Clinical Chemistry
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Clinical Chemistry 51: 1549-1552, 2005; 10.1373/clinchem.2005.049932
This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Odeberg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Odeberg, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics
(Clinical Chemistry. 2005;51:1549-1552.)
© 2005 American Association for Clinical Chemistry, Inc.


Technical Briefs

Pyrosequencing Analysis of Thrombosis-Associated Risk Markers

Kristina Holmberg1, Marie-Louise Persson2, Mathias Uhlén1 and Jacob Odeberg1,3,a

1 Department of Biotechnology, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm Sweden;
2 Clinical Chemistry Laboratory, Blekinge Hospital, Karlskrona, Sweden;
3 Department of Medicine, Atherosclerosis Research Unit, King Gustaf V Research Institute, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden;

aaddress correspondence to this author at: Department of Biotechnology, KTH, AlbaNova University Center, SE 106 97 Stockholm, Sweden; fax 46-8-5537-8481, e-mail jacob{at}biotech.kth.se

The factor V Leiden and prothrombin G20210A polymorphisms are established risk factors for thrombosis (1)(2). General screening for these polymorphisms in persons with additional risk factors has been discussed (3), but a significant proportion of familial cases with deep vein thrombosis/venous thromboembolism is not explained by carriage of either of these mutations (4). There is accumulating evidence that multiple coexisting defects are present in persons with the most marked tendency to thrombosis (5). The current lack of a clear consensus regarding the clinical roles for several of the additional polymorphisms studied (1)(2) could reflect that most studies have addressed these independently.

We developed a pyrosequencing-based genotyping protocol for parallel analysis of the ß-fibrinogen (–455G/A and –854 G/A), prothrombin (G20210A), coagulation factor V Leiden (G1691; Arg506Gln), coagulation factor VII (–401G/T and –402 G/A), coagulation factor XIII (G163T; Val34Leu), plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 (PAI-1; –675 4G/5G), methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR; C677T; Ala222Val), glycoprotein IIIa (GPIIIa; C1565T; Leu33Pro; also known as PlA1/PlA2), and endothelial nitric oxide synthase (eNOS; G894T; Glu298Asp) polymorphisms, together with the cytochrome P450 2C9 [CYP2C9*1 (wild type)], CYP2C9*2 (C430T; Cys144Arg), CYP2C9*3 (A1075C; Ile359Leu), and CYP2C9*4 (T1076C; Ile359Thr) isoforms, which modulate the effect of warfarin in antithrombotic therapy.

To start with subnanogram amounts of genomic DNA, we developed an outer nested PCR for simultaneous amplification of 11 gene fragments covering these single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Genomic DNA samples were arrayed in 96-well plates together with negative controls. PCR primers were designed based on available GenBank entries and searched against publicly available nucleotide databases to ensure specificity for the selected primer annealing regions. Individual primer pairs (outer and inner) and multiplex primer panels were run in gradient PCRs to confirm specificity and to determine the functional annealing temperature intervals (primer sequences and optimized PCR conditions are given in Table 1 of the Data Supplement that accompanies the online version of this Technical Brief at http://www.clinchem.org/content/vol51/issue8/). Individual (inner) PCR primers were intentionally designed to be positioned inside the primers of the outer mixture (mixture D) so that either genomic DNA or the outer PCR product from mixture D would work as template in the PCR reaction. In addition, different duplex combinations of inner PCR primers were optimized (Table 1 of the online Data Supplement). Template preparation and primer annealing for pyrosequencing were performed in a Magnatrix 1200 instrument (Magnetic Biosolution) with the standard method and using reagents provided by the manufacturer, 50 µg of magnetic M-270 streptavidin beads (Dynal Biotech), and 1.65 pmol of pyrosequencing primer per sample (Table 1 of the online Data Supplement). Samples obtained from the robot in a PSQTM 96-well plate were analyzed on the PSQ HS 96 instrument (Pyrosequencing).

The potential flexibility in assay design inherent to its sequencing-by-synthesis principle of pyrosequencing is not exploited in the assay design software of the pyrosequencing system. By the default design, genotype information would be obtained within 2 nucleotide dispensations, which in theory would work for most types of SNPs. However, it is our accumulated experience from setting up a large number of SNP assays that raw data output can deviate from the theoretical relative peak heights to an extent that creates ambiguities in the genotype interpretation. This is particularly true when signals happen to be lower. In addition, sequence context–dependent deviations in peak height at certain positions can occur.

For genotyping assays that could be applied in clinical diagnostics, robustness in interpretation is critical, not leaving any room for ambiguity or a dependency on the trained eye. Robustness is also particularly crucial in smaller or medium association studies, in which a general success rate of 90% compared with 99.9% can make the difference between having the power to identify a significant association or not in the sample sizes available, particularly when synergistic interactions between several polymorphisms are to be investigated. To achieve this, we used an alternative design approach (Fig. 1 ). The addition orders for all assays (Table 2 of the online Data Supplement) were designed so that a minimum of 4 distinguishing peaks were obtained, generating more distinct genotype profiles (Fig. 1 and Fig. 1 of the online Data Supplement). This approach also enabled molecular haplotyping of the factor VII (–401 G/T and –402 G/A) polymorphisms (Fig. 2 of the online Data Supplement).



View larger version (32K):
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Figure 1. Default vs out-of-phase design in pyrosequencing.

The raw data profiles for the 3 different genotypes with the default assay designs (left) and with the alternative out-of-phase designs actually used (right) for the GpIIIa (A and B) and PAI-1 (C and D) polymorphisms. The yellow background and black arrows indicate those sequential nucleotide additions for which the pattern of peaks will differ between alleles. The nucleotide addition orders have been designed so that the initial out-of-phase between the extended strands on the 2 alternative alleles, which occurs when one strand extends over the polymorphic site, is not eliminated by the subsequent addition of the nucleotide complementary to the other allelic variant. Instead, nucleotide dispensations are made so that the leading strand is further extended one or a few bases before the lagging strand on the second allele is allowed to extend over the polymorphic position.

Allele frequencies were analyzed in a set of 480 unrelated DNA samples of Caucasian/Scandinavian origin (from a cohort of patients presenting with symptoms of acute chest pain) and tested for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium to exclude any assay bias resulting from possible unknown linked polymorphisms located in the primer annealing regions (Table 3 of the online Data Supplement). We also investigated how frequently combined multiple prothrombotic alleles occurred (Table 1 ). Notably, 88% of the DNA samples analyzed here harbored 3 or more of the analyzed prothrombotic alleles.


View this table:
[in this window]
[in a new window]
 
Table 1. Proportion of individuals in the test population vs the number of gene variants an individual carried.

Recent literature suggests synergistic effects for several of the SNPs included here. For example, both protective and a negative effects have been described for the factor XIII Leu34 allele depending on complex interactions with other factors (1)(6)(7). Increased plasma total homocysteine is a risk factor for thrombosis (8), and the most studied genetic variant in this respect is the Ala222Val polymorphism of the MTHFR protein (1), but nitric oxide (NO) concentrations, through the Glu298Asp polymorphism in the eNOS enzyme can affect homocysteine concentrations by an effect on folate catabolism (9). In our study, 23% of the individuals carried both the MTHFR T-allele and the Asp298 allele, suggesting that a hypothetical synergistic effect may be relevant to consider in studies. The main role of NO in the hemostatic system is as a mediator of normal endothelial function and in the control of platelet aggregation. The latter is also influenced significantly by the platelet receptor GPIIIa/IIb PlA1/PlA2 polymorphism both in vitro and in vivo (10). Furthermore, carriers of a combination of coagulation factor V Leiden (G1691A; Arg506Gln) and different genotypes of the fibrinogen gene cluster appear to have an additionally increased risk of deep vein thrombosis (11).

Genetics has implications for the pharmacologic treatment of thrombophilia as well. Today, large interindividual variability in the anticoagulant dose effect of warfarin necessitates careful monitoring and adjustment based on measurement of the prothrombin complex, particularly at the initiation of therapy. It has been shown that combinations of genetic variants in the CYP2C9, factor VII, and prothrombin genes contribute to 50% of the interindividual variance in the warfarin sensitivity (12). From a clinical pharmacologic perspective, combined genotype analysis before initiation of therapy could reduce bleeding complications by identifying potential low-dose responders.

In conclusion, neutralizing or synergistic effects of gene–gene and gene–environment interactions undoubtedly exist, and the high prevalence of combined carriers of multiple prothrombotic gene variants in our sample indicates that screening for multiple risk alleles is relevant to consider in further studies. We present an optimized genetic assay for such analyses, with potential application in both epidemiologic studies and clinical diagnostics.


Acknowledgments

We thank Annica Åbergh, Lars Svennersten, and Marie Andersson for genotyping. The KTH DNA typing facility is funded by the Wallenberg Foundation Consortium North.


References

  1. Lane DA, Grant PJ. Role of hemostatic gene polymorphisms in venous and arterial thrombotic disease. Blood 2000;95:1517-1532.[Free Full Text]
  2. Endler G, Mannhalter C. Polymorphisms in coagulation factor genes and their impact on arterial and venous thrombosis. Clin Chim Acta 2003;330:31-55.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  3. Lensen R, Rosendaal F, Vandenbroucke J, Bertina R. Factor V Leiden: the venous thrombotic risk in thrombophilic families. Br J Haematol 2000;110:939-945.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  4. Press RD, Bauer KA, Kujovich JL, Heit JA. Clinical utility of factor V Leiden (R506Q) testing for the diagnosis and management of thromboembolic disorders. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2002;126:1304-1318.[Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  5. Bernardi F, Marchetti G. Modulation of thrombophilia genes by environmental factors. Pathophysiol Haemost Thromb 2002;32:335-337.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  6. Endler G, Funk M, Haering D, Lalouschek W, Lang W, Mirafzal M, et al. Is the factor XIII 34Val/Leu polymorphism a protective factor for cerebrovascular disease?. Br J Haematol 2003;120:310-314.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  7. Butt C, Zheng H, Randell E, Robb D, Parfrey P, Xie YG. Combined carrier status of prothrombin 20210A and factor XIII-A Leu34 alleles as a strong risk factor for myocardial infarction: evidence of a gene-gene interaction. Blood 2003;101:3037-3041.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  8. Ray JG. Meta-analysis of hyperhomocysteinemia as a risk factor for venous thromboembolic disease. Arch Intern Med 1998;158:2101-2106.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  9. Brown KS, Kluijtmans LA, Young IS, Woodside J, Yarnell JW, McMaster D, et al. Genetic evidence that nitric oxide modulates homocysteine: the NOS3 894TT genotype is a risk factor for hyperhomocystenemia. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2003;23:1014-1020.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  10. Feng D, Lindpaintner K, Larson MG, O’Donnell CJ, Lipinska I, Sutherland PA, et al. Platelet glycoprotein IIIa Pl(a) polymorphism, fibrinogen, and platelet aggregability: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation 2001;104:140-144.[Abstract/Free Full Text]
  11. Marchetti G, Ferraresi P, Legnani C, Pinotti M, Lunghi B, Scapoli C, et al. Asymptomatic carriership of factor V Leiden and genotypes of the fibrinogen gene cluster. Br J Haematol 2003;121:632-638.[CrossRef][Web of Science][Medline] [Order article via Infotrieve]
  12. Shikata E, Ieiri I, Ishiguro S, Aono H, Inoue K, Koide T, et al. Association of pharmacokinetic (CYP2C9) and pharmacodynamic (vitamin K-dependent protein-factors II, VII, IX, and X, proteins S and C, and {gamma}-glutamyl carboxylase) gene variants with warfarin sensitivity. Blood 2003;103:2630-2635.




This Article
Right arrow Extract Freely available
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Data Supplements
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (8)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Odeberg, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Holmberg, K.
Right arrow Articles by Odeberg, J.
Related Collections
Right arrow Molecular Diagnostics and Genetics


HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS