| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
|
|
|
|||||||
|
|||||||||
Endocrinology and Metabolism |
1 Clinical Neurocardiology Section, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
2 Department of General Internal Medicine, St. Radboud University Hospital, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
3 Department of Clinical Pathophysiology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy.
4 Department of Laboratory Medicine, Clinical Center, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
5 Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
6 Pediatric and Reproductive Endocrinology Branch, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, MD.
aAddress correspondence to this author at: Building 10, Room 6N252, National Institutes of Health, 10 Center Dr., MSC-1620, Bethesda, MD 20892-1620. Fax 301-402-0180; e-mail ge{at}box-g.nih.gov.
 |
Abstract |
|---|
 Top Abstract IntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Methods: We examined relationships of tumor size, location, and catecholamine content with plasma and urinary metanephrines or catecholamines in 275 patients with pheochromocytoma. We then prospectively examined whether measurements of plasma free metanephrines could predict tumor size and location in an additional 16 patients.
Results: Relative proportions of epinephrine and norepinephrine in tumor tissue were closely matched by relative increases of plasma or urinary metanephrine and normetanephrine, but not by epinephrine and norepinephrine. Tumor diameter showed strong positive relationships with summed plasma concentrations or urinary outputs of metanephrine and normetanephrine (r = 0.81 and 0.77; P <0.001), whereas relationships with plasma or urinary catecholamines were weaker (r = 0.41 and 0.44). All tumors in which increases in plasma metanephrine were >15% of the combined increases of normetanephrine and metanephrine either had adrenal locations or appeared to be recurrences of previously resected adrenal tumors. Measurements of plasma free metanephrines predicted tumor diameter to within a mean of 30% of actual diameter, and high plasma concentrations of free metanephrine relative to normetanephrine accurately predicted adrenal locations.
Conclusions: Measurements of plasma free metanephrines not only provide information about the likely presence or absence of a pheochromocytoma, but when a tumor is present, can also help predict tumor size and location. This additional information may be useful for clinical decision-making during tumor localization procedures.
|
Introduction |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
In cases of positive test results, the extent of increases in plasma free metanephrines can be useful in guiding further diagnostic decision-making. In our experience, increases of plasma free normetanephrine above 2.2 nmol/L (400 ng/L) or of plasma free metanephrine above 1.2 nmol/L (236 ng/L), 3.5- to 4-fold above the upper limits of the adult reference intervals, do not occur in patients without pheochromocytoma (
100% specificity), but occur in 80% of patients with the tumor (4). In such patients, there is a high likelihood of pheochromocytoma, and the remaining problem is to locate the tumor. In patients with milder increases, pharmacologic, dietary, and other causes of false-positive results should first be eliminated (4). The clonidine suppression test, coupled with measurements of plasma free normetanephrine, then provides a simple pharmacologic method to finally exclude or confirm the tumor.
Despite the above advances, the implementation and interpretation of biochemical tests for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma continue to generate difficulty. We continue to see patients for whom multitudes of unnecessary biochemical tests have been ordered or in whom expensive imaging studies have been carried out to locate a supposed tumor, even after biochemical testing has yielded equivocal or even normal results. We also continue to see occasional patients who have undergone unnecessary surgery because of a suspected, but biochemically unconfirmed, pheochromocytoma.
Although continuing use of unnecessary biochemical tests generates revenue for commercial laboratories, this is not in the best interests of patients or healthcare systems. Of course, this problem is not confined to the laboratory diagnosis of pheochromocytoma; there is a recognized general need for more guidance from the laboratory in the choice, implementation, and interpretation of many laboratory tests (5). Such guidance may include narrative interpretations, which, as described by Smythe and Drew (6), are particularly useful in the diagnosis of pheochromocytoma. In the present study we examined whether measurements of plasma free metanephrines could provide information about the catecholamine phenotype, size, and location of the pheochromocytoma, all of which may be useful for guiding clinical decision-making once the tumor is diagnosed.
|
Patients and Methods |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
laboratory tests
Blood samples were collected into heparin-containing tubes by use of a forearm venous cannula, with patients supine for at least 20 min before sampling. Patients were instructed to fast and abstain from caffeinated and decaffeinated beverages overnight and to avoid taking acetaminophen for 5 days before blood sampling. All samples were collected on ice, and plasma was separated and stored at –80 °C before analysis according to recommended procedures (7). Plasma was assayed by HPLC for concentrations of free metanephrines and catecholamines, as described previously (8)(9), with further details and modifications as listed on the Clinical Neurochemistry Laboratory web site (http://www.catecholamine.org/labprocedures). The 24-h urinary outputs of catecholamines and deconjugated (free plus conjugated) fractionated metanephrines for patients seen at the NIH were measured by HPLC or liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectroscopy, under a contract between the NIH Clinical Center and an outside commercial laboratory (Mayo Medical Laboratories, Rochester, MN). HPLC procedures were also used for urinary measurements in patients seen elsewhere, as described previously (1).
Reference intervals for plasma concentrations of free normetanephrine (0.10–0.61 nmol/L), free metanephrine (0.06–0.31 nmol/L), norepinephrine (0.47–2.95 nmol/L), and epinephrine (4–83 0.02–0.45 nmol/L) were established from combined groups of 175 normotensive and 110 hypertensive volunteers, as detailed elsewhere (10). Reference intervals for 24-h urinary outputs of deconjugated normetanephrine (0.70–2.64 µmol/24 h), deconjugated metanephrine (0.22–1.32 µmol/24 h), norepinephrine (0.09–0.47 µmol/24 h), and epinephrine (0–0.11 µmol/24 h) were those provided by Mayo Medical Laboratories.
tumor catecholamine concentrations, location, and size
Samples of tumor tissue were procured from 114 patients, generally within 1 h of surgical resection of tumors. Small 10- to 50-mg tissue samples were immediately frozen for storage at –80 °C before further processing. Weighed samples of tissue were homogenized in 0.5 mL of 0.4 mol/L perchloric acid containing 0.5 mmol/L EDTA. After centrifugation, appropriately diluted samples of supernatants were assayed for catecholamines by the same HPLC methodology used for plasma analyses.
Adrenal and extraadrenal locations of tumors were determined in 274 patients by use of results of imaging studies and surgical and pathology records. For patients presenting with recurrent or malignant pheochromocytoma, careful attention was made to assess the adrenal or extraadrenal location of primary tumors or presence of multifocal disease. Tumor dimensions from pathology records were available for 214 patients. Care was taken to ensure that dimensions represented those of actual tumors or nodules rather than whole resected masses.
data analysis and statistics
For initial examination of tumor catecholamine phenotypes, designations of epinephrine-producing (adrenergic) and predominantly norepinephrine-producing (noradrenergic) tumors were based on tissue epinephrine content as a percentage of both epinephrine and norepinephrine, according to previous observations in two groups of patients with differing production of phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase, the enzyme that converts norepinephrine to epinephrine (11)(12). Absolute increases in plasma or urinary catecholamines or metanephrines above normal were determined as increases above the upper limits of the reference intervals for each analyte. A value of zero was assigned when there was no increase. Percentage increases in plasma or urinary metanephrine relative to combined increases in normetanephrine and metanephrine, or increases in plasma or urinary epinephrine relative to combined increases in norepinephrine and epinephrine, were then estimated for comparisons with relative tumor tissue epinephrine content.
Statistical methods, performed with Statview (SAS Institute Inc.), included linear regression analysis for examination of relationships of relative tumor epinephrine content with relative increases in plasma or urinary metanephrine or epinephrine. Comparisons of test sensitivities in patients with adrenergic and noradrenergic tumors were performed with the 
2 test. Regression analysis and multiple linear regression analysis were used to examine relationships between mean tumor diameters and plasma concentrations or urinary outputs of metanephrines or catecholamines. Mean tumor diameters were calculated from cubed roots of rectangular volumes. Where there were two or more masses, rectangular volumes were calculated separately for each mass and summed to obtain a total rectangular volume.
Prospective predictions of tumor diameter were calculated by use of the logarithmic relationship of mean tumor diameter with the summed plasma concentrations of normetanephrine and epinephrine. The 95% confidence intervals of this relationship were estimated by regression analysis of calculated upper and lower intervals. These were estimated by use of logarithmically transformed data to generate geometric means ± 2 SD over different intervals of tumor diameter.
|
Results |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
).
|
All patients with adrenergic tumors had increased plasma free metanephrine, and all except one of the patients with noradrenergic tumors had increased plasma free normetanephrine (Table 1
). The patients with noradrenergic tumors all had no or negligible increases in plasma free metanephrine amounting to <10% of the combined increases in normetanephrine and metanephrine. In contrast, increases in plasma free metanephrine in patients with adrenergic tumors were >10% of the combined increases in metanephrine and normetanephrine in all except one patient, who had an 8% increase. Among these patients, there was a strong positive relationship (r = 0.82; P <0.001) between the tumor tissue epinephrine content and increases in plasma free metanephrine relative to combined increases in metanephrine and normetanephrine (Fig. 1
).
|
The above findings for plasma free metanephrines differed markedly from those for plasma catecholamines: only 65% of patients with adrenergic tumors had increases in plasma epinephrine and 87% of patients with noradrenergic tumors had increases of norepinephrine (Table 1
). In addition, the relationship between tissue epinephrine content (as a percentage) and relative increases in plasma epinephrine was weaker than that with relative increases in plasma metanephrine (Fig. 1
).
Differences similar to the above for plasma markers of pheochromocytoma were observed for urinary markers. Ninety-seven percent of patients with adrenergic tumors had increased urinary metanephrine compared with only 71% with increased urinary epinephrine, and 97% of patients with noradrenergic tumors had increased urinary normetanephrine compared with only 77% with increased urinary norepinephrine (Table 1
). Among patients with adrenergic tumors, the relationship of tumor tissue epinephrine content with increases in urinary metanephrine was stronger than that with urinary epinephrine (r = 0.84 vs r = 0.60).
tumor location
Among the 274 patients for whom there were records of tumor locations, 186 patients had tumors with adrenal locations, 35 patients had recurrences (mainly malignancies) that appeared to have developed from previously resected adrenal tumors, and 53 patients had extraadrenal primary tumors or recurrences of previously resected extraadrenal tumors (Fig. 2
). Ninety-two of the 186 (49%) patients with adrenal tumors had increases in plasma free metanephrine that were >10% of the combined increases in normetanephrine and metanephrine, indicating an epinephrine-producing (adrenergic) biochemical phenotype for tumors in these patients. The other 94 (51%) patients had no or negligible increases in metanephrine relative to normetanephrine, indicating a predominantly norepinephrine-producing (noradrenergic) biochemical phenotype. This compared with 12 (34%) recurrences of adrenal tumors with an adrenergic phenotype and 23 (66%) with a noradrenergic phenotype.
|
In contrast to the above patterns of catecholamine phenotypes in patients with adrenal tumors or recurrences, all except 1 of the 53 patients with extraadrenal tumors (98%) had patterns of increases in plasma free metanephrines that indicated a noradrenergic phenotype. The single patient with the adrenergic extraadrenal tumor was an unusual case. Imaging studies suggested a large right adrenal tumor. The right adrenal was removed but was found to be normal. The patient then underwent further surgery to remove a nearby extraadrenal tumor. It is possible that this tumor may have been connected to the previously resected adrenal gland, but this is uncertain; therefore, the tumor was designated as an extraadrenal paraganglioma. In addition, although plasma free metanephrine was abnormally increased [2.6 nmol/L (516 ng/L)], the plasma concentration of normetanephrine was more strongly increased [13.7 nmol/L (2513 ng/L)]. Thus, the increase in plasma free metanephrine above the upper reference limit in this patient was only 15% of the combined increases in metanephrine and normetanephrine.
tumor size
Among the 214 patients for whom dimensions of resected tumors were recorded, 96 had tumors that were designated as having an epinephrine-producing (adrenergic) biochemical phenotype, and 118 had tumors that were designated as having a predominantly norepinephrine-producing (noradrenergic) biochemical phenotype. There was a strong positive logarithmic relationship (r = 0.81; P <0.001) between tumor diameter and summed plasma concentrations of free normetanephrine and metanephrine that did not show any differences among patients with adrenergic and noradrenergic tumors (Fig. 3A
). There was also a similarly strong positive relationship (r = 0.77; P <0.001) between tumor diameter and summed 24-h urinary outputs of normetanephrine and metanephrine, again with no differences among patients with adrenergic and noradrenergic tumors (Fig. 3B
).
|
In contrast to the strong relationships of tumor diameter with plasma free or urinary deconjugated metanephrines, the relationships of tumor diameter with plasma or urinary catecholamines, although significantly positive (P <0.001), were weaker (r = 0.41 for plasma catecholamines; r = 0.44 for urinary catecholamines) and showed considerable scatter (Fig. 3
, C and D). Multiple linear regression analysis indicated different relationships for adrenergic and noradrenergic tumors. Patients with noradrenergic tumors had larger (P <0.001) increases in plasma and urinary catecholamines relative to tumor diameter than patients with adrenergic tumors. Correlation coefficients for relationships of tumor diameter with plasma catecholamines (r = 0.41) and urinary catecholamines (r = 0.44) were improved after independent examination of relationships for patients with noradrenergic tumors (r = 0.52 for plasma catecholamines; r = 0.54 for urinary catecholamines) and adrenergic tumors (r = 0.47 for plasma catecholamines; r = 0.46 for urinary catecholamines).
diagnostic sensitivities according to catecholamine phenotype
Among all 275 patients with pheochromocytoma, 109 patients had tumors that were designated with an epinephrine-producing (adrenergic) biochemical phenotype, and 166 had tumors that were designated with a predominantly norepinephrine-producing (noradrenergic) biochemical phenotype. In all but three patients, these designations were based on relative increases above the reference limits of free metanephrine and normetanephrine. In those three patients, who had normal plasma concentrations of free normetanephrine and metanephrine, designation of a noradrenergic biochemical phenotype was based on measurements of tumor tissue catecholamines or subsequent measurements of increased plasma concentrations of normetanephrine with further development of malignant disease.
For patients with adrenergic tumors, the diagnostic sensitivities of both plasma free and urinary deconjugated fractionated metanephrines were higher (P <0.002) than the sensitivities of plasma and urinary catecholamines (Table 2
). These differences were less pronounced in patients with noradrenergic tumors, in whom only measurements of plasma free metanephrines offered improved sensitivity over plasma and urinary catecholamines. Measurements of plasma catecholamines provided higher (P <0.04) diagnostic sensitivity in patients with noradrenergic tumors than in those with adrenergic tumors.
|
prospective prediction of tumor location and size
Among the 16 patients with pheochromocytoma in the prospective analysis, 5 had increases in plasma free metanephrine of >10% of the combined increases of normetanephrine and metanephrine, indicating an adrenergic catecholamine phenotype (Table 3
). This correctly indicated an adrenal location for all five of the tumors in these patients.
|
The relationship of plasma concentrations of free metanephrines with tumor diameters among the 16 patients in the prospective analysis showed a distribution that fell within the 95% confidence intervals of the relationship for the 214 patients in the retrospective analysis (Fig. 4A
). Predictions of most likely tumor diameters and intervals for minimum and maximum diameters, estimated by use of the regression equations in Fig. 4A
, ranged from 0.8 to >10 cm (Table 3
). Measured diameters of tumors from all 16 patients fell within the ranges estimated by use of regression equations for the 95% confidence intervals of the relationship between tumor diameter and plasma free metanephrines for the 214 patients in the retrospective analysis.
|
Predictions of tumor diameters for the 16 patients in the prospective analysis were, on average, 19% higher than measured diameters and ranged from 47% smaller than to 83% larger than measured diameters (Table 3
). The mean positive or negative difference of predicted from measured diameter was 30% (range, 3–83%). Predicted tumor diameters showed a positive relationship (r = 0.87; P <0.001) with measured diameters (Fig. 4B
).
|
Discussion |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
Pheochromocytomas are highly heterogeneous tumors with diverse phenotypes. Although the tumors are characterized by production of catecholamines, the nature of this production can vary considerably, accounting in part for variable clinical presentations (14). As shown here, and in agreement with the findings of Kimura et al. (15), approximately one half of adrenal tumors produce nearly exclusively norepinephrine and the other half a variable mixture of epinephrine and norepinephrine. Among hereditary tumors, the pattern of catecholamine production can depend on the underlying mutation, with those from patients with von Hippel–Lindau syndrome all producing predominantly norepinephrine and those from patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 all producing a mixture of epinephrine and norepinephrine (11)(16). The former noradrenergic tumors and the latter adrenergic tumors have distinct patterns of gene expression that are retained even when there is no clear hereditary basis (12). These distinct patterns of gene expression indicate different pathways of tumorigenesis, possibly involving development of tumors from different populations of chromaffin cells with different susceptibilities to the effects of a particular mutation. Identifying the catecholamine phenotype of a pheochromocytoma may therefore not only be useful for pointing to a possible underlying mutation, but also for understanding the cellular origins of the tumor and pathways of tumorigenesis.
The catecholamine phenotype of a pheochromocytoma is most accurately determined by measurements of catecholamine concentrations or production of biosynthetic enzymes in resected tumor tissue. Biopsies are dangerous; therefore, determination of phenotypes before surgical resection must rely on standard laboratory tests. As shown here, measurements of plasma or urinary catecholamines are not only relatively insensitive markers for diagnosis of pheochromocytoma, but also fail to accurately identify the catecholamine phenotype of many tumors. In contrast, the catecholamine biochemical phenotype is more reliably indicated by measurements of plasma free metanephrines, although this is with some degree of error in a small proportion of tumors with significant but relatively low epinephrine content. Nevertheless, an increase in free metanephrine larger than 10% of the summed increases of normetanephrine and metanephrine seems useful for identifying most adrenergic tumors, whereas no increase or an increase in plasma free metanephrine <5% of the combined increases in normetanephrine and metanephrine appears to reliably indicate noradrenergic tumors.
Previous observations have indicated that extraadrenal pheochromocytomas secrete predominantly or exclusively norepinephrine, whereas epinephrine secretion is usually confined to adrenal tumors (17). These observations are supported in the present study, in which measurements of plasma free metanephrine and normetanephrine were used to more accurately indicate the catecholamine phenotype. Although some extraadrenal pheochromocytomas produced significant quantities of free metanephrine and had an adrenergic phenotype, almost without exception these were recurrences from previously resected adrenal tumors. The single exception in our series was an extraadrenal tumor that might have arisen from a previously resected adrenal gland in close proximity to the resected tumor. This tumor was nevertheless designated with an adrenergic extraadrenal phenotype. Although exclusive increases in plasma free normetanephrine cannot be used to indicate adrenal or extraadrenal locations of a pheochromocytoma, our data indicate that increases in plasma free metanephrine >10% of the combined increases in metanephrine and normetanephrine can be used to indicate an adrenal location or recurrence of an adrenal tumor.
It has previously been suggested that differences in norepinephrine and epinephrine secretion between adrenal and extraadrenal tumors are attributable to the proximity of the former tumors to adrenal cortical steroids, which induce production of phenylethanolamine-N-methyltransferase, the enzyme that converts norepinephrine to epinephrine (18). Our observation that recurrent adrenal tumors can retain the ability to produce significant quantities of epinephrine indicates that continual proximity of tumor cells to adrenal steroids is not necessary for maintaining the adrenergic phenotype. This has practical implications during routine annual screening of patients for recurrent tumors, where patterns of increases of metanephrine and normetanephrine in such recurrences might be expected to follow the catecholamine phenotype of the original tumor.
Poor or no relationships of pheochromocytoma tumor mass or volume with urinary outputs or plasma concentrations of catecholamines and improved relationships with catecholamine metabolites are well documented (16)(19)(20)(21). These differences reflect variable and intermittent secretion of catecholamines by tumors, compared with continuous production of free metanephrines within tumor cells by O-methylation of catecholamines leaking from storage vesicles, a process that is independent of catecholamine release (22). Here we show that variable catecholamine release by tumors is in part attributable to differences in adrenergic and noradrenergic phenotypes of tumors. Relative to tumor size, noradrenergic tumors secrete more catecholamines than adrenergic tumors. Similar differences have been observed in adrenal medullary chromaffin cells, where cells that produce and store mainly norepinephrine secrete catecholamines more actively than those that produce epinephrine (23). Presumably our findings of higher sensitivities of measurements of catecholamines for diagnosis of noradrenergic than adrenergic tumors reflect underlying differences in catecholamine release.
The strong positive relationship between tumor diameter and summed plasma concentrations of free normetanephrine and metanephrine observed here indicate that these measurements might be useful for predicting tumor size. Indeed, based on this relationship, we were able to prospectively predict the diameters of tumors to within a mean of 30% of the actual diameter measured in resected tissue. Moreover, we were also able to accurately predict adrenal locations for tumors that produced relatively high concentrations of plasma free metanephrine compared with normetanephrine. Such predictions may provide useful supporting confirmatory information during subsequent imaging procedures for tumor localization. Conversely, during biochemical testing for an adrenal incidentaloma, the likelihood that the mass might be a pheochromocytoma can be indicated not only by increases in plasma free metanephrines, but by the nature of these increases and how they fall within the range predicted by the size of the mass. A limitation is the fairly wide range of concentrations possible for a given tumor size.
How might the above information derived from measurements of plasma free metanephrines best be translated for use in the diagnostic decision-making process? As reviewed elsewhere (5)(24), clinicians cannot be expected to appropriately implement and accurately interpret all of the ever-increasing plethora of complex and new laboratory tests available to their patients. There is a growing need for laboratory medicine to become better integrated in the diagnostic decision-making process, and more specifically for laboratory directors to provide guidance with testing procedures and interpretation and follow-up of test results (25)(26)(27).
The laboratory diagnosis of pheochromocytoma is one example where such guidance in diagnostic decision-making may be particularly valuable, because of the rarity of the tumor amid the large numbers of patients tested and the high frequency of largely unnecessary costly tests and imaging procedures used to track down suspected tumors. Indeed, others have recognized this need and have developed computerized systems for providing, along with laboratory results, useful narrative interpretations to assist clinicians with follow-up (6). It seems that such systems could easily be adapted for newer and improved laboratory tests, such as measurements of plasma free metanephrines, and used on a wider scale to provide more valuable information to clinicians and patients than is possible with numerical results alone. As outlined in the examples in Table 4
, such information could include statements about the likelihood of a tumor and recommendations for further testing, based on previous studies and published algorithms (1)(4). Documentation of the catecholamine phenotype and predictions about size and location of the tumor, as further outlined here, although unlikely to have any major impact on the choice of imaging procedures may be useful for coregistration with the information obtained during these tumor localization procedures.
|
|
Acknowledgments |
|---|
|
References |
|---|
|
TopAbstractIntroductionPatients and MethodsResultsDiscussionReferences |
|---|
The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:
|
|
 |
|
  R. J. Singh and G. Eisenhofer High-Throughput, Automated, and Accurate Biochemical Screening for Pheochromocytoma: Are We There Yet? Clin. Chem., September 1, 2007; 53(9): 1565 - 1567. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Cleary, J. K Phillips, T.-T. Huynh, K. Pacak, A. G Elkahloun, J. Barb, R. A Worrell, D. S Goldstein, and G. Eisenhofer Neuropeptide Y expression in phaeochromocytomas: relative absence in tumours from patients with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome J. Endocrinol., May 1, 2007; 193(2): 225 - 233. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T. Scholz, G. Eisenhofer, K. Pacak, H. Dralle, and H. Lehnert Current Treatment of Malignant Pheochromocytoma J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., April 1, 2007; 92(4): 1217 - 1225. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. J. L. M. Timmers, A. Kozupa, G. Eisenhofer, M. Raygada, K. T. Adams, D. Solis, J. W. M. Lenders, and K. Pacak Clinical Presentations, Biochemical Phenotypes, and Genotype-Phenotype Correlations in Patients with Succinate Dehydrogenase Subunit B-Associated Pheochromocytomas and Paragangliomas J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., March 1, 2007; 92(3): 779 - 786. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. L. Brain, J. Kay, and B. Shine Measurement of Urinary Metanephrines to Screen for Pheochromocytoma in an Unselected Hospital Referral Population Clin. Chem., November 1, 2006; 52(11): 2060 - 2064. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 T.-T. Huynh, K. Pacak, F. M Brouwers, M. S Abu-Asab, R. A Worrell, M. M Walther, A. G Elkahloun, D. S Goldstein, S. Cleary, and G. Eisenhofer Different expression of catecholamine transporters in phaeochromocytomas from patients with von Hippel-Lindau syndrome and multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 Eur. J. Endocrinol., October 1, 2005; 153(4): 551 - 563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |
) are shown separately. Regression lines are shown only for relationships for adrenergic tumors.
), along with the 95% confidence intervals (dotted regression lines) of the relationship and regression equations for relationships. Predictions of tumor diameter in panel B and in Table 3