Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1043-1046, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2004.046755
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1043-1046.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Combination of His-Tagged T4 Endonuclease VII with Microplate Array Diagonal Gel Electrophoresis for High-Throughput Mutation Scanning

Matt J. Smith1, Gabriella Pante-de-Sousa1,2, Khalid K. Alharbi1, Xiao-he Chen1, Ian N.M. Day1,a and Keith R. Fox3

1 Human Genetics Division, School of Medicine, Southampton University Hospital, Southampton, UK;2 Department of Physiology, Federal University of Para, Belem-Para, Brazil;3 School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Human Genetics Division, Duthie Building (Mp808), School of Medicine, Southampton University Hospital, Tremona Road, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK; fax 44-(0)23-80794264, e-mail inmd{at}soton.ac.uk

Various physical mutation-scanning methods have been developed to avoid unnecessary resequencing of long stretches of DNA (1)(2)(3)(4)(5)(6). Protein-based mutation-scanning techniques include enzymatic digestion [reviewed in Ref. (7)], protein binding to a DNA duplex, and direct analyses of the in vivo or in vitro gene product. One such enzyme is T4 endonuclease VII (endoVII), the product of gene 49 of bacteriophage T4 (8). Radiolabel replacement with fluorescent tags has facilitated automated analysis (9). EndoVII recognizes heteroduplex structural distortions, nicking 2–6 bp 3' to the distortion, with efficiency dependent on sequence context (10) and mismatch type(11). Perfectly matched DNA undergoes some background digestion, which produces a highly reproducible pattern (12). Mutation detection sensitivity obtained with endoVII digestion was found to be similar to that for denaturing HPLC and direct sequencing (13).

Microplate array diagonal gel electrophoresis (MADGE) (14) provides an open-faced 96-well gel format for polyacrylamide gels. Recently, nondenaturing 192-, 384-, and 768-well formats of MADGE for high-throughput checking of PCR and post-PCR reactions (15) have been developed. We have combined, in proof-of-principle experiments, the mismatch digestion properties of endoVII with the high-throughput capabilities of MADGE and a newly developed denaturing MADGE format to create a simple mutation-scanning technique that can screen ~1000 PCR samples during a single 35-min electrophoretic run.

Plasmid pRB210 (T4 endonuclease VII in pET11a) was a kind gift from Professor B. Kemper (Institute for Genetics, University of Cologne, Germany). The PCR primers used to amplify the endoVII gene from pRB210 were as follows: forward, 5'-GCGCCATATGATGTTATTGAC-3'; reverse, 5'-CAGCGGATCCTCATTTTAAACT-3'. After trimming was performed with BamHI and NdeI (New England Biolabs), pETendoVII was generated by ligation into pET15b (Novagen). Expressed N-terminal His-tagged endoVII was then purified by affinity chromatography.

We used a single colony from pETendoVII-transfected BL21 (DE3) Gold cells (Stratagene) to inoculate a 1-L Luria broth culture containing 100 µg/L carbenicillin. After overnight culture at 30 °C, an identical fresh 500-mL passage was made, and at mid-log phase of growth (absorbance at 600 nm, 0.6–0.8), protein expression was induced by 1 mmol/L isopropyl-ß-D-thiogalactopyranoside. Cells were harvested after 2 h by centrifugation at 5000g for 10 min, and then lysed by sonication (10 cycles of 30 s on and 30 s off at a probe amplitude of 10–15 µm in a MSE Soniprep 150). Cell debris and intact cells were removed by centrifugation at 10 000g for 40 min. All steps were carried out at 4 °C. The cell lysate was passed through a Schleicher & Schuell 0.2 µm single-use filter.

EndoVII was purified by use of 1-mL HiTrap columns in conjunction with the {Delta}KTATM FPLCTM chromatography system (Amersham Bioscience), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Protein purity was assessed by sodium dodecyl sulfate gel electrophoresis (Fig. 1 in the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol51/issue6/), enzyme activity was confirmed (without His-tag removal) with digests of synthetic heteroduplex substrates (data not shown), and protein quantification was by Bradford assay. Storage was in 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8) with 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol and 500 mL/L glycerol at –80 °C.

All primers were from MWG-Biotech. Exon 3 from wild-type LDLR (GenBank accession no. Nm_000527) was PCR-amplified using primers LDLR-F (5'-GCCTCAGTGGGTCTTTCCTT-3') and LDLR-R (5'-CCAGGACTCAGATAGGCTCAA-3'), respectively, with 6-carboxyfluorescein (FAM) and hexachloro-6-carboxyfluorescein (HEX) 5' end labels for probe generation or without end labels for generating amplicon from genomic DNAs for testing. Jumpstart Taq polymerase (Sigma-Aldrich) was used to ensure the highest quality probe generation, but the thermal and ionic conditions for probe and test sample amplifications were otherwise identical and essentially as given by Whittall et al. (16). Probe PCR parallel reactions from microplate wells were pooled and purified with Wizard PCR prep reagents (Promega). The same 220-bp PCR amplicon of LDLR exon 3 was generated (with unlabeled primers) from samples from 330 unrelated familial hypercholesterolemic individuals previously mutation scanned by single-strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis (16) and by meltMADGE (17). Six previously defined heterozygotes, c.259T>G (p.W66G), c.266G>A (p.C68Y), c.269A>G (p.D69G), c.301G>A (p.E80K), c.301delG (p.E80fs), and c.313 + 1G>A (splice site), were examined. Initially samples known to contain 1 of the 6 mutations were used to test endoVII digestion and were analyzed by capillary electrophoresis on an ABI-310 instrument. Subsequently, 330 amplicons were screened blind with denaturing MADGE (below) as the analytical platform. All protocols were developed by M.J. Smith and were validated by independent use by G. Pante-de-Sousa and X. Chen.

To form the heteroduplexes, we mixed 2.5 µL of purified fluorescently labeled probe (representing an equivalent volume of original PCR) and 5.5 µL of unpurified test PCR amplicon, heated the mixture to 95 °C, and allowed it to cool to reform duplex DNA. For endoVII digestion, we used a 10-µL reaction volume containing 8 µL of probe/test mixture and 2 µL of 5x endoVII reaction mixture [250 mmol/L K2HPO4 (pH 6.5), 25 mmol/L MgCl2, 5 mmol/L dithiothreitol, and 0.1 g/L endoVII]. Phosphate ions have been shown to improve the efficiency of endoVII (18). Digestions were for 20 min at 37 °C.

EndoVII reaction mixture (2.5 µL) was mixed with 12 µL of deionized formamide, denatured at 95 °C for 5 min, and then chilled on ice before capillary electrophoresis (Applied Biosystems 310 Genetic Analyzer).

For endoVII-MADGE, the reaction was terminated by addition of 3 µL of loading dye (10 mmol/L NaOH, 50 mmol/L EDTA, 800 mL/L formamide, 2.5 g/L bromphenol blue, and 2.5 g/L xylene cyanole FF). Samples were denatured by heating at 95 °C for 5 min and placed on ice until gel loading.

EndoVII digestion fragments were resolved on a 10% polyacrylamide denaturing MADGE gel containing 7 mol/L urea and 1x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer [90 mmol/L Tris-HCl (pH 8.3), 90 mmol/L boric acid, 2 mmol/L EDTA]. After sample loading, the gel was covered by a second glass plate. This plate–gel–plate sandwich was secured by rubber bands, and silicon rubber tubing was inserted along the long edge of the sandwich to prevent electrophoretic edge artifacts. The assembly was placed in a purpose-built 2-L gel tank (19) (with capacity for 10 gels) containing 1x Tris-borate-EDTA buffer at 65 °C for electrophoresis at 10 V/cm for 35min. EndoVII-MADGE gels were scanned and analyzed with either a FluorImagerTM 595 or a Typhoon Trio+ (Molecular Dynamics, Amersham Biosciences) and ImageQuant fragment analysis software (Molecular Dynamics).

LDLR mutations c.259T>G, c.301delG, c.301G>A, and c.313 + 1G>A generated a strong digest fragment for at least 1 probe strand, whereas c.266G>A generated a lower yield of digest fragment on 1 of the probe strands. c.269A>G displayed cleavage of the A·C heteroduplex when the label was on the C strand (mutant as probe). A typical example of the digestion pattern of the LDLR mutants can be seen in Fig. 2 of the online Data Supplement. The extra peaks observed corresponded to expected digest fragment sizes. These same products were trialed under various conditions in denaturing MADGE gels followed by fluoroimaging: the protocol described above was efficient.

A typical 96-well endoVII-MADGE gel from blind scanning of 330 familial hypercholesterolemic individuals is shown in Fig. 1 (also shown, with dual label, in Fig. 3 of the online Data Supplement). Previous mutation scanning of this sample set had identified 47 heterozygous individuals with 1 of the 6 mutations: c.259T>G, c.266G>A, c.269A>G, c.301G>A, c.301delG, or c.313 + 1G>A (Table 1 ). When we used only wild-type probe, endoVII-MADGE identified 51 samples containing additional digest fragments; 46 of these corresponded to the previously identified mutations covering 5 of the 6 known LDLR mutations (c.259T>G, c.266G>A, c.301G>A, c.301delG, and c.313 + 1G>A). The c.269A>G mutation remained undetected (see above). Of the 5 additional samples, 3 displayed digestion patterns matching those for positively identified known LDLR mutations: 1 with the pattern for c.259T>G and 2 with the pattern for c.301G>A. The remaining 2 samples displayed unique digest patterns that did not correspond to digest patterns for the 5 known mutations (Fig. 4A in the online Data Supplement). One digest pattern was similar to that for c.313 + 1G>A, but c.313 + 1G>A was characterized by a strong digestion fragment, whereas the unidentified mutation produced a significantly weaker fragment (Fig. 4B in the online Data Supplement). Sequencing showed that the sample was heterozygous for the base change c.311G>T. The second sample produced a digestion fragment close to the undigested amplicon. Sequencing showed a 2-base deletion, c.196_197delGT. c.311G>T has been reported previously (www.ucl.ac.uk/fh/genebook.html), whereas c.196_197delGT appears to be a novel mutation. Of the 7 mutations detected, 2 displayed detectable mismatch-specific digestion patterns in both the sense and antisense strands, c.196_197delGT and c.259T>G, whereas the remainder were identified by digestion of 1 strand.



View larger version (112K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. EndoVII-MADGE analysis.

Shown is a typical endoVII-MADGE gel image for the LDLR exon 3 amplicon. The 8 x 12 array set at a 71.6-degree angle allows tracks to pass through 2 successive rows, allowing 96 samples to be run on a single gel. Samples containing mutations (tracks indicated by arrows) were identified by the presence of an extra band or by an increase in intensity of a background band. In this example, the 5' fluorescent label was on the antisense strand.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Number of separate cases detected for a set of mutations distributed through LDLR exon 3.

This study suggests the feasibility of combining the mismatch digestion properties of endoVII with the high-throughput capabilities of MADGE to create a simple high-throughput mutation-scanning method. We found that the reduced resolution and increased relative background associated with short-track electrophoresis did not decrease the rate of mutation detection. EndoVII-MADGE also identified 2 previously unrecognized mutations in the sample set. EndoVII-MADGE consistently compared favorably with SSCP analysis of the same region (Table 1Up ) in many heterozygotes, detecting 7 of 8 different sequence variations (8 of 8 when test samples were end labeled). This approach could potentially add to strategies for the investigation of unknown mutations at the population level.


Acknowledgments

M.J. Smith was the recipient of a University of Southampton Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Science cross-school PhD studentship. We thank Professor Borries Kemper for clone pRB210. This work was also supported by the UK Department of Health, National Genetics Reference Laboratory (Wessex), and HOPE.


References

  1. Orita M, Iwahana H, Kanazawa H, Hayashi K, Sekiya T. Detection of polymorphisms of human DNA by gel electrophoresis as single-strand conformation polymorphisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1989;86:2766-2770.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  2. Fischer SG, Lerman LS. Length-independent separation of DNA restriction fragments in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Cell 1979;16:191-200.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Underhill PA, Jin L, Lin AA, Mehdi SQ, Jenkins T, Vollrath D, et al. Detection of numerous Y chromosome biallelic polymorphisms by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. Genome Res 1997;7:996-1005.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  4. Cotton RG, Rodrigues NR, Campbell RD. Reactivity of cytosine and thymine in single-base-pair mismatches with hydroxylamine and osmium tetroxide and its application to the study of mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1988;85:4397-4401.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  5. Li Q, Liu Z, Monroe H, Culiat CT. Integrated platform for detection of DNA sequence variants using capillary array electrophoresis. Electrophoresis 2002;23:1499-1511.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Reed GH, Wittwer CT. Sensitivity and specificity of single-nucleotide polymorphism scanning by high-resolution melting analysis. Clin Chem 2004;50:1748-1754.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  7. Taylor GR. Enzymatic and chemical cleavage methods. Electrophoresis 1999;20:1125-1130.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  8. Youil R, Kemper BW, Cotton RG. Screening for mutations by enzyme mismatch cleavage with T4 endonuclease VII. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;92:87-91.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Del Tito BJ, Poff HE, 3rd, Novotny MA, Cartledge DM, Walker RI, Earl CD, et al. Automated fluorescent analysis procedure for enzymatic mutation detection. Clin Chem 1998;44:731-739.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Pottmeyer S, Kemper B. T4 endonuclease VII resolves cruciform DNA with nick and counter-nick and its activity is directed by local nucleotide sequence. J Mol Biol 1992;223:607-615.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  11. Solaro PC, Birkenkamp K, Pfeiffer P, Kemper B. Endonuclease VII of phage T4 triggers mismatch correction in vitro. J Mol Biol 1993;230:868-877.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Youil R, Kemper B, Cotton RG. Detection of 81 of 81 known mouse ß-globin promoter mutations with T4 endonuclease VII—the EMC method. Genomics 1996;32:431-435.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  13. Andrulis IL, Anton-Culver H, Beck J, Bove B, Boyd J, Buys S, et al. Comparison of DNA- and RNA-based methods for detection of truncating BRCA1 mutations. Hum Mutat 2002;20:65-73.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Day IN, Humphries SE. Electrophoresis for genotyping: microtiter array diagonal gel electrophoresis on horizontal polyacrylamide gels, hydrolink, or agarose. Anal Biochem 1994;222:389-395.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  15. Gaunt TR, Hinks LJ, Rassoulian H, Day IN. Manual 768 or 384 well microplate gel ‘dry’ electrophoresis for PCR checking and SNP genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res 2003;31:e48.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  16. Whittall R, Gudnason V, Weavind GP, Day LB, Humphries SE, Day IN. Utilities for high throughput use of the single strand conformational polymorphism method: screening of 791 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia for mutations in exon 3 of the low density lipoprotein receptor gene. J Med Genet 1995;32:509-515.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  17. Day IN, Alharbi KK, Haddad I, Ye S, Lawlor DA, Whittal RA, et al. Mutation scanning of LDLR in the whole population: severe, moderate and silent mutations, paucimorphisms and cholesterol level. Eur J Hum Genet 2004;12:302.
  18. Golz S, Greger B, Kemper B. Enzymatic mutation detection. Phosphate ions increase incision efficiency of endonuclease VII at a variety of damage sites in DNA. Mutat Res 1998;382:85-92.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  19. Day IN, O’Dell SD, Cash ID, Humphries SE, Weavind GP. Electrophoresis for genotyping: temporal thermal gradient gel electrophoresis for profiling of oligonucleotide dissociation. Nucleic Acids Res 1995;23:2404-2412.[Abstract/Free Full Text]




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Smith, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Fox, K. R.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
Right arrow Lipids, Lipoproteins, and Cardiovascular Risk Factors


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS