preanalytical Impact of Sample Handling on Proteome Profiling Experiments with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry

Peter Findeisena, Diamandula Sismanidis, Martin Riedl, Victor Costina and Michael Neumaier

Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim of the University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Institute for Clinical Chemistry, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Theodor Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany; fax 621-383-3819, e-mail peter.findeisen{at}ikc.ma.uni-heidelberg.de

Mass spectrometry (MS) offers a wide range of possibilities for analyzing biological samples containing complex mixtures of proteins and peptides, by generating proteome profiles. The aim of most profiling experiments is identification of changes in protein patterns that are related to a certain disease or clinical status and might therefore be used to improve diagnosis, staging, and monitoring (1). Reproducibility of spectra generated by matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS is crucial (2), however, and early enthusiastic reports about the diagnostic power of proteome-profiling approaches for early disease classification have recently been critically assessed and reevaluated (3). The reproducibility of profiling experiments depends on sample quality, which in turn is greatly influenced by preanalytical storage conditions and the choice of anticoagulants (4)(5)(6). In this study, we examined the impact of preanalytical sample handling and storage times on MALDI-TOF MS data for serum and plasma samples and identified a candidate marker to allow objective classification of given samples with respect to age and, hence, appropriateness for MS protein profiling and interpretation of data.

We collected 10-mL venous blood samples into serum tubes, EDTA-coated tubes, and ammonium-heparin–coated tubes (Sarstedt). After collection, all samples were initially kept at room temperature for 30 min, to allow clot formation, before centrifugation at 3000g for 10 min in a precooled (4 °C) centrifuge (Rotina 48R; Hettich). After centrifugation, 1 aliquot of each sample was immediately frozen at –80 °C (time 0); other aliquots were incubated for distinct time periods at room temperature as follows: Specimens from 1 healthy volunteer were stored at room temperature until 1, 2, and 4 h after collection and then stored at –80 °C before further use. For classification analysis, serum samples from 6 healthy volunteers and from 20 patients consecutively entering the emergency unit of the university hospital at Mannheim were collected and processed as described above, with the exception that aliquots were prepared only at time 0 and from samples stored at room temperature for 4 h after collection. The study was conducted in accordance with the regulations of the local ethics committee. All samples were deidentified.

Serum and plasma samples were processed with the following magnetic bead (MB)–based affinity chromatography resins, used according to optimized protocols recommended by the manufacturer (Bruker Daltonics): hydrophobic interaction chromatography C8 (MB-HIC-C8), weak cation-exchange chromatography (MB-WCX), and immobilized metal-ion affinity chromatography (MB-IMAC-Cu). Specifically, 5 µL of the sample was mixed with the appropriate MB suspension, washed 3 times with 100 µL of wash buffer, and eluted with 5 µL of appropriate elution solution for the MB-HIC-C8 and MB-WCX reagent sets and 10 µL of appropriate elution solution for the MB-IMAC-Cu reagent set. A portion of the eluted sample was diluted 1:10 in matrix solution, and 1 µL of the resulting mixture was spotted on a SCOUT 600-µm AnchorChip target (Bruker Daltonics), a sample support coated with a strongly water-repellent layer of poly(tetrafluoroethylene) (Teflon) harboring an array of small spots acting as hydrophilic sample anchors and holding the sample droplets in place during solvent evaporation. AnchorChip targets produce more homogenous matrix crystallization with better reproducibility of MS spectra than crystallization on steel targets (7).

MALDI-TOF MS measurements were performed with an Autoflex II (Bruker Daltonics) operating in positive linear mode. Ions formed by a pulsed ultraviolet laser beam (nitrogen laser; wavelength, 337 nm; 25 Hz) were accelerated to 20 kV. Other instrumental settings were as follows: ion source 2 potential, 18.40 kV; focusing lens voltage, 7.8 kV; and pulsed-ion extraction, 250 ns. Matrix solution was prepared by dissolving 0.3 g/L {alpha}-cyano-4-hydroxycinnamic acid solution (Bruker Daltonics) in ethanol–acetone (2:1 by volume), and external mass calibration was performed.

The MS spectra for peaks of 1–10 kDa were generated by summarizing 350 laser shots (50 laser shots at 7 different spot positions). To increase detection sensitivity, excess matrix was removed with 10 shots at a laser power of 90% before acquisition of spectra with 50 shots at a fixed laser power of 50%.

For identification of the [M+H+] 1467-Da candidate mass peak, we performed postsource decay analysis in reflector mode with an accelerating voltage of 20 kV and a delayed extraction of 110 ns. Interpretation of the MS/MS spectra was performed with BioTools software (Bruker Daltonics) with integrated online linking to the Mascot database (www.matrixscience.com).

For each spectrum, a peak-picking algorithm (centroid, signal-to-noise ratio >1.5) was applied by use of flexAnalysis software (Bruker Daltonics), and files containing mass lists and peak areas were exported to Excel file format for further analysis. Using an in-house–written Excel macro function, we sorted the m/z ratios and corresponding peak areas of 2 individual experiments for duplicate masses, accepting a tolerance of 0.1% mass deviation. The corresponding peak areas of 2 spectra were displayed graphically (see, for an example, Fig. 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol51/issue12) in a scatter plot, and we applied linear regression (add trend line) of Excel software to calculate the coefficient of determination (R2) (8). Because the correlation was related to the value of peak areas, the R2 values were calculated separately for spectra containing all peaks or only peaks <100 000, 50 000, and 25 000 arbitrary units.

We calculated time-dependent changes within MS profiles by subtracting the R2 values of different timepoints (1, 2, and 4 h after sample collection) from the R2 value at the corresponding time 0. To determine the method reproducibility, we performed measurements of time 0 samples for 8 individually prepared aliquots and calculated the mean (SD) values of R2. Sample preparations at other times (1, 2, and 4 h) were performed by duplicate spotting of single sample preparations. Serum samples showed profound time-dependent changes in proteome profiles compared with plasma samples. Most changes within MS spectra occurred after a storage time of 4 h at room temperature in serum samples, regardless of the MBs (WCX, HIC-C8, and IMAC-Cu) used for sample processing (Table 1 ).


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Summary of R2 difference calculations.1

Serum samples from 6 individual donors were collected, and aliquots were prepared only at time 0 and 4 h after blood withdrawal. Serum samples were processed with MB-WCX before MALDI-TOF MS. Samples from 3 randomly selected blood donors were chosen as a training set. In all cases, correct classification of the serum samples from the test set was possible with respect to the sample age (data not shown).

Systematic analysis of the time-related changes within mass spectra identified a single [M+H+] peak of 1467 Da that displayed an obvious decrease in signal intensity corresponding to extended storage of serum samples (Fig. 1A ). The 1467-Da peak was prominent in the MS spectra of serum samples processed with MB-IMAC-Cu and MB-HIC-C8 and was visible as a minor peak in spectra of serum samples processed with MB-WCX but was absent in plasma samples (see Fig. 2 in the online Data Supplement). Postsource decay analysis allowed identification of this peak as part of the N-terminal fragment of fibrinogen {alpha}. For sera from 20 patients, mass spectra of serum samples processed with MB-HIC-C8 also showed a consistently prominent 1467-Da [M+H+] peak. The time-dependent decreases in the relative peak areas is shown in Fig. 1B . Because values for the 2 groups did not overlap, the time-dependent decrease in the area of the 1467-Da peak was sufficient to classify samples as aged. Initial signal intensity and time-dependent degradation of the 1467-Da mass peak were not related to acute-phase markers such as C-reactive peptide concentrations (data not shown).



View larger version (33K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Time-dependent changes in the 1467-Da [M+H+] peak.

(A), serum from 1 individual donor. Samples were processed with MB-IMAC-Cu and spotted on the target in duplicate. tp, timepoint. (B), values for sera from 20 patients, processed with MB-IMAC-Cu. For any sample, the relative (rel) peak area of the 1467-Da [M+H+] peak was calculated, and values for timepoint 0 and timepoint 4 h are displayed as box-and-whisker plots. At timepoint 0, the 1467-Da [M+H+] peak in any of the 20 serum samples was prominent, with a mean peak area of 8.9%; the peak area decreased to ~1.7% after 4 h of sample storage at room temperature. The line inside each box is the mean; the limits of each box are the 25th and 75th percentiles, and the whiskers are the minimum and maximum values.

We have concluded that different preanalytical sample-handling conditions lead to a significant nonbiological experimental bias that invalidates bioinformatics analysis of proteomic profiling data. Standardized sample collection procedures are required for advantageous use of high-throughput technologies in the proteomics field (9). Our results indicate that plasma samples may be more suitable for MS protein profiling (Table 1Up ). During coagulation, release of cellular components, mainly from thrombocytes and leukocytes, is induced (10)(11). Furthermore, proteases seem to be more active in serum samples (12). Through the course of thrombin activation, fibrinogen has been shown to release 3 major forms of fibrinopeptide A (FPA) (13): the unmodified form ADSGEGDFLAEGGGVR (FPA), which constitutes ~70%, an NH2-terminal truncated FPA (des-Ala FPA; ~10%), and a product in which Ser-3 is phosphorylated (P-FPA; ~20%). Only the des-Ala FPA (1467 Da), which is one of the most prominent peaks in freshly obtained serum samples, is sufficiently ionized by the MALDI process (14)(15). As shown in this study, the decrease of the 1467-Da [M+H+] peak is strongly dependent on extended storage of serum samples and appears to be a suitable quality indicator for excluding inappropriate serum samples from protein-profiling experiments. Further work will concentrate on the identification of additional decay markers for assessment of sample quality and their validation in larger clinical studies.


Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge that the costs of publication and reprints were supported by the LESSER-LOEWE Foundation e.V.


References

  1. Rosenblatt KP, Bryant-Greenwood P, Killian JK, Mehta A, Geho D, Espina V, et al. Serum proteomics in cancer diagnosis and management. Annu Rev Med 2004;55:97-112.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Ransohoff DF. Lessons from controversy: ovarian cancer screening and serum proteomics. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:315-319.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  3. Baggerly KA, Morris JS, Coombes KR. Reproducibility of SELDI-TOF protein patterns in serum: comparing datasets from different experiments. Bioinformatics 2004;20:777-785.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Baumann S, Ceglarek U, Fiedler GM, Lembcke J, Leichtle A, Thiery J. Standardized approach to proteome profiling of human serum based on magnetic bead separation and matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Clin Chem 2005;51:973-980.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Thavasu PW, Longhurst S, Joel SP, Slevin ML, Balkwill FR. Measuring cytokine levels in blood. Importance of anticoagulants, processing, and storage conditions. J Immunol Methods 1992;153:115-124.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Karsan A, Eigl BJ, Flibotte S, Gelmon K, Switzer P, Hassell P, et al. Analytical and preanalytical biases in serum proteomic pattern analysis for breast cancer diagnosis. Clin Chem 2005;51:1525-1528.[Free Full Text]
  7. Schuerenberg M, Luebbert C, Eickhoff H, Kalkum M, Lehrach H, Nordhoff E. Prestructured MALDI-MS sample supports. Anal Chem 2000;72:3436-3442.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Chan YH. Biostatistics 104: correlational analysis. Singapore Med J 2003;44:614-619.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  9. Baggerly KA, Morris JS, Edmonson SR, Coombes KR. Signal in noise: evaluating reported reproducibility of serum proteomic tests for ovarian cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2005;97:307-309.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Fischer JE, Janousek M, Fischer M, Seifarth FG, Blau N, Fanconi S. Effect of collection and preprocessing methods on neutrophil elastase plasma concentrations. Clin Biochem 1998;31:131-136.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Borregaard N, Cowland JB. Granules of the human neutrophilic polymorphonuclear leukocyte. Blood 1997;89:3503-3521.[Free Full Text]
  12. Evans MJ, Livesey JH, Ellis MJ, Yandle TG. Effect of anticoagulants and storage temperatures on stability of plasma and serum hormones. Clin Biochem 2001;34:107-112.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Brummel KE, Butenas S, Mann KG. An integrated study of fibrinogen during blood coagulation. J Biol Chem 1999;274:22862-22870.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  14. Gay S, Binz PA, Hochstrasser DF, Appel RD. Peptide mass fingerprinting peak intensity prediction: extracting knowledge from spectra. Proteomics 2002;2:1374-1391.[CrossRef][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Krause E, Wenschuh H, Jungblut PR. The dominance of arginine-containing peptides in MALDI-derived tryptic mass fingerprints of proteins. Anal Chem 1999;71:4160-4165.[Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Cancer Res.Home page
G. M. Fiedler, A. B. Leichtle, J. Kase, S. Baumann, U. Ceglarek, K. Felix, T. Conrad, H. Witzigmann, A. Weimann, C. Schutte, et al.
Serum Peptidome Profiling Revealed Platelet Factor 4 as a Potential Discriminating Peptide Associated with Pancreatic Cancer
Clin. Cancer Res., June 1, 2009; 15(11): 3812 - 3819.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
JCOHome page
P. Findeisen, M. Zapatka, T. Peccerella, H. Matzk, M. Neumaier, D. Schadendorf, and S. Ugurel
Serum Amyloid A As a Prognostic Marker in Melanoma Identified by Proteomic Profiling
J. Clin. Oncol., May 1, 2009; 27(13): 2199 - 2208.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
P. Findeisen, S. Post, F. Wenz, and M. Neumaier
Addition of Exogenous Reporter Peptides to Serum Samples before Mass Spectrometry-Based Protease Profiling Provides Advantages over Profiling of Endogenous Peptides
Clin. Chem., October 1, 2007; 53(10): 1864 - 1866.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
J. F. Timms, E. Arslan-Low, A. Gentry-Maharaj, Z. Luo, D. T'Jampens, V. N. Podust, J. Ford, E. T. Fung, A. Gammerman, I. Jacobs, et al.
Preanalytic Influence of Sample Handling on SELDI-TOF Serum Protein Profiles
Clin. Chem., April 1, 2007; 53(4): 645 - 656.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. M. Fiedler, S. Baumann, A. Leichtle, A. Oltmann, J. Kase, J. Thiery, and U. Ceglarek
Standardized Peptidome Profiling of Human Urine by Magnetic Bead Separation and Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption/Ionization Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry
Clin. Chem., March 1, 2007; 53(3): 421 - 428.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
G. L. Hortin
The MALDI-TOF Mass Spectrometric View of the Plasma Proteome and Peptidome
Clin. Chem., July 1, 2006; 52(7): 1223 - 1237.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (19)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Findeisen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Neumaier, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Findeisen, P.
Right arrow Articles by Neumaier, M.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS