Letters to the Editor |
1 Department of Pathology, University of Utah, Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT
2 Department of Pathology, University of Arkansas, for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR
3 ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, UT
4 ARUP Institute for Clinical, and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT
aAddress correspondence to this author at: ARUP Laboratories, 500 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT 84108. Fax 801- 584-5207; e-mail Ashwood{at}aruplab.com.
To the Editor:
The presence of increased concentrations of bilirubin in amniotic fluid is an indicator of fetal hemolysis (1)(2). In the
A450 (or
OD450) method, the absorbance at 450 nm is used as a surrogate for concentration of amniotic bilirubin. Chloroform extraction of bilirubin from amniotic fluid samples can be used to eliminate spectral interference from hemoglobin, which absorbs at a maximum at 410 nm. However, clinical interpretation of the
A450 often relies on studies in which chloroform extraction was not used (3)(4).
We studied the extraction of bilirubin from 37 amniotic fluid samples submitted for bilirubin scanning. All studies were in accordance with the guidelines approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Utah. Frozen (70 °C), light-protected samples were thawed and centrifuged at 900g for 5 min at 26 °C. Absorbances of samples were scanned (Beckman DU-800) from 350 to 550 nm in 1-mL air-blanked quartz cuvettes. The use of water or chloroform blanks increased
A450 <0.01 in both native and chloroform-extracted samples (n = 4). The
A450 was determined as the difference between the absorbance at 450 nm and a logarithmic baseline between 365 and 550 nm, calculated as: log(A450) = m (450 nm) + b, where m = [log(A550) log(A365)]/(550nm 365nm), and b = log(A365) m(365 nm). This can be rearranged to yield the equation:
A450 = A450 10 [0.541 log(A365) + 0.459 log (A550)]. Hemoglobin concentrations in 24 consecutive samples were determined from the net absorbance of the oxyhemoglobin peak at 578 nm and a molar hemoglobin absorptivity of 44 000 mol1 cm1.
Chloroform was added (2 mL, HPLC grade, Fischer Scientific) to an equal volume of amniotic fluid in a closed 12-mL screw-top glass tube. Samples were shaken vigorously by hand for 1 min and centrifuged (at 26 °C) for 5 min at 900g. The
A450 was measured as the difference in absorbance between the bilirubin peak at 450 nm, and a baseline was established between the absorbance of wavelengths flanking the bilirubin peak (
370 nm and 525 nm) on a linear scale. We also calculated
A450 for the chloroform extract with a logarithmic baseline. Quality control specimens consisting of pooled amniotic fluid samples had
A450 means (SD) of 0.0360 (0.0030), and 0.1223 (0.0073). Finally, the proportion of bilirubin remaining in the clarified extracted aqueous layer was estimated in 24 consecutive samples as for native fluid.
For 36 of the 37 amniotic fluid samples examined, mean (SD) recovery of
A450 in the chloroform fraction was 88 (4)% as determined by regression analysis (Fig. 1
). After
A410 nm correction in which 5% of the absorbance of the hemoglobin peak at 410 nm was subtracted from the
A450, mean (SD) recovery of
A450 increased to 93 (4)% (1). A mean (SD) of 12 (11)% of the
A450 in the native sample was observed in the aqueous phase after extraction in samples (n = 24) with an original
A450 of >0.02. The mean hemoglobin concentration in unextracted samples was 0.093 g/L (range 00.12 g/L).
![]() View larger version (17K): [in a new window] |
Figure 1. The correlation of measured A450 in patient samples before and after chloroform extraction.
Comparison of the
|
A450 in the chloroform extract increased the mean bilirubin recovery to
89 (4)%. Thus, although use of a logarithmic baseline is imperative for
A450 determination in native amniotic fluid samples (2), the use of a linear baseline vs a logarithmic baseline did not notably affect (1% change) measured
A450 in chloroform extract.
In a single sample, the apparent bilirubin recovery after chloroform extraction was low (
A450 = 0.17 vs 0.31 in the unextracted sample). The remaining bilirubin was visible in the aqueous fraction (
A450 = 0.16). Use of the
A410 correction did not resolve the unexpectedly low recovery. A second chloroform extraction did not substantially decrease the amount of bilirubin remaining in the aqueous layer. Thus, the amniotic fluid bilirubin appears to be sequestered in the aqueous layer, possibly covalently bound to albumin.
For almost all native amniotic fluid samples studied,
A450 results with and without chloroform extraction were similar. The observed 12% mean decrease after extraction is consistent with previous studies that reported a mean decrease of
20% (5). Thus, the Liley plot can be used in conjunction with chloroform extraction of amniotic bilirubin, although caution should be used in classifying patient samples that exhibit
A450 measurements close to Liley zone boundaries.
In contrast to our findings, unconjugated bilirubin added to pooled amniotic fluid samples is poorly extracted by chloroform (<50%) (3)(4). Incomplete chloroform extraction in some patient samples has also been reported by others (3). The aqueous fraction of the amniotic fluid sample should be analyzed to detect such cases. In these situations, the use of an unextracted sample, or the use of an alternative method such as the observation of photometric degradation, may be more appropriate (6).
Acknowledgments
We thank Jacquelyn McCowen-Rose for her assistance in preparing this manuscript. The University of Utah Department of Pathology and the ARUP Institute of Clinical and Experimental Pathology provided financial support for this work.
References
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||