Clinical Chemistry AACC Online Job Center
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1531-1533, 2005. First published June 10, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.048959
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.048959v1
51/8/1531    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pöge, U.
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pöge, U.
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1531-1533.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

ß-Trace Protein Is an Alternative Marker for Glomerular Filtration Rate in Renal Transplantation Patients

Uwe Pöge1,a, Thomas M. Gerhardt1, Birgit Stoffel-Wagner2, Holger Palmedo3, Hans-Ulrich Klehr1, Tilman Sauerbruch1 and Rainer P. Woitas1

Departments of1 Medicine,2 Clinical Biochemistry, and 3 Nuclear Medicine, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I der Universität Bonn, Allgemeine Innere Medizin, Sigmund-Freud-Strasse 25, D 53105 Bonn, Germany; fax 49-228-287-4952, e-mail u.poege{at}uni-bonn.de

Careful monitoring of graft function after renal transplantation (RTx) is necessary for short- and long-term success. Because of the many difficulties in performing serial measurements of glomerular filtration rate (GFR) by use of exogenous substances such as inulin, 51Cr-EDTA, or technetium-diethylenetriaminepentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), graft function is often estimated from serum creatinine concentrations. Tubular secretion as well as various nonrenal factors may alter creatinine concentrations, thus rendering it an imprecise marker for GFR (1). Cystatin C (Cys C) is at least as good as creatinine as a marker of renal function (2)(3)(4), but corticosteroid treatment can alter serum Cys C concentrations (5)(6)(7), making it potentially less useful in RTx patients.

ß-Trace protein (BTP), also known as prostaglandin D synthase, is a 23- to 29-kDa enzyme that has been proposed as an alternative marker for GFR in children and in persons with diabetes or various renal diseases (8)(9)(10)(11), but it has not been examined as an endogenous renal function marker in RTx patients. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performances of BTP, Cys C, and creatinine as estimates of GFR in RTx patients.

We prospectively performed GFR measurements in 85 consecutive RTx patients (34 females and 51 males) who attended our outpatient department. GFR was determined by 99mTc-DTPA clearance with a single-injection technique based on the method described by Russell et al. (12).

Patients included into the study were in "steady-state" conditions, defined as the lack of increases or decreases >15% in creatinine within 2 weeks before and after the investigation.

The mean (SD) patient age was 49.6 (13.3) years (range, 19–72 years), and the time frame of investigation was 75.7 (71.2) months after transplantation (range, 3–240 months; 21 patients within 12 months after RTx, 39 patients at 1 to 10 years after RTx, and 25 patients more than 10 years after RTx).

Immunosuppression was based on a calcineurin inhibitor regimen in 83 patients (51 on cyclosporin A, 32 on tacrolimus). Of these, 81 patients were treated with corticosteroids, and 42 patients also received mycophenolate-mofetil (n = 40) or azathioprine (n = 2). One patient was on sirolimus, mycophenolate-mofetil, and corticosteroids, and another was on sirolimus, tacrolimus, and corticosteroids.

The study was approved by the local ethics boards and was performed in accordance with the ethics guidelines of the revised Helsinki Declaration of 1996. Informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Creatinine, BTP, and Cys C concentrations were measured simultaneously. Serum creatinine was measured by a modification of the Jaffe method according to Knapp and Mayne (13). Cys C and BTP were measured by fully automated latex-enhanced immunonephelometric methods (N Latex Cystatin C and N Latex beta-trace protein; Dade Behring) on a Behring Nephelometer II according to the manufacturer’s instructions (9)(10). Bias was 2.55% (mean, 1.06 mg/L; n = 20) for the Cys C assay and 2.35% for the BTP assay (mean, 1.49 mg/L; n = 20). The within-run imprecision (CV) for the Cys C assay was 3.4% at 1.09 mg/L (n = 20), and the between-run CV was 4.7% at 1.06 mg/L (n = 20). Corresponding values for the BTP assay were 3.6% (at 1.47 mg/L; n = 20) and 4.6% (at 1.49 mg/L; n = 20).

Reference intervals established from a representative cohort of 200 healthy blood donors [100 female; median age, 31 years; 95% confidence interval (CI), 19.0–60.5 years] were 0.48–0.82 mg/L for Cys C, 0.40–0.74 mg/L for BTP, and 53–106 µmol/L for creatinine.

Results are presented as the mean and 95% CI unless indicated otherwise. Statistical analysis was performed with Medcalc® (Ver. 4.2) and StatView® (Ver. 5.0 for Windows; SAS Institute Inc.). P <0.05 (2-tailed) was considered significant.

The mean (95% CI) GFR was 38.6 (35.3–41.9) mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1 in our cohort, and the mean (95% CI) concentrations of plasma BTP, creatinine, and Cys C were 1.59 (1.41–1.76) mg/L, 156 (140–173) µmol/L, and 2.22 (2.00–2.47) mg/L, respectively.

The correlation coefficients for BTP and Cys C with creatinine were 0.86 and 0.82, and that of BTP with Cys C was 0.80. The reciprocals of all analytes correlated significantly with the GFR: r1/BTP = 0.83 (95% CI, 0.75–0.89; P <0.0001); r1/cystatin C = 0.85 (0.78–0.90; P <0.0001); r1/creatinine = 0.88 (0.80–0.91; P <0.0001). These correlation coefficients did not differ significantly.

ROC curve analyses were used to describe the diagnostic performance of creatinine, Cys C, and BTP for detection of renal impairment. The data for GFR cutoffs of 30, 40, 50, and 60 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1 are given in Table 1 . The areas under the curves (AUCs) were not significantly different. The sensitivities were 73%–94%, and specificities were 85%–100%.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Diagnostic performance of creatinine, Cys C, and BTP.

The highest sensitivity for BTP (85%; 95% CI, 74%–92%) was for detecting a GFR of 50 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1 with a serum BTP of 1.17 mg/L. The highest specificity for BTP (94%; 95% CI, 80%–99%) was for detecting a GFR <40 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1 and using a cutpoint of 1.29 mg/L (see Table 1Up ).

Patients were stratified into 6 renal impairment groups according to the DTPA clearance results: <20, 20–30, 30–40, 40–50, 50–60, and >60 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1. The relative increases in analytes above the upper reference values determined for each subgroup are shown in Fig. 1 . BTP and Cys C showed a significantly greater proportional increase than creatinine at all selected stages of renal impairment (Fig. 1 ; P <0.003 for all groups).



View larger version (23K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Cys C, BTP, and creatinine concentrations at different stages of renal impairment.

Patients were stratified into 6 renal impairment groups according to the GFR measured as 99mTC-DTPA clearance: <20 (n = 9), 20–30 (n = 18), 30–40 (n = 24), 40–50 (n = 14), 50–60 (n = 10), and >60 (n = 10) mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1. Data are given as box plots, where the limits of the boxes indicate the 25th and 75th percentiles and the lines inside the boxes indicate the 50th (median) percentile. The whiskers indicate the 10th and 90th percentiles. Relative increases in Cys C and BTP were significantly higher than increases in creatinine (P <0.003 for each); however, the increases in Cys C were significantly more prominent than the increases in BTP for all groups (P <0.012 for each), except for the subgroup of patients with GFR = 20–30 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1.

To evaluate the influence of steroids, we performed a matched-pair analysis of 20 patients in groups A and B with respect to gender, age, weight, and GFR. Group A received ≥10 mg of prednisone per day [mean (SD), 14.8 (5.1) mg; n = 10], whereas group B received 5 mg of prednisone per day. Despite the small sample size, the matched-pair analysis showed significantly higher Cys C concentrations in group A [mean (95% CI), 2.86 (1.75–3.98) mg/L] than in group B [2.3 (1.48–3.14) mg/L; P = 0.049]. BTP concentrations were not affected by steroids [1.58 (0.93–2.22) mg/L vs 1.79 (1.21–2.38) mg/L; P = 0.1].

Our data show similar diagnostic performance for BTP, Cys C, and creatinine in RTx patients. In fact, when renal function decreased, BTP and Cys C detected a diminished GFR earlier and increased more prominently than creatinine.

We found only 5 published studies using ROC analyses for evaluation of the diagnostic performance of BTP. BTP was superior to creatinine in 2 investigations in children (8)(14). In adults, at cutoff points of 70 and 80 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1, the diagnostic performance of BTP was similar to or slightly better than that of creatinine (9)(10)(11). However, none of these investigations showed an advantage of BTP over Cys C, which is in line with our results. In the cited studies, the range of GFR defined as normal was wide, giving decision points of 70–90 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1. In fact, the mean GFR in our cohort was <40 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1. Nonetheless, ROC analysis revealed similar AUCs for all tested analytes, irrespective of the cutoff value used.

In accordance with a recent study showing that BTP increased when GFR was <75 mL · min–1 · (1.73 m2)–1 (11), we saw an earlier increase in BTP than creatinine. Because virtually all measured BTP (96.5%) and all Cys C (100%) concentrations were above the upper reference values, in contrast to 75% of creatinine results, we evaluated the impact of concomitant prednisone treatment. We found that steroid maintenance treatment (≥10 mg/day) was associated with higher Cys C concentrations, whereas we observed no association between steroid dose and BTP concentration.

On the basis of the above results, we believe that BTP may be a useful and reliable analyte to estimate GFR, particularly when RTx patients receive steroids that may falsely increase Cys C concentrations. Thus, despite similar diagnostic sensitivities and specificities, BTP may have a place alongside Cys C and creatinine as an alternative endogenous GFR marker in RTx patients.


References

  1. Shemesh O, Golbetz H, Kriss JP, Myers BD. Limitations of creatinine as a filtration marker in glomerulopathic patients. Kidney Int 1985;28:830-838.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  2. Fliser D, Ritz E. Serum cystatin C concentration as a marker of renal dysfunction in the elderly. Am J Kidney Dis 2001;37:79-83.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Newman DJ, Thakkar H, Edwards RG, Wilkie M, White T, Grubb AO, et al. Serum cystatin C measured by automated immunoassay: a more sensitive marker of changes in GFR than serum creatinine. Kidney Int 1995;47:312-318.[ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Woitas RP, Stoffel-Wagner B, Flommersfeld S, Poge U, Schiedermaier P, Klehr HU, et al. Correlation of serum concentrations of cystatin C and creatinine to inulin clearance in liver cirrhosis. Clin Chem 2000;46:712-715.[Free Full Text]
  5. Cimerman N, Brguljan PM, Krasovec M, Suskovic S, Kos J. Serum cystatin C, a potent inhibitor of cysteine proteinases, is elevated in asthmatic patients. Clin Chim Acta 2000;300:83-95.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Risch L, Herklotz R, Blumberg A, Huber AR. Effects of glucocorticoid immunosuppression on serum cystatin C concentrations in renal transplant patients. Clin Chem 2001;47:2055-2059.[Free Full Text]
  7. Pöge U, Gerhardt T, Bokenkamp A, Stoffel-Wagner B, Klehr HU, Sauerbruch T, et al. Time course of low molecular weight proteins in the early kidney transplantation period—influence of corticosteroids. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2004;19:2858-2863.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Filler G, Priem F, Lepage N, Sinha P, Vollmer I, Clark H, et al. Beta-trace protein, cystatin C, ß(2)-microglobulin, and creatinine compared for detecting impaired glomerular filtration rates in children. Clin Chem 2002;48:729-736.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Priem F, Althaus H, Birnbaum M, Sinha P, Conradt HS, Jung K. Beta-trace protein in serum: a new marker of glomerular filtration rate in the creatinine-blind range. Clin Chem 1999;45:567-568.[Free Full Text]
  10. Woitas RP, Stoffel-Wagner B, Poege U, Schiedermaier P, Spengler U, Sauerbruch T. Low-molecular weight proteins as markers for glomerular filtration rate. Clin Chem 2001;47:2179-2180.[Free Full Text]
  11. Donadio C, Lucchesi A, Ardini M, Donadio E, Giordani R. Serum levels of ß-trace protein and glomerular filtration rate—preliminary results. J Pharm Biomed Anal 2003;32:1099-1104.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Russell CD, Bischoff PG, Kontzen FN, Rowell KL, Yester MV, Lloyd LK, et al. Measurement of glomerular filtration rate: single injection plasma clearance method without urine collection. J Nucl Med 1985;26:1243-1247.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  13. Knapp ML, Mayne PD. Development of an automated kinetic Jaffe method designed to minimise bilirubin interference in plasma creatinine assays. Clin Chim Acta 1987;168:239-246.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  14. Pham-Huy A, Leonard M, Lepage N, Halton J, Filler G. Measuring glomerular filtration rate with cystatin C and ß-trace protein in children with spina bifida. J Urol 2003;169:2312-2315.[CrossRef][ISI][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]



The following articles in journals at HighWire Press have cited this article:


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
U. Poge, T. Gerhardt, and R. P. Woitas
Estimation of Glomerular Filtration Rate by Use of Beta-Trace Protein
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2008; 54(8): 1403 - 1405.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
T. Gerhardt, U. Poge, B. Stoffel-Wagner, B. Klein, H.-U. Klehr, T. Sauerbruch, and R. P. Woitas
Serum levels of beta-trace protein and its association to diuresis in haemodialysis patients
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., January 1, 2008; 23(1): 309 - 314.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. Bokenkamp, C. A.R.C. Laarman, K. I. Braam, J. A.E. van Wijk, W. A. Kors, M. Kool, J. de Valk, A. A. Bouman, M. D. Spreeuwenberg, and B. Stoffel-Wagner
Effect of Corticosteroid Therapy on Low-Molecular Weight Protein Markers of Kidney Function
Clin. Chem., December 1, 2007; 53(12): 2219 - 2221.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
C. A. White, A. Akbari, S. Doucette, D. Fergusson, N. Hussain, L. Dinh, G. Filler, N. Lepage, and G. A. Knoll
A Novel Equation to Estimate Glomerular Filtration Rate Using Beta-Trace Protein
Clin. Chem., November 1, 2007; 53(11): 1965 - 1968.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Nephrol Dial TransplantHome page
C. White, A. Akbari, N. Hussain, L. Dinh, G. Filler, N. Lepage, and G. A. Knoll
Chronic kidney disease stage in renal transplantation classification using cystatin C and creatinine-based equations
Nephrol. Dial. Transplant., October 1, 2007; 22(10): 3013 - 3020.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Clin. Chem.Home page
A. R. Huber and L. Risch
Recent Developments in the Evaluation of Glomerular Filtration Rate: Is There a Place for {beta}-Trace?
Clin. Chem., August 1, 2005; 51(8): 1329 - 1330.
[Full Text] [PDF]


This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow All Versions of this Article:
clinchem.2005.048959v1
51/8/1531    most recent
Right arrow Submit an electronic Letter to
the Editor about this paper
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (12)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Pöge, U.
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Pöge, U.
Right arrow Articles by Woitas, R. P.
Related Collections
Right arrow Proteomics and Protein Markers


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS